Skip to main content
Log in

Building an online wisdom community: A transformational design model

  • Published:
Journal of Computing in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

THIS PAPER discusses the development of a new instructional design model based on socioconstructivist learning theories and distance education principles for the design of online wisdom communities and the efficacy of the model drawing on evaluation results from its implementation in Fall 2002. The model, Final Outcome Centered Around Learner (FOCAL), aims to facilitate transformational learning by fostering three dimensions: the development of a Wisdom Community, Knowledge Innovation, Mentoring and Learner Support, in an online learning environment. The theoretical framework for the FOCAL model is grounded in socioconstructivist learning theories that focus on the link between cognitive and social processes in understanding learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adolphs, R., & Damasio, A.R. (2001). The interaction of affect and cognition: A neurobiological perspective. In J.P. Forgas (Eds.),Handbook of affect and social cognition (pp. 27–49). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atlee, T. (1992).Deep democracy and community wisdom. Retrieved May 20, 2003, from http://www.co-intelligence.org/CIPol_CommWisdom.html

  • Barab, S.A., & Duffy, T.M. (2000). Practice fields to communities of practice. In D. Jonassen & S.M. Land. (Eds.),Theoretical foundations of learning environments (pp. 25–56). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barab, S.A., MaKinster, J., & Scheckler, R. (in press). Designing system dualities: Characterizing online community. To appear in S. Barab, R. Kling, & J. Gray (Eds.),Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning. Cambridge University Press.

  • Bielaczyc, K. & Collins, A. (1999). Learning communities in classrooms: A reconceptualization of educational practice. In C. Reigeluth (Ed.),Instructional design theories and models (pp. 169–292). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L., Cocking, R.R., Donovan, M.S., & Pellegrino, J.W. (Eds.). (2000).How people learn. Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J.S., & Duguid, P. (2000).The social life of information. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain, C. (2002). E-mentoring provides another means for assisting new teachers in Central Illinois.College of Education News; University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign. Retrieved May 16, 2003, from http://www.ed.uiuc.edu/news/2002/NTSP.htm?pf=true

  • Dillon, C., & Blanchard, D. (1991). Education for each: Learner driven distance education. Invited paper presented atThe Second American Symposium on Research in Distance Education, May 22–24, 1991, The American Center for the Study of Distance Education, The Pennsylvania State University, Pennsylvania.

  • Feenberg, A., & Bellman, B. (1990). Social factor research in the design of educational computer networking. In L.M. Harasim (Ed.),Online Education: Perspectives on a New Environment (pp. 67–97). NY: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunawardena, C.N. (1998). Designing collaborative learning environments mediated by computer conferencing: Issues and challenges in the Asian socio-cultural context.Indian Journal of Open Learning, 7(1), 105–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansman, C.A. (2001). Mentoring as continuing professional education.Adult Learning, 12(1), 7–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J. (1991). Situating learning in communities of practice. In L.B. Resnick, J.M. Levine, & S.D. Teasley (Eds.),Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 63–82). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lemke, J. (1997). Cognition, context and learning: A semiotic perspective. In D. Kirshner & J.A. Whitson (Eds.),Situated cognition: Social, semiotic, and psychological perspectives, (pp. 37–56). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mezirow, J. (1978). Perspective transformation.Adult education, 28(2), 100–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mezirow, J. (1991).Transformative dimensions of adult learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naisbitt, J. (1982).Megatrends: Ten new directions changing our lives. NY: Warner Books, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, L.B. (1991). Shared cognition: Thinking as social practice. In L.B. Resnick, J.M. Levine, & S.D. Teasley (Eds.),Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 1–20). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, L.B., Levine, J.M., & Teasley, S.D. (1991).Perspectives on socially shared cognition. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richey, R.C., & Nelson, W.A. (1996). Developmental research. In D.H. Jonassen (Ed.),Handbook of research for educational communications and technology: A project of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology (pp. 1213–1245). NY: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romero, M.E. (1994). Identifying giftedness among Keresan Pueblo Indians: The Keres study.Journal of American Indian Education, 34(1), 35–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, L.A. (2000, October). The role of assessment in a learning culture.Educational Researcher, 29(7), 4–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teasley, S., & Roschelle, J. (1993). Constructing a joint problem space: The computer as a tool for sharing knowledge. In S.P. Lajoie & S.J. Derry (Eds.),Computers as cognitive tools (pp. 229–257). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L.S. (1978).Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman (Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charlotte N. Gunawardena.

Additional information

ABOUT THE AUTHORS

Charlotte N. (Lani) Gunawardena is a Professor of Distance Education and Instructional Technology in the Organizational Learning and Instructional Technology Program in the College of Education at the University of New Mexico. As Principal Investigator she is currently researching and evaluating a federally funded Web-based math and science teacher professional development project. Her recent research examines the social construction of knowledge in online communities and evaluation of distance education systems. Dr. Gunawardena, an international consultant, has worked as a World Bank Consultant in Sri Lanka, and consulted in Brazil, Mexico, Norway, and Turkey.

Barbara Jennings is a doctoral student in the Distance Education Program in the Organizational Learning and Instructional Technology Program in the College of Education, at the University of New Mexico. Ms. Jennings is also a member of the technical staff at Sandia National Laboratory in New Mexico where she has developed distance education tutorials and online classes for High Performance Computing users. She is also a part-time faculty member in the College of Arts and Sciences at Albuquerque Technical Vocational Institute where she teaches introductory computer science courses. Ms. Jennings’ research interests include online education development and using these techniques and activities to enhance traditional classroom learning.

Ludmila C. Ortegano-Layne is currently a PhD candidate in the Organizational Learning and Instructional Technology Program at the University of New Mexico and an Aggregate Professor at Simon Rodriguez University in Caracas, Venezuela. Her research interests include instructional design and distance education, which has been one of her primary activities as a faculty member at Simon Rodriguez. In 1998, she was responsible for developing the training materials, both printed and those delivered by satellite TV, used for training election officials for the presidential election in Venezuela. For her degree program at the University of New Mexico, she has been focusing on the use of concept maps to enhance and measure collaborative learning within the online distance education context.

Casey Frechette is a doctoral candidate in the Organizational Learning and Instructional Technology Program at the University of New Mexico. He is also the Project Assistant for NETtrain, a project that falls under the Navajo Education Technology Consortium and the Education Technology Improvement Project. Mr. Frechette is investigating the relationship between interactivity in a computer-based learning environment and spatial visualization skills for his dissertation.

Kayleigh Carabajal is the Director of Institutional Effectiveness at Albuquerque Technical Vocational Institute (TVI) and Project Director for the community college’s Department of Education Title V grant aimed at strengthening the college’s capacity to serve minority and low-income students. Her responsibilities include evaluating programs designed to increase student retention and academic progress and serving as a mentor for faculty new to teaching online courses at TVI. She also serves as a Quality Examiner for community colleges nationwide, participating in the Continuous Quality Improvement Network initiative. Her doctoral research examines interaction patterns among online learners in support of collaborative learning.

Ken Lindemann is a full-time faculty member of Business Occupations at the Albuquerque Technical Vocational Institute. He is also pursuing his doctoral degree in the Organizational Learning and Instructional Technology Program at the University of New Mexico. His doctoral research centers on distance education and the much-needed element of learner support in distance education, including mentoring as one form of learner support. Mr. Lindemann is a research assistant for a federally funded Web-based math and science teacher professional development project.

Julia Mummert is a recent graduate of the Master’s Program in the Organizational Learning and Instructional Technology Program at the University of New Mexico. Before pursuing her MA, she was an elementary classroom teacher in both public and private schools in New Mexico and Louisiana. She serves as a Project Assistant for a federally funded Web-based math and science teacher professional development project.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gunawardena, C.N., Jennings, B., Ortegano-Layne, L.C. et al. Building an online wisdom community: A transformational design model. J. Comput. High. Educ. 15, 40–62 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02940929

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02940929

Keywords

Navigation