Skip to main content
Log in

Distribution of bifidobacteria in the gastrointestinal tract of calves

  • Published:
Folia Microbiologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Development of gastrointestinal microflora of calves with special reference to bifidobacteria was investigated; fecal bacteria were enumerated in calves aged 3 days to 7 weeks. Bacteria were detected by using selective media, bifidobacteria using modified TPY agar with an addition of mupirocin and acetic acid and by fluorescencein situ hybridization (FISH). Bifidobacteria were dominant group of fecal flora of calves after 7 d of life, constituting 10 % of total bacterial counts. The highest bacterial concentrations were observed in rumen, cecum, and colon, the lowest in abomasum and duodenum. Bifidobacteria and lactobacilli exhibited the highest survival ability during stomach passage and dominated in all parts of the digestive tract. Bifidobacteria counts determined by FISH were significantly higher than those provided by cultivation. Modified TPY agar was highly selective and suitable for bifidobacteria isolation but FISH was shown to be a more precise method for their enumeration. Our results show that gastrointestinal microflora of calves in the milk-feeding period is similar to breast-fed infants with respect to the occurrence of bifidobacteria as a dominant bacterial group. The use ofBifidobacterium strains offers a promising way for providing beneficial effectors for calves in the milk-feeding period.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abe F., Ishibashi N., Shimamura S.: Effect of administration of bifidobacteria and lactic acid bacteria to newborn calves and piglets.J.Dairy Sci.78, 2838–2846 (1995).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bujňáková D., Vlkova E., Rada V., Kmeť V.: Aggregation of lactobacilli and bifidobacteria withEscherichia coli O157.Folia Microbiol.49, 143–146 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chierici R., Fanaro S., Saccomandi D., Vigi V.: Advances in the modulation of the microbial ecology of the gut in early infancy.Acta Paediatr.91 (Suppl.), 56–63 (2003).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Conway P.: Development of intestinal microbiota, pp. 3–38 in R.I. Mackie, B.A. White, R.E. Isaacson (Eds):Gastrointestinal Microbiology. Chapman & Hall, New York 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Gawad A.I.A., El-Sayed E.M., Hafez S.A., El-Zeini H.M., Saleh F.A.: Inhibitory effect of yoghurt and soya yoghurt containing bifidobacteria on the proliferation of Ehrlich ascites tumor cellsin vitro andin vivo in a mouse tumor model.Brit.J.Nutr.92, 81–86 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fanaro S., Chierici R., Guerrini P., Vigi V.: Intestinal microflora in early infacy: composition and development.Acta Paediatr.441 (Suppl.), 48–55 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fonty G., Gouet P., Jouany J.P., Senaud J.: Establishment of the microflora and anaerobic fungi in the rumen of lambs.J.Gen.Microbiol.133, 1835–1843 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • Higginbotham G.E., Bath D.L.: Evaluation ofLactobacillus fermentation cultures in calf feeding systems.J.Dairy Sci.76, 615–620 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karney T.L., Johnson M.C., Ray B.: Changes in the lactobacilli and coliform populations in the intestinal tract of calves from birth to weaning.J.Anim.Sci.63, 446–447 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Moragues M., Comas-Riu J., Vives-Rego J.: Rapid G+ count and subpopulation assessment of the intestinal bacteria inApodemus sylvaticus andMus musculus by flow cytometry.Folia Microbiol.49, 587–590 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Orban J.I., Patterson J.A.: Modification of the phosphoketolase assay for rapid identification of bifidobacteria.J.Microbiol.Meth.40, 221–224 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ozawa K., Yabu-Uchi K., Yamanaka K., Yamashita Y., Nomura S., Oku I.: Effect ofStreptococcus faecalis BIO-4R on intestinal flora of weanling piglets and calves.Appl.Environ.Microbiol.45, 1513–1518 (1983).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paggi R.A., Fay J.P.: Effect of short-chain acids on the carboxymethylcellulase activity of the ruminal bacteriumRuminococcus albus.Folia Microbiol.49, 479–483 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pereira D.I.A., Gibson G.R.: Cholesterol assimilation by lactic acid bacteria and bifidobacteria isolated from the human gut.Appl.Environ.Microbiol.68, 4689–4693 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rada V., Petr J.: A new selective medium for the isolation of glucose nonfermenting bifidobacteria.J.Microbiol.Meth.43, 127–132 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sakata S., Tonooka T., Ishizeki S., Takada M., Sakamoto M., Fukuyama M., Benno Y.: Culture-independent analysis of fecal microbiota in infants, with special reference toBifidobacterium species.FEMS Microbiol.Lett.243, 417–423 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sanz Sampelayo M.R., Lupiani M.J., Guerrero J.E., Boza J.: A comparison of different metabolic types between goat kids and lambs: key blood constituents at different times in the first 2 months after birth.Small Rumin.Res.31, 29–35 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scardovi V.: GenusBifidobacterium, pp. 1418–1434 in P.H.A. Sneah, N.S. Mair, M.E. Sharpe, J.G. Holt (Eds):Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology. Blackie Academic & Professional, London 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmering R., Blaut M.: Pro- and prebiotics — the tasty guardian angels?Appl.Microbiol.Biotechnol.55, 19–28 (2001).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith H.W.: The development of the flora of the alimentary tract in young animals.J.Pathol.Bacteriol.90, 495–513 (1965).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Strompfová V., Lauková A., Ouwehand A.C.: Lacotbacilli and enterococci — potential probiotics for dogs.Folia Microbiol.49, 203–208 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trovatelli M.D., Matteuzzi D.: Presence of bifidobacteria in the rumen of calves fed different rations.Appl.Environ.Microbiol.32, 470–473 (1976).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tuohy K.M., Rouzaud G.C., Bruck W.M., Gibson G.R.: Modulation of the human gut microflora towards improved health using prebiotics-assessment of efficacy.Curr.Pharm.Des.11, 75–90 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan E.E., De Vries M.C., Zoetendal E.G., Ben-Amor K., Akkermans A.D.L., De Vos W.M.: The intestinal LABs.Antonie van Leeuwenhoek82, 341–352 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vlková E., Rada V., Bujňáková D., Kmeť V.: Enumeration, isolation, and identification of bifidobacteria from infant feces.Folia Microbiol.49, 209–212 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vlková E., Nevoral J., Jenčíkova B., Kopečný J., Goderooij J., Trojanová I., Rada V.: Detection of infant bifidobacteria by enzymatic methods.J.Microbiol.Meth.60, 365–373 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace R.J., Newbold C.J.: Probiotics for ruminants, pp. 317–353 in R. Fuller (Ed.):Probiotics — the Scientific Basis. Chapman & Hall, London 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • You H.J., Oh D.K., Ji G.E.: Anticancerogenic effect of a novel chiroinositol-containing polysaccharide fromBifidobacterium bifidum BGN4.FEMS Microbiol.Lett.240, 131–136 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Vlková.

Additional information

This study was supported by grants 523/05/P117 and 523/03/H076 of theGrant Agency of the Czech Republic and MSM 604 607 0901 of theGrant Agency of Ministry of Education, Youth, and Sports of the Czech Republic.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vlková, E., Trojanová, I. & Rada, V. Distribution of bifidobacteria in the gastrointestinal tract of calves. Folia Microbiol 51, 325–328 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02931825

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02931825

Keywords

Navigation