Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Investigating the Relationships Among Elementary School Students’ Epistemological Beliefs, Metacognition, and Constructivist Science Learning Environment

  • Published:
Journal of Science Teacher Education

Abstract

The research questions addressed in this study were: what types of epistemological beliefs do elementary students have; what types of metacognition do elementary students have; and what are the relationships among students’ perceived characteristics of constructivist learning environment, metacognition, and epistemological beliefs. A total of 626 students enrolled in sixth, seventh, and eight grades of nine elementary public schools located in Ankara, Turkey constituted the participants of this study. Constructivist learning environment survey (CLES), Junior metacognitive awareness inventory (Jr. MAI), and Schommer epistemological belief questionnaire (EB) were administered to students. Factor Analysis of Jr. MAI revealed both knowledge of cognition and regulation of cognition items were loaded into one factor. Confirmatory factor analysis of EB revealed a four factor structure namely innate ability, quick learning, omniscient authority, and certain knowledge. Regression analyses revealed that metacognition and omniscient authority were significant predictors of personal relevance dimension of CLES. Metacognition was found as the only predictor of the student negotiation. Innate ability and metacognition significantly contributed to uncertainty. This study revealed that the elementary students with different mastery levels hold different epistemological beliefs and multi-faceted nature of elementary school students’ metacognition was seemed to be supported with this study. It was found that metacognition contributed to model more than epistemological beliefs for all three dimensions of CLES.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aldridge, J. M., Fraser, B. J., & Sebela, M. P. (2004). Using teacher action research to promote constructivist learning environment in South Africa. South African Journal of Education, 24(4), 245–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldridge, J. M., Fraser, B. J., Taylor, P. C., & Chen, C. (2000). Constructivist learning environments in a cross-national study in Taiwan and Australia. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 37–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baxter Magolda, M. B., & Porterfield, W. (1988). Intellectual development: Linking theory and practice. Washington, DC: American College Personnel Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belenky, M. F., Clinchy, B. M., Goldberger, N. R., & Tarule, J. M. (1986). Women’s ways of knowing. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berberoglu, G., & Hei, L. M. (2003). A comparison of university students’ approach to learning across Taiwan and Turkey. International Journal of Testing, 3(2), 173–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J. B. (1987). Student approaches to learning and studying. Hawthorn: Australian Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyes, M. C., & Chandler, M. (1992). Cognitive development, epistemic doubt, and identity formation in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 21, 277–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braten, I., & Stromso, H. I. (2005). The relationship between epistemological beliefs, implicit theories of intelligence, and self-regulated learning among Norwegian postsecondary students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 539–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. L. (1978). Knowing when, where, and how to remember: A problem of metacognition. Advances in Instructional Psychology, 1, 77–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cano, F. (2005). Epistemological beliefs and approaches to learning: Their change through secondary school and their influence on academic performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(2), 203–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conley, A. M., Pintrich, P. R., Vekiri, I., & Harrison, D. (2004). Changes in epistemological beliefs in elementary science students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 186–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross, D. R., & Paris, S. G. (1988). Development and instructional analyses of children’s metacognition and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(2), 131–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, B. J. (2003). Science learning environments: Assessment, effects and determinants. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 527–564). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennessey, M. G. (1999). Probing the dimensions of metacognition: Implications for conceptual change teaching learning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST), Boston, MA, March 28–31.

  • Johnson, B., & McClure, R. (2004). Validity and reliability of a shortened, revised version of the constructivist learning environment survey (CLES). Learning Environments Research, 7, 65–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, P. M., & Kitchener, K. S. (2004). Reflective judgment: Theory and research on development of epistemic assumptions through adulthood. Educational Psychologist, 39, 5–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitchener, K. S. (1986). The reflective judgment model: Characteristics, evidence, and measurement. In R. A. Mines & K. S. Kitchener (Eds.), Adult cognitive development: Methods and models (pp. 76–91). New York: Praeger Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education (MEB). (2005). Elementary science program for 6th–8th grade students.

  • Perry, W. G., Jr. (1968). Patterns of development in thought and values of students in a liberal arts college: A validation of a scheme. Cambridge, MA: Bureau of Study Counsel, Harvard University. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 024315).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R. (2002). The role of metacognitive knowledge in learning, teaching, and assessing. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 219–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schommer, M. (1990). The effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 498–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schommer, M. (1994). Synthesizing epistemological belief research: Tentative understandings and provocative confusions. Educational Psychology Review, 6(4), 293–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schommer, M. (1998). The influence of age and education on epistemological beliefs. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 551–562.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schommer, M., Calvert, C., Gariglietti, G., & Bajaj, A. (1997). The development of epistemological beliefs among secondary students: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 37–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schommer-Aikins, M. (2004). Explaining the epistemological belief system: Introducing the embedded systemic model and coordinated research approach. Educational Psychologist, 39(1), 19–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schommer-Aikins, M., Duell, O. K., & Hutter, R. (2005). Epistemological beliefs, mathematical problem-solving beliefs, and academic performance of middle school students. The Elementary School Journal, 105(3), 289–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schommer-Aikins, M., Mau, W., Brookhart, S., & Hutter, R. (2000). Understanding middle students’ beliefs about knowledge and learning using multidimensional paradigm. Journal of Educational Research, 94, 120–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schraw, G., Crippen, K. J., & Hartley, K. (2006). Promoting self-regulation in science education: Metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning. Research in Science Education, 36, 111–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schraw, G., & Denison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 460–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schraw, G., & Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive theories. Educational Psychology Review, 7(4), 351–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schunk, D. H., Pintrich, P. R., & Meece, J. L. (2008). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperling, R. A., Howard, B. C., Miller, L. A., & Murphy, C. (2002). Measures of children’s knowledge and regulation of cognition. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 51–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P., & Fraser, B. (1991). CLES: An instrument for assessing constructivist learning environments. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, The Abbey, Fontane, Wisconsin.

  • Taylor, P., Fraser, B. J., & Fisher, D. L. (1995). Monitoring constructivist classroom learning environments. Paper presented in National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST), San Francisco, CA.

  • Taylor, P., Fraser, B. J., & Fisher, D. L. (1997). Monitoring constructivist classroom learning environments. International Journal of Educational Research, 27, 293–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, C. C. (2000). Relationships between student scientific epistemological beliefs and perceptions of constructivist learning environments. Educational Research, 42(2), 193–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz-Tuzun, O., Cakiroglu, J., & Boone, W. J. (2006). Turkish high school student’s perceptions of constructivist learning environment in chemistry classrooms and their attitudes toward chemistry. Paper presented and published in the proceedings of National Association for research in Science Teaching (NARST), San Francisco, CA.

  • Yilmaz-Tuzun, O., & Topcu, S. M. (2008). Relationships among preservice science teachers’ epistemological beliefs, epistemological world views, and self-efficacy beliefs. International Journal of Science Education, 30(1), 65–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (1986). Becoming a self-regulated learner: Which are the key sub-processes? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 11, 307–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview. Educational Psychologist, 25(1), 3–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (1995). Self-regulatory involves more than metacognition: A social cognitive perspective. Educational Psychologist, 30(4), 217–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (1998). Academic studying and development of personal skill: A self-regulatory perspective. Educational Psychologist, 33(2/3), 73–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Elementary Education, Faculty of Education, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey

    Özgül Yilmaz-Tüzün

  2. Department of Elementary Education, Faculty of Education, Yuzuncu Yil University, Van, Turkey

    Mustafa Sami Topcu

Authors
  1. Özgül Yilmaz-Tüzün
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mustafa Sami Topcu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Özgül Yilmaz-Tüzün.

About this article

Cite this article

Yilmaz-Tüzün, Ö., Topcu, M.S. Investigating the Relationships Among Elementary School Students’ Epistemological Beliefs, Metacognition, and Constructivist Science Learning Environment. J Sci Teacher Educ 21, 255–273 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-009-9163-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-009-9163-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation