Skip to main content
Log in

The SLOSS dilemma: a butterfly case study

  • Papers
  • Published:
Biodiversity & Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Butterfly species richness is examined on simulated archipelagoes of 2, 3, 4 and 5 holm oak forest fragments in the Guadalajara Province (central Spain). It is shown that there are more species on several small ‘islands’ than on a single island. Also, species number increases with the number of fragments that form the archipelago, and with the average distance between islands within the archipelago. Thus, we conclude, at least for butterflies in a system of fragmented holm oak forests in central Iberia, that the best strategy in order to maximize the conservation of species richness is the creation of a net of some small and scattered reserves.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Balleto, E. and Casale, A. (1991) Mediterranean insect conservation. In The Conservation of Insects and their Habitats (N.M. Collins and J.A. Thomas, eds.) pp. 121–42. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baz, A. (1985) Ecología y faunística de las Mariposas de la comarca madrileña del rio Henares. Alcalá de Henares, Spain: M.Sc. thesis, Universidad de Alcalá.

  • Baz, A. and García-Boyero, A. (1995) The effects of forest fragmentation on butterfly communities in central Spain. J. Biogeogr. (in press).

  • Burkey, T.V. (1989) Extinction in nature reserves. The effect of fragmentation and the importance of migration between reserve fragments. Oikos 55, 75–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, R.L.H. and Williams, W.R. (1995) Implications of biogeographical structures for the conservation of European butterflies. In Ecology and Conservation of Butterflies (A.S. Pullin, ed.) pp. 213–29. London: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, J.M. (1975) The island dilemma: Lessons of modern biogeographic studies for the design of natural reserves. Biol. Conserv. 7, 129–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, J.M. (1976) Island biogeography and conservation: Strategy and limitations. Science 193, 1027–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahrig, J. and Merriam, G. (1985) Habitat patch connectivity and population survival. Ecology 66, 1762–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Game, M. and Peterken, G.F. (1984) Nature reserve selection strategies in the woodland of central Lincolnshire, England. Biol. Conserv. 29, 137–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilpin, M.E. (1988) A comment on Quinn and Hastings: extinction in subdivided habitats. Conserv. Biol. 2, 290–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbell, S.P. and Wright, S.J. (1983) Stochastic extinction and reserve size: a focal species approach. Oikos 41, 466–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kudrna, O. (1986) Aspects of the conservation of Butterflies in Europe. In: Butterflies of Europe, vol. 8. (O. Kudrna, ed.). Aula-Verlag, Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvinen, O. (1982) Conservation of endangered plant populations: single large or several small reserves. Oikos 38, 301–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lahti, T. and Ranta, E. (1985) The SLOSS principle and conservation practice: An example. Oikos 44, 369–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lahti, T. and Ranta, E. (1986) Island biogeography and conservation: a reply to Murphy and Wilcox. Oikos 47, 388–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margules, C.R., Higgs, A.J. and Rafe, R.E. (1982) Modern biogeographic theory: are there any lessons for nature reserve design? Biol. Conserv. 24, 115–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munguira, M.L. (1995) Conservation of butterfly habitats and diversity in European Mediterranean countries. In Ecology and Conservation of Butterflies (A.S. Pullin, ed.) pp. 277–89. London: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, D.D. and Wilcox, B.A. (1986) On island biogeography and conservation. Oikos 47, 385–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, E. (1977) A method for assessing changes in the abundance of butterflies. Biol. Conserv. 12, 115–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff, D. (1986) Design of nature reserves. In Wildlife Conservation Evaluation (M.B. Usher. ed.) pp. 315–37. London: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff, D. and Abele, L.G. (1976) Island biogeography theory and conservation practice. Science 191, 285–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff, D. and Abele, L.G. (1982) Refuge design and island biogeography theory: Effects of fragmentation. Am. Nat. 120, 41–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff, D. and Abele, L.G. (1984) Conservation and obfuscation: subdivision of reserves. Oikos 42, 399–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff, D. and Gotelli, N. (1984) Effects of insularization on plant species richness in the prairie-forest ecotone. Biol. Conserv. 29, 27–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spellerberg, I.F. (1991) Biogeographical basis of conservation. In The Scientific Management of Temperate Communities for Conservation (I.F. Spellerberg, F.B. Goldsmith and M.G. Morris, eds.) pp. 293–322. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terborgh, J.W. (1976) Island biogeography and conservation: strategy and limitations. Science 193, 1029–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viejo, J.L. (1984) Estudio faunístico de los ropalóceros del quejigar supramediterráneo de Madrid. SHILAP Rvta. Lep 12, 135–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox, B.A. and Murphy, D.D. (1985) Conservation strategy: the effects of fragmentation on extinction. Am Nat. 125, 879–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E.O. and Willis, E.O. (1975) Applied biogeography. In Ecology and Evolution of Communities (M.L. Cody and J.M. Diamond, eds.) pp. 523–34. Cambridge, MS: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baz, A., Garcia-Boyero, A. The SLOSS dilemma: a butterfly case study. Biodivers Conserv 5, 493–502 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00056393

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00056393

Keywords

Navigation