Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The uneasy case for degressive taxation: A critique of Blum and Kalven

  • Articles
  • Published:
The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Authors

Additional information

Editor’s Note: Murray N. Rothbard (1926–1995) was the S.J. Hall distinguished professor of economics at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas. This is an unpublished manuscript from the Rothbard papers, written in 1952 for the Volker Fund. In a letter to the Volker Fund’s Herbert C. Cournuelle, on August 18, 1952, Rothbard gave his reasons for writing about the Blum and Kalven essay: “[I]t is certainly an important one…. However, it is decidedly an article of mixed quality, containing many errors and significant omissions. Because of this, I am at present engaged in writing a detailed critique of the article.” The article is Walter J. Blum and Harry J. Kalven, Jr., “The Uneasy Case for Progressive Taxation,” University of Chicago Law Review 19 (1952): 417–520.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rothbard, M.N. The uneasy case for degressive taxation: A critique of Blum and Kalven. Quart J Austrian Econ 4, 43–61 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12113-001-1002-3

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12113-001-1002-3

Keywords

Navigation