Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative PGAA and NAA results of geological samples and standards

  • Published:
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Concentrations of major and trace elements in volcanic rock and soil samples, including geological standard reference materials, were determined by neutron activation analysis (NAA) and prompt gamma activation analysis (PGAA), both using the k 0-standardization method. The paper highlights the different experimental procedures, such as sample preparation, data collection and spectrum evaluation. In geological samples, PGAA gives precise results for major elements (Si, Ti, Al, Fe, Mn, Mg, Ca, Na, K and—as a unique method—for H), for some of the light trace elements as B and Cl, as well as for Sc, S, Cr, Co, Ni, Cd, Nd, Sm and Gd. NAA is sensitive for the rare earth elements, and for many major (Ti, Al, Fe, Mn, Mg, Ca, Na, K) and trace elements (e.g.: Sc, V, Cr, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, As, Se, Rb, Sr, Zr, As, Sb, Ce, Ba, Hf, Ta, W). For most major elements the results obtained by the two methods show good agreement. The comparison of the results obtained for trace elements is not always possible, since PGAA is less sensitive and concentrations are often below its detection limits. Nevertheless, the complementarity of NAA and PGAA allows nearly panoramic analysis of geological materials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Révay Zs, Kennedy G (2012) Application of the k 0 method in neutron activation analysis and in prompt gamma activation analysis. Radiochim Acta 100:687–698

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Fazekas B, Östör J, Kis Z, Molnár GL, Simonits A (1997) In: Molnár G, Belgya T, Révay Zs (eds) Proceedings of the 9th international symposium on capture gamma-ray spectroscopy and related topics. Springer Verlag, Budapest

  3. Fazekas B, Molnár G, Belgya T, Dabolczi L, Simonits A (1987) Introducing HYPERMET-PC for automatic analysis of complex gamma-ray spectra. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 2:271–277

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rausch H, Simonits A, Sziklai-László I (1994) Reaktor neutronaktivációs analízis: PC-Program elemkoncentráció számítására (in English: A PC-Program for element concentration calculations in neutron activation analysis). Izotóptechnika, Diagnosztika 37:1–8

  5. De Corte F (1987) The k 0-standardization method: a move to the optimization of neutron activation analysis. Habilitation thesis, University of Gent

  6. De Corte F, Simonits A (1994) Vade Mecum for k 0-Users, Addendum to the KAYZERO/SOLCOI software package. DSM Research, Gellen (NL), R94/11492, 25

  7. Moens L, De Corte F, Simonits A, Xilei L, De Wispelaere A, De Donder J, Hoste J (1982) Calculation of the absolute peak efficiency of Ge and Ge(Li) detectors for different counting geometries. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 70:539

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Zs Révay, Molnár GL (2003) Standardisation of the prompt gamma activation analysis method. Radiochim Acta 91:361–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Szentmiklósi L, Belgya T, Révay Zs, Kis Z (2010) Upgrade of the prompt gamma activation analysis and the neutron-induced prompt gamma spectroscopy facilities at the Budapest research reactor. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 286:501–505

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Choi HD, Firestone RB, Lindstrom RM, Molnár GL, Mughabghab SF, Paviotti-Corcuera R, Révay Zs, Trkov A, Zerkin V, Chunmei Z (2007) Database of prompt gamma rays from slow neutron capture for elemental analysis. Technical report IAEA, Vienna. ISBN 92-0-101306-X. IAEAL 06–00466. 0306-Nuclear data. STI/PUB/1263, 251 pp

  11. Zs Révay (2009) Determining elemental composition using prompt gamma activation analysis. Anal Chem 81:6851–6859

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Xilei L, Van Renterghem D, De Corte F, Cornelis R (1989) Correction for neutron induced reaction interferences in the NAA k 0-standardization method. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 133:153–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sziklai-László I, Gméling K (2013) Results of the k 0-based instrumental neutron activation analysis (k 0-INAA) for WEPAL plant and soil IPE/ISE 2013 in Hungary. Accepted in Annex on CD-ROM of IAEA TECDOC (under preparation). TECDOC and Annex connected to IAEA TC project RER1007: Workshop on inter-comparison feedback of NAA and other analytical techniques proficiency tests performed in 2012–2013

Download references

Acknowledgments

The presenting author would like to thank for the support of Centre for Energy Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences (MTA, EK) and for the Hungarian Chemical Association (MKE) for able to participate at the 6th International k 0-Users’ Workshop, Budapest, 22–27 September, 2013. IAEA is greatly thanked to support the 6th k 0-Users’ Workshop to help young researchers to attend the conference. Authors gratefully acknowledge Dr. Jesse L. Weil and László Szentmiklósi for the linguistic corrections and also their valuable discussions and constructive revision of the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Gméling.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gméling, K., Simonits, A., Sziklai László, I. et al. Comparative PGAA and NAA results of geological samples and standards. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 300, 507–516 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-014-3032-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-014-3032-2

Keywords

Navigation