Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Niche overlap and host specificity in parasitic Maculinea butterflies (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) as a measure for potential extinction risks under climate change

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Organisms Diversity & Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Species depending on specific biotic interactions are particularly threatened by environmental changes. Therefore, host dependency in species living in parasitic relationships is acknowledged as a crucial factor increasing climatic susceptibility and species decline. In Maculinea butterflies and Myrmica ants, a complex form of social parasitism brings the butterflies into dependency of some few associated ant species for reproductive success. We evaluated to what extent these relations can be attributed to similarity in their climatic niches and whether alterations in niche overlap might foster the climatic susceptibility in Maculinea butterflies under future climate change. We show that the niches of ants and butterflies differ significantly more than expected at random corresponding to the observed flexibility in host exploitation. Moreover, a generally low degree of niche overlap and similar niche overlap scores between main and secondary host associations argue for a low host specificity of Maculinea butterflies. Pronounced range shifts and habitat retractions in all species will result in severe spatial limitations of Maculinea species by the presence of their hosts. No tightening in any of the host-parasite associations was detected under the pressure of range restrictions. Niche overlap scores remain comparably low in future scenarios and call for the possibility of extensive host shifts between all related species. Therefore, the absence of niche constraints might enable the parasites to extensively shift among hosts to allow the co-occurrence of several Maculinea species, in principle using the same host, and to maintain viable populations under the pressure of limited distributions and changing environments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akino, T., Knapp, J. J., Thomas, J. A., & Elmes, G. W. (1999). Chemical mimicry and host specificity in the butterfly Maculinea rebeli, a social parasite of Myrmica ant colonies. Proceedings of the Royal Society London Series B, 266, 1419–1426.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Als, T. D., Nash, D. R., & Boomsma, J. J. (2001). Adoption of parasitic Maculinea alcon caterpillars (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) by three Myrmica ant species. Animal Behaviour, 62, 99–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Als, T. D., Nash, D. R., & Boomsma, J. J. (2002). Geographical variation in host-ant specificity of the parasitic butterfly Maculinea alcon in Denmark. Ecological Entomology, 27, 403–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Als, T. D., Vila, R., Kandul, N. P., Nash, D. R., Yen, S.-H., Hsu, Y.-F., Mignault, A. A., Boomsma, J. J., & Pierce, N. E. (2004). The evolution of alternative parasitic life histories in large blue butterflies. Nature, 432, 386–390.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Araújo, M. B., Pearson, R. G., Thuiller, W., & Erhard, M. (2005). Validation of species–climate impact models under climate change. Global Change Biology, 11, 1504–1513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balletto, E., Bonelli, S., Settele, J., Thomas, J. A., Verovnik, R., & Wahlberg, N. (2010). Case 3508: Maculinea Van Eecke, 1915 (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae): proposed precedence over Phengaris Doherty, 1891. Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature, 67, 129–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaumont, L. J., Hughes, L., & Poulsen, M. (2005). Predicting species distributions: use of climatic parameters in BIOCLIM and its impact on predictions of species’ current and future distributions. Ecological Modelling, 186, 250–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bink, F. A. (1992). Ecologische Atlas van de Dagvlinders van Noordwest-Europa. Haarlem: Schuyt & Co. Uitgevers en Importeurs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broennimann, O., Fitzpatrick, M. C., Pearman, P. B., Petitpierre, B., Pellisier, L., Yoccoz, N. G., Thuiller, W., Fortin, M.-J., Randin, C., Zimmermann, N. E., Graham, C. H., & Guisan, A. (2012). Measuring ecological niche overlap from occurrence and spatial environmental data. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 21, 481–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busby, J. R. (1991). BIOCLIM—a bioclimate analysis and prediction system. Plant Protection Quarterly, 6, 8–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, I., Hill, J. K., Ohlemuller, R., Roy, D. B., & Thomas, C. D. (2011). Rapid range shifts of species associated with high levels of climate warming. Science, 333, 1024–1026.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Devictor, V., van Swaay, C., Brereton, T., Brotons, L., Chamberlain, D., Heliölä, J., Herrando, S., Julliard, R., Kuussaari, M., Lindström, Å., Reif, J., Roy, D. B., Schweiger, O., Settele, J., Stefanescu, C., van Strien, A., van Turnhout, C., Vermouzek, Z., Wallis De Vries, M., Wynhoff, I., & Jiguet, F. (2012). Differences in the climatic debts of birds and butterflies at a continental scale. Nature Climate Change, 2, 121–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elith, J., & Leathwick, J. R. (2009). Species distribution models: ecological explanation and prediction across space and time. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 40, 677–697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elith, J., Phillips, S. J., Hastie, T., Dudík, M., Chee, Y. E., & Yates, C. J. (2011). A statistical explanation of MaxEnt for ecologists. Diversity and Distributions, 17, 43–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elmes, R. R., & Thomas, J. A. (1992). Complexity of species conservation in managed habitats: interaction between Maculinea butterflies and their ant hosts. Biodiversity and Conservation, 1, 155–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elmes, G. W., Thomas, J. A., Hammarsted, O., Munguira, M. L., Martin, J., & van der Made, J. (1994). Differences in host-ant specificity between Spanish, Dutch and Swedish populations of the endangered butterfly, Maculinea alcon (Denis et Schiff.) (Lepidoptera). Memorabilia Zoologica, 48, 55–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elmes, G. W., Thomas, J. A., Wardlaw, J. C., Hochberg, M. E., Clarke, R. T., & Simcox, D. J. (1998). The ecology of Myrmica ants in relation to the conservation of Maculinea butterflies. Journal of Insect Conservation, 2, 67–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elmes, G. W., Akino, T., Thomas, J. A., Clarke, R. T., & Knapp, J. J. (2002). Intespecific differences in cuticular hydrocarbon profiles of Myrmica ants are sufficiently consistent to explain host specificity by Maculinea (large blue) butterflies. Oecologia, 130, 525–535.

  • Elmes, G. W., Wardlaw, J. C., Schönrogge, K., Thomas, J. A., & Clarke, R. T. (2004). Food stress causes differential survival of socially parasitic caterpillars of Maculinea rebeli integrated in colonies of host and non-host Myrmica ant species. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 110, 53–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiedler, K. (1991). Systematic, evolutionary, and ecological implications of myrmecophily within the Lycaenidae (Insecta: Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea). Bonn Zoological Monographs, 31, 1–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiedler, K., Hölldobler, B., & Seufert, P. (1996). Butterflies and ants: the communicative domain. Experientia, 52, 14–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Foden, W. B., Butchart, S. H. M., Stuart, S. N., Vié, J.-C., Akçakaya, R. H., Angulo, A., DeVantier, L. M., Gutsche, A., Turak, E., Cao, L., Donner, S. D., Katariya, V., Bernard, R., Holland, R. A., Hughes, A. F., O’Hanlon, S. E., Garnett, S. T., Sekercioğlu, C. H., & Mace, G. M. (2013). Identifying the world’s most climate change vulnerable species: a systematic trait-based assessment of all birds, amphibians and corals. PLoS One, 8, e65427.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Foitzik, S., Fischer, B., & Heinze, J. (2003). Arms races between social parasites and their hosts: geographic patterns of manipulation and resistance. Behavioral Ecology, 14, 80–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, J. (2009). Mapping species distributions: spatial inference and prediction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fric, Z., Wahlberg, N., Pech, P., & Zrzavy’, J. (2007). Phylogeny and classification of the Phengaris-Maculinea clade (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae): total evidence and phylogenetic species concepts. Systematic Entomology, 32, 558–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, Ø., Harper, D. A. T., & Ryan, P. D. (2001). PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica, 4, 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heikkinen, R. K., Luoto, M., Araújo, M. B., Virkkala, R., Thuiller, W., & Sykes, M. T. (2006). Methods and uncertainties in bioclimatic envelope modelling under climate change. Progress in Physical Geography, 30, 751–777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez, P. A., Graham, C. H., Master, L. L., & Albert, D. L. (2006). The effect of sample size and species characteristics on performance of different species distribution modelling methods. Ecography, 29, 773–785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hijmans, R.J., Guarino, L., & Rojas, E. (2002). DIVA-GIS. A geographic information system for the analysis of biodiversity data. Manual. Lima: International Potato Center.

  • Hijmans, R. J., Cameron, S. E., Parra, J. L., Jones, P. G., & Jarvis, A. (2005). Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. International Journal of Climatology, 25, 1965–1978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2007) Summary for policymakers. Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Ed. M.L. Parry, O.F. Canziani, J.P. Palutikof, P.J. Van der Linden, & C.E. Hanson). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

  • IUCN (2007) 2007 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. www.iucn-redlist.org. Accessed May 2014.

  • Jansen, G., Vepsäläinen, K., & Savolainen, R. (2011). A phylogenetic test of the parasite-host association between Maculinea butterflies (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) and Myrmica ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). European Journal of Entomology, 108, 53–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaltz, O., & Shykoff, J. A. (1998). Local adaptation in host–parasite systems. Heredity, 81, 361–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohn, A. J., & Riggs, A. C. (1982). Sample size dependence in measures of proportional similarity. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 9, 147–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kudrna, O., Lux, K., Pennerstorfer, J., Schweiger, O., Settele, J., & Wiemers, M. (2011). Distribution atlas of butterflies in Europe. Halle: Gesellschaft für Schmetterlingsschutz e.V.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morán-Ordóñez, A., Suárez-Seoane, S., Elith, J., Calvo, L., & de Luis, E. (2012). Satellite surface reflectance improves habitat distribution mapping: a case study on heath and shrub formations in the Cantabrian Mountains (NW Spain). Diversity and Distributions, 18, 588–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munguira, M. L., & Martín, J. (Eds.). (1999). Action plan for the Maculinea butterflies in Europe, Nature and Environment, No 97. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, D. R., Als, T. D., Maile, R., Jones, G. R., & Boomsma, J. J. (2008). A mosaic of chemical coevolution in a large blue butterfly. Science, 319, 88–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parmesan, C. (2006). Ecological and evolutionary responses to recent climate change. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 37, 637–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, T. A., Soberón, J., Pearson, R. G., Anderson, R. P., Martínez-Meyer, E., Nakamura, M., & Araújo, M. B. (2011). Ecological niches and geographic distributions. Oxford: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, S. J., & Dudík, M. (2008). Modeling of species distributions with Maxent: new extensions and a comprehensive evaluation. Ecography, 31, 161–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, S. J., Anderson, R. P., & Schapire, R. E. (2006). Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecological Modelling, 190, 231–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ridley, M. (2004). Evolution. Oxford: Blackwell Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rödder, D., & Engler, J. O. (2011). Quantitative metrics of overlaps in Grinnellian niches, advances and possible drawbacks. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 20, 915–927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schönrogge, K., Barr, B., Napper, E., Breen, J., Gardner, M. G., Elmes, G. E., & Thomas, J. A. (2002). When rare species become endangered: cryptic speciation in myrmecophilous hoverflies. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 75, 291–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schönrogge, K., Wardlaw, J. C., Peters, A. J., Everett, S., Thomas, J. A., & Elmes, G. W. (2004). Changes in chemical signature and host specificity from larval retrieval to full social integration in the myrmecophilous butterfly Maculinea rebeli. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 30, 91–107.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schweiger, O., Settele, J., Kudrna, O., Klotz, S., & Kühn, I. (2008). Climate change can cause spatial mismatch of trophically interacting species. Ecology, 89, 3472–3479.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Settele, J., & Kühn, E. (2009). Insect Conservation. Science, 325, 41–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Settele, J., Feldmann, R., & Reinhardt, R. (1999). Die Tagfalter Deutschlands-Ein Handbuch für Freilandökologen, Umweltplaner und Naturschützer. Stuttgart: Ulmer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Settele, J., Thomas, J. A., Boomsma, J., Kühn, E., Nash, D., Anton, C., Woyciechowski, M., & Varga, Z. (2002). MACulinea butterflies of the habitats directive and European red list as indicators and tools for conservation and MANagment (MacMan). Verhandlungen der Gesellschaft für Ökologie, 32, 63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sielezniew, M., Rutkowski, R., Ponikwi-Cka-Tyszko, D., Ratkiewicz, M., Dziekańska, I., & Švitra, G. (2012). Differences in genetic variability between two ecotypes of the endangered myrmecophilous butterfly Phengaris (=Maculinea) alcon—the setting of conservation priorities. Insect Conservation and Diversity, 5, 223–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swets, K. (1988). Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science, 240, 1285–1293.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tartally, A. & Varga, Z. (2005). Host-ant specificity of Maculinea species in Hungary: connections with parasitoids and host ants. In E. Kühn, R. Feldmann, J. Thomas & J. Settele (Eds.), Studies on the ecology and conservation of butterflies in Europe. Vol. II. Species ecology along a European gradient: Maculinea butterflies as a model (pp. 94–98). Conference Proceedings UFZ Leipzig-Halle, December 2005.

  • Tartally, A., & Varga, Z. (2008). Host ant use of Maculinea teleius in the Carpathian basin (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, 54, 257–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tartally, A., Nash, D. R., Lengyel, S., & Varga, Z. (2008). Patterns of host ant use by sympatric populations of Maculinea alcon and M. ‘rebeli’ in the Carpathian Basin. Insectes Sociaux, 55, 370–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tartally, A., Koschuh, A., & Varga, Z. (2014). The re-discovered Maculinea rebeli (Hirschke, 1904): host ant usage, parasitoid and initial food plant around the type locality with taxonomical aspects (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae). ZooKeys, 406, 25–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J. A. & Wardlaw, J. C. (1992). The capacity of a Myrmica ant nest to support a predacious species of Maculinea butterfly. Oecologia, 91, 101–109.

  • Thomas, J. A., & Settele, J. (2004). Evolutionary biology: butterfly mimics of ants. Nature, 432, 283–284.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J. A., Elmes, G. W., Wardlaw, J. C., & Woyciechowski, M. (1989). Host specificity among Maculinea butterflies in Myrmica ant nests. Oecologia, 79, 452–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J. A., Clarke, R. T., Elmes, G. W., & Hochberg M. E. (1998). Population dynamics in the genus Maculinea (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). In J. D. Dempster and I. F. G. McLean (Eds.), Insect populations (pp. 262–291). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academica Publisher.

  • Thomas, J. A., Telfer, M. G., Roy, D. B., Preston, C. D., Greenwood, J. J. D., Asher, J., Fox, R., Clarke, R. T., & Lawton, J. H. (2004). Comparative losses of British butterflies, birds, and plants and the global extinction crisis. Science, 303, 1879–1881.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J.A., Schönrogge, K., & Elmes, G.W. (2005). Specializations and host associations of social parasites of ants. Insect evolutionary ecology. Reading, UK: Proceedings of the Royal Entomological Society’s 22nd Symposium.

  • Thomas, J. A., Simcox, D. J., & Clarke, R. T. (2009). Successful conservation of a threatened Maculinea butterfly. Science, 325, 80–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, C. D., Hill, J. K., Anderson, B. J., Bailey, S., Beale, C. M., Bradbury, R. B., Bulman, C. R., Crick, H. Q. P., Eigenbrod, F., Griffiths, H. M., Kunin, W. E., Oliver, T. H., Walmsley, C. A., Watts, K., Worsfold, N. T., & Yardley, T. (2011). A framework for assessing threats and benefits to species responding to climate change. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 2, 125–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J. A., Elmes, G. W., Sielezniew, M., Stankiewicz-Fiedurek, A., Simcox, D. J., Settele, J., & Schönrogge, K. (2012). Mimetic host shifts in an endangered social parasite of ants. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 280, 20122336. doi:10.1098/rspb.2012.2336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ugelvig, L. V., Vila, R., Pierce, N. E., & Nash, D. R. (2011). A phylogenetic revision of the Glaucopsyche section (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae), with special focus on the Phengaris-Maculinea clade. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 61, 237–243.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van Swaay, C., Maes, D., Collins, S., Munguira, M. L., Sasic’, M., Settele, J., Verovnik, R., Warren, M., Wiemers, M., Wynhoff, I., & Cuttelod, A. (2011). Applying IUCN criteria to invertebrates: how red is the Red List of European butterflies? Biological Conservation, 144, 470–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, D. L., Glor, R. E., & Turelli, M. (2008). Environmental niche equivalency versus conservatism. Quantitative approaches to niche evolution. Evolution, 62, 2868–2883.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, D. L., Glor, R. E., & Turelli, M. (2010). ENMTools: a toolbox for comparative studies of environmental niche models. Ecography, 33, 607–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R. J., & Maclean, I. M. D. (2011). Recent evidence for the climate change threat to Lepidoptera and other insects. Journal of Insect Conservation, 15, 259–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wisz, M. S., Hijmans, R. J., Peterson, A. T., Graham, C. H., Guisan, A., & NPSDW Group. (2008). Effects of sample size on the performance of species distribution models. Diversity and Distributions, 14, 763–773.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wynhoff, I. (1998). The recent distribution of the European Maculinea species. Journal of Insect Conservation, 2, 15–27.

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank James Wetterer and András Tartally for kindly providing occurrence records of Myrmica species. Moreover, we are grateful to Zoltán Varga for valuable comments on an earlier version of this manuscript. This study was funded by the Friedrich Ebert Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Museum of Natural History Dortmund, Münsterstraße 271, 44145, Dortmund, Germany

    Katharina J. Filz

  2. Department of Biogeography, Trier University, Universitätsring 15, 54296, Trier, Germany

    Katharina J. Filz & Thomas Schmitt

  3. Senckenberg German Entomological Institute, Eberswalder Straße 90, 15374, Müncheberg, Germany

    Thomas Schmitt

  4. Entomology, Department of Zoology, Institute of Biology, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, 06099, Halle, Germany

    Thomas Schmitt

Authors
  1. Katharina J. Filz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Thomas Schmitt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katharina J. Filz.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Online Resource 1

List of occurrence records of butterfly and ant taxa used for modelling. Coordinates are rounded to the second decimal place. (PDF 54 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Filz, K.J., Schmitt, T. Niche overlap and host specificity in parasitic Maculinea butterflies (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) as a measure for potential extinction risks under climate change. Org Divers Evol 15, 555–565 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13127-015-0210-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13127-015-0210-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation