Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Two views of an objective quantum theory

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Is the Copenhagen interpretation really a subjective one? What is the special role that observations play in quantum theory? Is there really something peculiar about the projection postulate? Why does the Copenhagenist treat probabilities as properties of individual systems? Is there a measurement problem, and if so, can itin principle be solved within the framework of quantum theory? We offer aconceptual treatment of the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics in which these questions are answered and contrast it with another interpretation which we call Popperism. The interpretations differ in their choice of a state description, from which it follows that they will offer a different account of the relation of measurements to states and different ways of describing quantum theory. But the two descriptions are equally consistent and physically completely equivalent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. Bunge, A Ghost-Free Axiomatization of Quantum Mechanics, inQuantum Theory and Reality, M. Bunge, ed. (Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  2. B. S. DeWitt,Phys. Today 23, 30 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Y. Freundlich, Copenhagenism and Popperism, Tel-Aviv University Preprint TAUP-351-73.

  4. Y. Freundlich, In Defence of Copenhagenism, Tel-Aviv University Preprint TAUP-362-73.

  5. S. Kochen and E. P. Specker,J. Math. Mech. 17, 59 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  6. K. R. Popper, Quantum Mechanics Without ‘the Observer’, inQuantum Theory and Reality, M. Bunge, ed. (Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. L. Park,Am. J. Phys. 36, 211 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. L. Park and H. Margenau,Int. J. Theor. Phys. 1, 211 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. M. Jauch,Foundations of Quantum Mechanics (Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 1968), Chap. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  10. C. Piron, Observables in General Quantum Theory, inFoundations of Quantum Mechanics, Proceedings of the International School of Physics, Course II, B. D'Espagnat, ed. (Academic Press, New York and London, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  11. E. G. Beltrametti and G. Cassinelli, On the Logic of Quantum Mechanics, 1972 Preprint of Istituto di Scienze Fisiche dell Università di Genova (Italy).

  12. J. von Neumann,Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1955), Chap. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Y. Freundlich,Found. Phys. 2, 129 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  14. K. Hepp,Helv. Phys. Acta 45, 237 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. Daneri, A Loinger, and G. M. Prosperi,Nucl. Phys. B33, 297 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. M. Jauch and C. Piron, What is ‘Quantum-Logic’?, inQuanta, P. G. O. Freund, C. J. Goebel, and Y. Nambu, eds. (University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Philosophy, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel

    Yehudah Freundlich

Authors
  1. Yehudah Freundlich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Freundlich, Y. Two views of an objective quantum theory. Found Phys 7, 279–300 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00709012

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00709012

Keywords

Search

Navigation