Skip to main content
Log in

The genetic conditions in heterozygous and homozygous populations ofDrosophila I. The fate of alien chromosomes

  • Published:
Genetica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In experimental populations ofDrosophila melanogaster lethal chromosomes with dominant markers and inversions were introduced and the frequency changes of the markers studied during a period of several generations. The base populations of the various experiments differed from each other with respect to their degree of heterozygosity. Monochromosomal populations were isogenic for a quasinormal + chromosome, dichromosomal populations contained the genetic material of two different + chromosomes, trichromosomal of three, tetrachromosomal of four, hexachromosomal of six and polychromosomal populations of many normal chromosomes. Marker chromosomes with the dominant genesLCy, Cy, Pm orD respectively were added to the populations with an initial frequency of 16,6 per cent. The fate of the dominant markers was different in different populations. In some the marker chromosome reached equilibrium frequencies, in others they were eliminated with variable speed. As a rule the lethal marker chromosomes were accepted by monochromosomal populations; however, they were eliminated from populations with a higher degree of heterozygosity. Since in all populations one genotype, namely the homozygote for the marker chromosome, was lethal, the adaptive values “c” of the +/LCy, +/Cy, +/Pm or +/D heterozygotes could easily be calculated from the experimental data. This “c” value can be used as a measure for the combining ability of the marker chromosomes. It could be shown that “c” depends on the degree of heterozygosity of a population or in other words that the average degree of heterozygosity of the marker free individuals determines the selection processes. An equation can be arrived at which fits the experimental results very well if superiority of heterozygous +/+ individuals over +/+ homozygotes is assumed. From that it was concluded that heterosis is the determining variable in our experiments. An attempt was undertaken in order to decide if in our case the observed heterosis was due to dominance or to overdominance. It was postulated that in di-, tri-, tetra- or hexachromosomal populations the adaptive values of the marker free normals should progressively increase if recessive detrimental genes are the cause of heterosis but not if heterozygosity on many loci leads to overdominance. The “a” values of the +/+ individuals were ealeulated from the frequency changes of the marker chromosomes for each subsequent two-generation period. Unfortunately only two different dichromosomal populations were available. These showed increasing adaptive values for the normals. The tri-, tetra-, and hexachromosomal populations, however, gave different results, some with increasing, some with fluctuating adaptive values. From that it was concluded that heterosis can be due in one case to dominance and in the other to overdominance. In either case, the recessive genetic load may be rather important as a determinating factor in the dynamics of populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Band H. T. (1964). Genetic structure of populations. III. Natural selection and concealed genetic variability in a natural population ofDrosophila melanogaster.Evolution 18: 384–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson H. L. (1958). Increase in fitness in experimental populations resulting from heterosis.Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. (Wash.)44: 1136–1141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung Y. J. (1967). Persistence of a mutant gene inDrosophila populations of different genetic backgrounds.Genetics 57: 957–967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crow J. F. (1952). Dominance and Overdominance. In J. W. Gowen, Heterosis, Iowa State College Press, Ames 1952: pp. 282–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky Th. & B. Spasskv (1963). Genetics of natural populations. XXXIV. Adaptive norm, genetic load and genetic elite inDrosophila pseudoobscura.Genetics 48, 1467–1485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frydenberg O. (1963). Population studies of a lethal mutant inDrosophila melanogaster. I. Behaviour in populations with discrete generations.Hereditas 50: 89–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frydenberg O. (1964). Population studies of a lethal mutant inDrosophila melanogaster. II. Behaviour in populations with overlapping generations.Hereditas 51: 31–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner I. M. (1954). Genetic homeostasis. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr E. (1963). Animal species and evolution. Belknap Press, Cambridge (Massachusetts).

    Google Scholar 

  • Polivanov S. (1964). Selection in experimental populations ofDrosophila melanogaster with different genetic backgrounds.Genetics 50: 81–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smathers K. M. (1961). The contribution of heterozygousity at certain gene loci to fitness of laboratory populations ofDrosophila melanogaster.Amer. Nat. 95: 27–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speelich D. (1959). Experimentelle Beiträge zum Problem des positiven Heterosiseffektes bei der strukturpolymorphen ArtDrosophila subobscura.Z. Vererb. l. 90: 273–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperlich D. (1966). Equilibria for inversions induced by X-rays in isogenic strains ofDrosophila pseudoobscura.Cenetics 53: 835–842.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tschetwerikoff, S. S. (1926). On certain features of evolutionary process from the viewpoint of modern genetics.J. Exp. Biol. (Russian).

  • Vann E. (1966). The fate of X-ray induced chromosomal rearrangements introduced into laboratory populations ofDrosophila melanogaslev.Amer. Nat. 100: 425–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallase B. (1968). The average effect of radiation induced mutations on viability inDrosophila melanogaslev.Evolution 12: 532–552.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace B. (1963). Further data on the overdominance of induced mutations.Genetics 48: 633–651.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Dedicated to Prof. Th. Dobzhansky on the occasion of his seventieth birthday in deepest gratitude.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sperlich, D., Karlik, A. The genetic conditions in heterozygous and homozygous populations ofDrosophila I. The fate of alien chromosomes. Genetica 41, 265–304 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00958911

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00958911

Keywords

Navigation