Abstract
Private property forms the bedrock of the business/society relationship in a market economy. In one way or another most societies limitwhat people can claim as property as well as theextent of claims they can make regarding it. In the international arena today intellectual property rights are a focal point of debate. Many developing countries do not recognize the monopoly claims of patents and copyrights asserted by business as legitimate. This paper reviews contemporary areas of dispute and then presents the tasks facing the construction of a fair intellectual property rights regime.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anawalt, H. C.: 1988,Ideas In The Workplace: Planning for Protection (Carolina Academic Press, Durham, NC).
Behdad, S.: 1989, ‘Property Rights in Contemporary Islamic Economic Thought: A Critical Perspective’,Review of Social Economy 47(2), pp. 185–211.
Besen, S. M. and L. J. Raskind: 1991, ‘An Introduction to the Law and Economics of Intellectual Property’,Journal of Economic Perspectives 5(1), pp. 3–27.
Brown, C. G. and F. W. Rushing: 1990, ‘Intellectual Property Rights in the 1990s: Problems and Solutions’, in F. W. Rushing and C. G. Brown (eds.),Intellectual Property Rights in Science, Technology and Economic Performance (Boulder, CO, Westview Special Studies in Science, Technology and Public Policy).
Congressional Quarterly: 1990, ‘Is the U. S. Patent System Out of date?’,Editorial Research Reports 1(19), May 18.
Deardorff, A. V.: 1990, ‘Should Patent Protection Be Extended to All Developing Countries?’,The World Economy 13(4), pp. 497–506.
Freeman, R. E.: 1984,Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach (Pitman Publishing Co., Boston, MA).
Gadbaw, R. M. G. and T. J. Richards: 1988,Intellectual Property Rights — Global Consensus, Global Conflict? (Westview Press, Boulder, CO).
Government of India: 1989, ‘Paper Presented By India In Uruguay Round Multilateral Talks’ (Indian Embassy, Washington, D.C.) (xerox).
Hazarika, S.: 1989, ‘India and U.S. Disagree on Patents’,New York Times, April 17, p. D-10.
Hoffman, G. M.: 1990, ‘Piracy of Intellectual Property — A Report of the International Piracy Project’,Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science, pp. 9–11.
Johnson, R. D.: 1989, ‘Adam Smith's Radical Views on Property, Distributive Justice and the Market’,Review of Social Economy 47(3), pp. 247–271.
Kim K. W.: 1986, ‘A High Cost to Developing Countries’,New York Times, October 5, p. D2.
Lepp, A. W.: 1990, ‘Intellectual Property Rights Regimes in Southeast Asia’,Journal of Southeast Asia Business 6(11), pp. 28–40.
Locke, J.: 1965,Two Treatises On Civil Government (Mentor Books, New York).
Munzer, S. R.: 1990,A Theory of Property (Cambridge University Press, New York, NY).
Needham, J.: 1981,Science in Traditional China: A Comparative Perspective (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).
Pfizer, Inc.: 1989, Interview with General Patent Counsel.
Pryor, F. L.: 1991, ‘A Buddhist Economic System — In Practice’,American Journal of Economic and Sociology 50(1), pp. 17–32.
Pryor, F. L.: 1990, ‘A Buddhist Economic System — In Principle’,American Journal of Economic and Sociology 49(3), pp. 339–349.
Rapp, R. J. and R. P. Rozek: 1990, ‘Benefits and Costs of Intellectual Property Protection in Developing Countries’,Journal of World Trade 24 pp. 75–102.
Reeve, A.: 1986,Property (Humanities Press International, Atlantic Highlands, NJ).
Siebeck, W., R. E. Evenson, W. Lesser, and C. A. Primo Braga: 1990,Strengthening Protection of Intellectual Property in Developing Countries. A Survey of the Literature (World Bank, Washington, DC).
Steidlmeier, P.: 1992, ‘China's Most Favored Nation Trading Status: Activists' Attempts to Reform China and U. S. Business Prospects’ (State University of New York, School of Management Working Paper, Binghamton, NY).
Steidlmeier, P.: 1987,The Paradox of Poverty: A Reappraisal of Economic Development Policy (Ballinger Publishing Co., Lexington, MA).
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, National Technical Information Service: 1990, ‘Industrial Patent Activity In The United States’ (Washington, D.C.).
U.S. International Trade Commission: 1989,Foreign Protection of Intellectual Property Rights and the Effect on U. S. Industry and Trade (USITC Publication 2065, Washington, D.C.).
Uppal, J. S.: 1986, ‘Hinduism and Economic Development in South Asia’,International Review of Economics and Ethics 1(1), pp. 20–33.
World Bank: 1991,World Development Report, 1990 (Washington, D.C.).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Paul Steidlmeier is Associate Professor of business policy at the State University of New York in Binghamton. He is the author of a number of articles on business and society and of a recent book,People and Profits: The Ethics of Capitalism (Prentice Hall).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Steidlmeier, P. The moral legitimacy of intellectual property claims: American business and developing country perspectives. J Bus Ethics 12, 157–164 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00871935
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00871935