Skip to main content
Log in

Content Evaluation, Usage Profile, and Student Preferences Related to a Medical Student Wiki for Student-Authored Learning Resources (Carverpedia)

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Medical Science Educator Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We identified a lack of continuity in student-generated learning aids and the sharing of advice and resources between medical graduating classes. Carverpedia, built in the UIowa Wiki platform, is a novel collaboration between pre-clinical medical students and faculty to produce a centralized location for learning aids at the Carver College of Medicine. Carverpedia is designed to organize files and links in a centralized location accessible to all students. Previously, items were shared through various modalities (e.g., Facebook, email, etc.) without equal access for every student or well-developed archiving. After one academic year of use, there were 217 resources posted to the wiki site by 34 authors. Content posted on Carverpedia differed from Facebook content, with increased content summaries and active-learning. Site utilization, collected by Google Analytics, found 2979 sessions on Carverpedia and a total of 10,253 page views. Site usage and posting of resources was highly correlated with basic science exam schedule. This corresponded with the students surveyed on site usage, with the majority of students using Carverpedia for basic science courses, like Gross Anatomy and Foundations of Cellular Life. Of note, surveyed students found faculty-authored content, practice questions, content summaries, and active-learning resources the most useful of the resources posted. Overall, we found the Wiki format is effective as a means of creating an online community of support and collaboration for student-authored and faculty-authored learning resources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fosnot CT. Constructivism: theory, perspectives and practice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wertsch JV. Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dewey J. Logic, the theory of inquiry. New York, NY: H. Holt and Company; 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Matthews MR. Introductory comments on philosophy and constructivism in science education. Sci Educ-Netherlands. 1997;6:5–14. doi:10.1023/A:1008650823980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dennick R. Constructivism: reflections on twenty five years teaching the constructivist approach in medical education. International Journal of Medical Education. 2016;7:200–5. doi:10.5116/ijme.5763.de11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ainsworth S, Prain V, Tytler R. Drawing to learn in science. Science. 2011;333:1096–7. doi:10.1126/science.1204153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chi MTH, Bassok M, Lewis MW, Reimann P, Glaser R. Self-explanations: how students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Sci. 1989;13:145–82. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1302_1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ainsworth S, Loizou AT. The effects of self-explaining when learning with text or diagrams. Cognitive Sci. 2003;27:669–81. doi:10.1016/S0364-0213(03)00033-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Schwartz DL. The emergence of abstract representations in dyad problem solving. J Learn Sci. 1995;4:321–54. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0403_3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dweck CS. Self-theories: their role in motivation, personality and development. Florence, KY: Psychology Press; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Slavich GM, Zimbardo PG. Transformational teaching: theoretical underpinnings, basic principles and core methods. Educ Psychol Rev. 2012;24:569–608. doi:10.1007/s10648-012-9199-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ali A. Medical students’ use of Facebook for educational purposes. Perspect Med Educ. 2016;5:163–9. doi:10.107/s40037-016-0273-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Black EW. Wikipedia and academic peer review. Online Inform Rev. 2008;32:73–88. doi:10.1108/14684520810865994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rector LH. Comparison of Wikipedia and other encyclopedias for accuracy, breadth and depth in historical articles. Ref Serv Rev. 2008;36:7–22. doi:10.1108/00907320810851998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Callahan E, Herring SC. Cultural bias in Wikipedia content on famous persons. J Am Soc Inf Sci Tec. 2011;62:1899–915. doi:10.1002/asi.21577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Giles J. Internet encyclopedias go head to head. Nature. 2005;438:900–1. doi:10.1038/438900a.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chesney T. An empirical examination of Wikipedia’s credibility. First Monday. 2006;11

  18. Thompson CL, Schulz WL, Adam T. A student authored online medical education textbook: editing patterns and content evaluation of a medical student wiki. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2011;2011:1392–401. PMID: 22195202

    Google Scholar 

  19. Selwyn N. Faceworking: exploring students’ education-related use of Facebook. Learning, Media and Technology. 2009;34:157–74. doi:10.1080/17439880902923622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Cain J. Using Facebook as an informal learning environment. Am J Pharm Educ. 2011;75. doi:10.5688/ajpe7510207.Article 207

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge The University of Iowa Office of Teaching, Learning and Technology for their expert assistance in building the Carverpedia website and managing enrollments throughout the year. This project was funded by The University of Iowa Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine Office of Student Affairs and Curriculum.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Darren Hoffmann.

Ethics declarations

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional review committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. No identifiable personal data were gathered from participants in this study. This study has been approved by The University of Iowa Institutional Review Board for human subjects research (2014, IRB no. 201403757). The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Additional information

Nicholas Borcherding, Matthew Rudolph and Amy Tierney contributed equally to this article

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(PDF 1556 kb)

ESM 2

(PDF 86 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Borcherding, N., Rudolph, M., Tierney, A. et al. Content Evaluation, Usage Profile, and Student Preferences Related to a Medical Student Wiki for Student-Authored Learning Resources (Carverpedia). Med.Sci.Educ. 27, 41–50 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-016-0358-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-016-0358-0

Keywords

Navigation