Amman, H., & Kendrick, D. (2003). Mitigation of the Lucas critique with stochastic control methods. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control
Basse, T. (2006). An Austrian version of the Lucas critique. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics
Block, W., & Barnett, W. (2006). Gallaway and Vedder on stabilization policy. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 9, 57–81.
Bordo, M., & Kydland, F. (1995). The gold standard as a rule: An essay in exploration. Explorations in Economic History
Bordo, M., Erceg, C., & Evans, C. (2000). Money, sticky wages, and the great depression. American Economic Review, 90, 1447–1463.
Carilli, A., & Dempster, G. (2001). Expectations in Austrian business cycle theory: An application of the prisoner’s dilemma. Review of Austrian Economics
Cass, D. (1965). Optimum growth in an aggregative model of capital accumulation. Review of Economic Studies
Cochran, J. (2001). Capital-based macroeconomics: recent developments and extensions of Austrian business cycle theory. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 4, 17–25.
Cochran, J., Yetter, N., & Glahe, F. (2004). Capital-based macroeconomics: Boom and bust in Japan and the US. Indian Journal of Economics and Business, 3, 1–16.
Drazen, A. (2000). Political economy in macroeconomics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Engle, R., & Hendry, D. (1993). Testing super exogeneity and invariance in regression models. Journal of Econometrics
Ericsson, N., & Irons, J. (1995). The Lucas critique in practice: Theory without measurement. In K. Hoover (Ed.), Macroeconometrics: Developments, tensions, and prospects. Boston: Kluwer Academic.
Estrella, A., & Fuhrer, J. (2003). Monetary policy shifts and the stability of monetary policy models. Review of Economics and Statistics
Faber, M., Manstetten, R., & Proops, J. (1996). Ecological economics: Concepts and methods. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Foss, N. (2000). Austrian economics and game theory: A stocktaking and an evaluation. Review of Austrian Economics
Friedman, M. (1953). Essays in positive economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Friedman, M. (1968). The role of monetary policy. American Economic Review, 58, 1–17.
Garrison, R. (1991). New classical and old Austrian economics: Equilibrium business cycle theory in perspective. Review of Austrian Economics
Garrison, R. (2000). Book review of Faber et al. (1999). Quarterly Review of Austrian Economics
Garrison, R. (2001). Time and money: The macroeconomics of capital structure
. New York: Routledge.CrossRef
Garrison, R. (2006). From Keynes to Hayek: The marvel of macroeconomics. Review of Austrian Economics
Hansen, G., & Prescott, E. (1993). Did technology shocks cause the 1990–1991 recession? American Economic Review, 83, 280–286.
Hartley, J., Hoover, K., & Salyer, K. (1998). Real business cycles: A reader. London: Routledge.
Hayek, F. (1935). Collectivist economic planning. London: Routledge.
Hayek, F. (1944). The road to serfdom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hayek, F. (1960). The constitution of liberty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hoover, K. (1988). The new classical macroeconomics: A skeptical inquiry. New York: Blackwell.
Hoppe, H. -H. (1997). On certainty and uncertainty—or: How rational can our expectations be? Review of Austrian Economics
Hughes, A. M. (1997). The recession of 1990: An Austrian explanation. Review of Austrian Economics
Hülsmann, G. (1999). Economic science and neoclassicism. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics
Hülsmann, G. (2000). A realist approach to equilibrium economics. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics
Hülsmann, G. (2003). Facts and counterfactuals in economic law. Journal of Libertarian Studies, 17, 57–102.
Hülsmann, G. (2004). The a priori foundations of property economics. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics
Keeler, J. P. (2001). Empirical evidence on the Austrian business cycle theory. Review of Austrian Economics
Koopmans, T. C. (1965). On the concept of optimal economic growth. In The econometric approach to development planning. Amsterdam: N. Holland.
Kydland, F. (1975). Noncooperative and dominant player solutions in discrete dynamic games. International Economic Review
Kydland, F. (1977). Equilibrium solutions in dynamic dominant player models. Journal of Economic Theory
Kydland, F., & Prescott, E. (1977). Rules rather than discretion: The inconsistency of optimal plans. Journal of Political Economy
Kydland, F., & Prescott, E. (1982). Time to build and aggregate fluctuations. Econometrica
Kydland, F., & Prescott, E. (1991a). Hours and employment variation in business cycle theory. Economic Theory, 93, 161–178.
Kydland, F., & Prescott, E. (1991b). The econometrics of the general equilibrium approach. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 1, 63–81.
Kydland, F., & Prescott, E. (1996). The computational experiment: An econometric tool. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10, 69–85.
Kydland, F., & Prescott, E. (1997). A response from Finn E. Kydland and Edward C. Prescott [to Milton Friedman]. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11, 210–211.
Laidler, D. (1982). Monetarist perspective. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Lewin, P. (2001). The development of Austrian economics: Revisiting the neoclassical divide. Review of Austrian Economics
Linde, J. (2001). Testing for the Lucas critique: A quantitative investigation. American Economic Review
Lucas, R. (1976). Econometric policy evaluation: A critique. Carnegie–Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy
Lucas, R. (1979). An equilibrium model of the business cycle. Journal of Political Economy
Lucas, R. (1980). Methods and problems in business cycle theory. Journal of Money Credit and Banking
Lucas, R. (1985). Models of business cycles. Chicago: University of Chicago.
Mankiw, N. G. (1989). Real business cycles: A new Keynesian perspective. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 3, 79–80.
Montgomery, M. (2006). Austrian persistence? Capital-based business cycle theory and the dynamics of investment spending. Review of Austrian Economics
Mulligan, R. (2006a). Accounting for the business cycle: nominal rigidities, factor heterogeneity, and Austrian capital theory. Review of Austrian Economics
Mulligan, R. (2006b). An empirical examination of Austrian business cycle theory. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 9, 69–93.
Persson, T., & Tabellini, G. (2000). Political economics: Explaining economic policy. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Phelps, E. (1967). Phillips curve, expectations of inflation and optimal unemployment over time. Economica
Prescott, E. (1977). Should control theory be used for economic stabilization? Carnegie–Rochester Series on Public Policy
Prescott, E. (1986). Theory ahead of business cycle measurement. Federal Reserve of Minneapolis Quarterly Review, 10, 9–22.
Prescott, E., & Hansen, G. (1993). Did technology shocks cause the 1990–1991 recession. American Economic Review, 83, 280–286.
Rothbard, M. (1993). Man, economy, and state. Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute.
Salerno, J. (2001). Does the concept of secular growth have a place in capital-based macroeconomics. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics
Solow, R. (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics
Tabellini, G. (2005). Finn Kydland and Edward Prescott’s contribution to the theory of macroeconomic policy. Scandinavian Journal of Economics
von Mises, L. (1963). Human action: A treatise on economics. San Francisco: Fox & Wilkes.
von Mises, L. (2000). The equations of mathematical economics and the problem of economic calculation in a socialist state. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics
Weder, M. (2000). Animal spirits, technology shocks and the business cycle. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control
Young, A. (2009). A capital-based theory of secular growth. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, (in press).