Abstract
This article analyzes the current trend towards online education. It examines some of the reasons for the trend and the ramifications it may have on students, faculty and institutions of higher learning. The success and profitability of online programs and institutions such as the University of Phoenix has helped to make the move towards online education more appealing to other institutions, as well as, helped to change how online education is viewed by the public. Reasons such as cost, accessibility and flexibility are often presented as motivations for why many students and institutions use online learning. However, the reasons behind the movement towards more online learning may be more motivated by capitalistic ideals associated with an ever increasingly knowledge-based economy than that of providing quality and more accessible education. The movement towards more online learning coupled with the increased corporatization of higher education may be helping to contribute to the commodification of knowledge and the changing role of institutions and education itself. Thus potentially leading to a state in which education is further transformed into a commodity, students becoming more like consumers, faculty into entrepreneurs, and institutions of higher learning into storefronts for knowledge.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams, J., & DeFleur, M. H. (2006). The acceptability of online degrees earned as a credential for obtaining employment. Communication Education, 55(1), 32–45.
Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2008). Staying the course: Online education in the United States. Needham, MA: Sloan Consortium.
Apollo Group, Inc. (2008). Annual report: The power of learning. Retrieved from http://www.apollogrp.edu/Annual-Reports/2008%20Annual%20Report.pdf.
Bartley, S. J., & Golek, J. H. (2004). Evaluating the cost effectiveness of online and face-to-face interaction. Educational Technology & Sociology, 7(4), 167–175.
Bear, J. B., & Bear, M. P. (2003). Bears’ guide to earning degrees by distance learning. Berkeley: Ten Speed Press.
Blair, K. L., & Monske, E. A. (2003). Cui Bono?: Revisiting the promises and perils of online learning. Computers and Composition, 20, 441–453.
Breneman, W. D. (n.d). The university of phoenix: Poster child of for-profit higher education. Retrieved from http://www.ncspe.org/publications_files/breneman.pdf.
Carnevale, D., & Olsen, F. (2003, June 13). How to succeed in distance education. The Chronicle of Higher Education, A31.
DeFleur, M. H., & Adams, J. (2004). Acceptability of online degrees as criteria for admission to graduate programs. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 16(1), 150–163.
Dolence, M., & Norris, D. (1995). Transforming higher education: A vision for learning in the 21st century. Ann Arbor, MI: Society for College and University Planning.
Education-Portal.com. (2009). Are state budget cuts affecting the quality of public higher education? Retrieved from http://educationportal.com/articles/Are_State_Budget_Cuts_Affecting_the_Quality_of_Public_Higher_Education.html.
El-Khawas, E. (1999). The “new” competition: Serving the learning society in an electronic age. Higher Education Management, 11(2), 7–17.
Flew, T. (1999). The virtual university: Mickey mouse or real learning? Australian Quarterly, 71(1), 34–41.
Giroux, H. A. (2002). Neoliberalism, corporate culture, and the promise of higher education: The university as a democratic public Sphere. Harvard Educational Review, 72(4), 425–463.
Giroux, H. A. (2003). Selling out higher education. Policy Futures in Education, 1(1), 179–200.
Giroux, H. A. (2009). Democracy’s nemesis: The rise of the corporate university. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 9(5), 669–695.
Gladieux, L., & Swail, W. S. (1999). The virtual university and educational opportunity: Panacea or false hope? Higher Education Management, 2, 43–56.
Grineski, S. (2000). I’ve a feeling we’re not in Kansas anymore: The commercialization and commodification of teaching and learning in higher education. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 20(1), 19–28.
Hanna, D. E. (1998). Higher education in an era of digital competition: Emerging organizational models. JALN, 2(1), 66–95.
Larreamendy-Joerns, J., & Leinhardt, G. (2006). Going the distance with online education. Review of Educational Research, 76(4), 567–605.
Lynch, A. (1996). Thought contagion. New York: Basic Books.
Lynch, K. (2006). Neo-liberalism and marketisation: The implication for higher education. European Educational Research Journal, 5(1), 1–17. doi:10.2304/eerj.2006.5.1.1.
Mangan, K. S. (1998, March 27). Corporate know-how lands presidencies for a growing number of business deans. The Chronicle of Higher Education, A43–A44.
Morey, A. I. (2004). Globalization and the emergence of for-profit higher education. Higher Education, 48, 131–150.
Noble, D. F. (1998a). Digital diploma mills, part 1: The automation of higher education. October, 86, 107–117.
Noble, D. F. (1998b). Digital diploma mills, part II: The coming battle over online instruction. Sociological Perspectives, 41(40), 815–825.
Noble, D. F. (2003). Digital diploma mills. In B. Johnson, P. Kavanagh, & K. Mattson (Eds.), Steal this university: The rise of the corporate university and the academic labor movement (pp. 33–47). New York: Routledge.
Parker, N. K. (2004). Chapter 16: The quality dilemma in online education. In T. Anderson & F. Elloumi (Eds.), Theory and practice of online learning (pp. 385–409). Athabasca, Canada: Athabasca University.
Pearlstein, S. (2003, December 17). The lesson colleges need to learn (p. E1). Washington Post.
Pina, A. A. (2010). Online diploma mills: Implications for legitimate distance education. Distance Education, 31(1), 121–126.
Postman, N. (1992). The broken defenses. In N. Postman (Ed.), Technopoly: The surrender of culture to technology (pp. 70–91). New York: Vintage Books.
Selfe, C. (1999). Literacy and technology linked the national project to expand technological literacy. In C. Selfe (Ed.), Technology and literacy in the twenty-first century: The importance of paying attention (pp. 3–24). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
Storey, V. A., & Tebes, M. L. (2008). Instructor’s privacy in distance (online) teaching: Where do you draw the line? Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 11(2). Retrieved from http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/summer112/storey112.html.
University of Phoenix. History. Retrieved from http://www.phoenix.edu/about_us/about_university_of_phoenix/history.html.
University of Phoenix. Transfer. Retrieved from http://www.phoenix.edu/admissions/transfer_information.html.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chau, P. Online higher education commodity. J Comput High Educ 22, 177–191 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-010-9039-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-010-9039-y