Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Equity, justice, and altruism

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

According to traditional equity theory, justice is motivated by selfishness. However, critics of equity have argued that it is only one rule of justice that people can apply, and that sometimes other rules of justice are used, such as equality and need, that appear to be altruistically based; that is, they involve sharing and caring in a way that ignores contributions or “inputs” and the probability of receiving outcomes in return. Disagreements have arisen, however, as to the status of these alternative rules as elements of justice, the roles of altruism and selfishness within them, and the relative status of altruism and justice as moral principles. The main aim of this article is to help resolve some of these difficulties by examining the relationship between altruism and justice from the perspective of Wagstaff s theory of Equity as Desert (EAD). This theory integrates a number of allocation rules (including those related to the treatment of offenders) with the concepts of equal opportunity and personal responsibility. One of the advantages of this position is that it enables a conceptual and an empirical distinction to be made between helping and responsiveness to need as altruistic norms, and helping and responsiveness to need as justice norms. It is concluded that there may be something to be gained from viewing core rules of justice in the form of EAD as the sophisticated descendants of the sociobiological concept of reciprocal altruism, that is, a set of algorithms designed to limit both unbridled selfishness and indiscrimi-nate altruism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, J.S. (1963). Toward an understanding of inequity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 422–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, J.S. (1965). Inequity and social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 2. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle (1984). Nichomachaen Ethics V. In B. J. Barnes (Ed.), The Complete Works of Aristotle. Guilford: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, W. and Walster, E. (1974). Reactions to confirmations and disconfirmations of expectancies of equity and inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 208–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, R. (1980a). Effective choice in the Prisoner's dilemma. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 24, 3–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, R. (1980b). More effective choice in the Prisoner's dilemma. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 24, 379–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, R. (1984). The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, J. (1993). Heuristics and biases in equity judgments: A utilitarian approach. In B.A. Meilers and J. Baron (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on justice: Theory and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, B. (1989). Theories of justice. Hemel Hempstead, Herts: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batson, C.D. (1987). Prosocial motivation: Is it ever truly altruistic? In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 20. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayley, J.E. (1981). Human nature and justice. In R.L. Braham (Ed.), Social Justice. Boston: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendor, J., Kramer, R.M., and Stout, S. (1991). When in doubt: Cooperation in a noisy prisoner's dilemma. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 35, 691–719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz, L. (1969). Resistance to improper dependence relationships. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 5, 283–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, R. and Richerson, P.J. (1992). Punishment allows the evolution of cooperation (or anything else) in sizeable groups. Ethology and Sociobiology, 13, 171–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brabant, J. and Lerner, M.J. (1975). ‘A little time and effort’—Who deserves what from whom? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1,177–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, T. (1988). Justice: Issues in Political Thoery. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cashdan, E. (1989). Hunters and gatherers: Economic behavior in bands. In S. Plattner (Ed.), Economic anthropology, 31–48. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cialdini, R.B., Schaller, M., Houlihan, D., Arps, K., Fultz, J. and Beaman, A.L. (1987). Empathy based helping: Is it selflessly or selfishly motivated? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 749–758.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock, T.H. and Parker, G.A. (1995). Punishment in animal societies. Nature, 373, 209–216.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R.L. (1982). Perceiving justice: An attributional perspective. In J. Greenberg and Cohen, R.L. (Eds.), Equity and justice in social behavior. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R.L. and Greenberg, J. (1982). The justice concept in social psychology. In J. Greenberg, and R.L. Cohen, (Eds.), Equity and justice in social behavior. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colby, A. and Kohlberg, L. (1987). The measurement of moral judgment—Volume 1—Theoretical foundations and research validation. London: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosmides, L. and Tooby, J. (1992). Cognitive adaptations for social exchange. In J.H. Barlow, L. Cosmides and J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, R., Jones, P. A. and Card, R. (1988). Introduction to criminal law. London: Butterworths.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R. (1976). The selfish gene. London: Oxford University Press,

    Google Scholar 

  • de Waal, F. (1989). Chimpanzee politics: Power and sex among apes. London: John Hopkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desmarais, S. and Lerner, M.J. (1994). Entitlement in close relationships: A justice-motive analysis. In M.J. Lerner and G. Mikula (Eds.), Entitlement and the affectional bond: Justice in close relationships. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M. (1975). Equity, equality and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis of distributive justice? Journal of Social Issues, 31, 137–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M. (1983). Current social psychological perspectives on justice. European Journal of Social Psychology, 13,305–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M. (1985). Distributive justice: A social psychological perspective. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, C. (1981). Justice as desert. In R.L. Braham (Ed.), Social justice. Boston: M. Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, G.C. and Meeker, B.F. (1986). Achieving fairness in the face of competing concerns: The different effects of individual and group characteristics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 754–760.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg, J. (1970). Doing and deserving, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fogerty, M. (1961). The just wage. London: Geoffrey Chapman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folger, R., Sheppard, B.H. and Buttram, R.T. (1995). Equity, equality and need: Three faces of social justice. In B.B. Bunker and J.Z. Rubin (Eds.), Conflict, cooperation and justice: Essays inspired by the work of Morton Deutsch. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, R.L. (1968). Freewill and Determinism. London: Routledge and Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furby, L. (1986). Psychology and justice. In R.L. Cohen (Ed.), Justice: Views from the social sciences. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A. (1982). Why are the poor always with us? Explanations for poverty in Britain. British Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 311–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, K.J. (1969). The psychology of behavior exchange. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, W.D. (1964). The genetical theory of social behaviour (1 and 2). Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7, 1–16; 17-32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R.J. (1983). Pinning down the equity formula. In D.M. Messick and K.S. Cook (Eds.), Equity theory: Psychological and sociological perspectives. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R.J. (1993). Two insights occasioned by attempts to pin down the equity formula. In B.A. Meilers and J. Baron (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on justice: Theory and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, H.L.A. (1968). Punishment and responsibility. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatfield, E., Utne, M.K. and Traupman, J. (1979). Equity theory and intimate relationships. In R.L. Burgess and T.L. Huston (Eds.), Social exchange in developing relationships. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, R. and Emler, N.P. (1981). Retributive justice. In M.J. Lerner and S.C. Lerner (Eds.). The justice motive in social behavior. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hospers (1961). Human Conduct: An Introduction to the Problems of Ethics. New York: Harcourt Brace and World.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huxley, T.H. (1911). Evolution and ethics and other essays. London: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1963). Lectures on Ethics. Translated by L. Infield. New York: Harper Written 1775-1780.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karniol, R. and Miller, D.T. (1981). Morality and the development of conceptions of justice. In M.J. Lerner, and S.C. Lerner (Eds.), The justice motive in social behavior. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, M.B. (1989). The undeserving poor. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluegel, J.R. and Smith, E.R. (1986). Beliefs about inequality. New York: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1971). From is to ought: How to commit the naturalistic fallacy and get away with it in the study of moral development. In T. Mischel (Ed.), Cognitive development and epistemology. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1976). Moral stages and moralization: The cognitive-developmental approach. In T. Lickona (Ed.), Moral development and behavior: Theory research and social issues. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamm, H.E. and Kayser, E. (1978). The allocation of monetary gain and loss following dyadic performance. The weight given to effort and ability under conditions of low and high intra-dyadic attraction. European Journal of Social Psychology, 8, 275–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenin, V. (1939). The teachings of Karl Marx, and Class society and the state. In Oakeshott, M. (Ed.), The social and political doctrines of contemporary Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, M.J. (1974). The justice motive: ‘Equity’ and ‘parity’ among children. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 538–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, M.J. (1975). The justice motive in social behavior: Introduction. Journal of Social Issues, 31,1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, M.J. (1977). The justice motive: Some hypotheses as to its origin and forms. Journal of Personality, 45, 1–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, M.J. (1980). The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leventhal, G.S., Karuza, J. and Fry, W.R. (1980). Beyond fairness: A theory of allocation preferences. In G. Mikula (Ed.), Justice and social interaction. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lind, E.A. and Tyler, T.R. (1988). Social Psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lissak, R.I. and Sheppard, B.H. (1983). Beyond fairness: The criterion problem in research on dispute intervention. Journal of Applied Psychology, 13,45–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, J.R. (1980). On justice. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maclntyre, A. (1982). After virtue: A study in moral theory. London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K.H. (1976). Capital: A critique of political economy, Vol.1. Harmondsworth, Middx: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K.H. (1978). Capital: A critique of political economy, Vol.2. Harmondsworth, Middx.:Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K.H. (1986). Critique of the Gotha Programme. In J. Elster (Ed.), Karl Marx: A Reader. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (First published 1875).

    Google Scholar 

  • McClintock, C.G. and Liebrand, W.B.G. (1988). Role of interdependence structure, individual value orientation, and another's strategy in social decision making: A transformational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 396–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J.P. and Mulherin, A. (1980). From attribution to helping: An analysis of the mediating effects of affect and expectancy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 201–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikula, G. (1980). On the role of justice in allocation decisions. In G. Mikula (Ed.), Justice and social interaction. 127–165. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J.S. (1993) Utilitarianism. In G. Williams (Ed.), Utilitarianism. On Liberty. Considerations on representative government. Remarks on Bentham's philosophy. London: Everyman (dfirst published 1861; “On Liberty,” 1859).

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D.T. (1977). Personal deserving versus justice for others: An exploration of the justice motive. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D.T. and Vidmar, N. (1981). The social psychology of punishment reactions. In M.J. Lerner and S.C. Lerner (Eds.). The justice motive in social behavior. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molander, P. (1985). The optimal level of generosity in a selfish, uncertain environment. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 29,611–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montada, L. (1980). Developmental changes in concepts of justice. In G. Mikula (Ed.), Justice and social interaction. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandy, J., Sinha, Y., Prakesh, A., and Tripathi, R. (1982). Right-Left political ideologies and attribution of the causes of poverty. European Journal of Social Psychology, 12, 327–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plato (1960). The laws. Translated by A. E. Taylor. London: Dent.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plato (1987). The republic. Translated by D. Lee. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, R.A. (1981). The economics of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raphael, D.D. (1981). Moral philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1972). A theory of justice. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reis, H.T. (1984). The multidimensionality of justice. In R. Folger (Ed.), The sense of injustice: Social psychological perspectives. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, S. (1979). Order and dispute: An introduction to legal anthropology. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, J.J. (1988). Rousseau's political writings: Discourse on inequality: Discourse on political economy: On social contract. A. Ritter and J. Bondanella (Eds.). New York: Norton (first published 1755).

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B. (1979). A history of western philosophy. London: Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabini, J. (1995). Social psychology (2nd Edition;. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadurski, W. (1985). Giving desert its due: Social justice and legal theory. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, E.E. (1975). On justice as equality. Journal of Social Issues, 31,45–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, G. and Weiner, B. (1988). An attribution-affect-action theory of behavior: Replications of judgments of help-giving. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 14,610–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. (1975). The justice of need and the activation of humanitarian norms. Journal of Social Issues, 31, 111–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwinger, T. (1980). Just allocations of goods: Decisions among three principles. In G. Mikula (Ed.), Justice and social interaction. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaver, K.G. (1985). The attribution of blame: Causality, responsibility, and blameworthiness. Cambridge, MA: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sher, G. (1981). The historical dimension of justice. In R.L. Braham (Ed.), Social justice. Boston: M. Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidgwick, H. (1907). The method of ethics. London: Macmillan (first published 1874).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stake, J.E. (1983). Factors in reward distribution: Allocator motive, gender and protestant ethic. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44,410–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, S., Wagstaff, G.F., and Brunas-Wagstaff, J. (1996). The influence of responsibility and need on the assignment of penalties for traffic violations. Proceedings of the British Psychological Society, 4, 54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tornblom, K.Y. (1992). The social psychology of distributive justice. In K.R. Scherer (Ed.), Justice: Interdisciplinary perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivers, R. (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Quarterly Review of Biology, 46,35–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T.R. (1987). Procedural justice research. Social Justice Research, 1,41–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T.R. and Belliveau, M.A. (1995). Tradeoffs in justice principles: Definitions of fairness. In B.B. Bunker and J.Z. Rubin (Eds.), Conflict, cooperation and justice: Essays inspired by the work of Morton Deutsch. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T.R. and Dawes, R.M. (1993). Fairness in groups: Comparing the self-interest and social identity perspectives. In B.A. Meilers and J. Baron (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on justice: Theory and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Utne, M.K. and Kidd, R.F. (1980). Equity and attribution. In G. Mikula (Ed.), Justice and social interaction. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagstaff, G.F. (1984). Political ideology, intelligence, heredity, and social justice: Is there a paradox? Psychological Reports, 54, 286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagstaff, G.F. (1994). Equity, equality and need: three principles of justice or one? Current Psychology: Research and Reviews, 13, 138–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagstaff, G.F. (in press). Equity, equality, and allocations to adults and children. Journal of Social Psychology.

  • Wagstaff, G.F. and Kelhar, S. (1993). On the roles of control and outcomes in procedural justice. Psychological Reports, 73, 121–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagstaff, G.F. and Perfect, T.J. (1992). On the definition of perfect equity and the prediction of inequity. British Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 69–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagstaff, G.F. and Quirk, M.A. (1983). Attitudes to sex roles, political conservatism, and belief in a just world. Psychological Reports, 2, 813–814.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagstaff, G.F. and Worthington, J. (in press). Equity, relative need, and allocations to zero input workers. Journal of Social Psychology.

  • Wagstaff, G.F., Chadwick, D. and Brunas-Wagstaff (1996). Equity and the distribution of undeserved outcomes. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Psychology, University of Liverpool.

  • Wagstaff, G.F., Huggins, J.P. and Perfect, T.J. (1993). Equity, equality, and need in the adult family. Journal of Social Psychology, 133,439–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagstaff, G.F., Huggins, J. and Perfect, T.J. (1996). Equal ratio equity, general linear equity, and framing effects in judgments of allocation divisions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 29–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagstaff, G.F., Bowles, R.J., Hughes, D., Rogers, B., Turner, S. and Perfect, T.J. (1994). Judgments concerning zero inputs in equity situations. Journal of Social Psychology, 134,649–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walster, E. and Walster, G.W. (1975). Equity and social justice. Journal of Social Issues, 31,21–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walster, E., Berscheid, E. and Walster, G.W. (1973). New directions in equity research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25, 151–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walster, E., Walster, G.W. and Berscheid, E. (1978). Equity: Theory and research. London: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walster, E., Walster, G.W. and Traupman, J. (1978). Equity and premarital sex. Journal of Personality, 36, 82–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. (1980). A cognitive (attribution)-emotion-action model of motivated behavior: An analysis of judgments of help-giving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 186–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92,548–573.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, S. (1984). Left-right ideological differences in blaming victims. Political Psychology, 5, 573–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, R. (1995). The moral animal: Evolutionary psychology and everyday life. Boston: Little-Brown.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wagstaff, G.F. Equity, justice, and altruism. Curr Psychol 17, 111–134 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-998-1000-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-998-1000-0

Keywords

Navigation