Assessing North American multimodel ensemble (NMME) seasonal forecast skill to assist in the early warning of anomalous hydrometeorological events over East Africa

  • Shraddhanand Shukla
  • Jason Roberts
  • Andrew Hoell
  • Christopher C. Funk
  • Franklin Robertson
  • Ben Kirtman
Article

DOI: 10.1007/s00382-016-3296-z

Cite this article as:
Shukla, S., Roberts, J., Hoell, A. et al. Clim Dyn (2016). doi:10.1007/s00382-016-3296-z

Abstract

The skill of North American multimodel ensemble (NMME) seasonal forecasts in East Africa (EA), which encompasses one of the most food and water insecure areas of the world, is evaluated using deterministic, categorical, and probabilistic evaluation methods. The skill is estimated for all three primary growing seasons: March–May (MAM), July–September (JAS), and October–December (OND). It is found that the precipitation forecast skill in this region is generally limited and statistically significant over only a small part of the domain. In the case of MAM (JAS) [OND] season it exceeds the skill of climatological forecasts in parts of equatorial EA (Northern Ethiopia) [equatorial EA] for up to 2 (5) [5] months lead. Temperature forecast skill is generally much higher than precipitation forecast skill (in terms of deterministic and probabilistic skill scores) and statistically significant over a majority of the region. Over the region as a whole, temperature forecasts also exhibit greater reliability than the precipitation forecasts. The NMME ensemble forecasts are found to be more skillful and reliable than the forecast from any individual model. The results also demonstrate that for some seasons (e.g. JAS), the predictability of precipitation signals varies and is higher during certain climate events (e.g. ENSO). Finally, potential room for improvement in forecast skill is identified in some models by comparing homogeneous predictability in individual NMME models with their respective forecast skill.

Supplementary material

382_2016_3296_MOESM1_ESM.png (479 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PNG 479 kb)
382_2016_3296_MOESM2_ESM.png (502 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (PNG 501 kb)
382_2016_3296_MOESM3_ESM.png (536 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (PNG 536 kb)
382_2016_3296_MOESM4_ESM.png (619 kb)
Supplementary material 4 (PNG 619 kb)

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Climate Hazards Group, Department of GeographyUniversity of CaliforniaSanta BarbaraUSA
  2. 2.NASA Marshall Space Flight CenterHuntsvilleUSA
  3. 3.Physical Sciences DivisionNOAA Earth System Research LaboratoryBoulderUSA
  4. 4.EROS United States Geological SurveyGarretsonUSA
  5. 5.University of MiamiMiamiUSA