Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

How Can Pricing and Reimbursement Policies Improve Affordable Access to Medicines? Lessons Learned from European Countries

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article discusses pharmaceutical pricing and reimbursement policies in European countries with regard to their ability to ensure affordable access to medicines. A frequently applied pricing policy is external price referencing. While it provides some benchmark for policy-makers and has been shown to be able to generate savings, it may also contribute to delay in product launch in countries where medicine prices are low. Value-based pricing has been proposed as a policy that promotes access while rewarding useful innovation; however, implementing it has proven quite challenging. For high-priced medicines, managed-entry agreements are increasingly used. These agreements allow policy-makers to manage uncertainty and obtain lower prices. They can also facilitate earlier market access in case of limited evidence about added therapeutic value of the medicine. However, these agreements raise transparency concerns due to the confidentiality clause. Tendering as used in the hospital and offpatent outpatient sectors has been proven to reduce medicine prices but it requires a robust framework and appropriate design with clear strategic goals in order to prevent shortages. These pricing and reimbursement policies are supplemented by the widespread use of Health Technology Assessment to inform decision-making, and by strategies to improve the uptake of generics, and also biosimilars. While European countries have been implementing a set of policy options, there is a lack of thorough impact assessments of several pricing and reimbursement policies on affordable access. Increased cooperation between authorities, experience sharing and improving transparency on price information, including the disclosure of confidential discounts, are opportunities to address current challenges.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. European Commission. Council conclusions on innovation for the benefit of patients (2014/C 438/06). Brussels: 6 December 2014.

  2. Council of the European Union. Council conclusions on the “Reflection process on modern, responsive and sustainable health systems”. Employment, Social Policy, Health and Consumers Affairs. Council meeting. Brussels, 10 December 2013. 2013.

  3. WHO Regional Office for Europe. Access to new medicines in Europe: technical review of policy initiatives and opportunities for collaboration and research. Copenhagen: 2015.

  4. Ministry of Health Welfare and Sport. Summary of Medicines Plan. The Hague: 2016. Accessible at: http://english.eu2016.nl/binaries/eu2016-en/documents/publications/2016/03/1/summary-of-medicins/summary-of-medicines-plan.pdf. Accessed 14 May 2016.

  5. Iyengar S, Tay-Teo K, Vogler S, Beyer P, Wiktor S, de Joncheere K, et al. Prices, costs, and affordability of new medicines for hepatitis C in 30 countries: an economic analysis. PLoS Med. 2016;13(5):e1002032.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Howard DH, Bach PB, Berndt ER, Conti RM. Pricing in the market for anticancer drugs. National Bureau of Economic Research. Nashville: American Economic Association; 2015.

  7. Tefferi A, Kantarjian H, Rajkumar SV, Baker LH, Abkowitz JL, Adamson JW, et al. In support of a patient-driven initiative and petition to lower the high price of cancer drugs. Mayo Clin Proc. 2015;90(8):996–1000.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Light DW, Kantarjian H. Market spiral pricing of cancer drugs. Cancer. 2013;119(22):3900–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Paris V, Hewlett E, Auraaen A, Alexa J, Simon L. Health care coverage in OECD countries in 2012. Paris: OECD Working Paper No. 88, OECD Publishing, 2016.

  10. OECD. OECD Health Statistics 2016. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development; released 30 June 2016.

  11. Bouvy J, Vogler S. Background Paper 8.3 Pricing and Reimbursement Policies: Impacts on Innovation. In: World Health Organization, editor. Priority Medicines for Europe and the World “A Public Health Approach to Innovation” Update on 2004 Background Paper. Geneva 2013.

  12. EFPIA. Patients’ W.A.I.T. Indicator—Report 2011. 2011. http://www.efpia.eu/uploads/Patients_WAIT_Report_2011_FINAL_070811_1.doc. Accessed 23 June 2016.

  13. Heads of Medicines Agencies. Report of Task Force of HMA. Availability of Human Medicinal Products. Madeira: 2007.

  14. Leopold C, Rovira J, Habl C. Generics in small markets or for low volume medicines European Union. Vienna: EMINet, 2010.

  15. Vogler S, Kilpatrick K, Babar Z-U-D. Analysis of medicine prices in New Zealand and 16 European Countries. Value Health. 2015;18(4):484–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Vogler S, Vitry A, Babar Z-U-D. Cancer drugs in 16 European countries, Australia, and New Zealand: a cross-country price comparison study. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(1):39–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kanavos P, Ferrario A, Vandoros S, Anderson GF. Higher US branded drug prices and spending compared to other countries may stem partly from quick uptake of new drugs. Health Aff. 2013;32(4):753–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kanavos P, Vandoros S, Irwin R, Nicod E, Casson M. Differences in costs of and access to pharmaceutical products in the EU. Brussels: European Parliament; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Danzon PM, Furukawa MF. International prices and availability of pharmaceuticals in 2005. Health Aff. 2008;27(1):221–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Leopold C, Mantel-Teeuwisse AK, Vogler S, de Joncheere K, Laing RO, Leufkens HGM. Is Europe still heading to a common price level for on-patent medicines? An exploratory study among 15 Western European countries. Health Policy. 2013;112:209–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Brekke KR, Holmås TH, Straume OR. Are Pharmaceuticals Still Inexpensive in Norway? A Comparison of Prescription Drug Prices in Ten European Countries. SNF Report No. 08/10. 2010.

  22. Simoens S. International comparison of generic medicine prices. Curr Med Res Opin. 2007;23(11):2647–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Jönsson B, Hofmarcher T, Lindgren P, Wilking N. Comparator report on patient access to cancer medicines in Europe revisited. IHE Rep. 2016;4:228.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Jönsson B, Persson U, Wilking N. Innovative Treatments for cancer in Europe—value, cost, and access. Lund: IHE-Report; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Nolte E, Corbett J. International variation in drug usage—an exploratory analysis of the “causes” of variation. London: RAND Europe; 2014.

  26. Nolte E, Newbould J, Conklin A. International variation in the usage of medicines—a review of literature. London: RAND Europe; 2010.

  27. Ferech M, Coenen S, Malhotra-Kumar S, Dvorakova K, Hendrickx E, Suetens C, et al. European Surveillance of Antimicrobial Consumption (ESAC): outpatient antibiotic use in Europe. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2006;58(2):401–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hoebert J, Laing R, Stephens P. Pharmaceutical consumption. The world medicines situation 2011. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2011.

  29. Hoebert JM. Cross-country variation in medicines use; a pharmaceutical system perspective; 2013.

  30. Hoebert JM, Souverein PC, Mantel-Teeuwisse AK, Leufkens HG, van Dijk L. Reimbursement restriction and moderate decrease in benzodiazepine use in general practice. The Annals of Family Medicine. 2012;10(1):42–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Penchansky R, Thomas JW. The concept of access: definition and relationship to consumer satisfaction. Med Care. 1981;19(2):127–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. World Health Organization. Equitable access to essential medicines: a framework for collective action. 2004.

  33. Management Sciences for Health. Defining and Measuring Access to Essential Drugs, Vaccines, and Health Commodities. Report of the WHO-MSH Consultative Meeting, Ferney-Voltaire, France, December 11–13, 2000 Geneva: World Health Organization. 1999. http://projects.msh.org/seam/reports/measuring_access_Dec2000.pdf. Accessed 3 June 2016.

  34. Bigdeli M, Jacobs B, Tomson G, Laing R, Ghaffar A, Dujardin B, et al. Access to medicines from a health system perspective. Health policy and planning. 2012.

  35. United Nations. Sustainable Developmet Goals, [28 July 2016]. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/. Accessed 28 June 2016.

  36. World Health Organization. Essential medicines and health products. Monitoring and Evaluation 2016. http://www.who.int/medicines/areas/policy/monitoring/en/. Accessed 1 Nov 2016.

  37. World Health Organization. Global Reference List of 100 Core Health Indicators. Luxembourg: World Health Organization; 2015.

  38. Carone G, Schwierz C, Xavier A. Cost-containment policies in public pharmaceutical spending in the EU. Brussels: European Commission, Directorate-General for Economics and Financial Afairs; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Paris V, Belloni A. Value in Pharmaceutical Pricing. OECD Health Working Papers, No. 63. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2013.

  40. Drummond M, Jönsson B, Rutten F, Stargardt T. Reimbursement of pharmaceuticals: reference pricing versus health technology assessment. Eur J Health Econ. 2011;12(3):263–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. World Health Organization. WHO guideline on country pharmaceutical pricing policies. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013.

  42. Zimmermann N, Vogler S, Bak Pedersen H. Policy options to deal with high-cost medicines—survey with European policy-makers. J Pharm Policy Pract. 2015;8(Suppl 1):P8.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Vogler S, Lepuschütz L, Schneider P, Stühlinger V. Study on enhanced cross-country coordination in the area of pharmaceutical product pricing. Vienna: Gesundheit Österreich Forschungs- und Planungs GmbH; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  44. OECD. Pharmaceutical Pricing Policies in a Global Market. Paris: OECD, 2008.

  45. Stargardt DVT, Schreyögg J. Impact of cross-reference pricing on pharmaceutical prices. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2006;5(4):235–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Danzon PM, Towse A. Differential pricing for pharmaceuticals: reconciling access, R&D and patents. Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2003;3(3):183–205.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Kyle MK. Pharmaceutical price controls and entry strategies. Rev Econ Stat. 2007;89(1):88–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Espin J, Rovira J, de Labry AO. Working paper 1: External price referencing—review series on pharmaceutical pricing policies and interventions. Geneva: World Health Organization and Health Action International, 2011.

  49. Rémuzat C, Urbinati D, Mzoughi O, El Hammi E, Belgaied W, Toumi M. Overview of external reference pricing systems in Europe. J Mark Access Health Policy. 2015;3:1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Europe Economics. External price referencing. London: Europe Economics; 2013.

  51. Michel M, Toumi M. Access to orphan drugs in Europe: current and future issues. Expert Rev Pharmacoeconomics Outcomes Res. 2012;12(1):23–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Persson U, Jönsson B. The end of the international reference pricing system? Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2016;14(1):1–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Kanavos P, Nicod E, Espin J. Short-and long-term effects of value-based pricing vs. external price referencing. 2010.

  54. Danzon PM, Wang YR, Wang L. The impact of price regulation on the launch delay of new drugs—evidence from twenty-five major markets in the 1990s. Health Econ. 2005;14(3):269–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Ferrario A, Reinap M, Pedersen HB, Kanavos P. Availability of medicines in Estonia: an analysis of existing barriers and options to address them. Copenhagen: WHO, Regional Office for Europe; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Toumi M, Rémuzat C, Vataire A-L, Urbinati D. External reference pricing of medicinal products: simulation-based considerations for cross-country coordination. Final Report. European Commission, 2014.

  57. Glynn D. The effects of parallel trade on affordable access to medicines. Eurohealth. 2009;15(2):1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Merkur S, Mossialos E. A pricing policy towards the sourcing of cheaper drugs in Cyprus. Health Policy. 2007;81(2):368–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Windmeijer F, De Laat E, Douven R, Mot E. Pharmaceutical promotion and GP prescription behaviour. Health Econ. 2006;15(1):5–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Leopold C, Mantel-Teeuwisse AK, Seyfang L, Vogler S, de Joncheere K, Laing RO, et al. Impact of external price referencing on medicine prices—a price comparison among 14 European countries. South Med Rev. 2012;5(1):34–41.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Håkonsen H, Horn AM, Toverud E-L. Price control as a strategy for pharmaceutical cost containment—What has been achieved in Norway in the period 1994–2004? Health policy. 2009;90(2):277–85.

  62. Towse A, Pistollato M, Mestre-Ferrandiz J, Khan Z, Kaura S, Garrison L. european union pharmaceutical markets: a case for differential pricing? Int J Econ Bus. 2015;22(2):263–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Vogler S, Zimmermann N, Habl C, Piessnegger J, Bucsics A. Discounts and rebates granted to public payers for medicines in European countries. South Med Review. 2012;5(1):38–46.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Claxton K. Oft, Vbp: qed? Health Econ. 2007;16(6):545–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Godman B, Gustafsson LL. A new reimbursement system for innovative pharmaceuticals combining value-based and free market pricing. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2013;11(1):79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Process on Corporate Social Responsibility in the Field of Pharmaceuticals, Platform on Access to Medicines in Europe, Working Group on Mechanism of Coordinated Access to Orphan Medicinal Products (MoCA-OMP). Transparent Value Framework. 2013.

  67. Kaplan W, Laing R. Priority Medicines for Europe and the World. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2004.

  68. Franken M, le Polain M, Cleemput I, Koopmanschap M. Similarities and differences between five European drug reimbursement systems. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2012;28(4):349.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Consultative Expert Working Group on Research and Developmen. Follow-up of the report of the Consultative Expert Working Group on Research and Development: Financing and Coordination (CEWG) 2016. http://www.who.int/phi/cewg/en/. Accessed 26 June 2016.

  70. Vogler S, Zimmermann N, Habimana K. Study of the policy mix for the reimbursement of medicinal products. Proposal for a best practice-based approach based on stakeholder assessment. Vienna: Commissioned by the European Commission, 2014.

  71. Hughes DA. Value-based pricing. Incentive for innovation or zero net benefit? Pharmacoeconomics. 2011;29(9):731–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Ferrario A, Kanavos P. Managed entry agreements for pharmaceuticals: the European experience. EMINet, 2013.

  73. Adamski J, Godman B, Ofierska-Sujkowska G, Osinska B, Herholz H, Wendykowska K, et al. Risk sharing arrangements for pharmaceuticals: potential considerations and recommendations for European payers. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10:153.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Morel T, Arickx F, Befrits G, Siviero P, van der Meijden C, Xoxi E, et al. Managed entry agreements and orphan drugs: a European comparative study (2006–2012). Value Health. 2013;16(7):A391–A.

  75. Garrison LP, Towse A, Briggs A, de Pouvourville G, Grueger J, Mohr PE, et al. Performance-based risk-sharing arrangements—good practices for design, implementation, and evaluation: report of the ISPOR good practices for performance-based risk-sharing arrangements task force. Value Health. 2013;16(5):703–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Neumann PJ, Chambers JD, Simon F, Meckley LM. Risk-sharing arrangements that link payment for drugs to health outcomes are proving hard to implement. Health Aff. 2011;30(12):2329–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Iskrov G, Stefanov R. Prospects of risk-sharing agreements for innovative therapies in a context of deficit spending in Bulgaria. Front Public Health. 2015;3:1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Ferrario A, Kanavos P. Dealing with uncertainty and high prices of new medicines: a comparative analysis of the use of managed entry agreements in Belgium, England, the Netherlands and Sweden. Soc Sci Med. 2015;124(1):39–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Parkinson B, Sermet C, Clement F, Crausaz S, Godman B, Garner S, et al. Disinvestment and value-based purchasing strategies for pharmaceuticals: an international review. Pharmacoeconomics. 2015;33(9):905–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Simoens S, Picavet E, Dooms M, Cassiman D, Morel T. Cost-effectiveness assessment of orphan drugs: a scientific and political conundrum. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2013;11(1):1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Vogler S, Zimmermann N, Ferrario A, Wirtz VJ, de Joncheere K, Pedersen HB, et al. Pharmaceutical policies in a crisis? Challenges and solutions identified at the PPRI Conference. J Pharm Policy Pract. 2016;9(1):1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Russo P, Mennini FS, Siviero PD, Rasi G. Time to market and patient access to new oncology products in Italy: a multistep pathway from European context to regional health care providers. Ann Oncol. 2010;21(10):2081–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Vogler S, Habl C, Leopold C, Mazag J, Morak S, Zimmermann N. PHIS Hospital Pharma Report. Vienna: Pharmaceutical Health Information System (PHIS); commissioned by the European Commission and the Austrian Federal Ministry of Health, 2010. http://whocc.goeg.at/Literaturliste/Dokumente/BooksReports/PHIS_HospitalPharma_Report.pdf. Accessed 15 Nov 2014.

  84. Er S. PHIS Hospital Pharma Report Denmark. Vienna: Pharmaceutical Health Information System (PHIS), 2009.

  85. Festöy H, Ognøy AH. PPRI pharma profile Norway. Vienna: Pharmaceutical Pricing and Reimbursement Information (PPRI); 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Leopold C, Habl C, Vogler S. Tendering of Pharmaceuticals in EU Member States and EEA countries. Results from the country survey. Vienna: ÖBIG Forschungs- und Planungsgesellschaft mbH; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  87. Dylst P, Vulto A, Simoens S. Tendering for outpatient prescription pharmaceuticals: what can be learned from current practices in Europe? Health Policy. 2011;101(2):146–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Gombocz M, Vogler S, Zimmermann N. Ausschreibungen für Arzneimittel: Erfahrungen aus anderen Ländern und Umsetzungsstrategien für Österreich [Tendering for Medicines: Experiences from other countries and implementation strategies for Austria]. Vienna: Gesundheit Österreich Forschungs- und Planungs GmbH; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Kanavos P. Tender systems for outpatient pharmaceuticals in the European Union: Evidence from the Netherlands and Germany. London: EMINET, January. 2012. Available at: http://www.progenerika.de/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Anlage-2_Tendering-Report-EMINET-13OCT2012-FINAL.pdf. Accessed 30 Apr 2016.

  90. Kanavos P, Seeley L, Vandoros S. Tender systems for outpatient pharmaceuticals in the European Union: Evidence from the Netherlands, Germany and Belgium. London: European Medicines Information Network (EMINet); 2009.

  91. Carradinha H. Tendering short-term pricing policies and the impact on patients, governments and the sustainability of the generic medicines industry. J Generic Med Bus J Generic Med Sect. 2009;6(4):351–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. VanHaeren E, Arickx F, Soete E, Bormans V, Mortier M, Leveque F. PCV162 Public tendering for off patent medicines in Belgium—the simvastatin case. Value Health. 2009;12(7):A343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Vogler S. The impact of pharmaceutical pricing and reimbursement policies on generics uptake: implementation of policy options on generics in 29 European countries—an overview. Generics Biosimilars Initiat (GaBI) J. 2012;1(2):93–100.

  94. Dylst P, Vulto A, Simoens S. Demand-side policies to encourage the use of generic medicines: an overview. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2013;13(1):59–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Vogler S, Schneider P, Gombocz M. Maßnahmen der Generikaförderung in Europa [Measures to enhance generics uptake in Europe]. Vienna: Gesundheit Österreich Forschungs- und Planungs GmbH; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  96. Vogler S. How large are the differences between originator and generic prices? Analysis of five molecules in 16 European countries. Farmeconomia Health Econ Ther Pathw. 2012;13(Suppl 3):29–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Vogler S, Leopold C. Access to essential medicines in Portugal. Vienna: ÖBIG Forschungs- und Planungsgesellschaft mbH; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  98. Gouya G, Reichardt B, Bidner A, Weissenfels R, Wolzt M. Partial reimbursement of prescription charges for generic drugs reduces costs for both health insurances and patients [Article in German]. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2008;120(3–4):89–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Vogler S, Zimmermann N, et al. Policy interventions related to medicines: survey of measures taken in European countries during 2010–2015. Health Policy. 2016;120(12):1363–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Danzon PM, Furukawa MF. Prices and availability of pharmaceuticals: evidence from nine countries. Health Affairs. 2003:W3–521. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.w3.521.

  101. Godman B, Bennie M, Baumgärtel C, Sović-Brkičić L, Burkhardt T, Fürst J, et al. Essential to increase the use of generics in Europe to maintain comprehensive health care? Farmeconomia Health Econ Ther Pathw. 2012;13(3S):5–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Dylst P, Vulto A, Godman B, Simoens S. Generic medicines: solutions for a sustainable drug market? Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2013;11(5):1–7.

  103. Sermet C, Andrieu V, Godman B, Van Ganse E, Haycox A, Reynier JP. Ongoing pharmaceutical reforms in France: implications for key stakeholder groups. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2010;8(1):7–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. European Commission Competition Directorate-General. Pharmaceutical sector inquiry. Brussels: European Commission; 2009.

  105. Simoens S. Generic and biosimilar medicines: quid? Farmeconomia Health Econom Ther Pathw. 2012;13(3S):3–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  106. Dylst P, Vulto A, Simoens S. Overcoming challenges in market access of generic medicines in the European Union. J Generic Med Bus J Generic Med Sect. 2012;9(1):21–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  107. Heinze G, Hronsky M, Reichardt B, Baumgärtel C, Müllner M, Bucsics A, et al. Potential savings in prescription drug costs for hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes mellitus by equivalent drug substitution in Austria: a nationwide cohort study. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2014;13(2):1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  108. Simoens S, De Coster S. Sustaining generic medicines markets in Europe. J Generic Med. 2006;3(4):268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  109. Cameron A, Mantel-Teeuwisse AK, Leufkens HGM, Laing RO. Switching from originator brand medicines to generic equivalents in selected developing countries: how much could be saved? Value Health. 2012;15(5):664–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. Ubeda A, Cardo E, Sellés N, Broseta R, Trillo JL, Fernández-Llimós F. Antidepressant utilization in primary care in a Spanish region. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2007;42(3):181–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. European Medicines Agency (EMA). European public assessment reports London 2106. http://www.ema.europa.eu/ema/index.jsp?curl=pages%2Fmedicines%2Flanding%2Fepar_search.jsp&mid=WC0b01ac058001d124&searchTab=searchByAuthType&alreadyLoaded=true&isNewQuery=true&status=Authorised&keyword=Enter+keywords&searchType=name&taxonomyPath=&treeNumber=&searchGenericType=biosimilars&genericsKeywordSearch=Submit. Accessed 7 July 2016.

  112. Schellekens H, Smolen JS, Dicato M, Rifkin RM. Safety and efficacy of biosimilars in oncology. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(11):e502–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. Food and Drug Adminstration (FDA). FDA approves Inflectra, a biosimilar to Remicade. Press release. 2016. http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm494227.htm. Accessed 6 July 2016.

  114. European Commission. Multi-stakeholder Workshop on Biosimilar Medicinal Products. Summary. 20 June 2016. http://ec.europa.eu/DocsRoom/documents/19302/attachments/1/translations/en/renditions/native. Accessed 3 Nov 2016.

  115. Goll GL, Olsen IC, Jorgensen KK, Lorentzen M, Bolstad N, Haavardsholm EA, et al. Biosimilar Infliximab (CT-P13) Is not inferior to originator infliximab: results from a 52-week randomized switch trial in Norway. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016;968((suppl. 10). http://acrabstracts.org/abstract/biosimilar-infliximab-ct-p13-is-not-inferior-to-originator-infliximab-results-from-a-52-week-randomized-switch-trial-in-norway/. Accessed 3 Nov 2016.

  116. Mestre-Ferrandiz J, Towse A, Berdud M. Biosimilars: how can payers get long-term savings? PharmacoEconomics. 2016;34(6):609–16.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  117. Vogler S, Peter S, Gombocz M, Zimmermann N. Differences in pricing policies for generic and biosimilar medicines. Value Health. 2016;19(7):A350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  118. European Biopharmaceutical Enterprises. What pricing and reimbursement policies to use for off-patent biologicals?—results from the EBE 2014 biological medicines policy survey. Generics Biosimilars Initiat J (GaBI Journal). 2015;4(1):17–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  119. Renwick MJ, Smolina K, Gladstone EJ, Weymann D, Morgan SG. Postmarket policy considerations for biosimilar oncology drugs. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(1):e31–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  120. Vogler S, Zimmermann N, Leopold C, Habl C, Mazag J. Discounts and rebates granted for medicines for hospital use in five European countries. Open Pharmacoecon Health Econ J. 2013;5:1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  121. GaBI Online. Huge discount on biosimilar infliximab in Norway. Generics Biosimilars Initiat J (GaBI Journal). 2015. http://www.gabionline.net/Biosimilars/General/Huge-discount-on-biosimilar-infliximab-in-Norway. Accessed 3 Nov 2016.

  122. Council of the European Union. Council conclusions on strengthening the balance in the pharmaceutical systems in the EU and its Member States. 17 June 2016. http://www.consilium.europa.eu/press-releases-pdf/2016/6/47244642812_en.pdf. Accessed 3 July 2016.

  123. European Commission. Medical Countermeasures that could be procured in common under the joint procurement agreement. http://ec.europa.eu/health/preparedness_response/docs/jpa_note_scope_en.pdf. Accessed 3 June 2016. Luxembourg: 2014.

  124. Ministre des Affaires sociales et de la Santé publique. The Grand Duchy of Luxemburg Joins Belgium-Netherlands Initiative on Orphan Drugs, Communiqué de presse 24 September 2015 2016 [3 June 2016]. http://www.deblock.belgium.be/fr/grand-duchy-luxemburg-joins-belgium-netherlands-initiative-orphan-drugs. Accessed 3 June 2016.

  125. Bundesministerium für Gesundheit [Federal Ministry of Health]. Oberhauser: Österreich tritt Benelux-Kooperation für Arzneimittelpolitik bei [Oberhauser: Austria joins the Benelux cooperation on pharmaceutical policy]. 17 June 2016. http://www.bmgf.gv.at/home/Startseite/aktuelle_Meldungen/Oberhauser_Oesterreich_tritt_Benelux_Kooperation_fuer_Arzneimittelpolitik_bei. Accessed 4 July 2016.

  126. Kristensen FB, Mäkelä M, Neikter SA, Rehnqvist N, Håheim LL, Mørland B, et al. European network for Health Technology Assessment, EUnetHTA: planning, development, and implementation of a sustainable European network for Health Technology Assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009;25(S2):107–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  127. European Medicines Agency (EMA). Early dialogue between regulators and health technology assessment bodies key to medicines development. EMA and multiple stakeholders to develop tools for industry. Available from: http://www.ema.europa.eu/ema/index.jsp?curl=pages/news_and_events/news/2013/11/news_detail_001979.jsp&mid=WC0b01ac058004d5c1. Accessed 28 June 2016. [press release]. 28 Nov 2013.

  128. European Medicines Agency (EMA). Pilot project on adaptive licensing. London: 19 March 2014. http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Other/2014/03/WC500163409.pdf. Accessed 3 June 2016.

  129. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Public involvement. London. 2016. https://www.nice.org.uk/about/nice-communities/public-involvement. Accessed 6 June 2016.

  130. van Thiel G, Stolk P. Background Paper 8.5 Patient and Citizen Involvement. In: World Health Organization, editor. Priority Medicines for Europe and the World 2013 Update. Geneva; 2013.

  131. Scottish Medicines Consortium. Capturing the patient and carer voice. Glasgow 2016. https://www.scottishmedicines.org.uk/Public_Involvement/Public_Involvement. Accessed 6 June 2016.

  132. European Commission. Council Directive 89/105/EEC of 21 December 1988 relating to the transparency of measures regulating the prices of medicinal products for human use and their inclusion in the scope of national health insurance systems. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:31989L0105:en:HTML. Accessed 4 Nov 2016.

  133. EFPIA. EFPIA Position Paper: Principles for application of international reference pricing systems. 16 July 2014.

  134. Review of Council Directive 89/105/EEC of 21 December 1988 relating to the transparency of measures regulating the pricing of medicinal products for human use and their inclusion in the scope of national health insurance systems (Transparency Directive). Joint Position Paper. Submitted by European Social Insurance Platform (ESIP)/Association Internationale de la Mutualité (AIM) on 10 February 2011 [press release]. 2011.

  135. Robertson J, Walkom EJ, Henry DA. Transparency in pricing arrangements for medicines listed on the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme. Aust Health Rev. 2009;33(2):192–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  136. Joppi R, Demattè L, Menti AM, Pase D, Poggiani C, Mezzalira L. The Italian horizon scanning project. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2009;65(8):775–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  137. Packer C, Fung M, Stevens A. Analyzing 10 years of early awareness and alert activity in the United Kingdom. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2012;28(03):308–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  138. Godman B, Paterson K, Malmström RE, Selke G, Fagot J-P, Mrak J. Improving the managed entry of new medicines: sharing experiences across Europe. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2012;12(4):439–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  139. Nordic Contact Point for Priorization. Memo—Overview of Nordic collaboration within the prioritization area [27 July 2016]. https://nyemetoder.no/Documents/Nordiskkontaktpunkt/Memo-OverviewofNordiccollaboration.pdf. Accessed 27 July 2016.

  140. Avorn J. The $2.6 billion pill—methodologic and policy considerations. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(20):1877–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  141. Sullivan T. New York Introduces Pharmaceutical Cost Transparency Bill: Policy and Medicines; 18 May 2016. http://www.policymed.com/2015/05/new-york-introduces-pharmaceutical-cost-transparency-bill.html. Accessed 7 July 2016.

  142. World Health Organization. Global strategy and plan of action on public health, innovation and intellectual property. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011.

  143. Velásquez G, Seuba X. Rethinking global health: a binding convention for R&D for pharmaceutical products. South Center Res Pap. 2011;42:29.

    Google Scholar 

  144. Jayadev A, Stiglitz J. Two ideas to increase innovation and reduce pharmaceutical costs and prices. Health Aff. 2009;28(1):w165–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  145. Moon S, Bermudez J, t Hoen E. Innovation and access to medicines for neglected populations: could a treaty address a broken pharmaceutical R&D system? PLoS Med. 2012;9(5):e1001218.

  146. Røttingen J-A, Chamas C. A new deal for global health R&D? The recommendations of the consultative expert working group on research and development (CEWG). PLoS Med. 2012;9(5):e1001219.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  147. Love J, Hubbard T. Bid Idea: prizes to Stimulate R&D for New Medicines. Chi-Kent L Rev. 2007;82:1519.

    Google Scholar 

  148. Balasegaram M, Bréchot C, Farrar J, Heymann D, Ganguly N, Khor M, et al. A global biomedical R&D fund and mechanism for innovations of public health importance. PLoS Med. 2015;12(5):e1001831.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  149. The Review on Antimicrobial Resistance. Tackling drug-resistent infections globally: final report and recommendations. London: Wellcome Trust and UK Government; 2016.

  150. United Nations Secretary General’s High-Level Panel on Access to Medicines. Report of the United Nations Secretary General’s High-Level Panel on Access to Medicines. Promoting innovation and access to health technologies. September 2016.

  151. Wirtz VJ, Hogerzeil HV, Gray AL, Bigdeli M, de Joncheere CP, Ewen MA, et al. Essential medicines for universal health coverage. Lancet. 2016. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31599-9.

    Google Scholar 

  152. Björkhem-Bergman L, Andersén-Karlsson E, Laing R, Diogene E, Melien O, Jirlow M, et al. Interface management of pharmacotherapy. Joint hospital and primary care drug recommendations. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2013;69(1):73–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  153. Leopold C. Pharmaceutical policy analysis—a European perspective on pricing and reimbursement in challenging times. Utrecht: Utrecht University; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  154. Almarsdóttir AB, Traulsen JM. Studying and evaluating pharmaceutical policy—becoming a part of the policy and consultative process. Pharm World Sci. 2006;28(1):6–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  155. Gotham D, Onarheim KH, Barber MJ. How the MDGs gave up on measuring access to medicines. Lancet Glob Health. 2016;4(5):e296–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  156. Kaplan WA, Ritz LS, Vitello M, Wirtz VJ. Policies to promote use of generic medicines in low and middle income countries: a review of published literature, 2000–2010. Health Policy. 2012;106(3):211–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sabine Vogler.

Ethics declarations

Funding

No funding was received for the writing of the manuscript.

Conflict of interest

SV, VP, AF, VW, KdJ, PS, HBP, GD and ZUB have no conflicts of interest to declare. All authors submitted a signed Conflict of Interest disclosure form.

Author contributions

All authors fulfilled the authorship criteria. All authors are aware of the submission and are in agreement with the manuscript. SV had the lead in drafting and revising the manuscript. VP drafted the chapter on health technology assessments, KdJ drafted the section about measurement of policies, and PS drafted the Appendix on networks. AF had the lead in providing literature. VP, AF, VW, KdJ, PS, HBP, GD and ZUB critically reviewed several versions of the manuscript.

Additional information

Kees de Joncheere–Retired.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vogler, S., Paris, V., Ferrario, A. et al. How Can Pricing and Reimbursement Policies Improve Affordable Access to Medicines? Lessons Learned from European Countries. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 15, 307–321 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40258-016-0300-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40258-016-0300-z

Keywords

Navigation