Abstract
Purpose
Advertisements are commonplace in orthopaedic journals and may influence the readership with claims of clinical and scientific fact. Since the last assessment of the claims made in orthopaedic print advertisements ten years ago, there have been legislative changes and media scrutiny which have shaped this practice. The purpose of this study is to re-evaluate these claims.
Methods
Fifty claims from 50 advertisements were chosen randomly from six highly respected peer-reviewed orthopaedic journals (published July–December 2011). The evidence supporting each claim was assessed and validated by three orthopaedic surgeons. The assessors, blinded to product and company, rated the evidence and answered the following questions: Does the evidence as presented support the claim made in the advertisement and what is the quality of that evidence? Is the claim supported by enough evidence to influence your own clinical practice?
Results
Twenty-eight claims cited evidence from published literature, four from public presentations, 11 from manufacturer "data held on file" and seven had no supporting evidence. Only 12 claims were considered to have high-quality evidence and only 11 were considered well supported. A strong correlation was seen between the quality of evidence and strength of support (Spearman r = 0.945, p < 0.0001). The average ICC between the assessors’ ratings was strong (r = 0.85) giving validity to the results.
Conclusion
Orthopaedic surgeons must remain sceptical about the claims made in print advertisements. High-quality evidence is required by orthopaedic surgeons to influence clinical practice and this evidence should be sought by manufacturers wishing to market a successful product.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Sarmiento A (2003) The relationship between orthopaedics and industry must be reformed. Clin Orthop Relat Res 412:38–44
Crowninshield RD, Callaghan JJ (2007) The orthopaedic profession and the industry partnership. Clin Orthop Relat Res 457:73–77
Fugh-Berman A, Alladin K, Chow J (2006) Advertising in medical journals: should current practices change? PLoS Med 3(6):e130
Othman N, Vitry A, Roughead EE (2009) Quality of pharmaceutical advertisements in medical journals: a systematic review. PLoS ONE 4(7):e6350
Goldhahn S, Audige L, Helfet DL, Hanson B (2005) Pathways to evidence-based knowledge in orthopaedic surgery: An international survey of AO course participants. Int Orthop 29:59–64
Bhattacharyya T, Tornetta P 3rd, Healy WL, Einhorn TA (2003) The validity of claims made in orthopaedic print advertisements. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85:1224–1228
Del Signore A, Murr AH, Lustig LR, Platt MP, Jalisi S, Pratt LW, Spiegel JH (2011) Claim validity of print advertisements found in otolaryngology journals. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 137(8):746–750
No authors listed (2012) The blue guide, medicines in the UK, medicines and healthcare products regulatory agency. Third Edition. http://www.mhra.gov.uk/home/groups/pl-a/documents/publication/con2022589.pdf. Accessed 10 October 2013
No authors listed (2013) Title 21-food and drugs, chapter 1—food and drugs administration, department of health and human services, subchapter C—drugs: general, part 202 prescription drug advertising. http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfCFR/CFRSearch.cfm?CFRPart=202&showFR=1. Accessed 10 October 2013
No authors listed (2010) Medical device alert: ASR™ hip replacement implants manufactured by DePuy International Ltd (MDA/2010/069). http://www.mhra.gov.uk/Publications/Safetywarnings/MedicalDeviceAlerts/CON093789. Accessed 10 October 2013
Wilkinson JM (2012) Metal-on-metal hip prostheses: where are we now? Br Med J 345:e7792
Smith AJ, Dieppe P, Howard PW, Blom AW (2012) Failure rates of metal-on-metal hip resurfacings: analysis of data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. Lancet 380:1759–1766
Thomson Reuters (2013) 2011 journal citation reports® science edition. http://thomsonreuters.com/journal-citation-reports/. Accessed 21 October 2013
Portney LG, Watkins MP (2009) Foundations of clinical research Applications to practice, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall Inc, New Jersey, pp 588–600
Fleiss JL (1981) Statistical methods for rates and proportions, 3rd edn. Wiley & Sons, New York, p 218
No authors listed (2012) National Joint Registry of England and Wales. 9th Annual Report. http://www.njrcentre.org.uk/NjrCentre/Portals/0/Documents/England/Reports/9th_annual_report/NJR%209th%20Annual%20Report%202012.pdf. Accessed 10 October 2013
Shah NN, Edge AJ, Clark DW (2009) Hydroxyapatite-ceramic-coated femoral components in young patients followed-up for 16 to 19 years: an update of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91:865–869
No authors listed (1986) Federal Trade Commission. FTC policy statement regarding advertising substantiation. http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/guides/ad3subst.htm. Accessed 10 October 2013
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Davidson, D.J., Rankin, K.S., Jensen, C.D. et al. Are the claims made in orthopaedic print advertisements valid?. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 38, 1067–1072 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-2159-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-2159-z