Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Calcium channel effectors are potent non-competitive blockers of acetylcholine receptors

  • Published:
Pflügers Archiv Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nicardipine and other calcium channel effectors (CCEs) were studied for their effects on nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) activity. While CCEs had no effect on frog (Rana pipiens) skeletal muscle contractions resulting from nerve stimulation or direct stimulation of the muscle, nicotinic agonist-induced contractures were blocked. Nicardipine did not affect nAChR single-channel open time or amplitude, corroborating data from endplate currents (EPCs); EPC amplitudes and decays were unaffected. All the CCEs tested, however, non-competitively blocked nAChRs. The block of nAChRs resulted in a shortened agonist-induced depolarization and thus a diminished contracture response. An increase in cultured mouse skeletal muscle (C-2) cell single-channel closed times was observed with the intracellular addition of nicardipine, verifying a direct block of nAChRs. Using single-channel analysis, nicardipine's site of action, or at least access to its site of action, was determined to be at the intracellular side of the receptor. A direct action of the CCEs on the nAChR was also shown by their ability to block phencyclidine (PCP) binding to Torpedo nobiliana membranes. All the CCEs blocked specific binding of [3H]-PCP to its binding site on the nAChR-channel complex, with bepridil and nicardipine being the most potent. These data are compatible with a model in which nicardipine and other CCEs, at concentrations which do not alter nAChR channel open time or conductance, block the effects of superfused nicotinic agonist on nAChRs either by stabilizing the formation of the nAChR desensitized state or by effecting a slow channel block.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adam LP, Henderson EG (1986) Augmentation of succinylcholine-induced neuromuscular blockade by calcium channel antagonists. Neurosci Lett 70: 148–153

    Google Scholar 

  2. Adams PR (1975) A study of desensitization using voltage clamp. Pflügers Arch 360: 135–144

    Google Scholar 

  3. Affolter H, Coronado R (1985) Agonists Bay K-8644 and CGP-28392 open calcium channels reconstituted from skeletal muscle transverse tubules. Biophys J 48: 341–347

    Google Scholar 

  4. Anwyl R, Narahashi T (1980) Comparison of desensitization and time-dependent block of the acetylcholine receptor responses by chlorpromazine, cytochalasin B, Triton X-100 and other agents. Br J Pharmacol 69: 99–106

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bikhazi GB, Leung I, Flores C, Mikati MS, Foldes FF (1988) Potentiation of neuromuscular blocking agents by calcium channel blockers in rats. Anesth Analg 67: 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  6. Boyd ND, Cohen JB (1984) Desensitization of membrane-bound Torpedo acetylcholine receptor by amine non-competitive antagonists and aliphatic alcohols: studies of [3H] acetylcholine binding and 22Na+ ion fluxes. Biochemistry 23: 4023–4033

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bregestovski PD, Miledi R, Parker FRS (1980) Blocking of frog endplate channels by the organic calcium channel antagonist D600. Proc R Soc Lond [Biol] 211: 15–24

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chang CC, Tang SS (1974) Differentiation between intrinsic and extrinsic acetylcholine receptors of the chick biventer cervicis muscle. Naunyn Schiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 282: 379–388

    Google Scholar 

  9. Changeux JP, Pinset C, Ribera AB (1986) Effects of chlorpromazine and phencyclidine on mouse C2 acetylcholine receptor kinetics. J Physiol (Lond) 378: 497–513

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cheng YC, Prusoff WH (1973) Relationship between the inhibition constant (Ki and the concentration of inhibitor which causes 50 percent inhibition (IC50) of an enzymatic reaction. Biochem Pharmacol 22: 3099–3108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chestnut TJ (1983) Two-component desensitization at the neuromuscular junction of the frog. J Physiol (Lond) 336: 229–241

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cognard C, Romey G, Galizzi J-P, Fosset M, Lazdunski M (1986) Dihydropyridine-sensitive Ca2+ channels in mammalian skeletal muscle cells in culture: electrophysiological properties and interactions with Ca2+ channel activator (Bay K-8644) and inhibitor (PN 200–110). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83: 1518–1522

    Google Scholar 

  13. Colquhoun D, Sakmann B (1985) Fast events in single-channel currents activated by acetylcholine and its analogues at the frog end-plate. J Physiol (Lond) 369: 501–557

    Google Scholar 

  14. Colquhoun D, Sigworth FJ (1983) Fitting and statistical analysis of single-channel records. In: Sakmann B, Neher E (eds) Single-channel recording, chap 11. Plenum Press, New York, pp 191–263

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cramb G, Dow JW (1983) Uptake of bepridil into isolated ventricular myocytes. Biochem Pharmacol 32: 227–231

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Durant N, Nguyen N, Katz RL (1984) Potentiation of neuromuscular blockade by verapamil. Anesthesiology 60: 298–303

    Google Scholar 

  17. El-Fakahany EE, Eldefrawi AT, Murphy DL, Aguayo LG, Triggle DJ, Albuquerque EX, Eldefrawi ME (1984) Interactions of phencyclidine with crayfish muscle membranes. Sensitivity to calcium channel antagonists and other drugs. Mol Pharmacol 25: 369–378

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Epstein PM, Lambert JJ (1984) Displacement of [3H]-phencyclidine binding to Torpedo electric organ membrane by calcium channel antagonists. Biochem Pharmacol 33: 4087–4089

    Google Scholar 

  19. Feltz A, Trautmann A (1980) Interaction between nerve released acetylcholine and bath applied agonists at the frog endplate. J Physiol (Lond) 299: 533–552

    Google Scholar 

  20. Feltz A, Trautmann A (1982) Desensitization at the frog neuromuscular junction: a biphasic process. J Physiol (Lond) 322: 257–272

    Google Scholar 

  21. Frank GB (1984) Blockade of Ca2+ channels inhibit K+ contractures but not twitches in skeletal muscle. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 62: 374–378

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gu Y, Silberstein L, Hall ZA (1985) The effects of a myesthenic serum on the acetylcholine receptors of C2 myotubes. I. Immunological distinction between the two toxin-binding sites of the receptor. J Neurosci 5: 1909–1916

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hamill OP, Marty A, Neher E, Sakmann B, Sigworth FJ (1981) Improved patch-clamp techniques for high-resolution current recording from cells and cell-free membrane patches. Pflügers Arch 391: 85–100

    Google Scholar 

  24. Herz JM, Johnson JA, Taylor P (1987) Interaction of non-competitive inhibitors with the acetylcholine receptor. J Biol Chem 262: 7238–7247

    Google Scholar 

  25. Huerta M, Muniz J, Stefani E (1986) Effects of external calcium on potassium contractures in tonic muscle fibres of the frog (Rana pipiens). J Physiol (Lond) 376: 219–230

    Google Scholar 

  26. Jackson MB, Wong BS, Morris CE, Lecar H, Christian CN (1983) Successive openings of the same acetylcholine receptor channel are correlated in open time. Biophys J 42: 109–114

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Katz B, Thesleff S (1957) A study of the “desensitization” produced by acetylcholine at the motor end-plate. J Physiol (Lond) 138: 63–80

    Google Scholar 

  28. Labarca P, Montal MS, Lindstrom JM, Montal M (1985) The occurrence of long openings in the purified cholinergic receptor channel increases with acetylcholine concentration. J Neurosci 5: 3409–3413

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lambert JJ, Durant NN, Reynolds LS, Volle RL, Henderson EG (1981) Characterization of end-plate conductance in transected frog muscle: modification by drugs. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 216: 62–69

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lambert JJ, Durant NN, Henderson EG (1983) Drug induced modification of ionic conductance at the neuromuscular junction. Ann Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 23: 509–534

    Google Scholar 

  31. Magleby KL, Palotta BS (1981) A study of desensitization of acetylcholine receptors using nerve-released transmitter in the frog. J Physiol (Lond) 316: 225–250

    Google Scholar 

  32. Manthey AA (1966) The effect of calcium on the desensitization of membrane receptors at the neuromuscular junction. J Gen Physiol 49: 963–976

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Maricq AV, Gu Y, Hestrin S, Hall Z (1985) The effects of a myasthenic serum on the acetylcholine receptors of C2 myotubes. II. Functional Inactivation of the Receptor. J Neurosci 5: 1917–1924

    Google Scholar 

  34. Miledi R, Parker L (1980) Blocking of acetylcholine induced channels by extracellular or intracellular application of D600. Proc R Soc Lond [Biol] 211: 143–150

    Google Scholar 

  35. Neher E, Steinbach JH (1978) Local anesthetics transiently block currents through single acetylcholine-receptor channels. J Physiol (Lond) 277: 153–176

    Google Scholar 

  36. Oswald RE, Heidmann T, Changeux J-P (1983) Multiple affinity states for noncompetitive blockers revealed by [3H]-phencyclidine binding to acetylcholine receptor rich membrane fragments from Torpedo marmorata. Biochemistry 22: 3128–3136

    Google Scholar 

  37. Pang DC, Sperelakis N (1983) Nifedipine, diltiazem, bepridil and verapamil uptakes into cardiac and smooth muscles. Eur J Pharmacol 87: 199–207

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Pang DC, Sperelakis N (1983) Uptake of [3H]-nitrendipine into cardiac and smooth muscles. Biochem Pharmacol 32 (10): 1660–1663

    Google Scholar 

  39. Sato T, Ono H (1981) Facilitation of neuromuscular transmission by calcium antagonists, diltiazem, nefedipine and verapamil, in the dog. Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther 249: 235–246

    Google Scholar 

  40. Scubon-Mulieri B, Parsons RL (1977) Desensitization and recovery at the frog neuromuscular junction. J Gen Physiol 69: 431–447

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Sobel A, Weber M, Changeux J-P (1977) Large-scale purification of the acetylcholine-receptor protein in its membrane-bound and detergent-extracted forms from Torpedo marmorata electric organ. Eur J Biochem 80: 215–224

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Sperelakis N, Valle R, Orozco C, Martinez-Palomo A, Rubio R (1973) Electromechanical uncoupling of frog skeletal muscle by possible change in sarcoplasmic reticulum content. Am J Physiol 225 (4): 793–800

    Google Scholar 

  43. Steinbach JH, Stevens CF (1976) Neuromuscular transmission chap 2. In: Llin'as R, Precht W (eds) Frog neurobiology: a handbook. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, pp 33–92

    Google Scholar 

  44. Zheng C, Brown RD, Taylor P (1985) Actions of membrane-active drugs on agonist occupation and functional state of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Acta Pharm Sin 6: 231–236

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. L. P. Adam

    Present address: Krannert Institute of Cardiology, Indiana University School of Medicine, 1001 West 10th Street, 46202, Indianapolis, IN, USA

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pharmacology, University of Connecticut Health Center, 06032, Farmington, CT, USA

    L. P. Adam & E. G. Henderson

Authors
  1. L. P. Adam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. E. G. Henderson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Adam, L.P., Henderson, E.G. Calcium channel effectors are potent non-competitive blockers of acetylcholine receptors. Pflügers Arch. 416, 586–593 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00382694

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00382694

Key words

Search

Navigation