Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Butterflies and ants: The communicative domain

  • Published:
Experientia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Associations with ants, termed myrmecophily, are widespread in the butterfly family Lycaenidae and range from mere co-existence to more or less specific mutualistic or even parasitic interactions. Secretions of specialized epidermal glands are crucial for mediating the interactions. Transfer of nutrients (carbohydrates, amino acids) from butterfly larvae to ants plays a major role, but manipulative communication with the help of odour signals is also involved. By means of myrmecophily, lycaenid butterflies largely escape ant predation, and certain species gain protection through attendant ants or achieve developmental benefits from ant-attendance. Benefits to the ants range from minimal to substantial food rewards. While most lycaenid species maintain facultative relationships with a variety of ant genera, highly specific and obligatory associations have convergently evolved in a number of butterfly lineages. As a corollary, communication systems are largely unspecific in the former, but may be highly specialized in the latter. The sophisticated communication between obligate myrmecophiles and their host ants is tightly connected with the evolutionary rise of specialized life-cycles and thus is a source of augmenting diversity within the butterflies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  1. Ackery, P. R., Biocontrol potential of African lycaenid butterflies entomophagous on Homoptera. J. Afr. Zool.104 (1990) 581–591.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Agosti, D., Revision of the Oriental ant genusCladomyrma, with an outline of the higher classification of the Formicinae (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Syst. Ent.16 (1991) 293–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Atsatt, P. R., Lycaenid butterflies and ants: selection for enemy-free space. Am. Nat.118 (1981) 638–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Atsatt, P. R., Ant-dependent food plant selection of the mistletoe butterflyOgyris amaryllis (Lycaenidae). Oecologia48 (1981) 60–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ballmer, G. R., and Pratt G. F., Quantification of ant attendance (myrmecophily) of lycaenid larvae. J. Res. Lepid.30 (1992) 95–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Baylis, M., and Pierce, N. E., The effects of ant mutualism on the foraging and diet of lycaenid caterpillars, in: Caterpillars — ecological and evolutionary constraints on foraging, pp. 404–421. Eds. N. E. Stamp and T. M. Casey. Chapman and Hall, New York/London 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Burghardt, F., Untersuchungen zum Einfluß der Futterqualität auf die Myrmekophilie von Bläulingsraupen. Diplom thesis, University of Würzburg, 1994.

  8. Callaghan, C. J., Notes on the biology of a myrmecophilous African lycaenid,Aphnaeus adamsi Stempffer (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae). Bull. Soc. ent. Fr.97 (1993) 339–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cammaerts, R., Stimuli inducing the regurgitation of the workers ofLasius flavus (Formicidae) upon the myrmecophilous beetleClaviger testaceus (Pselaphidae). Behav. Proc.28 (1992) 81–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cammaerts, R., and Cammaerts, M.-C., Response of the myrmecophilous beetleEdaphopaussus favieri (Carabidae, Paussinae) to 3-ethyl-2,5-dimethylpyrazine, the only known component of its host trail pheromone, in: Biology and evolution of social insects, pp. 211–216. Ed. J. Billen Leuven University Press, Leuven 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cammaerts, R., Detrain, C., and Cammaerts, M.-C., Host trail following by the myrmecophilous beetleEdaphopaussus favieri (Fairmaire) (Carabidae Paussinae). Insect Soc.37 (1990) 200–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Claassens, A. J. M., and Dickson, C. G. C., A study of the myrmecophilous behaviour of the immature stages ofAloeides thyra (L.) (Lep: Lycaenidae) with special reference to the function of the retractile tubercles and with additional notes on the general biology of the species. Ent. Rec. J. Var.89 (1977) 225–231.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cottrell, C. B., Aphytophagy in butterflies: its relationship to myrmecophily. Zool. J. Linn. Soc.79 (1984) 1–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cottrell, C. B., The extraordinaryLiphyra butterfly. Transv. Mus. Bull.22 (1987) 5–12.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cushman, J. H., Rashbrook V. K., and Beattie, A. J., Assessing benefits to both participants in a lycaenid-ant association. Ecology75 (1994) 1031–1041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dejean, A., Nkongmeneck, B., Corbara, B., and Djieto-Lordon, C., Impact des fourmis arboricoles sur une pullulation d'Achaea catocaloides (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae) dans des plantations de cacaoyers du Cameroun, et étude de leurs Homoptères associés. Act. Oecol.12 (1991) 471–488.

    Google Scholar 

  17. DeVries, P. J., The larval ant-organs ofThisbe irenea (Lepidoptera: Riodinidae) and their effects upon attending ants. Zool. J. Linn. Soc.94 (1988) 379–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. DeVries, P. J., Enhancement of symbioses between butterfly caterpillars and ants by vibrational communication. Science248 (1990) 1104–1106.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. DeVries, P. J., Call production by myrmecophilous riodinid and lycaenid butterfly caterpillars (Lepidoptera): morphological, acoustical, functional, and evolutionary patterns. Am. Mus. Novit3025 (1991) 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  20. DeVries, P. J., Evolutionary and ecological patterns in myrmecophilous riodinid butterflies, in: Ant-plant interactions, pp. 143–156. Eds. C. R. Huxley and D. F. Cutler, Oxford University Press, Oxford 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  21. DeVries, P. J., Mutualism betweenThisbe irenea butterflies and ants, and the role of ant ecology in the evolution of larval-ant associations. Biol. J. Linn. Soc.43 (1991) 179–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. DeVries, P. J., Thomas, J. A., and Cocroft, R., A comparison of acoustical signals betweenMaculinea butterfly caterpillars and their obligate host ant species. Biol. J. Linn. Soc.49 (1993) 229–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Downey, J. C., Thrips utilize exudations of Lycaenidae. Ent. News76 (1965) 25–27.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Downey, J. C., and Allyn, A. C., Butterfly ultrastructure. 1. Sound production and associated abdominal structures in pupae of Lycaenidae and Riodinidae. Bull. Allyn Mus.14 (1973) 1–47.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Downey, J. C., and Allyn, A. C., Sounds produced in pupae of Lycaenidae. Bull. Allyn Mus.48 (1978) 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ehrhardt, R., Über die Biologie und Histologie der myrmekophilen Organe vonLycaena orion. Ber. naturf. Ges. Freiburg20 (1914) 90–98.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Elfferich, N. W., Enige opmerkingen over de biologie vanPlebejus argus L. (Lep., Lycaenidae). Entomol. Ber. Amsterdam25 (1965) 26–31.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Elmes, G. W., Thomas, J. A., Hammarsted, O., Munguira, M. L., Martin, J., and van der Made, J. G., Differences in host-ant specificity between Spanish, Dutch and Swedish populations of the endangered butterfly,Maculinea alcon (Denis et Schiff.) (Lepidoptera). Memorabilia Zool.48 (1994 55–68.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Elmes, G. W., Thomas, J. A., and Wardlaw, J. C., Larvae ofMaculinea rebeli, a large-blue butterfly and theirMyrmica host ants: wild adoption and behaviour in ant-nests. J. Zool. Lond.223 (1991) 447–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Elmes, G. W., Wardlaw, J. C., and Thomas, J. A., Larvae ofMaculinea rebeli, a large-blue butterfly and theirMyrmica host ants: patterns of caterpillar growth and survival. J. Zool. Lond.224 (1991) 79–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Farquharson, C. O., Five years' observations (1914–1918) on the bionomics of Southern Nigerian insects, chiefly directed to the investigation of lycaenid life-histories and to the relation of Lycaenidae, Diptera, and other insects to ants (ed. E. B. Poulton). Trans. ent. Soc. Lond.1921 (1922) 319–448.

  32. Fiedler, K., Die Beziehungen von Bläulingspuppen (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) zu Ameisen (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Nachr. ent. Ver. Apollo Frankfurt, N. F.9 (1988) 33–58.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Fiedler, K., New information on the biology ofMaculinea nausithous andM. teleius (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Nota lepid.12 (1990) 246–256.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Fiedler, K., Effects of larval diet on the myrmecophilous qualities ofPolyommatus icarus caterpillars (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Oecologia83 (1990) 284–287.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Fiedler, K., Systematic, evolutionary, and ecological implications of myrmecophily within the Lycaenidae (Insecta: Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea). Bonner zool. Monogr.31 (1991) 1–210.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Fiedler, K., Lycaenid butterflies and plants: is myrmecophily associated with amplified hostplant diversity? Ecol. Ent.19 (1994) 79–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Fiedler, K., Lycaenid butterflies and plants: is myrmecophily associated with particular hostplant prefenreces. Ethol. Ecol. Evol.7 (1995) 107–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Fiedler, K., Life-history patterns of myrmecophilous butterflies and other insects: their implications on tropical species diversity, in: Proceedings of the international symposium on biodiversity and systematics in tropical ecosystems, in press Ed. H. Ulrich, Museum A. Koenig, Bonn 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Fiedler, K., and Hagemann, D. The influence of larval age and ant number on myrmecophilous interactions of the African Grass Blue butterfly,Zizeeria knysna (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). J. Res. Lepid.31 (1995) in press.

  40. Fiedler, K., and Hölldobler, B., Ants andPolyommatus icarus immatures (Lycaenidae) — sex-related developmental benefits and costs of ant attendance. Oecologia91 (1992) 468–473.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Fiedler, K., and Maschwitz, U., Functional analysis of the myrmecophilous relationships between ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and lycaenids (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). II. Lycaenid larvae as trophobiotic partners of ants — a quantitative approach. Oecologia75 (1988) 204–206.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Fiedler, K., and Maschwitz, U., Functional analysis of the myrmecophilous relationships between ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and lycaenids (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). III. New aspects of the function of the retractile tentacular organs of lycaenid larvae. Zool. Beitr. Berlin, N. F.31 (1988) 409–416.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Fiedler, K., and Maschwitz, U., Functional analysis of the myrmecophilous relationships between ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and lycaenids (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). I. Release of food recruitment in ants by lycaenid larvae and pupae. Ethology80 (1989) 71–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Fiedler, K., and Maschwitz, U., The symbiosis between the weaver ant,Oecophylla smaragdina, andAnthene emolus, an obligate myrmecophilous lycaenid butterfly. J. nat. Hist.23 (1989) 833–846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Fiedler, K., and Maschwitz, U., Adult myrmecophily in butterflies: the role of the antAnoplolepis longipes in the feeding and oviposition behaviour ofAllotinus unicolor. Tyô to Ga40 (1989) 241–251.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Fiedler, K., and Saam, C., Does ant-attendance influence development in 5 European Lycaenidae butterfly species? (Lepidoptera). Nota lepid.17 (1994) 5–24.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Fiedler, K., Schurian, K. G., and Hahn, M., The life-history and myrmecophily ofPolyommatus candalus (Herrich-Schäffer) from Turkey (Lep., Lycaenidae). Linneana Belg.14 (1994) 315–332.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Fiedler, K., Seufert, P., Pierce, N. E., Pearson, J. G., and Baumgarten, H.-T., Exploitation of lycaenid-ant mutualisms by braconid parasitoids. J. Res. Lepid. (in press).

  49. Gilbert, L. E., Adult resources in butterflies: African lycaenidMegalopalpus feeds on larval nectary. Biotropica8 (1976) 282–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Henning, S. F., Biological groups within the Lycaenidae (Lepidoptera). J. Entomol. Soc. Sth. Afr.46 (1983) 65–85.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Henning, S. F., Chemical communication between lycaenid larvae (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) and ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). J. entomol. Soc. sth. Afr.46 (1983) 341–366.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Heppner, J. B., Faunal regions and the diversity of Lepidoptera. Trop. Lepid.2 Suppl.1 (1991) 1–85.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Hill, C. J., The myrmecophilous organs ofArhopala madytus Fruhstorfer (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). J. Aust. entomol. Soc.32 (1993) 283–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Hinton, H. E., Myrmecophilous Lycaenidae and other Lepidoptera — a summary. Proc. Trans. sth. Lond., entomol. nat. Hist. Soc.1949–50 (1951) 111–175.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Hochberg, M. E., Clarke, R. T., Elmes, G. W., and Thomas, J. A., Population dynamic consequences of direct and indirect interactions involving a large blue butterfly and its plant and red ant hosts. J. Anim. Ecol.63 (1994) 375–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Hochberg, M., Thomas, J. A., and Elmes, G. W., A modelling study of the population dynamics of a large blue butterfly,Maculinea rebeli, a parasite of red ant ant nests. J. Anim. Ecol.61 (1992) 397–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Hölldobler, B., Zur Physiologie der Gast-Wirt-Beziehungen (Myrmecophilie) bei Ameisen. I. Das. Gastverhältnis derAtemeles-undLomechusa-Larven (Col. Staphylinidae) zuFormica (Hym. Formicidae). Z. vergl. Physiol.56 (1967) 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Hölldobler, B., Orientierungsmechanismen des AmeisengastesAtemeles (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae) bei der Wirtssuche. Zool. Anz. Suppl.33 (1969) 580–585.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Hölldobler, B., Host finding by oder in the myrmecophilic beetleAtemeles publicollis Bris. (Staphylinidae). Science166 (1969) 757–758.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Hölldobler, B., Zur Physiologie der Gast-Wirt-Beziehungen (Myrmecophilie) bei Ameisen. II. Das Gastverhältnis des imaginalenAtemeles pubicollis Bris. (Col. Staphylinidae) zuMyrmica andFormica (Hym. Formicidae). Z. vergl. Physiol.66 (1970) 215–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Hölldobler, B., Communication between ants and their guests. Scient. Am.1971 (March) (1971) 86–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Hölldobler, B., and Wilson, E. O., The ants. Harvard University Press 1990.

  63. Howard, R. W., Akre, R. D., and Garnett, W. B., Chemical mimicry in an obligate predator of carpenter ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Ann. ent. Soc. Am.83 (1990) 607–616.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Howard, R. W., Stanley-Samuelson, D. W., and Akre, R. D., Biosynthesis and chemical mimicry of cuticular hydrocarbons from the obligate predator,Microdon albicomatus Novak (Diptera: Syrphidae) and its ant prey,Myrmica incompleta Provancher (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). J. Kansas ent. Soc.63 (1990) 437–443.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Hummel, V., Untersuchungen zum Einfluß des Dauer einer Ameisenassoziation auf die Sekretabgabe und andere Myrmekophilieparameter der Raupen des BläulingsAricia agestis (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Diplom thesis, University of Würzburg, 1994.

  66. Ito, F., and Higashi, S., Variance of ant effects on the different life forms of moth caterpillars. J. Anim. Ecol.60 (1991) 327–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Jackson, T. H. E., The early stages of some African Lycaenidae (Lepidoptera), with an account of their larval habits. Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond.86 (1937) 201–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Jones, R. E., Ants, parasitoids, and the cabbage butterflyPieris rapae. J. Anim. Ecol.56 (1987) 739–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Jordano, D., and Thomas, C. D., Specificity of an ant-lycaenid interaction. Oecologia91 (1992) 431–438.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Jutzeler, D., Weibchen der BläulingsartLycaeides idas L. riechen ihre Wirtsameisen (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Mitt. ent. Ges. Basel. N. F.39 (1989): 95–118.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Jutzeler, D., Kann das Weibchen vonPlebejus argus (Linnaeus, 1761) Ameisen riechen? (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Mitt. ent. Ges. Basel, N. F.39 (1989) 150–159.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Kistner, D. H., The social insects' bestiary, in: Social insects, vol. 3, pp. 1–244. Ed. H. R. Hermann. Academic Press, New York 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Kitching, R. L., and Luke, B., The myrmecophilous organs of the larvae of some Brithis Lycaenidae (Lepidoptera): a comparative study. J. nat. Hist.19 (1985) 259–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Laine, K., and Niemelä, P., The influence of ants on the survival of mountain birches during anOporinia autumnata (Lep., Geometridae) outbreak. Oecologia47 (1980) 39–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Lamborn, W. A., On the relationship between certain West African insects, especially ants, Lycaenidae and Homoptera. Trans. ent. Soc. Lond.1913 (1914) 436–524.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Larsen, T. B., and Pittaway, A. R., Notes on the ecology, biology and taxonomy ofApharitis acamas (Klug) (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Ent. Gaz.33 (1982) 163–168.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Leimar, O., and Axén, A., Strategic behaviour in an interspecific mutualism: interactions between lycaenid larvae and ants. Anim. Behav.46 (1993) 1177–1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Mahdi, T., and Whittaker, J. B., Do birch trees (Betula pendula) grow better if foraged by wood ants?. J. Anim. Ecol.62 (1993) 101–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Malicky, H., Versuch einer Analyse der ökologischen Beziehungen zwischen Lycaeniden (Lepidoptera) und Formiciden (Hymenoptera). Tijdschr. Ent.112 (1969) 213–298.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Malicky, H., Unterschiede im Angriffsverhalten vonFormica-Arten (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) gegenüber Lycaenidenraupen (Lepidoptera). Insect Soc.17 (1970) 121–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Maschwitz, U., Fiala, B., Moog, J., and Saw, L. G., Two new myrmecophytic associations from the Malay Peninsula: ants of the genusCladomyrma (Formicidae, Camponotinae) as partners ofSaraca thaipingensis (Caesalpiniaceae) andCrypteronia griffithii (Crypteroniaceae). 1. Colony foundation and acquisition of trophobionts. Insect Soc.38 (1991) 27–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Maschwitz, U., Nässig, W. A., Dumpert, K., and Fiedler, K., Larval carnivory and myrmecoxeny, and imaginal myrmecophily in miletine lycaenids (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) on the Malay Peninsula. Tyô to Ga39 (1988) 167–181.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Maschwitz, U., Schroth, M., Hänel, H., and Tho, Y. P., Aspects of the larval biology of myrmecophilous lycaenids from West Malaysia. Nachr. ent. Ver. Apollo Frankfurt. N. F.6 (1985) 181–200.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Maschwitz, U., Wüst, M., and Schurian, K., Bläulingsraupen als Zuckerlieferanten für Ameisen. Oecologia18 (1975) 17–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Mathews, J. N. A., Aggregation and mutualism in insect herbivores. Dissertation, University of Oxford, 1993.

  86. Nash, D. R., Cost-benefit analysis of a mutualism between lycaenid butterflies and ants. Dissertation, University of Oxford, 1989.

  87. Peterson, M. A., The nature of ant attendance and the survival of larvalIcaricia acmon (Lycaenidae). J. Lepid. Soc.47 (1993) 8–16.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Pierce, N. E., The ecology and evolution of symbioses between lycaenid butterflies and ants. Dissertation. Harvard University, Cambridge/Massachusetts, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Pierce, N. E., Amplified species diversity: a case study of an Australian lycaenid butterfly and its attendant ants, in: The biology of butterflies, pp. 197–200. Eds. R. I. Vane-Wright and P. R. Ackery, Academic Press, London 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  90. Pierce, N. E., Lycaenid butterflies and ants: selection for nitrogen-fixing and other protein-rich food plants. Am. Nat.125 (1985) 888–895.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Pierce, N. E., The evolution and biogeography of associations between lycaenid butterflies and ants. Oxford Surv. Evol. Biol.4 (1987) 89–116.

    Google Scholar 

  92. Pierce, N. E., Butterfly-ant mutualisms, in: Towards a more exact ecology, pp. 299–324. Eds. P. J. Grubb and J. Whittaker. Blackwell Science Publishers, Oxford 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  93. Pierce, N. E., and Easteal, S., The selective advantage of attendant ants for the larvae of a lycaenid butterfly,Glaucopsyche lygdamus. J. Anim. Ecol.55 (1986) 451–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Pierce, N. E., and Elgar, M. A., The influence of ants on host plant selection byJalmenus evagoras, a myrmecophilous lycaenid butterfly. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol.16 (1985) 209–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Pierce, N. E., and Mead, P. S., Parasitoids as selective agents in the symbiosis between lycaenid butterfly larvae and ants. Science112 (1981) 1185–1187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Pierce, N. E., and Young, W. R., Lycaenid butterflies and ants: two-species stable equilibria in mutualistic, commensal, and parasitic interactions. Am. Nat.128 (1986) 216–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Pierce, N. E., Kitching, R. L., Buckley, R. C., Taylor, M. F. J., and Benbow, K. F., The costs and benefits of cooperation between the Australian lycaenid butterfly,Jalmenus evagoras, and its attendant ants. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol.21 (1987) 237–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Pierce, N. E., Nash, D. R., Baylis, M., and Carper, E. R. Variation in the attractiveness of lycaenid butterfly larvae to ants, in: Ant-plant interactions, pp. 131–142. Eds. C. R. Huxley and D. F. Cutler. Oxford University Press, Oxford 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  99. Pollard, E., and Yates, T. J., Monitoring butterflies for ecology and conservation. Chapman and Hall, London 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  100. Quinet, Y., and Pasteels, J. M., Trail following and stowaway behaviour of the myrmecophilous staphylinid beetle,Homoeusa acuminata, during foraging trips of its hostLasius fuliginosus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Insect Soc.42 (1995) 31–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Risch, S. J., and Carroll, C. R., Effect of a keystone predaceous ant,Solenopsis geminata, on arthropods in a tropical agroecosystem. Ecology63 (1982) 1979–1983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Rojo de la Paz, A., Two new cases of myrmecophily in the Lycaenidae (Lepidoptera): biology ofCigaritis zohra (Donzel, 1847) andCigaritis allardi (Oberthür, 1909) in Morocco. Nota lepid, Suppl.4 (1992) 14–17.

    Google Scholar 

  103. Samson, P. R., and O'Brien, C. F., Predation onOgyris genoveva (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) by meat ants. Aust. ent. Mag.8 (1981) 21.

    Google Scholar 

  104. Sanders, C. J., and Pang, A., Carpenter ants as predators of spruce budworm in the boreal forest of northwestern Ontario. Can. Ent.124 (1992) 1093–1100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  105. Scheper, M., van der Made, J., and Wynhoff, I.,Maculinea alcon: interactions between a myrmecophilous butterfly, its larval foodplant and its host ants. Proc. expl appl. Ent.5 (1995) in press.

  106. Schroth, M., and Maschwitz, U., Zur Larvalbiologie und Wirtsfundung vonMaculinea teleius (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae), einem Parasiten vonMyrmica laevinodis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Ent. Gener.9 (1984) 225–230.

    Google Scholar 

  107. Schurian, K. G., Fiedler, K., and Maschwitz, U., Parasitoids exploit secretions of myrmecophilous lycaenid butterfly caterphillars (Lycaenidae). J. Lepid. Soc.47 (1993) 150–154.

    Google Scholar 

  108. Seufert, P., and Fiedler, K.,Drupadia ravindra andD. theda (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae): contrasting systems of myrmecophily among two closely related butterfly species, in: Les insectes sociaux, p. 275. Eds. A. Lenoir, G. Arnold and M. Lepage, Université Paris Nord, Paris 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  109. Shields, O., World numbers of butterflies. J. Lepid. Soc.43 (1989) 178–183.

    Google Scholar 

  110. Smiley, J. T., Atsatt, P. R., and Pierce, N. E., Local distribution of the lycaenid butterfly,Jalmenus evagoras, in response to host ants and plants. Oecologia76 (1988) 416–422.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Tautz, J., and Fiedler, K., Mechanoreceptive properties of caterpillar hairs involved in mediation of butterfly-ant symbioses. Naturwissenschaften79 (1992) 561–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  112. Thomas, J. A., The behaviour and habitat requirements ofMaculinea nausithous (the Dusky Large Blue Butterfly) andM. teleius (the Scarce Large Blue) in France. Biol. Conserv.28 (1984) 325–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  113. Thomas, J. A., Elmes, G. W., and Wardlaw, J. C., Contest competition amongMaculinea rebeli butterfly larvae in ant nests. Ecol. Ent.18 (1993) 73–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  114. Thomas, J. A., Elmes, G. W., Wardlaw, J. C., and Woyciechowski, M., Host specificity amongMaculinea butterflies inMyrmica ant nests. Oecologia79 (1989) 452–457.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. Thomas, J. A., and Wardlaw, J. C., The effect of queen ants on the survival ofMaculinea arion larvae inMyrmica ant nests. Oecologia85 (1990) 87–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  116. Thomas, J. A., and Wardlaw, J. C., The capacity of aMyrmica ant nest to support a predacious species ofMaculinea butterfly. Oecologia91 (1992) 101–109.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  117. Vander Meer, R. K., and Wojcik, D. P., Chemical mimicry in the myrmecophilous beetleMyrmecaphodius excavaticollis. Science218 (1982) 806–808.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  118. Vane-Wright, R. I., Ecological and behavioural orgins of diversity in butterflies, in: The diversity of insect faunas: pp. 56–70. Eds. L. A. Mound and N. Waloff. Academic Press. London 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  119. Viehmeyer, H., A myrmecophilous lycaenid chrysalis from the Philippines. Phillipp. J. Sci. D5 (1910) 73–77.

    Google Scholar 

  120. Wagner, D., Species-specific effects of tending ants on the development of lycaenid butterfly larvae. Oecologia96 (1993) 276–281.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  121. Wagner, D., Species-sepcific effects of tending ants on the life history ofHemiargus isola, a North American lycaenid butterfly. Dissertation, Princeton University, 1994.

  122. Warnecke, G., Übersicht über die bisher als myrmekophil bekannt gewordenen paläarktischen Schmetterlingsraupen der Familie Lycaenidae. Int. ent. Z. Guben26 (1932) 165–171, 215–219, 238–242, 285–291, 375–378, 431–433, 460–462, 479–480, 514–516;27 (1933) 44–46, 121–127, 178–180, 305–309.

    Google Scholar 

  123. Warrington, S., and Whittaker, J. B., An experimental field study of different levels of insect herbivory induced byFormica rufa predation on sycamore (Acer pseudoplatanus) I. Lepidoptera larvae. J. Anim. Ecol.22 (1985) 775–785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  124. Watkins, J. F., Gehlbach, F. R., and Baldridge, R. S., Ability of the blind snake,Leptotyphlops dulcis, to follow pheromone trails of army ants,Neivamyrmex nigrescens andN. opacithorax. Sthwest. Nat.12 (1967) 455–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  125. Wilson, E. O., The insect societies. Harvard University Press, Cambridge/ Massachusetts 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  126. Woodman, R. L., and Price, P. W., Differential larval predation by ants can influence willow sawfly community structure. Ecology73 (1992) 1028–1037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Lehrstuhl für Verhaltensphysiologie und Soziobiologie, Theodor-Boveri-Institut am Biozentrum der Universität, Am Hubland, D-97074, Würzburg, Germany

    K. Fiedler, B. Hölldobler & P. Seufert

Authors
  1. K. Fiedler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. B. Hölldobler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. P. Seufert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fiedler, K., Hölldobler, B. & Seufert, P. Butterflies and ants: The communicative domain. Experientia 52, 14–24 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01922410

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01922410

Key words

Search

Navigation