Skip to main content
Log in

Grid Technology Reliability for Flash Flood Forecasting: End-user Assessment

  • Published:
Journal of Grid Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The flash flood forecasting is one of the most important challenges for research in hydrology. The anticipation of extreme hydrological scenarios through rainfall–runoff models is still limited, mainly because of the high uncertainty of rainfall forecasts, as of limited computing resources. The authors propose to simulate an ensemble of potential hydrological scenarios in order to support the forecaster’s decision-making process. The developed applicative layer takes advantage of the computing capabilities of Grid technology, significantly enhancing the management of independent modelling operations in an operational lead time. A set of experimentations is deployed in order to firstly assess efficiency of this applicative layer and secondly to gauge more broadly the potentialities of Grid to handle flood crisis management operations. Finally, in managing more than one hundred hydrological simulations simultaneously, this experimental platform opens new perspectives for the improvement of hydrological forecast modelling, limited up to now by the lack of computing resources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adzigogov, L., Soldatos, J., Polymenakos, L.: EMPEROR: an OGSA Grid meta-scheduler based on dynamic resource predictions. J. Grid Comp. 3(1), 19–37 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Al-Ali, R.J., Amin, K., Von Laszewski, G., Rana, O.F., Walker, D.W., Hategan, M., Zaluzec, N.: Analysis and provision of QoS for distributed Grid applications. J. Grid Comp. 2(2), 163–182 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ambroise, B.: Streamflow generation within small rural catchments in a temperate environment: 2—systemic and dynamic modeling. Rev. Sci. Eau 12, 123–153 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Anderson, D.P.: BOINC: a system for public-resource computing and storage. In: Proc. of IEEE/ACM International Workshop on Grid Computing, Pittsburgh (2004)

  5. Astalos, J., Huchly, L., Dobrucky, M.: Experiences from porting the astrophysical simulation “the unified theory of Kuiper-belt and Oort-cloud formation” to EGEE Grid, 3rd user forum, Clermont Ferrand, France, 11–15 February 2008. Available via http://indico.cern.ch/contributionDisplay.py?contribId=139&sessionId=19&confId=22351 (2008)

  6. Ayral, P.-A., Sauvagnargues-Lesage, S., Gay, S., Bressand, F.: Forecasting Flash Floods with an Operational, Model Advances in Natural and Technological Hazards Research, vol. 25, pp. 335–352. Springer (2007)

  7. Beven, K.: Rainfall–Runoff Modelling: The Primer. Wiley, Chichester (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bovolo, I.C., Abele, S., Bathurst, J., Caballero, D., Ciglan, M., Eftichidis, G., Simo, B.: A distributed framework for multi-risk assessment of natural hazards used to model the effects of forest fire on hydrology and sediment yield. Comput. Geosci. 35, 924–945 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Burke, S., Campana, S., Lanciotti, E., Méndez Lorenzo, P., Miccio, V., Nater, C., Santinelli, R., Sciabà, A.: gLite 3 User Guide, Manuals Series, Worldwide LHC computing Grid (2009). Available via https://edms.cern.ch/file/722398/1.2/gLite-3-UserGuide.html

  10. Camarinha-Matos, L.M., Afsarmanesh, H.: A framework for virtual organization creation in a breeding environment. Ann. Rev. Control 31, 119–135 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chiang, Y.-M., Hsu, K.-L., Chang, F.J., Hong, Y., Sorooshian, S.: Merging multiple precipitation sources for flash flood forecasting. J. Hydrol. 340, 183–196 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Claudet, R., Bouvier, C.: Outils de prévision des crues rapides: les besoins de l’alerte et du suivi en temps réel, Colloque d’hydrotechnique, 176ème session du comité scientifique et technique, 15–16 Juin, Nîmes, France, pp. 105–112 (2004)

  13. Christodoulopoulos, K., Gkamas, V., Varvarigos, E.A.: Statistical Analysis and Modeling of Jobs in a Grid Environment, vol. 6(1), pp. 77–101 (2008)

  14. Collier, C.G.: Flash flood forecasting: What are the limits of predictability? Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 133, 3–23 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Delrieu, G., Ducrocq, V., Gaume, E., Nicol, J., Payrastre, O., Yates, E., Kirstetter, P., Andrieu, H., Ayral, P.-A., Bouvier, C.: The catastrophic flash-flood event of 8–9 September 2002 in the Gard region, France: a first case study for the Cévennes–Vivarais Mediterranean Hydrometeorological Observatory Journal of Hydrometeorology, vol. 6, pp. 34–52. American Meteorological Society, Boston (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Duband, D.: Thinking over hydrometeorological forecasting. Houille Blanche 1, 42–50 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Field, E.H., Gupta, V., Gupta, N., Maechling, P., Jordan, T.H.: Hazard map calculations using Grid computing. Seismol. Res. Lett. 76, 565–573 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Folino, G., Forestiero, A., Papuzzo, G., Spezzano, G.: MOSE: a Grid-enabled software platform to solve geoprocessing problems. Nuovo Cimento Soc. Ital. Fis. C 28, 225–235 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Foster, I., Kesselman, C.: The Grid 2: Blueprint for a New Computing Infrastructure. Kaufmann, San Francisco (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gadgil, H., Choi, J., Engel, B., Fox, G., Ko, S., Pallickara, S., Pierce, M.: Management of data streams for a real time flood simulation. Community Grids Lab Technical Report (2004)

  21. Gagliardi, F., Jones, B., Grey, F., Begin, M., Heikkurinen, M.: Building an infrastructure for scientific Grid computing: status and goals of the EGEE project. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 363, 1729–1742 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gaume, E., Livet, M., Desbordes, M., Villeneuve, J.: Hydrological analysis of the river Aude, France, flash flood on 12 and 13 November 1999. J. Hydrol. 286, 135–154 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gaume, E., Bain, V., Bernadara, P., Newinger, O., Barbuc, M., Bateman, A., Blaskovicova, L., Blösh, G., Borg, M., Dumitrescu, A., Daliakopoulos, I., Garcia, J., Imirescu, A., Kohnova, S., Koutroulis, A., Marchi, L., Matreata, S., Medina, V., Preciso, E., Sempere-Torres, D., Stancalie, G., Szolgay, J., Tsanis, I., Velasco, D., Viglione, A.: A compilation of data on European flash floods. J. Hydrol. 367, 70–78 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Germain-Renaud, C., Loomis, C., Mościcki, J.T., Texier, R.: Scheduling for Responsive Grids, vol. 6(1), pp. 15–27 (2008)

  25. Hluchy, L., Astalos, J., Dobrucky, M., Habala, O., Simo, B., Tran, V.D.: Flood forecasting in a Grid computing environment. Parallel Process. and Appl. Math. 3019, 831–839 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Horton, R.E.: The role of infiltration in the hydrological cycle. Trans. Am. Geophys. Union. 14, 446–460 (1933)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Huedo, E., Montero, R., Llorente, I.M.: Evaluating the reliability of computational Grids from the end user’s point of view. J. Systems Archit. 52, 727–736 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Huet, P., Martin, X., Prime, J.L., Foin, P., Laurain, C., Cannard, P.: Retour d’expérience des crues de septembre 2002 dans les départements du Gard, de l’Hérault, du Vaucluse, des Bouches-du-Rhône, de l’Ardèche et de la Drôme, Inspection Générale de l’Environnement, Paris (2003)

  29. Kobiyama, M., Goerl, R.: Quantitative method to distinguish flood and flash flood as disasters. SUISUI HRL 1, 11–14 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lecca, G., Lai, C., Murgia, F., Biddau, R., Fanfani, L., Maggi, P.: AQUAGRID: an extensible platform for collaborative problem solving in groundwater protection. Earth Sci. Inf. 2, 83–95 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lee, C., Percivall, G.: Standards-based computing capabilities for distributed geospatial applications. Comput. 41, 50–57 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Mazzetti, P., Nativi, S., Esteves, A., Sá, V., Lebreiro, N., Thierion, V., Verlato, M.: Research Strategies for the development of a Civil, Report on CYCLOPS (CYber-Infrastructure for CiviL protection Operative ProcedureS) Project. CYCLOPS-WP04-D16-IMAA. (2008)

  33. Mazzetti, P., Nativi, S., Angelini, V., Verlato, M., Fiorucci, P.: A Grid platform for the European Civil Protection e-infrastructure: the forest fires use scenario. Earth Sci. Inf. 2, 53–62 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. McClatchey, R., Anjum, A., Stockinger, H., Ali, A., Willers, I., Thomas, M.: Data intensive and network aware (DIANA) Grid scheduling. J. Grid Comp. 5(1), 43–64 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Mineter, M., Dowers, S., Skouloudis, A., Jarvis, C.: Towards use of Grids in environmental research, management and policy. Int. J. Environ. Pollut. 20, 297–308 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Montz, B., Gruntfest, E.: Flash flood mitigation: recommendations for research and applications. Global Environ. Change B Environ. Hazards 4, 15–22 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Murgia, F., Biddau, R., Concas, A., Demontis, R., Fanfani, L., Heilmann, Z., Lai, C., Lecca, G., Lorrai, E., Marrocu, M.: GRIDA3: a shared resources manager for environmental data analysis and applications. Earth Sci. Inf. 2, 5–21 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Norbiato, D., Borga, M., Esposti, S.D., Gaume, E., Anquetin, S.: Flash flood warning based on rainfall thresholds and soil moisture conditions: an assessment for gauged and ungauged basins. J. Hydrol. 362, 274–290 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Pacini, F., Maraschini, A.: Job description language attributes specification—for the gLite middleware (submission through WMProxy service), EGEE Tech. Rep., 590869 (2007). Available via https://edms.cern.ch/file/590869/1/EGEE-JRA1-TEC-590869-JDL-Attributes-v0-9.pdf

  40. Rabuffetti, D., Barbero, S.: Operational hydro-meteorogical warning and real-time flood forecasting: the Piemonte region case study. Hydrol. Earth. Syst. Sci. 9, 457–466 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Rood, B., Lewis, M.J.: Grid resource availability prediction-based scheduling and task replication, vol. 7(4), pp. 479–500 (2009)

  42. Sauvagnargues-Lesage, S., Thierion, V., Ayral, P.-A., Mazzeti, P., Mangione, D., Nardin, P.: Use-cases analysis document, report on CYCLOPS (CYber-Infrastructure for CiviL protection Operative ProcedureS) Project. CYCLOPSWP03-D9-DDSC. (2007)

  43. The EGEE project homepage: http://project.eu-egee.org

  44. Toukourou, M., Johannet, A., Dreyfus, G., Ayral, P.-A.: Rainfall-runoff modeling for flash floods in the absence of rainfall forecasts: the case of “Cévenol flash floods”. Appl. Intell. (in press)

  45. Verlato, M., Dal Pra, S., Angelini, V., D’Andrea, M., Frizziero, E., Squizzato, S., Pina, A., Esteves, A., Sa, V., Marques, R., Thierion, V., Ayral, P.-A.: Dissemination and coordination activity, Report on CYCLOPS (CYber-Infrastructure for CiviL protection Operative ProcedureS) Project. CYCLOPS-WP02-D17-INFN-002 (2008)

  46. Von Laszewski, G., Wagstrom, P.: Tools and environments for parallel and distributed computing, in Series on parallel and distributed computing, Wiley, Chapter Gestalt of the Grid, pp. 149–187 (2004)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vincent Thierion.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thierion, V., Ayral, PA., Jacob, G. et al. Grid Technology Reliability for Flash Flood Forecasting: End-user Assessment. J Grid Computing 9, 405–422 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10723-010-9173-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10723-010-9173-9

Keywords

Navigation