Abstract
The present study considers underground passengers and investigates the ways in which they spend their time during a trip of average length or shorter. Using a structured procedure that had been refined after a preliminary study, more than 1,700 passengers were observed in London. The results showed that even when the length of travel is very short (2–6 stops), underground passengers engage in several occupations, especially those involving the use of mobile Information and Communication Technologies. These occupations depend on the specific spatial and temporal conditions of the travel, as well as on gender and age. These results should be useful in designing travel services that enhance passengers’ experiences; they also suggest a criterion for comparing trips using different transportation modes (i.e., looking at the time point during the trip at which the ratio of active versus passive occupations changes).
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
There were limited possibilities to distinguish among certain kinds of devices, so mobile phones and PDA, which look similar from a distance, were considered in one category. “Headphones” indicated that passengers were wearing headphones connected to an unidentified device; the nature of that device, for the sake of this study, was disambiguated by the action performed with it.
Although the Borough of Camden as a whole is quite heterogeneous, the area surrounding Hampstead station is wealthy, as is demonstrated by data reported in the 2001 Census Key Statistics (http://www.camden.gov.uk/ccm/cms-service/stream/asset/?asset_id=87114). According to these data, Hampstead Town has the highest percentage of residents occupying higher managerial (9 %) or higher professional (19 %) positions as compared to the other wards (down to 2 and 5.9 %, respectively). Moreover, the percentage of residents living in housing association homes is only 2.6 % compared to the average of the borough (11.4 %).
Although they relied on a different method than the one adopted in the present study, these studies examined activities and artifacts used by the passengers of a public transportation mode and included trips of approximately the same length (15 and 20 min, respectively) as an average trip on a single car of the underground (12.7 min). In addition, the present study did not involve standing passengers, whose behavior would not have been comparable to the behavior of passengers sitting on a train.
The relationship between the trip on the underground and the entire travel experience before and after it can partly explain the reason why men used more ICTs than women. According to the findings of some studies, men take one-purpose trips, whereas women take multi-purpose trips on less comfortable transportation modes (Jones et al. 1983), travel fewer miles daily (Giuliano and Narayan 2003) and are less likely to commute long distances (Cambridge Econometrics 2005).
References
Adams, C., Fitch, T.: Social inclusion and the shifting role of technology: is age the new gender in mobile access. In: Trauth, E., Howcroft, D., Butler, T., Fitzgerald, B., DeGross, J. (eds.) Social Inclusion: Societal and Organizational Implications for Information Systems, pp. 203–215. Springer, Boston (2006)
Anable, J., Gatersleben, B.: All work and no play? The role of instrumental and affective factors in work and leisure journeys by different travel modes. Transp. Res. A 39, 163–181 (2005)
Axhausen, K.W., Gaerling, T.: Activity-based approaches to travel analysis: conceptual frameworks, models, and research problems. Transp. Rev. 12(4), 323–341 (1992)
Balepur, P.N.: Impacts of Computer-Mediated Communication on Travel and Communication Patterns: The Davis Community Network Study. UC Berkeley, Working Papers, California Partners for Advanced Transit and Highways (PATH), Institute of Transportation Studies (1998). http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/6cb1f85c. Accessed 6 Apr 2011
Blumen, O.: Dissonance in women’s commuting? The experience of exurban employed mothers in Israel. Urban Stud. 37, 731–748 (2000)
Brown, B., O’Hara, K.: Place as a practical concern of mobile worker. Environ. Plan. A 35, 1565–1587 (2003)
Cambridge Econometrics, WSP & LSE: Commuter Flows in London and the Wider South East 2001 to 2016/21. Report (2005). http://www.eera.gov.uk/GetAsset.aspx?id=fAA4ADMANQB8AHwARgBhAGwAcwBlAHwAfAAwAHwA0. Accessed 6 Apr 2011
Campbell, S.W.: A cross-cultural comparison of perceptions and uses of mobile telephony. New Media Soc. 9, 343–363 (2007)
Connolly, D., Caulfield, B., O’Mahony, M.: Rail passengers’ preferences for onboard Wi-Fi internet access. In: Presented at the 88th Annual Meeting of the Transp Res Board, Washington. http://www.tara.tcd.ie/jspui/bitstream/2262/27259/1/Connolly%20Caulfield%20and%20O%27Mahony%2031%2007%2008.doc (2009). Accessed 6 Apr 2011
Department for Transport: Annual Report 2006. http://www.dft.gov.uk/about/publications/apr/ar2006/dftannualreport2006.pdf (2006). Accessed April 6 2011
Department for Transport: National Travel Survey 2009. http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/statistics/datatablespublications/nts/latest/nts2009-05.pdf (2009). Accessed 6 Apr 2011
Department for Transport: Transport Statistics Bulletin. National Travel Survey. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http://www.dft.gov.uk/adobepdf/162469/221412/221535/224237/224260/publictransportstatisticsbul.pdf (2006). Accessed 6 Apr 2011
Dutton, W.H., Helsper, E.: The Internet in Britain. Oxford Internet Institute (OII). http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm/SSRN_ID1327033_code1148612.pdf?abstractid=1327033&mirid=1 (2007). Accessed 6 Apr 2011
Giuliano, G., Narayan, D.: Another look at travel patterns and urban form: the US and Great Britain. Urban Stud. 40, 2295–2312 (2003)
Handy, S., Weston, L., Mokhtarian, P.L.: Driving by choice or necessity? Transp. Res. A 39, 183–203 (2005)
Hein, J., Evans, J., Jones, P.: Mobile methodologies: theories, technology and practice. Geogr. Compass 2(5), 1266–1285 (2010)
Hensher, D.A.: The value of commuter travel time savings. J. Transp. Econ. Policy 10, 167–176 (1976)
Hess, S., Bierlaire, M., Polak, J.: Estimation of value of travel-time savings using Mixed Logit models. Transp. Res. A 39, 221–236 (2005)
Jain, J., Lyons, G.: The gift of travel time. J. Transp. Geogr. 16, 81–89 (2008)
Jara-Díaz, S.R., Ortúzar, J.deD.: Introducing the expenditure rate in the estimation of mode choice models. J. Transp. Econ. Policy 23, 293–308 (1989)
Jones, P.M., Dix, M.C., Clarke, M.I., Heggie, I.G.: Understanding Travel Behavior. Aldershort, Gower (1983)
Kenyon, S.: The ‘accessibility diary’: discussing a new methodological approach to understand the impact of Internet use upon personal travel and activity participation. J. Transp. Geogr. 14, 123–134 (2006)
Kitamura, R., Mokhtarian, P.L., Daidet, L.: A micro-analysis of land use and travel in five neighborhoods in the San Francisco Bay Area. Transportation 24, 125–158 (1997)
Kwan, M., Dijst, M., Schwanen, T.: The interaction between ICT and human activity-travel behavior. Transp. Res. A 41, 121–124 (2007)
Lenz, B., Nobis, C.: The changing allocation of activities in space and time by the use of ICT—“Fragmentation” as a new concept and empirical results. Transp. Res. A 41, 190–204 (2007)
Ling, R., Haddon, L., Klamer, L.: The understanding and use of the internet and mobile telephone among contemporary Europeans. Presented at the Conference ‘e-Usages’, Paris, 12–14 June 2001
Lyons, G., Urry, J.: Travel time use in the information age. Transp. Res. A 39, 257–276 (2005)
Lyons, G., Jain, J., Holley, D.: The use of travel time by rail passengers in Great Britain. Transp. Res. A 41, 107–120 (2007)
Mokhtarian, P.L., Salomon, I.: How derived is the demand for travel? Some conceptual and measurement. Transp. Res. A 35, 695–719 (2001)
Noble, M., Wright, G., Dibben, C., Smith, G.A.N., McLennan, D., Anttila, C., Barnes, H., Mokhtar, C., Noble, S., Avenell, D., Gardner, J., Covizzi, I., Lloyd, M.: The English Indices of Deprivation (revised). Report (2004). Summary: http://www.communities.gov.uk/documents/communities/pdf/131209.pdf. Accessed 6 Apr 2011
Ofcom: Media Literacy Audit—Report on adult media literacy. Ofcom’s Media Literacy Publications and Research (2006). http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/research/media-literacy/medialit_audit.pdf. Accessed 6 Apr 2011
O’Hara, K., Taylor, A., Sellen, A., Newman, W.: Understanding the materiality of writing while reading from multiple sources. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 56, 269–305 (2002)
Ohmori, N., Harata, N.: How different are activities while commuting by train? A case in Tokyo. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 99, 547–561 (2008)
Ory, D.T., Mokhtarian, P.L.: When is getting there half the fun? Modeling the liking for travel. Transp. Res. A 39, 97–123 (2005)
Pendyala, R.M., Goulias, K.G., Kitamura, R.: Impact of telecommuting on spatial and temporal patterns of household travel. Transportation 18, 383–409 (1991)
Perry, M., O’hara, K., Sellen, A., Brown, B., Harper, R.: Dealing with mobility: understanding access anytime, anywhere. ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact. 8, 323–347 (2001)
Polzin, S.E., Chu, X.: Public transit in America: results from the 2001 National Household Travel Survey (2005). http://www.nctr.usf.edu/pdf/527-09.pdf. Accessed 6 Apr 2011
Russell, N., Drew, N.: ICT access and use: Report on the benchmark survey. DfEE Research Report RR252. Report (2001)
Salomon, I., Mokhtarian, P.L.: Emerging travel patterns: do telecommunications make a difference? In: Mahmassani, H.S. (ed.) In Perpetual Motion: Travel Behaviour Research Opportunities and Application Challenges, pp. 143–182. Pergamon Press/Elsevier, Oxford (2002)
Somitra, S., Mokhtarian, P.L.: The impact of telecommuting on the activity spaces of participants and their households. Geogr. Anal. 29, 24–144 (1997)
Spagnolli, A., Gamberini, L.: A place for presence. Understanding the human involvement in mediated interactive environments. Psychnology 3, 6–15 (2005). www.psychnology.org. Accessed 1 Dec 2009
Stahl, A., Hook, C., Svensson, M., Taylor, A.S., Combetto, M.: Experiencing the affective diary. Pers. Ubiquitous Comput. 13, 365–378 (2009)
Stutzer, A., Frey, B.S.: Stress that doesn’t pay: the commuting paradox. IZA (Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit—Institute for the Study of Labor) Discussion Paper N. 1278 (2004). http://devpapers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm/SSRN_ID408220_code170891.pdf?abstractid=408220&mirid=1. Accessed 6 Apr 2011
Timmermans, H., van der Waerden, P.: Synchronicity of activity engagement and travel in time and space: descriptors and correlates of field observations. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2054, 1–9 (2008)
Transport for London: London Travel Report 2006. http://www.tfl.gov.uk/assets/downloads/corporate/London-Travel-Report-2006-final.pdf. Accessed 6 Apr 2011
Transport for London: Travel in London key trends and developments. Report number 1 (2009). http://www.tfl.gov.uk/assets/downloads/corporate/Travel-in-London-report-1.pdf. Accessed 6 Apr 2011
van der Waerden, P., Timmermans, H., van Neerven, R.: Extent, nature, and covariates of multitasking of rail passengers in an urban corridor: a Dutch case study. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2110, 106–111 (2009)
Vorbau, A.W., Slayden Mitchell, A., O’Hara, K.: “My iPod is my Pacifier”: an investigation on the everyday practices of mobile video consumption. Technical report (2007). http://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/2006/HPL-2006-151R1.pdf. Accessed 6 Apr 2011
Watts, L.: The art and craft of train travel. Soc. Cult. Geogr. 9, 711–726 (2008)
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Patricia Mokhtarian and the three anonymous reviewers for the quality of the feedback provided to earlier versions of this paper and for the thoughtfulness of their comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gamberini, L., Spagnolli, A., Miotto, A. et al. Passengers’ activities during short trips on the London Underground. Transportation 40, 251–268 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-012-9419-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-012-9419-4