Skip to main content
Log in

Praise for regret: People value regret above other negative emotions

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Motivation and Emotion Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

What do people think about the emotion of regret? Recent demonstrations of the psychological benefits of regret have been framed against an assumption that most people find regret to be aversive, both when experienced but also when recalled later. Two studies explored lay evaluations of regret experiences, revealing them to be largely favorable rather than unfavorable. Study 1 demonstrated that regret, but not other negative emotions, was dominated by positive more than negative evaluations. In both studies 1 and 2, although participants saw a great deal of benefit from their negative emotions, regret stood out as particularly beneficial. Indeed, in study 2, regret was seen to be the most beneficial of 12 negative emotions on all five functions of: making sense of past experiences, facilitating approach behaviors, facilitating avoidance behaviors, gaining insights into the self, and in preserving social harmony. Moreover, in study 2, individuals made self-serving ascriptions of regret, reporting greater regret experiences for themselves than for others. In short, people value their regrets substantially more than they do other negative emotions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baumeister, R. F. (1998). The self. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 680–740). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, D. E. (1982). Regret in decision making under uncertainty. Operations Research, 30, 961–981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. D. (1986). Evaluations of self and others: Self-enhancement biases in social judgment. Social Cognition, 4, 353–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, T., & Butler, D. (2006). Regret in economic and psychological theories of choice. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 19, 139–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, T., & Zeelenberg, M. (2002). Regret in decision making. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 212–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, D., Heath, C., & Suls, J. (2004). Flawed self-assessment: Implications for health, education, and the workplace. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5, 69–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eaton, J., & Struthers, C. W. (2006). The reduction of psychological aggression across varied interpersonal contexts through repentance and forgiveness. Aggressive Behavior, 32, 195–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eaton, J., Struthers, C. W., & Santelli, A. G. (2006). The mediating role of perceptual validation in the repentance—forgiveness process. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1389–1401.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, S., Lipson, A., Holstein, C., & Huh, E. (1992). Irrational reactions to negative outcomes: Evidence for two conceptual systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 328–339.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Epstude, K., & Roese, N. J. (in press). The functional theory of counterfactual thinking. Personality and Social Psychology Review.

  • Gilbert, D. T., Morewedge, C. K., Risen, J. L., & Wilson, T. D. (2004). Looking forward to looking backward: The misprediction of regret. Psychological Science, 15, 346–350.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., Krueger, A. B., Schkade, D., Schwarz, N., & Stone, A. A. (2004). A survey method for characterizing daily life experience: The day reconstruction method (DRM). Science, 306, 1776–1780.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Miller, D. T. (1986). Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychological Review, 93, 136–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, L. A., & Hicks, J. A. (2006). Narrating the self in the past and the future: Implications for maturity. Research in Human Development, 3, 121–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, L. A., & Hicks, J. A. (2007). Whatever happened to “what might have been?” Regrets, happiness, and maturity. American Psychologist., 62, 625–636.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kruger, J. (1999). Lake Wobegon be gone! The “below-average effect” and the egocentric nature of comparative ability judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 221–232.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Landman, J. (1993). Regret: The persistence of the possible. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lecci, L., Okun, M. A., & Karoly, P. (1994). Life regrets and current goals as predictors of psychological adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 731–741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markman, K. D., McMullen, M. N., & Elizaga, R. A. (2008). Counterfactual thinking, persistence, and performance: A test of the reflection and evaluation model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 421–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markman, K. D., & Weary, G. (1998). Control motivation, depression, and counterfactual thought. In M. Kofta, G. Weary, & G. Sedak (Eds.), Personal control in action: Cognitive and motivational mechanisms (pp. 363–390). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFarland, C., & Miller, D. T. (1990). Judgments of self-other similarity: Just like other people, only more so. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 475–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, T. R., Thompson, L., Peterson, E., & Cronk, R. (1997). Temporal adjustments in the evaluation of events: The “Rosy View.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 421–448.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Monroe, M. R., Skowronski, J. J., MacDonald, W., & Wood, S. E. (2005). The mildly depressed experience more post-decisional regret than the non-depressed. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 24, 665–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niedenthal, P. M., Tangney, J. P., & Gavanski, I. (1994). “If only I weren’t” versus “If only I hadn’t”: Distinguishing shame and guilt in counterfactual thinking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 585–595.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ortony, A., Clore, G. L., & Collins, A. (1988). The cognitive structure of emotions. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roese, N. J. (1994). The functional basis of counterfactual thinking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 805–818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roese, N. J. (1997). Counterfactual thinking. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 133–148.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roese, N. J., & Olson, J. M. (2007). Better, stronger, faster: Self-serving judgment, affect regulation, and the optimal vigilance hypothesis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 124–141.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roese, N. J., & Summerville, A. (2005). What we regret most ... and why. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1273–1285.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1161–1178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, J. A. (2003). Core affect and the psychological construal of emotion. Psychological Review, 110, 145–172.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sabini, J., & Silver, M. (2005). Why emotion names and experiences don’t neatly pair. Psychological Inquiry, 16, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saffrey, C., & Ehrenberg, M. E. (2007). When thinking hurts: Attachment, rumination, and post-relationship adjustment. Personal Relationships, 14, 351–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schimmack, U. (2003). Affective measurement in experience sampling research. Journal of Happiness Studies, 4, 79–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, B., Ward, A., Monterosso, J., Lyubormirsky, S., White, K., & Lehman, D. R. (2002). Maximizing versus satisficing: Happiness is a matter of choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1178–1197.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scollon, C. N., Kim-Prieto, C., & Diener, E. (2003). Experience sampling: Promises and pitfalls, strengths and weaknesses. Journal of Happiness Studies, 4, 5–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaver, P., Schwartz, J., Kirson, D., & O’Connor, C. (1987). Emotion knowledge: Further exploration of a prototype approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1061–1086.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shimanoff, S. B. (1984). Commonly named emotions in everyday conversations. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 58, 514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. A., & Ellsworth, P. C. (1985). Patterns of cognitive appraisal in emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 813–838.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 193–210.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tellegen, A., Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1999). On the dimensional and hierarchical structure of affect. Psychological Science, 10, 297–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Boven, L., & Ashworth, L. (2007). Looking forward, looking back: Anticipation is more evocative than ‘retrospection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 289–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk, W. W., & Zeelenberg, M. (2002). Investigating the appraisal patterns of regret and disappointment. Motivation and Cognition, 26, 321–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk, E., & Zeelenberg, M. (2007). When curiousity killed regret: Avoiding or seeking the unknown in decision-making under uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 656–662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wierzbicka, A. (1992). Defining emotion concepts. Cognitive Science, 16, 539–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, T. D., & Gilbert, D. T. (2003). Affective forecasting. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 35, pp. 345–411). New York: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, T. D., Meyers, J., & Gilbert, D. T. (2003). “How happy was I, anyway?”: A retrospective impact bias. Social Cognition, 21, 407–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeelenberg, M. (1999). The use of crying over spilled milk: A note on the rationality and functionality of regret. Philosophical Psychology, 12, 325–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeelenberg, M., Beattie, J., van der Pligt, J, & de Vries, N. (1996). Consequences of regret aversion: Effects of expected feedback on risky decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65, 148–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeelenberg, M., Inman, J. J., & Pieters, R. G. M. (2001). What do we do when decisions go awry: Behavioral consequences of experienced regret. In J. Baron, G. Loomes, & E. Weber (Eds.), Conflict and tradeoffs in decision making (pp. 136–155). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeelenberg, M., & Pieters, R. (2007). A theory of regret regulation 1.0. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17, 3–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeelenberg, M., van Dijk, W. W., van der Pligt, J., Manstead, A. S. R., van Empelen, P., & Reinderman, D. (1998). Emotional reactions to outcomes of decisions: The role of counterfactual thinking in the experience of regret and disappointment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 75, 117–141.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported National Institute of Mental Health grant MH55578, awarded to the first author. Ashley Gonzalez conducted Study 1 as part of a McNair Fellowship summer research program. Comments on this research by Chris Fraley and Justin Kruger are much appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Neal J. Roese.

Appendix

Appendix

Scale Items

Emotion appraisals (study 1)

Frequency:

In general, I tend to feel this emotion often

Intensity:

When I feel this emotion, I feel it very deeply

Positive beliefs:

This emotion helps me to know how to act in the future

This emotion keeps me from making the same mistakes again

Overall, this emotion is useful to me

Negative beliefs:

This emotion gets in the way of understanding past events

This emotion is pointless and unproductive

Overall, this emotion is bad for me

Regret Scale (Schwartz et al. 2002) (study 2)

1. Whenever I make a choice, I’m curious about what would have happened if I had chosen differently

2. Whenever I make a choice, I try to get information about how the other alternatives turned out

3. If I make a choice and it turns out well, I still feel like something of a failure it I find out that another choice would have turned out better

4. When I think about how I’m doing in life, I often assess opportunities I have passed up

5. Once I make a decision, I don’t look back

Functions of Negative Emotions (study 2)

Sense-making:

Helps me make sense of past events

Helps me come to terms with undesirable outcomes

Approach Motivation:

Prepares me for action

Helps me know how to act in the future

Avoidance Motivation:

Stops me from making the same mistakes again

Stops me from doing dangerous or harmful things

Insight:

Helps me gain insight to my own attributes

Helps me better understand the impact of my actions

Social Harmony:

Improves my relationships with others

Helps me better understand what others are thinking and feeling

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Saffrey, C., Summerville, A. & Roese, N.J. Praise for regret: People value regret above other negative emotions. Motiv Emot 32, 46–54 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-008-9082-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-008-9082-4

Keywords

Navigation