Abstract
Purpose
The objective was to obtain a standardized evaluation of available specific and generic breast cancer health-related quality-of-life instruments.
Methods
We carried out systematic literature reviews in the PubMed and EMBASE databases to identify manuscripts which contained information regarding either the development process or metric properties of health-related quality-of-life instruments used among breast cancer patients. Each instrument was evaluated independently by two researchers, and occasionally a third one, using the Evaluating Measures of Patient-Reported Outcomes (EMPRO) tool. An overall score and seven attribute-specific EMPRO scores were calculated (range 0–100, worst to best): concept and measurement model, reliability, validity, responsiveness, interpretability, burden, and alternative forms.
Results
FACT-B was the instrument with the best global performance, obtaining an overall EMPRO score of 79.27. It was also the most accurate instrument on the Concept and Measurement Model, Reliability, and Interpretability attributes. Four more instruments scored over 50 points on the overall score, which summarizes the five attribute-specific scores: EORTC BR-23, IBCSG, WHO-QOL BREF, and SF-36. An overall score of at least 50 points implies that the use of these instruments could be recommended for assessing health-related quality of life in breast cancer patients.
Conclusion
The FACT-B scored the highest on overall on our EMPRO evaluation of instruments measuring health-related quality of life among breast cancer patients. However, depending on the purpose of the study, several instruments (EORTC BR-23, IBCSG, SF-36, and WHO-QOL BREF) have shown good performance in some of the specific individual dimensions included in the EMPRO.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ferlay, J., Soerjomataram, I., Dikshit, R., Eser, S., Mathers, C., Rebelo, M., et al. (2015). Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: Sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. International Journal of Cancer, 136(5), E359–E386. doi:10.1002/ijc.29210.
Ferlay, J., Steliarova-Foucher, E., Lortet-Tieulent, J., Rosso, S., Coebergh, J. W. W., Comber, H., et al. (2013). Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: Estimates for 40 countries in 2012. European Journal of Cancer, 49, 1374–1403. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2012.12.027.
Perry, S., Kowalski, T. L., & Chang, C.-H. (2007). Quality of life assessment in women with breast cancer: Benefits, acceptability and utilization. HQLO, 5, 24. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-5-24.
Calvert, M., Brundage, M., Jacobsen, P. B., Schünemann, H. J., & Efficace, F. (2013). The CONSORT Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) extension: Implications for clinical trials and practice. HQLO, 11, 184. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-11-184.
Osoba, D. (2011). Health-related quality of life and cancer clinical trials. Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology, 3, 57–71. doi:10.1177/1758834010395342.
Bray, F., Ren, J. S., Masuyer, E., & Ferlay, J. (2013). Estimates of global cancer prevalence for 27 sites in the adult population in 2008. International Journal of Cancer, 132, 1133–1145. doi:10.1002/ijc.27711.
Sprangers, M. A., Groenvold, M., Arraras, J. I., et al. (1996). The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer breast cancer-specific quality-of-life questionnaire module: First results from a three-country field study. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 14, 2756–2768.
Brady, M. J., Cella, D. F., Mo, F., et al. (1997). Reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast quality-of-life instrument. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 15, 974–986.
Van Esch, L., Den Oudsten, B. L., & De Vries, J. (2011). The World Health Organization Quality of Life Instrument-Short Form (WHOQOL-BREF) in women with breast problems. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 11, 5–22.
Bernhard, J., Hürny, C., Coates, A. S., et al. (1997). Quality of life assessment in patients receiving adjuvant therapy for breast cancer: The IBCSG approach. The International Breast Cancer Study Group. Annals of Oncology, 8, 825–835.
Treanor, C., & Donnelly, M. (2015). A methodological review of the Short Form Health Survey 36 (SF-36) and its derivatives among breast cancer survivors. Quality of Life Research, 24, 339–362.
Oliveira, I. S., da Cunha Menezes Costa, L., Fagundes, F. R., & Cabral, C. M. (2015). Evaluation of cross-cultural adaptation and measurement properties of breast cancer-specific quality-of-life questionnaires: A systematic review. Quality of Life Research, 24(5), 1179–1195. doi:10.1007/s11136-014-0840-3.
Valderas, J. M., Ferrer, M., Mendivil, J., Garin, O., Rajmil, L., Herdman, M., et al. (2008). Development of EMPRO: A tool for the standardized assessment of patient-reported outcome measures. Value Health, 11, 700–708.
PROQOLID. http://www.proqolid.org/. Last Access Nov 2015.
The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) website. http://www.eortc.org/. Last Access Feb 2015.
Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy website. http://facit.org/. Last Access Feb 2015.
International Breast Cancer Study Group website. http://www.ibcsg.org/. Last Access Feb 2015.
World Health Organization website. http://who.int/. Last Access February 2015.
Delgado-Sanz, M. C., García-Mendizábal, M. J., Pollán, M., et al. (2011). Heath-related quality of life in Spanish breast cancer patients: A systematic review. HQLO, 9, 3. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-9-3.
Chopra, I., & Kamal, K. M. (2012). A systematic review of quality of life instruments in long-term breast cancer survivors. HQLO, 10, 14. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-10-14.
Montazeri, A. (2008). Health-related quality of life in breast cancer patients: A bibliographic review of the literature from 1974 to 2007. Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research, 27(1), 32. doi:10.1186/1756-9966-27-32.
Scientific Advisory Committee of the Medical Outcome Trust. (2002). Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: Attributes and review criteria. Quality of Life Research, 11, 193–205.
Garin, O., Herdman, M., Vilagut, G., Ferrer, M., Ribera, A., Rajmil, L., et al. (2014). Assessing health-related quality of life in heart failure: A systematic, standardized comparison of available measures. Heart Failure Reviews, 19(3), 359–367. doi:10.1007/s10741-013-9394-7.
Schmidt, S., Ferrer, M., González, M., González, N., Valderas, J. M., Alonso, J., et al. (2014). Evaluation of shoulder-specific patient-reported outcome measures: A systematic and standardized comparison of available evidence. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 23, 434–444.
Schmidt, S., Garin, O., Pardo, Y., et al. (2014). Assessing quality of life in patients with prostate cancer: A systematic and standardized comparison of available instruments. Quality of Life Research, 23(8), 2169–2181. doi:10.1007/s11136-014-0678-8.
Fayers, P. M., & Machin, D. (2007). Quality of life: The assessment, analysis and interpretation of patient-reported outcomes (2nd ed., pp. 77–108). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Whitehead, S. J., & Ali, S. (2010). Health outcomes in economic evaluation: The QALY and utilities. British Medical Bulletin, 96, 5–21. doi:10.1093/bmb/ldq033.
Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Patrick, D. L., et al. (2010). The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: An international Delphi study. Quality of Life Research, 19(4), 539–549. doi:10.1007/s11136-010-9606-8.
Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Gibbons, E., et al. (2010). Inter-rater agreement and reliability of the COSMIN (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement Instruments) Checklist. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 10, 82. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-10-82.
Ware, J. E, Jr. (2003). Conceptualization and measurement of health-related quality of life: Comments on an evolving field. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 84, S43–S51.
Niu, H. Y., Niu, C. Y., Wang, J. H., Zhang, Y., & He, P. (2014). Health-related quality of life in women with breast cancer: A literature-based review of psychometric properties of breast cancer-specific measures. APJCP, 15, 3533–3536.
Cheung, Y. B., Luo, N., Ng, R., & Lee, C. F. (2014). Mapping the functional assessment of cancer therapy-breast (FACT-B) to the 5-level EuroQoL Group’s 5-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) utility index in a multi-ethnic Asian population. HQLO, 12, 180. doi:10.1186/s12955-014-0180-6.
Kim, E. J., Ko, S. K., & Kang, H. Y. (2012). Mapping the cancer-specific EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-BR23 to the generic EQ-5D in metastatic breast cancer patients. Quality of Life Research, 21, 1193–1203. doi:10.1007/s11136-011-0037-y.
Voko, Z., Nemeth, R., Dank, M., Nagy-Erdei, Z., Kalo, Z., Geczi, L. (2014). Mapping the cancer-specific EORTC QLQ-BR23 onto the preference-based EuroQol-5D instrument. JHPOR, 2, 90–99. doi:10.7365/JHPOR.2013.4.10.
Rowen, D., Brazier, J., & Roberts, J. (2009). Mapping SF-36 onto the EQ-5D index: How reliable is the relationship? HQLO, 7, 27. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-7-27.
Cerezo, O., Oñate-ocaña, L. F., Arrieta-joffe, P., et al. (2012). Validation of the Mexican-Spanish version of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and BR23 questionnaires to assess health-related quality of life in Mexican women with breast cancer. European Journal of Cancer Care (Engl), 21, 684–691.
Michels, F. A., Latorre Mdo, R., & Maciel Mdo, S. (2013). Validity, reliability and understanding of the EORTC-C30 and EORTC-BR23, quality of life questionnaires specific for breast cancer. Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia, 16, 352–363.
Irarrázaval, M. E., Rodríguez, P. F., Fasce, G., et al. (2013). Validation of BR23 questionnaire for the assessment of quality of life of breast cancer patients in Chile. Revista Medica de Chile, 141, 723–734.
Awad, M. A., Denic, S., & El Taji, H. (2008). Validation of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaires for Arabic-speaking Populations. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1138, 146–154. doi:10.1196/annals.1414.021.
El Fakir, S., Abda, N., Bendahhou, K., et al. (2014). The European organization for research and treatment of cancer quality of life questionnaire-BR 23 breast cancer-specific quality of life questionnaire: Psychometric properties in a Moroccan sample of breast cancer patients. BMC Research Notes, 7, 53. doi:10.1186/1756-0500-7-53.
Jayasekara, H., Rajapaksa, L. C., & Brandberg, Y. (2008). Measuring breast cancer-specific health-related quality of life in South Asia: Psychometric properties of the Sinhala version of the EORTC QLQ-BR23. Quality of Life Research, 17, 927–932.
Kontodimopoulos, N., Ntinoulis, K., & Niakas, D. (2011). Validity of the Greek EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23 for measuring health-related quality of life in breast cancer patients. European Journal of Cancer Care (Eng), 20, 354–361.
Chie, W. C., Chang, K. J., Huang, C. S., et al. (2003). Quality of life of breast cancer patients in Taiwan: Validation of the Taiwan Chinese version of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC-BR23. Psychooncol, 12, 729–735.
Yun, Y. H., Bae, S. H., Kang, I. O., Shin, K. H., Lee, R., & Im Kwon, S. (2004). Cross-cultural application of the Korean version of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Breast-Cancer-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-BR23). Supportive Care in Cancer, 12, 441–445. doi:10.1007/s00520-004-0632-3.
Nagel, G. C., Schmidt, S., Strauss, B. M., & Katenkamp, D. (2001). Quality of life in breast cancer patients: A cluster analytic approach. Empirically derived subgroups of the EORTC-QLQ BR 23–a clinically oriented assessment. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 68, 75–87.
Sánchez-Pedraza, R., Sierra-Matamoros, F. A., & López-Daza, D. F. (2012). Validación colombiana de la escala FACT-B para medir la calidad de vida de pacientes con cáncer de mama. Revista Colombiana de Obstetricia y Ginecología, 63, 196–206.
Belmonte Martínez, R., Garin Boronat, O., Segura Badía, M., Sanz Latiesas, J., Marco Navarro, E., & Ferrer Fores, M. (2011). Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Questionnaire for Breast Cancer (FACT-B + 4). Spanish version validation. Medicina Clínica (Barc), 137, 685–688.
Patoo, M., Allahyari, A. A., Moradi, A. R., & Payandeh, M. (2015). Persian Version of Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy- Breast (FACT-B) Scale: Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Psychometric Properties. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 16, 3799–3803.
Wan, C., Zhang, D., Yang, Z., Xin, T., Tang, W., Feng, C., et al. (2007). Validation of the simplified Chinese version of the FACT-B for measuring quality of life for patients with breast cancer. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 106, 413–418.
Michels, F. A. S., Latorre, M. R. D. O., & Maciel, M. S. (2010). Validation, reliability and comprehension of the IBCSG quality of life questionnaire specific to breast cancer. Applied Cancer Research, 30, 348–352.
Carlsson, M., & Hamrin, E. (2002). Evaluation of the life satisfaction questionnaire (LSQ) using structural equation modelling (SEM). Quality of Life Research, 11, 415–425.
Carlsson, M., Hamrin, E., & Lindqvist, R. (1999). Psychometric assessment of the Life Satisfaction Questionnaire (LSQ) and a comparison of a randomised sample of Swedish women and those suffering from breast cancer. Quality of Life Research, 8, 245–253.
Carlsson, M., & Hamrin, E. (1996). Measurement of quality of life in women with breast cancer. Development of a Life Satisfaction Questionnaire (LSQ-32) and a comparison with the EORTC QLQ-C30. Quality of Life Research, 5, 265–274.
Wan, C., Yang, Z., Tang, X., et al. (2009). Development and validation of the system of quality of life instruments for cancer patients: Breast cancer (QLICP-BR). Supportive Care in Cancer, 17, 359–366.
Oliveira, I. S., Costa, L. C., Manzoni, A. C., & Cabral, C. M. (2014). Assessment of the measurement properties of quality of life questionnaires in Brazilian women with breast cancer. Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy, 18, 372–383.
Vilagut, G., Ferrer, M., Rajmil, L., et al. (2005). The Spanish version of the Short Form 36 Health Survey: A decade of experience and new developments. Gaceta Sanitaria, 19(2), 135–150.
Vilagut, G., Valderas, J. M., Ferrer, M., Garin, O., López-García, E., & Alonso, J. (2008). Interpretation of SF-36 and SF-12 questionnaires in Spain: Physical and mental components. Medical Clinics (Barc), 130, 726–735.
Ashing-Giwa, K. T., Padilla, G. V., Tejero, J. S., & Kim, J. (2004). Breast cancer survivorship in a multiethnic sample: Challenges in recruitment and measurement. Cancer, 101, 450–465.
Spagnola, S., Zabora, J., Brintzenhofeszoc, K., Hooker, C., Cohen, G., & Baker, F. (2003). The Satisfaction with Life Domains Scale for Breast Cancer (SLDS-BC). The Breast Journal, 9, 463–471.
Benitez-Borrego, S., Guardia-Olmos, J., & Urzúa-Morales, A. (2014). Factorial structural analysis of the Spanish version of WHOQOL-BREF: An exploratory structural equation model study. Quality of Life Research, 23, 2205–2212.
Lucas-Carrasco, R. (2012). The WHO quality of life (WHOQOL) questionnaire: Spanish development and validation studies. Quality of Life Research, 21, 161–165.
Den Oudsten, B. L., Van Heck, G. L., Van der Steeg, A. F., Roukema, J. A., & De Vries, J. (2009). The WHOQOL-100 has good psychometric properties in breast cancer patients. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62, 195–205.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The work included in the present manuscript has not received any funding, and it is solely the work of the authors. The authors declare that there are no conflict of interests.
Additional information
Stefano Maratia and Sergio Cedillo have contributed equally to this work.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Maratia, S., Cedillo, S. & Rejas, J. Assessing health-related quality of life in patients with breast cancer: a systematic and standardized comparison of available instruments using the EMPRO tool. Qual Life Res 25, 2467–2480 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-016-1284-8
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-016-1284-8