Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 224, Issue 4, pp 647–655

Dissecting the response in response–effect compatibility

Research Article

DOI: 10.1007/s00221-012-3343-x

Cite this article as:
Pfister, R. & Kunde, W. Exp Brain Res (2013) 224: 647. doi:10.1007/s00221-012-3343-x

Abstract

Voluntary actions are guided by sensory anticipations of body-related as well as environment-related action effects. Even though action effects in the environment typically resemble the action goal proper, anticipations of body-related effects can cause interference if they do not correspond to intended environment-related effects. The present study explored which specific response features cause such interference: the spatial location of the moving limb or its anatomical connection to the body causes such interference? Using a response–effect compatibility design with normal and crossed hand-key mappings, we show that environment-related effects are predominantly related to spatial rather than anatomical response features, ensuring that goal-directed behavior is flexible and efficient at the same time. Furthermore, results indicate that this mechanism applies to both, free- and forced-choice actions.

Keywords

Action control Effect anticipations Spatial versus anatomical codes Ideomotor theory 

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Psychology IIIJulius-Maximilians University of WürzburgWürzburgGermany

Personalised recommendations