Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Uncertainty and feasibility of dynamical downscaling for modeling tropical cyclones for storm surge simulation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a modeling study conducted to evaluate the uncertainty of a regional model in simulating hurricane wind and pressure fields, and the feasibility of driving coastal storm surge simulation using an ensemble of region model outputs produced by 18 combinations of 3 convection schemes and 6 microphysics parameterizations, using Hurricane Katrina as a test case. Simulated wind and pressure fields were compared to observed H*Wind data for Hurricane Katrina, and simulated storm surge was compared to observed high-water marks on the northern coast of the Gulf of Mexico. The ensemble modeling analysis demonstrated that the regional model was able to reproduce the characteristics of Hurricane Katrina with reasonable accuracy and can be used to drive the coastal ocean model for simulating coastal storm surge. Results indicated that the regional model is sensitive to both convection and microphysics parameterizations that simulate moist processes closely linked to the tropical cyclone dynamics that influence hurricane development and intensification. The Zhang and McFarlane (ZM) convection scheme and the Lim and Hong (WDM6) microphysics parameterization are the most skillful in simulating Hurricane Katrina maximum wind speed and central pressure, among the three convection and the six microphysics parameterizations. Error statistics of simulated maximum water levels were calculated for a baseline simulation with H*Wind forcing and the 18 ensemble simulations driven by the regional model outputs. The storm surge model produced the overall best results in simulating the maximum water levels using wind and pressure fields generated with the ZM convection scheme and the WDM6 microphysics parameterization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arbizu-Barrena C, Pozo-Vazquez D, Ruiz-Arias JA, Tovar-Pescador J (2015) Macroscopic cloud properties in the WRF NWP model: an assessment using sky camera and ceilometer data. J Geophys Res Atmos 120

  • Bhaskaran PK, Nayak S, Bonthu SR, Murty PLN, Sen D (2013) Performance and validation of a coupled parallel ADCIRC–SWAN model for THANE cyclone in the Bay of Bengal. Environ Fluid Mech 13:601–623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blake ES, Landsea CW, Gibney EJ (2011) The deadliest, costliest, and most intense united states tropical cyclones from 1851 to 2010 (and other frequently requested hurricane facts). NOAA Technical Memorandum NWS NHC-6. http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/pdf/nws-nhc-6.pdf

  • Camargo SJ (2013) Global and regional aspects of tropical cyclone activity in the CMIP5 models. J Clim 26:9880–9902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardone VJ, Cox AT (2009) Tropical cyclone wind field forcing for surge models: critical issues and sensitivities. Nat Hazards 51:29–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chavas DR, Lin N, Emanuel K (2015) A model for the complete radial structure of the tropical cyclone wind field. Part I: comparison with observed structure*. J Atmos Sci 72:3647–3662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen C, Liu H, Beardsley RC (2003) An unstructured grid, finite-volume, three-dimensional, primitive equations ocean model: application to coastal ocean and estuaries. J Geophys Res 20:28

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen CS, Beardsley RC, Luettich RA, Westerink JJ, Wang H, Perrie W, Xu QC, Donahue AS, Qi JH, Lin HC, Zhao LZ, Kerr PC, Meng YQ, Toulany B (2013) Extratropical storm inundation testbed: intermodel comparisons in Scituate, Massachusetts. J Geophys Res Oceans 118:5054–5073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colle BA (2003) Numerical Simulations of the extratropical transition of Floyd (1999): structural evolution and responsible mechanisms for the heavy rainfall over the northeast United States. Mon Weather Rev 131:2905–2926

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson C, Kubatko EJ, Westerink JJ, Trahan C, Mirabito C, Michoski C, Panda N (2011) Discontinuous Galerkin methods for modeling Hurricane storm surge. Adv Water Resour 34:1165–1176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng LP, McCabe MF, Stenchikov G, Evans JP, Kucera PA (2015) Simulation of flash-flood-producing storm events in Saudi Arabia using the weather research and forecasting model. J Hydrometeorol 16:615–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietrich JC, Bunya S, Westerink JJ, Ebersole BA, Smith JM, Atkinson JH, Jensen R, Resio DT, Luettich RA, Dawson C, Cardone VJ, Cox AT, Powell MD, Westerink HJ, Roberts HJ (2010) A high-resolution coupled riverine flow, tide, wind, wind wave, and storm surge model for southern Louisiana and Mississippi. Part II: synoptic description and analysis of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. Mon Weather Rev 138:378–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dudhia J, Hong S-Y, Lim K-S (2008) A new method for representing mixed-phase particle fall speeds in bulk microphysics parameterizations. J Meteorol Soc Jpn 86A:33–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FEMA (2006) Final coastal and riverine high water mark collection for Hurricane Katrina in Mississippi. FEMA-1604-DR-MS, Task Orders 413 and 420. March 14, 2006. https://www.fema.gov/pdf/hazard/flood/recoverydata/katrina/katrina_ms_hwm_public.pdf

  • Ferreira CM, Irish JL, Olivera F (2014) Quantifying the potential impact of land cover changes due to sea-level rise on storm surge on lower Texas coast bays. Coast Eng 94:102–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu D, Li PY, Fu G (2015) An observational and modeling study of extratropical transition of Hurricane Sandy in 2012. J Ocean Univ China 14:783–794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gornitz V (1991) Global coastal hazards from future sea-level rise. Global Planet Change 89:379–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green BW, Zhang FQ (2014) Sensitivity of tropical cyclone simulations to parametric uncertainties in air–sea fluxes and implications for parameter estimation. Mon Weather Rev 142:2290–2308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grell G, Dudhia J, Stauffer DR (1993) A description of the fifth generation Penn State/NCAR mesoscale model (MM5). NCAR Tech. Note. NCAR/TN-3981IA, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, 107 pp

  • Holland GJ (1980) An analytic model of the wind and pressure profiles in hurricanes. Mon Weather Rev 108:1212–1218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong SY, Dudhia J, Chen SH (2004) A revised approach to ice microphysical processes for the bulk parameterization of clouds and precipitation. Mon Weather Rev 132:103–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houston SH, Shaffer WA, Powell MD, Chen J (1999) Comparisons of HRD and SLOSH surface wind fields in hurricanes: implications for storm surge modeling. Weather Forecast 14:671–686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu KL, Chen Q, Kimball SK (2012) Consistency in hurricane surface wind forecasting: an improved parametric model. Nat Hazards 61:1029–1050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang W, Hagen SC, Bacopoulos P, Teng F (2014) Sea-level rise effects on hurricane-induced salinity transport in Apalachicola Bay. J Coastal Res. doi:10.2112/SI68-007.1

    Google Scholar 

  • Islam T, Srivastava PK, Rico-Ramirez MA, Dai Q, Gupta M, Singh SK (2015) Tracking a tropical cyclone through WRF–ARW simulation and sensitivity of model physics. Nat Hazards 76:1473–1495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jakobsen F, Madsen H (2004) Comparison and further development of parametric tropical cyclone models for storm surge modelling. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 92:375–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeong CK, Panchang V, Demirbilek Z (2012) Parametric adjustments to the rankine vortex wind model for gulf of Mexico hurricanes. J Offshore Mech Arct Eng 134:041102. doi:10.1115/1.4006148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kain JS, Fritsch JM (1990) A one-dimensional entraining detraining plume model and its application in convective parameterization. J Atmos Sci 47:2784–2802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kain JS, Fritsch JM (1993) Convective parameterization for mesoscale models: the Kain-Fritcsh scheme. In: Emanuel KA, Raymond DJ (eds) The representation of cumulus convection in numerical models. American Meteorlogical Society

  • Kanase RD, Mukhopadhyay P, Salvekar PS (2015) Understanding the role of cloud and convective processes in simulating the weaker tropical cyclones over indian seas. Pure Appl Geophys 172:1751–1779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasheta TE, Chang CB (2002) Development of a hurricane boundary-layer wind model. Meteorol Atmos Phys 79:259–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr PC, Donahue AS, Westerink JJ, Luettich RA, Zheng LY, Weisberg RH, Huang Y, Wang HV, Teng Y, Forrest DR, Roland A, Haase AT, Kramer AW, Taylor AA, Rhome JR, Feyen JC, Signell RP, Hanson JL, Hope ME, Estes RM, Dominguez RA, Dunbar RP, Semeraro LN, Westerink HJ, Kennedy AB, Smith JM, Powell MD, Cardone VJ, Cox AT (2013) US IOOS coastal and ocean modeling testbed: inter-model evaluation of tides, waves, and hurricane surge in the Gulf of Mexico. J Geophys Res Oceans 118:5129–5172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishnamurti TN, Pattnaik S, Biswas MK, Bensman E, Kramer M, Surgi N, Kumar TSVV (2010) Hurricane forecasts with a mesoscale suite of models. Tellus Ser Dyn Meteorol Oceanogr 62:633–646

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuiry SN, Ding Y, Wang SSY (2014) Numerical simulations of morphological changes in barrier islands induced by storm surges and waves using a supercritical flow model. Front Struct Civil Eng 8:57–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landsea CW (1993) A climatology of intense (or major) Atlantic hurricanes. Mon Weather Rev 121:1703–1713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Z, Pu ZX (2014) Numerical Simulations of the Genesis of Typhoon Nuri (2008): sensitivity to initial conditions and implications for the roles of intense convection and moisture conditions. Weather Forecast 29:1402–1424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim KSS, Hong SY (2010) Development of an effective double-moment cloud microphysics scheme with prognostic cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) for weather and climate models. Mon Weather Rev 138:1587–1612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin N, Chavas D (2012) On hurricane parametric wind and applications in storm surge modeling. J Geophys Res Atmos 117

  • Lin YL, Colle BA (2011) A new bulk microphysical scheme that includes riming intensity and temperature-dependent ice characteristics. Mon Weather Rev 139:1013–1035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin Y-L, Farley R, Orville HD (1983) Bulk parameterization of the snow field in a cloud model. J Clim Appl Meteorol 22:1065–1092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin N, Smith JA, Villarini G, Marchok TP, Baeck ML (2010) modeling extreme rainfall, winds, and surge from Hurricane Isabel (2003). Weather Forecast 25:1342–1361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu YB, Zhang DL, Yau MK (1997) Multiscale numerical study of Hurricane Andrew (1992). 1. Explicit simulation and verification. Mon Weather Rev 125:3073–3093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynn BH, Healy R, Druyan LM (2009) Investigation of Hurricane Katrina characteristics for future, warmer climates. Clim Res 39:75–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martino CD, Cheung KF, Phadke AC, Houston SH (2001) Simulation of hurricane waves with parametric wind fields. In: Conference proceedings of oceans 2001 MTS/IEEE: an ocean odyssey, vols 1–4, pp 1323–1330

  • McFarquhar GM, Zhang HN, Heymsfield G, Hood R, Dudhia J, Halverson JB, Marks F (2006) Factors affecting the evolution of Hurricane Erin (2001) and the distributions of hydrometeors: role of microphysical processes. J Atmos Sci 63:127–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison H, Gettelman A (2008) A new two-moment bulk stratiform cloud microphysics scheme in the community atmosphere model, version 3 (CAM3). Part I: description and numerical tests. J Clim 21:3642–3659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison H, Pinto JO (2005) Mesoscale modeling of spring time arctic mixed-phase clouds using a new two-moment bulk microphysics scheme. J Atmos Sci 62:3683–3704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison H, Pinto JO (2006) Intercomparison of bulk cloud microphysics schemes in mesoscale simulations of springtime arctic mixed-phase stratiform clouds. Mon Weather Rev 134:1880–1900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison H, Thompson G, Tatarskii V (2009) Impact of cloud microphysics on the development of trailing stratiform precipitation in a simulated squall line: comparison of one- and two-moment schemes. Mon Weather Rev 137:991–1007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukhopadhyay P, Taraphdar S, Goswami BN (2011) Influence of moist processes on track and intensity forecast of cyclones over the north Indian Ocean. J Geophys Res Atmo 116:D05116. doi:10.1029/2010JD014700

    Google Scholar 

  • Neale RB, Richter JH, Jochum M (2008) The impact of convection on ENSO: from a delayed oscillator to a series of events. J Clim 21:5904–5924

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordeng TE (1995) Extended versions of the convective parameterization scheme at ECMWF and their impact on the mean and transient activity of the model in the Tropics. In: ECMWF research department technical memorandum, vol 206

  • Oh SM, Moon IJ (2013) Typhoon and storm surge intensity changes in a warming climate around the Korean Peninsula. Nat Hazards 66:1405–1429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olabarrieta M, Warner JC, Armstrong B, Zambon JB, He RY (2012) Ocean-atmosphere dynamics during Hurricane Ida and Nor’Ida: an application of the coupled ocean-atmosphere-wave-sediment transport (COAWST) modeling system. Ocean Model 43–44:112–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pielke RA, Gratz J, Landsea CW, Collins D, Saunders M, Musulin R (2008) Normalized Hurricane damage in the United States: 1900–2005. Nat Hazards Rev 9:14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell MD, Houston SH, Amat LR, Morisseau-Leroy N (1998) The HRD real-time hurricane wind analysis system. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 77–8:53–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen R, Liu CH, Ikeda K, Gochis D, Yates D, Chen F, Tewari M, Barlage M, Dudhia J, Yu W, Miller K, Arsenault K, Grubisic V, Thompson G, Gutmann E (2011) High-resolution coupled climate runoff simulations of seasonal snowfall over Colorado: a process study of current and warmer climate. J Clim 24:3015–3048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds RW, Smith TM, Liu C, Chelton DB, Casey KS, Schlax MG (2007) Daily high-resolution-blended analyses for sea surface temperature. J Clim 20:5473–5496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richter JH, Rasch PJ (2008) Effects of convective momentum transport on the atmospheric circulation in the community atmosphere model, version 3. J Clim 21:1487–1499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutledge SA, Hobbs PV (1983) The mesoscale and microscale structure and organization of clouds and precipitation in midlatitude cyclones. VIII: a model for the ‘‘seeder-feeder’’ process in warm-frontal rainbands. J Atmos Sci 40:1185–1206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salathe EP, Hamlet AF, Mass CF, Lee SY, Stumbaugh M, Steed R (2014) Estimates of twenty-first-century flood risk in the pacific northwest based on regional climate model simulations. J Hydrometeorol 15:1881–1899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro LJ (1983) The asymmetric boundary-layer flow under a translating Hurricane. J Atmos Sci 40:1984–1998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skamarock WC, Klemp JB, Dudhia J, Gill DO, Barker DM, Duda MG, Huang X, Wang W, Powers JG (2008) A Description of the Advanced Research WRF Version 3, NCAR Tech. Note, NCAR/TN-475+STR. National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, 8 pp. http://www.mmm.ucar.edu/wrf/users/docs/arw_v3.pdf

  • Tao W-K, Simpson JS, McCumber M (1989) An ice-water saturation adjustment. Mon Weather Rev 117:231–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tao WK, Shi JJ, Chen SYS, Lang S, Lin PL, Hong SY, Peters-Lidard C, Hou A (2011) The impact of microphysical schemes on hurricane intensity and track. Asia Pac J Atmos Sci 47:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taraphdar S, Mukhopadhyay P, Leung RL, Zhang F, Abhilash S, Goswami BN (2014) The role of moist processes in the intrinsic predictability of Indian Ocean cyclones. J Geophys Res Atmos 119:8032–8048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tasnim KM, Shibayama T, Esteban M, Takagi H, Ohira K, Nakamura R (2015) Field observation and numerical simulation of past and future storm surges in the Bay of Bengal: case study of cyclone Nargis. Nat Hazards 75:1619–1647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson EF, Cardone VJ (1996) Practical modeling of hurricane surface wind fields. J Waterw Port Coast Ocean Eng ASCE 122:195–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson G, Rasmussen RM, Manning K (2004) Explicit forecasts of winter precipitation using an improved bulk microphysics scheme. Part I: description and sensitivity analysis. Mon Weather Rev 132:519–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson Gregory, Field PR, Rasmussen RM, Hall WD (2008) Explicit forecasts of winter precipitation using an improved Bulk Microphysics scheme. Part II: implementation of a new snow parameterization. Mon Weather Rev 136:5095–5115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiedtke M (1989) A comprehensive mass flux scheme for cumulus parameterization in large-scale models. Mon Weather Rev 117:1779–1800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trenberth KE, Fasullo J (2008) Energy budgets of Atlantic hurricanes and changes from 1970. Geochem Geophys Geosyst 9

  • U.S. DOE (2009) Comparing the Impacts of the 2005 and 2008 Hurricanes on U.S. Energy Infrastructure. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability. February 2009. https://www.oe.netl.doe.gov/docs/HurricaneComp0508r2.pdf

  • Vickery PJ, Masters FJ, Powell MD, Wadhera D (2009a) Hurricane hazard modeling: the past, present, and future. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 97:392–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vickery PJ, Wadhera D, Powell MD, Chen YZ (2009b) A hurricane boundary layer and wind field model for use in engineering applications. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 48:381–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vizy EK, Cook KH (2009) Tropical storm development from african easterly waves in the eastern Atlantic: a comparison of two successive waves using a regional model as part of NASA AMMA 2006. J Atmos Sci 66:3313–3334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walton DB, Sun FP, Hall A, Capps S (2015) A hybrid dynamical-statistical downscaling technique. Part I: development and validation of the technique. J Clim 28:4597–4617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Sen OL, Wang B (2003) A highly resolved regional climate model (IPRC-RegCM) and its simulation of the 1998 severe precipitation event over China. Part I: model description and verification of simulation. J Clim 16:1721–1738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Xie S-P, Hu H-M, Wang B (2004) Regional model simulations of marine boundary layer clouds over the south-east Pacific off South America. Part I: control experiment. Mon Weather Rev 132:274–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Zhou L, Hamilton KP (2007) Effect of convective entrainment/detrainment on simulation of tropical precipitation diurnal cycle. Mon Weather Rev 135:567–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warner JC, Armstrong B, He RY, Zambon JB (2010) Development of a coupled ocean-atmosphere-wave-sediment transport (COAWST) modeling system. Ocean Model 35:230–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisberg RH, Zheng LY (2008) Hurricane storm surge simulations comparing three-dimensional with two-dimensional formulations based on an Ivan-like storm over the Tampa Bay, Florida region. J Geophys Res Oceans 113

  • Willoughby HE, Darling RWR, Rahn ME (2006) Parametric representation of the primary hurricane vortex. Part II: a new family of sectionally continuous profiles. Mon Weather Rev 134:1102–1120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu SD, Huang WR, Zhang GP, Gao F, Li XM (2014) Integrating Monte Carlo and hydrodynamic models for estimating extreme water levels by storm surge in Colombo, Sri Lanka. Nat Hazards 71:703–721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xue PF, Chen CS, Qi JH, Beardsley RC, Tian RC, Zhao LZ, Lin HC (2014) Mechanism studies of seasonal variability of dissolved oxygen in Mass Bay: a multi-scale FVCOM/UG-RCA application. J Mar Syst 131:102–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang ZQ, Wang TP, Leung R, Hibbard K, Janetos T, Kraucunas I, Rice J, Preston B, Wilbanks T (2014) A modeling study of coastal inundation induced by storm surge, sea-level rise, and subsidence in the Gulf of Mexico. Nat Hazards 71:1771–1794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeh KS, Zhang XJ, Gopalakrishnan S, Aberson S, Rogers R, Marks F, Atlas R (2012) Performance of the experimental HWRF in the 2008 Hurricane Season. Nat Hazards 63:1439–1449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang GJ, Mcfarlane NA (1995) Sensitivity of Climate Simulations to the Parameterization of Cumulus Convection in the Canadian Climate Center General-Circulation model. Atmos Ocean 33:407–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang JA, Uhlhorn EW (2012) Hurricane sea surface inflow angle and an observation-based parametric model. Mon Weather Rev 140:3587–3605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao L, Wang SY, Jin J, Clark AJ (2015) Weather Research and Forecasting model simulations of a rare springtime bow echo near the Great Salt Lake, USA. Meteorol Appl 22:301–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Biological and Environmental Research as part of the Integrated Assessment Research program. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory is operated by Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC05-76RL01830.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhaoqing Yang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, Z., Taraphdar, S., Wang, T. et al. Uncertainty and feasibility of dynamical downscaling for modeling tropical cyclones for storm surge simulation. Nat Hazards 84, 1161–1184 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2482-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2482-y

Keywords

Navigation