Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Microhabitat preferences of benthic fauna in a woodland stream

  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Estimates of numbers, biomass, and diversity of benthic macroinvertebrates were made quarterly over a two-year period to investigate microhabitat preferences. Although biomass of most taxa was significantly different among sampling times, physical factors also appeared to be important in determining abundance of many taxa. Optimum depth, velocity, substrate type, and turbulence were determined for major taxa. Optimum conditions for diversity appeared to be 34 cm depth, 60 cm s−1 velocity, and rubble and boulder substrate type. Habitat preference functions were derived for several taxa based on significant polynomial regressions of biomass on depth, velocity, substrate, and Froude number (turbulence). The relationship between abundance and physical habitat conditions was tested by using the product of the preference factors (range: 0–1) for depth, velocity and substrate type as a measure of habitat suitability (joint preference factor). There were significant correlations between biomass [transformed by loge (x + 1)] of 10 benthic species and the joint preference factor. The joint preference factors accounted for from 11 to 61% of the variation of biomass of the 10 benthic species. The intercepts of the relationships between biomass of individual species and the joint preference factor were not significantly different from zero for any species. Therefore, the joint preference factors appear to be valid indicators of biomass. The preference functions have utility in habitat assessment studies, specifically with regard to minimum instream flow determinations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allan, J. D., 1975. The distributional ecology and diversity of benthic insects in Cement Creek, Colorado. Ecology 56: 1040–1053.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambühl, H., 1959. Die Bedeutung der Strömung als ökologischer Factor. Schweiz. Z. Hydrol. 21: 133–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, N. H. & Sedell, J. R., 1979. Detritus processing by macroinvertebrates in stream ecosystems. Ann. Rev. Ent. 24: 351–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barber, W. E. & Kevern, N. R., 1973. Ecological factors influencing macroinvertebrate standing crop distribution. Hydrobiologia 43: 53–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boobar, L. R. & Granett, J., 1980. Simulium penobscotensis (Diptera: Simuliidae) habitat characteristics in the Penobscot River, Maine. Envir. Ent. 9: 412–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bovee, K. D., 1978. Probability-of-use criteria for the family Salmonidae. U.S. Fish Wildl. Serv., Instream Flow Info. Pap. 4, Fort Collins, Col., USA.

  • Bovee, K. D., 1982. A guide to stream habitat analysis using the instream flow incremental methodology. U.S. Fish Wildl. Serv., Instream Flow Info. Pap. 12, Fort Collins, Col., USA.

  • Bovee, K. D. & Cochnauer, T., 1977. Development and evaluation of weighted criteria, probability-of-use curves for instream flow assessments: Fisheries. U.S. Fish Wildl. Serv., Instream Flow Info. Pap. 3, Fort Collins, Col., USA.

  • Bovee, K. D. & Milhous, R. T., 1978. Hydraulic simulation in instream flow studies: Theory and techniques. U.S. Fish Wildl. Serv., Instream Flow Info. Pap. 5, Fort Collins, Col., USA.

  • Brusven, M. A. & Prather, K. V., 1974. Influence of stream sediments on distribution of macrobenthos. J. Ent. Soc. br. Columbia, 71: 25–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carle, F. L. & Maughan, O. E., 1980. Accurate and efficient estimation of benthic populations: a comparison between removal estimation and conventional sampling techniques. Hydrobiologia 71: 181–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carle, F. L. & Strub, M. R., 1978. A new method for estimating population size from removal data. Biometrics 23: 621–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chow, V. T., 1959. Open channel hydraulics. McGraw-Hill Book Co., NY., 680 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coffman, W. P., Cummins, K. W. & Wuycheck, J. C., 1971. Energy flow in a woodland stream ecosystem. 1. Tissue support trophic structure of the autumnal community. Arch. Hydrobiol. 68: 232–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conover, W. J., 1971. Practical nonparametric statistics. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., Lond., 462 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, K. W., 1974. Structure and function of stream ecosystems. Bioscience 24: 631–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, K. W. & Lauff, G. H., 1969. The influence of substrate particle size on the microdistribution of stream macrobenthos. Hydrobiologia 34: 145–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De March, B. G. E., 1976. Spatial and temporal patterns in macrobenthic stream diversity. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 33: 1261–1270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Draper, N. R. & Smith, H., 1966. Applied regression analysis. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., N.Y., 407 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edington, J. M., 1968. Habitat preferences in net-spinning caddis larvae with special reference to the influence of water velocity. J. anim. Ecol. 37: 675–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egglishaw, H. J., 1969. The distribution of benthic invertebrates on substrata in fast flowing streams. J. anim. Ecol. 38: 19–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, S. G. & Likens, G. E., 1973. Energy flow in Bear Brook, New Hampshire: An integrative approach to stream ecosystem metabolism. Ecol. Monogr. 43: 421–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gore, J. A., 1978. A technique for predicting in-stream flow requirements of benthic macroinvertebrates. Freshwat. Biol. 8: 141–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gore, J. A. & Judy, R. D., 1981. Predictive models of benthic macroinvertebrate density for use in instream flow studies and regulated flow management. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 38: 1363–1370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maitland, P. S. & Penny, M. M., 1967. The ecology of the Simuliidae in a Scottish river. J. anim. Ecol. 36: 179–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minshall, G. W. & Minshall, J. N., 1977. Micro-distribution of benthic invertebrates in a Rocky Mountain (U.S.A.) stream. Hydrobiologia 55: 231–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oklahoma State Department of Health, 1977. Surface water quality assessment for Oklahoma, water year 1977. St. Wat. Qual. Lab., Rep. 305b, Okla. City, Okla., USA.

  • Orth, D. J. & Maughan, O. E., 1982. Evaluation of the incremental methodology for recommending instream flows for fishes. Trans. am. Fish. Soc. 111: 413–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pennak, R. W. & Van Gerpen, E. D., 1947. Bottom fauna production and physical nature of the substrate in northern Colorado trout streams. Ecology 28: 42–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Philipson, G. N., 1954. The effect of water flow and oxygen concentration on six species of caddis fly (Trichoptera) larvae. Proc. zool. Soc. Lond. 124: 547–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabeni, C. F. & Gibbs, K. E., 1980. Ordination of deep river invertebrate communities in relation to environmental variables. Hydrobiologia 74: 67–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabeni, C. F. & Minshall, G. W., 1977. Factors affecting microdistribution of stream benthic insects. Oikos 29: 33–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Railsback, S. F., in press. Modeling benthic insect habitat. Symp., Acquisition and utilization of aquatic habitat inventory information. West. Div. Am. Fish. Soc.

  • Scott, D., 1968. Ecological studies on the Trichoptera of the River Dean, Cheshire. Arch. Hydrobiol. 54: 340–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, C. E. & Weaver, V., 1948. The mathematical theory of communication. Univ. Illinois Press, Urbana, Ill., USA, 117 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprules, W. M., 1947. An ecological investigation of stream insects in Algonquin Park, Ontario. Univ. Toronto Studies, Biol. Ser. 56: 1–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stalnaker, C. B., 1979. The use of habitat structure preferenda for establishing flow regimes necessary for maintenance of fish habitat. In J. V. Ward & J. A. Stanford (eds). The ecology of regulated streams. Plenum Press, N.Y., USA: 321–337.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Statzner, B., 1981. The relation between ‘hydraulic stress’ and microdistribution of benthic macroinvertebrates in a lowland running water system, the Schierenseebrooks (North Germany). Arch. Hydrobiol. 91: 192–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steele, R. G. D. & Torrie, J. H., 1960. Principles and procedures of statistics. McGraw-Hill Book Co., N.Y., 481 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolbert, V. R., 1978. Effects of strip mining related disturbance on the benthic insect communities of selected streams in the New River Basin of east Tennessee. Ph.D. Diss., Univ. Tenn., Knoxville, Tenn., USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulfstrand, S., 1967. Microdistribution of benthic species (Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, Diptera: Simuliidae) in Lapland streams. Oikos 18: 293–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 1975. Draft environmental statement, Lukfata Lake, Glover Creek, Oklahoma, U.S. Army Corps Engineers, Tulsa, Okla., USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Geological Survey, 1977. Water resources data for Oklahoma, water year 1976, 2. U.S. Geol. Surv., Water-Data Rep. OK-76–2, Okla. City, Okla., USA.

  • U.S. Geological Survey, 1978. Water resources data for Oklahoma, water year 1977, 2. U.S. Geol. Surv., Water-Data Rep. OK-77–2, Okla. City, Okla., USA.

  • Ward, J. V., 1975. Bottom fauna-substrate relationships in a northern Colorado stream. Ecology 56: 1429–1434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, J. V., 1976. Effects of flow patterns below large dams on stream benthos: A review. In J. F. Orsborn & C. H. Allman (eds). Instream flow needs, 2. Am. Fish. Soc., Bethesa, Md., USA: 235–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wene, G. & Wickliffe, F. I., 1940. Modifications of a stream bottom and its effect on the insect fauna. Can. Ent. 72: 131–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, G. B., 1966. The critical problem of systematics in stream ecology. In K. W. Cummins, C. A. Tryon Jr. & R. T. Hartman (eds). Organism-substrate relationships in streams. Pymatuning Lab. Ecol., Spec. Pub. 4, Univ. Pittsburg, Pa., USA: 52–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, D. D., 1980. Some relationships between stream benthos and substrate heterogeneity. Limnol. Oceanogr. 25: 166–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, N. E. & Hynes, H. B. N., 1973. Microdistribution and feeding of the net-spinning caddisflies (Trichoptera) of a Canadian stream. Oikos 24: 73–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolman, M. G., 1971. The nations rivers. Science 174: 905–918.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zahar, A. R., 1951. The ecology and distribution of black flies in southeast Scotland. J. anim. Ecol. 20: 33–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Fisheries and Wildlife Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 24061, Blacksburg, VA, U.S.A.

    Donald J. Orth

  2. Oklahoma Cooperative Fishery Research Unit, Oklahoma State University, 74078, Stillwater, OK, U.S.A.

    O. Eugene Maughan

Authors
  1. Donald J. Orth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. O. Eugene Maughan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Orth, D.J., Maughan, O.E. Microhabitat preferences of benthic fauna in a woodland stream. Hydrobiologia 106, 157–168 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00006748

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00006748

Keywords

Search

Navigation