Skip to main content
Log in

Foop is still floop: A six year follow-up of phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia

  • Published:
Reading and Writing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A six year follow-up of a previously documented case of developmental phonological dyslexia, is reported. Overal reading and spelling levels have risen significantly, but the qualitative nature of the performance has remained unchanged: impaired non-word reading; morphological and visuo-semantic paralexias; and function word substitutions in text. Rhyming skills also remain impaired. A higher proportion of errors are paralexias and within these a higher proportion are visuo-semantic or morphological. The error pattern of phonological dylexia is thus more pronounced than before. In spelling, only a minority of errors are phonologically plausible. There is no evidence of the mastery of the alphabetic “stage” of reading or the alphabetic “stage” of spelling. It is argued that A.H. is reading orthographically not logographically and that current reading models, which require passage through an alphabetic “stage” before attaining an orthographic stage, do not adequately account for individual variation in the acquisition of literacy skills.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • BarryC. 1984. consistency and types of errors in a deep dyslexic patient. In R. N.Malatesha and H. A.Whitaker (eds.), Dyslexia: A Global Issue. The Hague: Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • CampbellR. and ButterworthB. 1985. Phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia in a highly literate subject: A developmental case with associated deficits of phonemic processing. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37A, 435–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • ColtheartM., BesnerD., JonassonJ. T., and DavelaarE. 1979. Ponological recoding in the lexical decision task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 31, 489–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • EllisA. W. and MarshallJ. C. 1978. Semantic errors or statistical flukes? A note on Allport's ‘On knowing the meaning of words we are unable to report’. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 30, 569–575.

    Google Scholar 

  • FrithU. 1985. Beneath the surface of developmental dyslexia. In K. E.Patterson, J. C.Marshall and M.Coltheart (eds.), Surface Dyslexia. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • HatfieldF. M. and PattersonK. E. 1983. Phonological spelling. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35A, 451–468.

    Google Scholar 

  • MarshallJ. C. and NewcombeJ. 1966. Syntactic and semantic errors in paralexia. Neuropsychologia, 4, 169–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • MarshallJ. C. and NewcombeF. 1973. Patterns of paralexia: a psycholinguistic approach. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 2, 175–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • MortonJ. 1969. Interaction of information in word recognition. Psychological Review, 76, 165–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • MortonJ. 1989. An information-processing account of reading acquisition. In A.Galaburda (ed.), From Reading To Neurons. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 43–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • PattersonK. E. 1982. The relation between reading and phonological coding: Further neuropsychological observations. In A.Ellis (ed.), Normality and Pathology in Cognitive Functions. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • SeymourP. 1986. Cognitive Analysis of Dyslexia. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • SeymourP. and MacGregorJ. 1984. Developmental dyslexia: A cognitive experimental analysis of phonological, morphemic and visual impairments. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 1, 43–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • SnowlingM., StackhouseJ., and RackJ. 1986. Phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia: A developmental analysis. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 3, 309–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • TempleC. M. 1984a. Developmental analogues to acquired phonological dyslexia. In R. N.Malatesha and H. A.Whitaker (eds.), Dyslexia: A Global Issue. the Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • TempleC. M. 1984b. New approaches to the developmental dyslexias. In F. C.Rose (ed.), Progress in Aphasiology, New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Temple, C. M. 1984c. A systematic comparison of the developmental and acquired dyslexias. D. Phil Thesis. University of Oxford.

  • TempleC. M. 1985. Reading with partial phonology. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 14, 523–541.

    Google Scholar 

  • TempleC. M. 1986. Developmental dysgraphias. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38A, 77–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • TempleC. M. 1987. The nature of normality, the deviance of dyslexia and the recognition of rhyme. Cognition, 27, 103–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • TempleC. M. 1988a. Developmental phonological dyslexia: Persistence in adulthood. Journal of Communication Disorders, 21, 189–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • TempleC. M. 1988b. Red is read but eye is blue: A case study of developmental dyslexia and follow-up report. Brain and Language, 34, 13–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Temple, C. M. (in press) Reading in callosal agenesis. Brain and Language.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This work was supported by a research award from the Wolfson Foundation. Requests for reprints should be addressed to Dr. Christine Temple, The Neuropsychology Unit, Radcliffe Infirmary, Woodstock Road, Oxford OX2 6HE, United Kingdom.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Temple, C.M. Foop is still floop: A six year follow-up of phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia. Read Writ 2, 209–221 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00257972

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00257972

Key words

Navigation