Skip to main content
Log in

Kalman filter decision systems for debris flow hazard assessment

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper aims to develop a model for debris flow hazard assessment, since Taiwan is a mountainous country subject to bouts of heavy rainfall during the rainy and typhoon seasons and is thus frequently subject to landslide disasters. The database used is comprised of information from actual cases that occurred in areas of Hualien in eastern Taiwan during 2007 and 2008. The Kalman filter model is utilized to assess the occurrence of debris flows from computed indexes, to verify modeling errors. Comparisons are made between two models to determine which one is better in practical applications. The efficiency of the Kalman filter decision system has been proved, showing smaller average relative error and correspondingly larger ratio of success on debris flow assessment when compared to the neural network model. The relative error is calculated between the differences in the ratio of model outputs and that of actual occurrences. Such an error index can be decreased from 4.65 to 3.39% by introducing the concept of geographic divisions to the Kalman filter model, which demonstrates its ability to forecast the occurrence of debris flows for the coming year.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Archetti R, Lamberti A (2003) Assessment of risk due to debris flow events. Nat Haz Rev 4(3):115–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calvo B, Savi F (2009) A real-world application of Monte Carlo procedure for debris flow risk assessment. Comput Geosci 35(5):967–977

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang CP (1995) Application of geographic information system in determining potential risk of debris flow. Master thesis, National Cheng Kung University, Taiwan (in Chinese)

  • Chen KH (2006) The study of using fuzzy theory to the prediction system of debris flow. Master thesis, Feng Chia University, Taiwan (in Chinese)

  • Chen H, Lee CF (2000) Numerical simulation of debris flows. Can Geotech J 37(1):146–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen SC, Ferng JW, Wang YT, Wu TY, Wang JJ (2008) Assessment of disaster resilience capacity of hillslope communities with high risk for geological hazards. Eng Geol 98(3–4):86–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen SC, Wu CY, Wu TY (2009) Resilient capacity assessment for geological failure areas: examples from communities affected by debris flow disaster. Environ Geol 56(8):1523–1532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crosta GB, Frattini P (2004) Controls on modern alluvial fan processes in the central Alps, northern Italy. Earth Surf Proc Landfor 29(3):267–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh CL, Chiang CH, Chen LJ (1992) Field survey and analysis of debris flow in Hualien and Taitung. J Chinese Soil Water Conserv 23(2):109–122 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Komma J, Blöschl G, Reszler C (2008) Soil moisture updating by ensemble Kalman filtering in real-time flood forecasting. J Hydrol 357:228–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landau ID, Lozano R, M’Saad M (1997) Adaptive control. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin JW (2001) Adaptive algorithms for the identification of nonlinear structural systems. Dissertation, Columbia University, New York

  • Lin JW (2011) Neural network model and geographic grouping for risk assessment of debris flow. Int J Phys Sci 6(6):1374–1378

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin JW, Chen HJ (2009) Repetitive identification of structural systems using a nonlinear model parameter refinement approach. Shock Vibrat 16(3):229–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin ML, Jan SS (1995) A preliminary research of application of geographic information system in determining risk of debris flow. J Chinese Inst Civil Hydraulic Eng 7(4):475–486 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu X, Yue ZQ, Tham LG, Lee CF (2002) Empirical assessment of debris flow risk on a regional scale in Yunnan province, Southwestern China. Environ Manag 30(2):249–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossa A, Liechti K, Zappa M, Bruen M, Germann U, Haase G, Keil C, Krahe P (2011) The COST 731 action: a review on uncertainty propagation in advanced hydro-meteorological forecast systems. Atmos Res 100:150–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu FC, Chen CK (1991) Mechanism and investigation of debris flow. J Chinese Soil Water Conservat 24(1):67–79 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the National Science Council of the Republic of China, Taiwan, for their financial support of this research under Contract Nos. NSC 95-2221-E-035-111, NSC 98-2221-E-366-006-MY2, NSC 100-2221-E-022-013-MY2 and NSC 100-2628-E-022-002-MY2.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cheng-Wu Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lin, JW., Chen, CW. & Peng, CY. Kalman filter decision systems for debris flow hazard assessment. Nat Hazards 60, 1255–1266 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-011-9907-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-011-9907-4

Keywords

Navigation