Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Education or Indoctrination? The Accuracy of Introductory Psychology Textbooks in Covering Controversial Topics and Urban Legends About Psychology

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The introductory psychology class represents the first opportunity for the field to present new students with a comprehensive overview of psychological research. Writing introductory psychology textbooks is challenging given that authors need to cover many areas they themselves may not be intimately familiar with. This challenge is compounded by problems within the scholarly community in which controversial topics may be communicated in ideological terms within scholarly discourse. Psychological science has historically seen concerns raised about the mismatch between claims and data made about certain fields of knowledge, apprehensions that continue in the present “replication crisis.” The concern is that, although acting in good faith, introductory psychology textbook authors may unwittingly communicate information to readers that is factually untrue. Twenty-four leading introductory psychology textbooks were surveyed for their coverage of a number of controversial topics (e.g., media violence, narcissism epidemic, multiple intelligences) and scientific urban legends (e.g., Kitty Genovese, Mozart Effect) for their factual accuracy. Results indicated numerous errors of factual reporting across textbooks, particularly related to failing to inform students of the controversial nature of some research fields and repeating some scientific urban legends as if true. Recommendations are made for improving the accuracy of introductory textbooks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Australian Government, Attorney General’s Department. (2010). Literature Review on the Impact of Playing Violent Video Games on Aggression. Commonwealth of Australia.

  • Brock, T. C. (2008). Negligible scholarly impact of 38-witnesses parable. American Psychologist, 63(6), 561–562. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.63.6.561.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Confer, J. C., Easton, J. A., Fleischman, D. S., Goetz, C. D., Lewis, D. G., Perilloux, C., & Buss, D. M. (2010). Evolutionary psychology: Controversies, questions, prospects, and limitations. American Psychologist, 65(2), 110–126. doi:10.1037/a0018413.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Donnellan, M., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Robins, R. W. (2009). An emerging epidemic of narcissism or much ado about nothing? Journal of Research in Personality, 43(3), 498–501. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2008.12.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fanelli, D. (2010). ‘Positive’ results increase down the hierarchy of the sciences. PLoS ONE, 5(4), e10068.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Farady, M. (2010). The girl-crisis movement: Evaluating the foundation. Review of General Psychology, 14(1), 44–55. doi:10.1037/a0019024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, C. J. (2010). Blazing Angels or Resident Evil? Can violent video games be a force for good? Review of General Psychology, 14(2), 68–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H., & Moran, S. (2006). The science of Multiple Intelligences Theory: A response to Lynn Waterhouse. Educational Psychologist, 41(4), 227–232. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4104_2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gershoff, E. (2002). Corporal punishment by parents and associated child behaviors and experiences: A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 128(4), 539–579. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.128.4.539.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, P. (2013). Why Zimbardo’s Prison Experiment Isn’t in My Textbook. Psychology Today.Retrieved from: https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/freedom-learn/201310/why-zimbardo-s-prisonexperiment-isn-t-in-my-textbook Accessed 13 December 2016.

  • Grimes, T., Anderson, J., & Bergen, L. (2008). Media violence and aggression: Science and ideology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R., Day, T., & Hall, R. (2011). A plea for caution: violent video games, the supreme court, and the role of science. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 86(4), 315–321.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, D. F. (2010). Undergraduate education in psychology: A blueprint for the future of the discipline. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/12063-000.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Haselhuhn, C. W., & Clopton, K. L. (2008). The representation of applied psychology areas in introductory psychology textbooks. Teaching of Psychology, 35(3), 205–209. doi:10.1080/00986280802189130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedges, L. V. (1987). How hard is hard science, how soft is soft science? The empirical cumulativeness of research. American Psychologist, 42(5), 443–455. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.42.5.443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inbar, Y., & Lammers, J. (2012). Political diversity in social and personality psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(5), 496–503. doi:10.1177/1745691612448792.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ioannidis, J. (2008). Effectiveness of antidepressants: An evidence myth constructed from a thousand randomized trials? Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine, 3, 1–9. Retrieved 1/20/13 from: http://www.peh-med.com/content/3/1/14.

  • Jarrett, T. (2008). Foundations of sand? The Psychologist. Retrieved from: https://thepsychologist.bps.org.uk/volume-21/edition-9/foundations-sand.

  • Jensen, R., & Burgess, H. (1997). Mythmaking: How introductory psychology texts present B. F. Skinner’s analysis of cognition. The Psychological Record, 47(2), 221–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larzelere, R. (2008). Disciplinary spanking: The scientific evidence. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 29(4), 334–335. doi:10.1097/DBP.0b013e3181829f30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • LeBel, E. P., & Peters, K. R. (2011). Fearing the future of empirical psychology: Bem’s (2011) evidence of psi as a case study of deficiencies in modal research practice. Review of General Psychology, 15(4), 371–379. doi:10.1037/a0025172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lifton, R. J. (1961). Thought reform and the psychology of totalism: A study of “brainwashing” in China. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lilienfeld, S. O. (2004). Defining Psychology: Is it worth the trouble? Journal Of Clinical Psychology, 60(12), 1249–1253. doi:10.1002/jclp.20067.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lilienfeld, S. O. (2012a). Public skepticism of psychology: Why many people perceive the study of human behavior as unscientific. American Psychologist, 67(2), 111–129. doi:10.1037/a0023963.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lilienfeld, S. O. (2012b). Further sources of our field’s embattled public reputation. American Psychologist, 67(9), 808–809. doi:10.1037/a0031015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lilienfeld, S. O., Lynn, S., Ruscio, J., & Beyerstein, B. L. (2009a). 50 great myths of popular psychology: Shattering widespread misconceptions about human behavior. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lilienfeld, S., Lynn, S., Ruscio, J., & Beyerstein, B. (2009b). Myth busting in introductory psychology courses: The whys and the hows. Essays in Excellence in Teaching, 9, 55–61. Retrieved 2/6/12 from: http://teachpsych.org/ebooks/eit2009/index.php.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lilienfeld, S. O., Lynn, S. J., Namy, L. L., & Woolf, N. (2012). Psychology: From inquiry to understanding (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macmillan, M. (2008). Phineas Gage: Unraveling the myth. The Psychologist, 21, 828-831.

  • Manning, R., Levine, M., & Collins, A. (2007). The Kitty Genovese murder and the social psychology of helping: The parable of the 38 witnesses. American Psychologist, 62(6), 555–562. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.62.6.555.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Manning, R., Levine, M., & Collins, A. (2008). The legacy of the 38 witnesses and the importance of getting history right. American Psychologist, 63(6), 562–563. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.63.6.562.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Matlin, M. W. (2004). Pollyanna Principle. In R. Pohl (Ed.), Cognitive illusions: Handbook on falicies and biases in thinking, judgment, and memory (pp. 255–272). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, S. Z., & Gibson, C. L. (2011). Corporal punishment’s influence on children’s aggressive and delinquent behavior. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38(8), 818–839. doi:10.1177/0093854811406070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nature. (2005). In praise of soft science. Nature, 435(7045), 1003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pashler, H., & Harris, C. (2012). Is the replicability crisis overblown? Three arguments examined. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 531–36. doi:10.1177/1745691612463401.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Redding, R. E. (2001). Sociopolitical diversity in psychology: The case for pluralism. American Psychologist, 56(3), 205–215. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.205.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, S. J., Steele, C. M., & Quinn, D. M. (1999). Stereotype threat and women’s math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35(1), 4–28. doi:10.1006/jesp.1998.1373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steuer, F., & Ham, K. (2008). Psychology textbooks: Examining their accuracy. Teaching of Psychology, 35, 160–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoet, G., & Geary, D. C. (2012). Can stereotype threat explain the gender gap in mathematics performance and achievement? Review of General Psychology, 16(1), 93–102. doi:10.1037/a0026617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tavris, C. (2014). Teaching contentious classics. APS Observer. Retrieved from: http://www.psychologicalscience.org/publications/observer/2014/october-14/teaching-contentious-classics.html.

  • Teo, T. (2012). Psychology is still a problematic science and the public knows it. American Psychologist, 67(9), 807–808. doi:10.1037/a0030084.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tetlock, P. E. (2012). Rational versus irrational prejudices: How problematic is the ideological lopsidedness of social psychology? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(5), 519–521. doi:10.1177/1745691612454305.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, R. (2001). Reoccurring errors among recent history of psychology textbooks. American Journal of Psychology, 120(3), 477–495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twenge, J. M., & Foster, J. D. (2008). Mapping the scale of the narcissism epidemic: Increases in narcissism 2002–2007 within ethnic groups. Journal of Research in Personality, 42(6), 1619–1622. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2008.06.014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waterhouse, L. (2006). Multiple intelligences, the Mozart effect, and emotional intelligence: A critical review. Educational Psychologist, 41(4), 207–225. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4104_1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Stetson University, 421 N Woodland Blvd, DeLand, FL, 32723, USA

    Christopher J. Ferguson

  2. Texas A&M International University, Laredo, TX, 78041, USA

    Jeffrey M. Brown & Amanda V. Torres

Authors
  1. Christopher J. Ferguson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jeffrey M. Brown
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Amanda V. Torres
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher J. Ferguson.

Ethics declarations

This manuscript did not involve human participants research. All research was designed to comport with ethical standards for social research.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no funding or conflicts of interest to declare.

Appendix A

Appendix A

Bernstein, D., Penner, L., Clarke-Stewart, A., Roy, E. (2012). Psychology, 9th edition. Independence, KY: Cengage.

Cacioppo, J., & Freberg, L. (2013). Discovering psychology: The science of mind. Independence, KY: Cengage.

Ciccarelli, S.K., & White, J.N. (2012). Psychology, 3rd edition. Boston, MA: Prentice Hall.

Comer, R., & Gould, E. (2013). Psychology around us, 2nd edition. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.

Coon, D. & Mitterer, J.O. (2013). Introduction to psychology: Gateways to mind and behavior, 13th edition. Belmont, CA: Wadworth.

Feist, G., & Rosenberg, E. (2011). Psychology: Perspectives and Connections. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.

Feldman, R. (2010). Psychology and your life, 2nd edition. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.

Gazzaniga, M., Heatherton, T., & Halpern, D. (2011). Psychological science, 4th edition. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Co.

Gerow, J., Bordens, K., & Blanch-Payne, E. (2012). General psychology with spotlights on diversity. Boston, MA: Pearson.

Gray, P. (2013). Why Zimbardo’s Prison Experiment Isn’t in My Textbook. Psychology Today. Retrieved from: https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/freedom-learn/201310/why-zimbardo-s-prison-experiment-isn-t-in-my-textbook.

Hockenbury, D., & Hockenbury, S. (2013). Psychology,6th edition. New York, NY: Worth.

Huffman, K. (2012). Psychology in action, 10th edition. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.

King, L. (2010). Experience psychology. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.

Kowalski, R., & Westen, D. (2011). Psychology, 6th edition. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.

Krause, M., & Corts, D. (2012). Psychological science: modeling scientific literacy. Boston, MA: Pearson.

Lahey, B. (2011). Psychology: An Introduction. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.

Lilienfeld, S.O., Lynn, S.J., Namy, L.L., & Woolf, N. (2012). Psychology: From inquiry to understanding, 2nd edition. Boston, MA: Pearson.

MacMillan, M. (2008). Phineas Gage: Unraveling the myth. The Psychologist, 21, 828–831.

Morris, C.G., & Maisto, A.A. (2013). Understanding psychology, 10th edition. Boston, MA: Pearson.

Myers, D. (2013). Psychology, 10th edition. New York, NY: Worth.

Nevid, J. (2013). Psychology: Concepts and applications, 4th edition. Independence, KY: Cengage.

Plotnik, R., & Kouyoumdjian, H. (2012). Discovery series: Introduction to psychology. Independence, KY: Cengage.

Schacter, D., Gilbert, D., & Wegner, D. (2011). Psychology, 2nd edition. Belmont, CA: Wadworth.

Wade, C., & Travis, C. (2011). Psychology, 10th edition. Boston, MA: Prentice Hall.

Weitan, W. (2013). Psychology: Themes and variations, 9th edition. Belmont, CA: Wadworth.

Wood, S.E., Wood, E.G. & Boyd, D. (2011). The world of psychology, 7th edition. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ferguson, C.J., Brown, J.M. & Torres, A.V. Education or Indoctrination? The Accuracy of Introductory Psychology Textbooks in Covering Controversial Topics and Urban Legends About Psychology. Curr Psychol 37, 574–582 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-016-9539-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-016-9539-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation