Abstract
The aim of this study was to gain information about how orthopaedic surgeons use evidence-based literature and how this is influenced by their knowledge of evidence-based medicine. We administered a questionnaire to participants at courses of the Association for the Study of Internal Fixation (AO-ASIF) in Davos, Switzerland, in December 2003. Special attention was paid to the surgeons’ educational level, affiliations, and the infrastructure and evidence sources they used. In addition, we tested participants on their knowledge and attitude to evidence-based orthopaedic surgery (EBOS). Of 1,274 course participants, 456 completed the questionnaire. Of 446 respondents, 300 had heard of EBOS, but only 45% could define it correctly. Nearly two thirds identified scientific publications as their main source of scientific knowledge. The respondents’ attitudes to and awareness of EBOS principles was high, but it did not influence their manner of searching for scientific information or their trust in various sources of recommendations.
Résumé
Le but de ce travail était de trouver de l’information sur l’utilisation par les chirurgiens orthopédistes de la littérature basée sur des preuves et comment cela pouvait être influencé par leur connaissance de la médecine basée sur des preuves. Nous avons donné un questionnaire aux participants au Cours de l’Association pour l’Étude de la Fixation Interne (AO-ASIF) à Davos en décembre 2003.Une attention spéciale a été portée au niveau pédagogique des chirurgiens, leurs affiliations, l’infrastructure et les sources de preuves qu’ils ont utilisé. De plus, nous avons testé les participants sur leurs connaissances et leur attitude envers la chirurgie orthopédique basée sur des preuves (EBOS). Sur 1,274 participants au cours, 456 ont complété le questionnaire. Des 446 participants interrogées 300 avaient entendu parler d’EBOS, mais seulement 45% pouvaient le définir correctement. Presque deux tiers des participants interrogés ont identifié les publications scientifiques comme leur principale source de connaissance scientifique. Chez les participants interrogés, la conscience des principes EBOS était haute, mais cela n’a pas influencé leur manière de chercher l’information scientifique ou leur confiance dans les sources de recommandations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Altman DG, Schulz KF, Moher D, Egger M, Davidoff F, Elbourne D, Gotzsche PC, Lang T (2001) The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med 134:663–694
Aronson B (2004) Improving online access to medical information for low-income countries. N Engl J Med 350: 966–968
Audigé L, Bhandari M, Griffin D, Middleton P, Reeves BC (2004) Systematic reviews of non-randomised clinical studies in the orthopaedic literature. Clin Orthop 427:249–257
Austin MA, Criqui MH, Barrett-Connor E, Holdbrook MJ (1981) The effect of response bias on the odds ratio. Am J Epidemiol 114:137–143
Bhandari M, Devereaux PJ, Guyatt GH, Cook DJ, Swiontkowski MF, Sprague S, Schemitsch EH (2002) An observational study of orthopaedic abstracts and subsequent full-text publications. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84:615–621
Bhandari M, Guyatt GH, Swiontkowski MF (2001) User’s guide to the orthopaedic literature: how to use an article about a surgical therapy. J Bone Joint Surg, Am 83:1555–1564
Bhandari M, Richards RR, Sprague S, Schemitsch EH (2002) The Quality of reporting of randomized trials in the journal of bone and joint surgery from 1988 through 2000. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84:388–96
Bhandari M, Tornetta P III, Guyatt GH (2003) Glossary of evidence-based orthopaedic terminology. Clin Orthop 413:158–163
Buchanan J, Dahlen K, Matucheski M (1999) Finding the evidence. WMJ 98:29–33
Garcia-Berthou E, Alcaraz C (2004) Incongruence between test statistics and P values in medical papers. BMC Med Res Methodol 4:13
Gillespie LD, Gillespie WJ (2003) Finding current evidence: search strategies and common databases. Clin Orthop 413:133–145
Hamlet WP, Fletcher A, Meals RA (1997) Publication patterns of papers presented at the Annual Meeting of The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79:1138–1143
Hanson BP, Bhandari M, Audige L, Helfet D (2004) The need for education in evidence-based orthopaedics: an international survey AO course participants. Acta Orthop Scand 75:328–333
Kiter E, Karatosun V, Gunal I (2003) Do orthopaedic journals provide high-quality evidence for clinical practice? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 123:82–85
Nguyen V, Tornetta P III, Bkaric M (1998) Publication rates for the scientific sessions of the OTA. Orthopaedic Trauma Association. J Orthop Trauma 12:457–459
Sackett DL, Straus SE, Richardson WS, Rosenberg W, Haynes RB (2000) Evidence-based medicine. How to practice and teach EBM. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh
Saloojee Y, Dagli E (2000) Tobacco industry tactics for resisting public policy on health. Bull WHO 78:902–910
Shojania KG, Bero LA (2001) Taking advantage of the explosion of systematic reviews: an efficient MEDLINE search strategy. Eff Clin Pract 4:157–162
Suarez-Almazor ME, Belseck E, Homik J, Dorgan M, Ramos-Remus C (2000) Identifying clinical trials in the medical literature with electronic databases: MEDLINE alone is not enough. Control Clin Trials 21:476–487
Yudkin JS, Swai AB (2000) Access to medical information in developing countries. Lancet 355:2248
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Goldhahn, S., Audigé, L., Helfet, D.L. et al. Pathways to evidence-based knowledge in orthopaedic surgery: an international survey of AO course participants. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 29, 59–64 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-004-0617-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-004-0617-3