Abstract
This study presents an extended framework for the analysis of economic effects of natural disaster risk management. It also attempts to define and evaluate the optimal insurance arrangements. A model, the economic utility constrained-maximization model, is proposed. The purpose of this study is to establish a strategy for determining an insurance and risk control plan in which consideration is given to balancing the economic effects (e.g., decrease in costs due to damage) by disaster mitigation. Furthermore, these values are compared with risk control actions for purposes of prioritization, to provide data to help evaluate the benefit of each risk control action. Disaster insurance policy premiums in contrast are based on actuarial data taken from situations in which risk control measures are not employed. This can make such contracts unfair to responsible enterprise managers who must take risk control measures. This represents an unfair aspect of insurance policies. Enterprise managers should be able to determine the optimum arrangement between natural disaster risk control and insurance given their budget limitations. The optimal strategies aim at the best applicability and balance between risk control and insurance capability for the enterprise manager. Risk control measures can generate several risk control options for enterprise managers. Premium discounts by insurers are given in this model.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Accorsi R, Zio E, Apostolakis GE (1999) Developing utility functions for environmental decision-making. Prog Nucl Energy 34(4):387–411
Chen CW (2004) Stability analysis of T-S fuzzy models for nonlinear multiple time-delay interconnected systems. Math Comput Simul 66:523–537
Chen CW (2006) Stability conditions of fuzzy systems and its application to structural and mechanical systems. Adv Eng Softw 37:624–629
Chen CW (2009) Modeling and control for nonlinear structural systems via a NN-based approach. Expert Syst Appl 36:4765–4772
Chen CW (2010a) GA-based adaptive neural network controllers for nonlinear systems. Int J Innov Comput Inform Control 6:1793–1803
Chen CW (2010b) Stability analysis of an oceanic structure using the Lyapunov method. Eng Comput 27:186–204
Chen CW (2010c) Application of fuzzy-model-based control to nonlinear structural systems with time delay: an LMI method. J Vib Control 16:1651–1672
Chen CY (2010d) Fuzzy control for an oceanic structure: a case study in time-delay TLP system. J Vib Control 16:147–160
Chen CW (2011) Stability analysis and robustness design of nonlinear systems: an NN-based approach. Appl Soft Comput 11(2):2735–2742
Chen CY (2012a) Assessment of the major hazard potential of interfacial solitary waves moving over a trapezoidal obstacle on a horizontal plateau. Nat Hazards 62(3):841–852
Chen CY (2012b) Disaster prevention and reduction for exploring teachers’ technology acceptance using a virtual reality system and partial least squares techniques. Nat Hazards 62(3):1217–1231
Chen PC, Chen CW, Chiang WL (2009) GA-based modified adaptive fuzzy sliding mode controller for nonlinear systems. Expert Syst Appl 36:5872–5879
Haque CE, Etkin D (2007) People and community as constituent parts of hazards: the significance of societal dimensions in hazards analysis. Nat Hazards 41(2):271–282
Hsiao FH, Chen CW, Liang YW, Xu SD, Chiang WL (2005a) T-S fuzzy controllers for nonlinear interconnected systems with multiple time delays. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst I Regul Pap 52:1883–1893
Hsiao FH, Hwang JD, Chen CW, Tsai ZR (2005b) Robust stabilization of nonlinear multiple time-delay large-scale systems via decentralized fuzzy control. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 13:152–163
Hsu WK (2011) An integrated flood risk assessment model for property insurance industry in Taiwan. Nat Hazards 58(3):1295–1309
Hsu WK (2012) Risk and uncertainty analysis in the planning stages of a risk decision-making process. Nat Hazards 61(3):1355–1365
Lauras M, Marques G, Gourc D (2010) Towards a multi-dimensional project performance measurement system. Decis Support Syst 48:342–353
Lin ML (2011) Using GIS-based spatial geocomputation from remotely sensed data for drought risk-sensitive assessment. Int J Innov Comput Inform Control 7(2):657–668
Lin JW (2012a) Kalman filter decision systems for debris flow hazard assessment. Nat Hazards 60(3):1255–1266
Lin JW (2012b) Modeling and assessment of bridge structure for seismic hazard prevention. Nat Hazards 61(3):1115–1126
Lin JW (2012c) Potential hazard analysis and risk assessment of debris flow by fuzzy modeling. Nat Hazards. doi:10.1007/s11069-012-0236-z
Power DJ, Sohal AS, Rahman S (2001) Critical success factors in agile natural disaster risk management: an empirical study. Int J Phys Distrib Logist 31(4):247–265
Prater E, Biehl M, Smith MA (2001) International natural disaster risk control tradeoffs between flexibility and uncertainty. Int J Oper Prod Manag 21(5/6):823–839
Prescott ES (1999) A primer on moral-hazard models. Fed Reserv Bank Richmond Econ Q 85:47–77
Raaijmakers R, Krywkow J, van der Veen A (2008) Flood risk perceptions and spatial multi-criteria analysis: an exploratory research for hazard mitigation. Nat Hazards 46(3):307–322
Raviv A (1979) The design of an optimal insurance policy. Am Econ Rev 69:84–96
Shih BY (2012) Using Lego NXT to explore scientific literacy in disaster prevention and rescue systems. Nat Hazards. doi:10.1007/s11069-012-0233-2
Tsai CH (2010) An earthquake disaster management mechanism based on risk assessment information for the tourism industry-A case study from the island of Taiwan. Tour Manag 31(4):470–481
Tsai CH (2011a) Development of a mechanism for typhoon and flood risk assessment and disaster management in the hotel industry—a case study of the Hualien area. Scand J Hosp Tour 11(3):324–341
Tsai CH (2011b) The establishment of a rapid natural disaster risk assessment model for the tourism industry. Tour Manag 32(1):158–171
Tseng CP (2011) A new viewpoint on risk control decision models for natural disasters. Nat Hazards 59(3):1715–1733
Tseng CP (2012a) Default risk-based probabilistic decision model for risk management and control. Nat Hazards. doi:10.1007/s11069-012-0183-8
Tseng CP (2012b) Natural disaster management mechanisms for probabilistic earthquake loss. Nat Hazards 60(3):1055–1063
Tseng CP, Chen CW, Liu FR (2012) Risk control allocation model for pressure vessels and piping project. J Vib Control 18(3):385–394
Yang HC (2012) Potential hazard analysis from the viewpoint of flow measurement in large open-channel junctions. Nat Hazards 61(2):803–813
Yi CS, Lee JH, Shim MP (2010) GIS-based distributed technique for assessing economic loss from flood damage: pre-feasibility study for the Anyang Stream Basin in Korea. Nat Hazards 55(2):251–272
Yusuf YY, Gunasekaran A, Adeleye EO, Sivayoganathan K (2004) Agile natural disaster risk capabilities: determinants of competitive objectives. Eur J Oper Res 159:379–392
Zhou HJ, Wang JA, Wan JH et al (2010) Resilience to natural hazards: a geographic perspective. Nat Hazards 53(1):21–41
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the National Science Council of the Republic of China, Taiwan, for their financial support of this research under Contract Nos. NSC 100-2221-E-022-013-MY2, NSC 100-2628-E-022-002-MY2.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, CW., Tseng, CP., Hsu, WK. et al. A novel strategy to determine the insurance and risk control plan for natural disaster risk management. Nat Hazards 64, 1391–1403 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0305-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0305-3