The NAMES assessment: a novel combined-modality screening tool for obstructive sleep apnea
- Shyam SubramanianAffiliated withDepartment of Medicine, Section of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine Email author
- , Sean E. HesselbacherAffiliated withDepartment of Medicine, Section of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine
- , Raymond AguilarAffiliated withTorr Sleep Center
- , Salim R. SuraniAffiliated withDepartment of Medicine, Section of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Baylor College of MedicineTorr Sleep CenterDepartment of Medicine, Texas A&M University
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) remains underdiagnosed, despite our understanding of its impact on general health. Current screening methods utilize either symptoms or physical exam findings suggestive of OSA, but not both. The purpose of this study was to develop a novel screening tool for the detection of OSA, the NAMES assessment (neck circumference, airway classification, comorbidities, Epworth scale, and snoring), combining self-reported historical factors with physical exam findings.
Subjects were adults without previously diagnosed OSA, referred to a community sleep center for suspicion of OSA. General health, Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), and Berlin questionnaires were completed, and a physical exam focusing on modified Friedman (MF) grade, body mass index (BMI), and neck circumference (NC) was performed prior to polysomnography. OSA was defined by a respiratory disturbance index ≥15. Each variable was dichotomized, and cutoff values were determined for the NAMES tool in a pilot group of 150 subjects. The NAMES score was calculated from NC, MF, comorbidities, ESS, and loud snoring values. The performances of the NAMES, Berlin questionnaire, and ESS screening tests in predicting OSA were then compared in a validation group of 509 subjects.
In the pilot population, the cutoff value for the composite NAMES tool was calculated at ≥3 points. In the validation group, NAMES demonstrated similar test characteristics to the Berlin questionnaire, and sensitivity was better than that seen with the Epworth scale. The addition of BMI and gender to the tool improved screening characteristics.
The NAMES assessment is an effective, inexpensive screening strategy for moderate to severe OSA.
KeywordsObstructive sleep apnea Screening Sensitivity and specificity
- The NAMES assessment: a novel combined-modality screening tool for obstructive sleep apnea
Sleep and Breathing
Volume 15, Issue 4 , pp 819-826
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Obstructive sleep apnea
- Sensitivity and specificity
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Medicine, Section of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, 7700 S. Main St., Houston, TX, 77030, USA
- 2. Torr Sleep Center, Corpus Christi, TX, USA
- 3. Department of Medicine, Texas A&M University, Corpus Christi, TX, USA