Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

EQUITY IN MATHEMATICS AND SCIENCE OUTCOMES: CHARACTERISTICS ASSOCIATED WITH HIGH AND LOW ACHIEVEMENT ON PISA 2006 IN IRELAND

  • Published:
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Equity in education is a key concern internationally; however, it is rare that this issue is examined separately for low- and high-achieving students and concurrently across different subject domains. This study examines student and school background characteristics associated with low and high achievement in mathematics and science on the Programme for International Student Assessment. Based on the results of a multilevel multinomial model of achievement for each domain, findings indicate that a greater number of the variables examined are associated with low rather than high achievement. At student level, home language, intention to leave school early, socioeconomic status, grade level, cultural capital, and books in the home are significantly associated with achievement in mathematics and science. At school level, only school average socioeconomic status is statistically significant in the models. Significant gender differences are found in the distribution of high and low achievers, which vary across the domains. In mathematics, females are more likely to be low achievers while males are more likely to be high achievers. In science, gender interacts with early school-leaving intent whereas males intending to leave school early are more likely to be in the low-achieving group than females intending to leave early. Conclusions emphasise the need for targeting resources aimed at promoting equity in outcomes at student level as well as at school level. Future work may extend the current analyses by incorporating domain-specific variables or examining cross-country differences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aitkin, M., Francis, B., & Hinde, J. (2005). Statistical modelling in GLIM 4. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1977). Cultural reproduction and social reproduction. In J. Karabel & A. Halsey (Eds.), Power and ideology in education (pp. 487–511). London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. (1977). Reproduction in education, society and culture. Sheffield: Sheffield Region Centre for Science and Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, M. M., & Xihua, Z. (2008). Family and motivation effects on mathematics achievement: Analyses of students in 41 countries. Learning and Instruction, 18(4), 321–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commission of the European Communities (2008). Migration and mobility: Challenges and opportunities for EU education systems (Green Paper). Brussels, Belgium: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conaty, C. (2002). Including all: Home, school and community united in education. Dublin: Veritas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosgrove, J., & Cunningham, R. (in press). A multilevel model of science achievement of Irish students participating in the 2006 Programme for International Student Assessment. Irish Journal of Education.

  • Cosgrove, J., & Gilleece, L. (2009, September). A profile of high and low achievers in Ireland: Reading literacy in PISA 2000, 2003 and 2006. Paper presented at the PISA research conference, Kiel, Germany.

  • Cosgrove, J., Shiel, G., Sofroniou, N., Zastrutzki, S., & Shortt, F. (2005). Education for life: The achievements of 15-year-olds in Ireland in the second cycle of PISA. Dublin: Educational Research Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education & Science (2005). DEIS (Delivering Equality of Opportunity In School): An action plan for educational inclusion. Dublin: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eivers, E., Shiel, G., & Cunningham, R. (2008). Ready for tomorrow’s world? The competencies of Ireland’s 15-year-olds in PISA 2006. Dublin: Educational Research Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, H. (1995). Interpreting international comparisons of student achievement. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of Ireland (1998). Education Act (No. 51 of 1998). Dublin: The Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, D. F., Benbow, C. P., Geary, D. C., Gur, R. C., Shibley Hyde, J., & Gernsbacher, M. A. (2007). The science of sex differences in science and mathematics. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 8(1), 1–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampden-Thompson, G., & Johnston, J. S. (2006). Variation in the relationship between nonschool factors and student achievement. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellaghan, T. (2001). Towards a definition of educational disadvantage. Irish Journal of Education, 32, 3–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, S., & Ó Fathaigh, M. (2004, April). Bringing in Bourdieu’s theory of social capital: Renewing learning partnership approaches to social inclusion. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Educational Studies Association of Ireland, NUI Maynooth, Ireland.

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (1999). Classifying educational programmes: Manual for ISCED-97 implementation in OECD countries. Paris: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2001). Knowledge and skills for life: First results from PISA 2000. Paris: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2004). Learning for tomorrow’s world—First results from PISA 2003. Paris: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2005). PISA 2003 data analysis manual. Paris: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2007). PISA 2006 science competencies for tomorrow’s world (vol. 1: Analysis). Paris: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2009). PISA 2006 technical report. Paris: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raudenbush, S. W., Bryk, A. S., Cheong, Y. F., & Congdon, R. T. (2004). HLM 6: Hierarchical linear and non-linear modelling. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raudenbush, S. W., & Willms, J. D. (1995). The estimation of school effects. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 20, 307–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiel, G., Cosgrove, J., Sofroniou, N., & Kelly, A. (2001). Ready for life: The literacy achievements of Irish 15-year olds. Dublin: Educational Research Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Gaer, E., Gebhardt, E., & Schulz, W. (2009, September). The relationship between achievement and self-concept: A cross-country investigation. Paper presented at the PISA research conference, Kiel, Germany.

  • Williams, T., & Williams, K. (in press). Self-efficacy and performance in mathematics: Reciprocal determinism in 33 nations. Journal of Educational Psychology.

  • Willms, J. D. (2002). Ten hypotheses about socioeconomic gradients and community differences in children’s developmental outcomes. Montreal, Quebec: Statistics Canada.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lorraine Gilleece.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gilleece, L., Cosgrove, J. & Sofroniou, N. EQUITY IN MATHEMATICS AND SCIENCE OUTCOMES: CHARACTERISTICS ASSOCIATED WITH HIGH AND LOW ACHIEVEMENT ON PISA 2006 IN IRELAND. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 8, 475–496 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-010-9199-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-010-9199-2

Key words

Navigation