Abstract
Traditional crop varieties are adapted to low inputs of fertilizers, pesticides, and water. In addition, biofuel from local vegetal biomass stimulates the economy in depressed rural areas. Biofuels also contribute to the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. Here, we tested the suitability of traditional maize varieties as solid biofuel. We cultivated traditional maize varieties without pesticides and irrigation. Four varieties were cropped in two locations, with two fertilization levels, and harvested at three different dates. For each trait, we measured the heating value, the ash content, and the elemental composition. Results show that plants harvested at physiological maturity, 150 days after sowing, have about 10 % more biomass and 20–30 % less ash, N, K, and Cl than plants harvested 115 days after sowing. Moreover, reducing standard N input by 40 % did not reduce the biomass yield. Calculations show that traditional maize varieties can produce an energy of 15–23 · 104 MJ/ha. These findings demonstrate that traditional maize cultivation can be optimized to increase the efficiency of biomass production and to reduce the environmental impact.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amon T, Amon B, Kryvoruchko V, Zollitsch W, Mayer K, Gruber L (2007) Biogas production from maize and dairy cattle manure—influence of biomass composition on the methane yield. Agric Ecosyst Environ 118:173–182. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2006.05.007
Avila-Segura M, Barak P, Hedtcke JL, Posner JL (2011) Nutrient and alkalinity removal by corn grain, stover and cob harvest in upper Midwest USA. Biomass Bioenergy 35:1190–1195. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.12.010
Carena MJ (2005) Maize commercial hybrids compared to improved population hybrids for grain yield and agronomic performance. Euphytica 141:201–208. doi:10.1007/s10681-005-7072-0
CEN (2009a) Determination of ash content. EN 14775 Comité Européen de Normalisation, Brussels
CEN (2009b) Determination of calorific value. EN 14981 Comité Européen de Normalisation, Brussels
CEN (2011a) Determination of major elements Al, Ca, Fe, Mg, P, K, Si, Na and Ti. EN 15290 Comité Européen de Normalisation, Brussels
CEN (2011b) Determination of total content of carbon, hydrogen and nitrogen-instrumental methods. EN 15104 Comité Européen de Normalisation, Brussels
CEN (2011c) Determination of total content of sulfur and chlorine. EN 15289 Comité Européen de Normalisation, Brussels
CEN (2011d) Sample preparation. EN 14780 Comité Européen de Normalisation, Brussels
Don A, Osborne B, Hastings A, Skiba CMS, Drewer J, Flessa H, Freibauer A, Hyvonen N, Jones MB, Lanigan GJ, Mander U, Monti A, Djomo SN, Valentine J, Walter K, Zegada-Lizarazu W, Zenone T (2011) Land-use change to bioenergy production in Europe: implications for the greenhouse gas balance and soil carbon. GCB Bioenergy 4:372–391. doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01116.x
Ebenstein A (2010) The consequences of industrialization: evidence from water pollution and digestive cancers in China. Rev Econ Stat 94:186–201. doi:10.1162/REST_a_00150
Fagernäs L, Brammer J, Wilén C, Lauer M, Verhoeff F (2010) Drying of biomass for second generation synfuel production. Biomass Bioenergy 34:1267–1277. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.04.005
González-Prieto SJ, Cabaneiro A, Villar MC, Carballas T, Carballas M (1996) Effect of soil characteristics on N mineralization capacity in 112 native and agricultural soils from the northwest of Spain. Biol Fertil Soils 22:252–260. doi:10.1007/BF00382521
Herrmann A, Rath J (2012) Biogas production from maize: current state, challenges and prospects. 1. Methane yield potential. Bioenergy Res 5:1027–1042. doi:10.1007/s12155-012-9202-6
Hoskinson RL, Karlen DL, Birrell SJ, Radtke CW, Wilhelm WW (2007) Engineering, nutrient removal, and feedstock conversion evaluations of four corn stover harvest scenarios. Biomass Bioenergy 31:126–136. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2006.07.006
Houlton B, Boyer E, Finzi A, Galloway J, Leach A, Liptzin D, Melillo J, Rosenstock T, Sobota D, Townsend A (2013) Intentional versus unintentional nitrogen use in the United States: trends, efficiency and implications. Biogeochem 114:11–23. doi:10.1007/s10533-012-9801-5
Kutka FJ, Smith ME (2007) How many parents give the highest yield in predicted synthetic and composite populations of maize? Crop Sci 47:1905–1913. doi:10.2135/cropsci2006.12.0802sc
Ladha JK, Pathak H, Krupnik T, Six J, van Kessel C (2005) In: Donald LS (ed) Efficiency of fertilizer nitrogen in cereal production: retrospects and prospects. Advances in agronomy, 1st edn. Elsevier, New York, pp 85–156
Lafitte HR, Edmeades GO (1994) Improvement for tolerance to low soil nitrogen in tropical maize I. Selection criteria. Field Crops Res 39:1–14. doi:10.1016/0378-4290(94)90066-3
Obernberger I, Brunner T, Bärnthaler G (2006) Chemical properties of solid biofuels—significance and impact. Biomass Bioenergy 30:973–982. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2006.06.011
Pordesimo LO, Hames BR, Sokhansanj S, Edens WC (2005) Variation in corn stover composition and energy content with crop maturity. Biomass Bioenergy 28:366–374. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2004.09.003
Reijnders L (2010) Transport biofuel yields from food and lignocellulosic C4 crops. Biomass Bioenergy 34:152–155. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2009.10.004
Schittenhelm S (2008) Chemical composition and methane yield of maize hybrids with contrasting maturity. Eur J Agron 29:72–79. doi:10.1016/j.eja.2008.04.001
Searcy E, Flynn PC (2010) A criterion for selecting renewable energy processes. Biomass Bioenergy 34:798–804. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.01.023
Sultana A, Kumar A (2011) Optimal configuration and combination of multiple lignocellulosic biomass feedstocks delivery to a biorefinery. Bioresour Technol 102:9947–9956. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2011.07.119
Tao G, Geladi P, Lestander TA, Xiong S (2012) Biomass properties in association with plant species and assortments. II: A synthesis based on literature data for ash elements. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16:3507–3522. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2012.01.023
Tilman D, Cassman KG, Matson PA, Naylor R, Polasky S (2002) Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature 418:671–677. doi:10.1038/nature01014
Wang L, Shahbazi A, Hanna MA (2011) Characterization of corn stover, distiller grains and cattle manure for thermochemical conversion. Biomass Bioenergy 35:171–178. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.08.018
Xiong S, Zhang Y, Zhuo Y, Lestander TA, Geladi P (2010) Variations in fuel characteristics of corn (Zea mays) stovers: General spatial patterns and relationships to soil properties. Renew Energy 35:1185–1191. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2009.11.032
Zhao W, Li Z, Wang D, Zhu Q, Sun R, Meng B, Zhao G (2008) Combustion characteristics of different parts of corn straw and NO formation in a fixed bed. Bioresour Technol 99:2956–2963. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2007.06.030
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by Cespa S.A. (Spanish company working on waste management and biomass-to-energy conversion), the Castilla-La Mancha Government (project POII10-0128-1789), and the Xunta de Galicia (through the Parga Pondal program and project 09MRU033403PR). The authors also thank INORDE for its participation in the project. B. Ordas thanks Serafin Gonzalez-Prieto for his valuable help.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Serrano, C., Monedero, E., Portero, H. et al. Efficient biofuel production from traditional maize under low input. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 34, 561–567 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-013-0174-5
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-013-0174-5