Skip to main content
Log in

Multinomial Probabilistic Values

  • Published:
Group Decision and Negotiation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Multinomial probabilistic values were introduced by one of us in reliability. Here we define them for all cooperative games and illustrate their behavior in practice by means of an application to the analysis of a political problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. A family of values axiomatically characterized in Weber (1988) by means of linearity, positivity, and the dummy player property.

  2. These values were introduced in reliability by Puente (2000) (see also Freixas and Puente 2002) with the name of “multibinary probabilistic values.” They were independently defined by Carreras (2004), for simple games only —i.e. as power indices—in a work on decisiveness (see also Carreras 2005) where they were called “Banzhaf \(\alpha \)-indices.”

  3. Alonso et al. (2007), Carreras and Freixas (2002), Carreras and Puente (2012), Carreras et al. (2005) and Carreras et al. (2007) are samples of our work in this line.

  4. Incidentally, the Banzhaf value gives the same allocations in this game.

  5. A similar scheme could be applied if the relevant notion were nationalism (vs. centralism), as for example in regions like Quebec, Scotland, Padania (Po Valley), Catalonia or the Basque Country. Higher-dimensional ideological spaces might be treated in a similar but more complicated way.

  6. The numerical example proposed below in this section shows that this bound cannot be improved, since the total power equals \(n\) in this example.

  7. As to the additional information given by ideological constraints in politics, it is worthy of mention, at least incidentally, a singular example. In the general elections held in Greece in May 7 and June 17, 2012, the willingness of the parties to form any coalition was being, due to Greek economy’s dramatic situation, much more decisive than the ideological constraints. Our model might well apply to study this situation. The profile components after May 7 were very low and led to an impasse, whereas they increased after June 17 and gave rise, finally, to a coalition government.

References

  • Alonso JM, Carreras F, Puente MA (2007) Axiomatic characterizations of the symmetric coalitional binomial semivalues. Discret Appl Math 155:2282–2293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banzhaf JF (1965) Weigthed voting doesn’t work: a mathematical analysis. Rutgers Law Rev 19:317–343

    Google Scholar 

  • Carreras F (2004) \(\alpha \)-decisiveness in simple games. Theory Decis 56:77–91 Also In: Gambarelli G (ed) Essays on cooperative games, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 77–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carreras F (2005) A decisiveness index for simple games. Eur J Oper Res 163:370–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carreras F, Freixas J (2002) Semivalue versatility and applications. Ann Oper Res 109:343–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carreras F, Puente MA (2012) Symmetric coalitional binomial semivalues. Group Decis Negot 21:637–662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carreras F, Llongueras MD, Magaña A (2005) On the convenience to form coalitions or partnerships in simple games. Ann Oper Res 137:67–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carreras F, Llongueras MD, Puente MA (2007) Partnerships in politics: a case study. Homo Oeconomicus 24:469–484

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubey P, Neyman A, Weber RJ (1981) Value theory without efficiency. Math Oper Res 6:122–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freixas J, Puente MA (2002) Reliability importance measures of the components in a system based on semivalues and probabilistic values. Ann Oper Res 109:331–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen G (1975) Multilinear extensions and the Banzhaf value. Naval Res Logist Q 22:741–750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puente MA (2000) Contributions to the representability of simple games and to the calculus of solutions for this class of games (in Spanish). Ph.D. Thesis. Technical University of Catalonia, Spain

  • Shapley LS (1953) A value for n-person games. In: Kuhn HW, Tucker AW (eds) Contributions to the Theory of Games II., Annals of Mathematical Studies, vol 28. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 307–317

  • Weber RJ (1988) Probabilistic values for games. In: Roth AE (ed) The Shapley value: essays in honor of Lloyd S. Shapley. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 101–119

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank an editor and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful suggestions, most of which have been incorporated to the text.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to María Albina Puente.

Additional information

Research supported by Grant SGR 2014-435 of the Catalonia Government (Generalitat de Catalunya) and Grant MTM 2012-34426 of the Economy and Competitiveness Spanish Ministry.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Carreras, F., Puente, M.A. Multinomial Probabilistic Values. Group Decis Negot 24, 981–991 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-014-9425-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-014-9425-3

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation