Skip to main content
Log in

Use of jasmonate for conditioning of potato plantlets and microtubers in greenhouse production of minitubers

  • Published:
American Journal of Potato Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A two-year study was conducted to determine the effects of (1) jasmonic acid (JA) pre-treatment, (2) JA supplement in culture media, (3) cultivar (Amisk, Atlantic, Russet Burbank, Shepody, and Umatilla Russet), (4) light (0 h, 8 h), and (5) dormancy breaking treatment (Rindite, gibberellic acid) on greenhouse production of minitubers from microtubers andin vitro plantlets. The microtubers were produced under short day (8 h) light conditions and in darkness, from stock plantlets pre-treated with JA and untreated, and on tuberization media with or without JA.In vitro plantlets (the industry choice in nuclear seed potato production) of all five cultivars performed well, meeting the standard criteria for greenhouse production of minitubers. Production of minitubers from microtuber-derived plants of cvs Amisk, Russet Burbank, and Umatilla Russet was similar to that of plantlet-derived plants with regard to number of minitubers. Yields (weight), however, were lower than those from plantlets. Microtuber responses to JA varied with cultivar. Amisk produced the highest number of minitubers per plot from microtubers derived from JA pre-treated plantlets. Jasmonic acid-pretreated microtubers also gave significantly more minitubers in Russet Burbank and Umatilla Russet than the microtubers from other treatments. Shepody did not benefit from JA treatments and JA pre-treated Atlantic microtubers performed poorly, producing significantly lower yields of minitubers than other cultivars. Independently of cultivar, microtubers produced under 8-h photoperiod gave significantly higher yields of minitubers than microtubers produced in the dark. Dormancy release was the key factor influencing microtuber performance. Rindite proved to be a much more effective dormancy breaking treatment than gibberellin. JA conditioning of stock plants prior to tuberization is being proposed as a treatment in production of microtubers for greenhouse production of minitubers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • AAFC (Agriculture & Agri-Food Canada). 1996. Propagation and initiation of single node cuttings of potatoin vitro. Prepared by LK Douglass, Potato Propagation and Tissue Culture Laboratory, Potato Research Centre, AAFC, Fredericton, Canada. pp. 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biondi S, S Fornale, KM Oksman-Caldentey, M Eeva, S Agostani, and N Bagni. 2000. Jasmonates induce over-accumulation of methylputrescine and conjugated polyamines inHyoscyamus muticus L. root cultures. Plant Cell Rep 19:691–697.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman WK, and SE Coleman. 2000. Modification of potato microtuber dormancy during induction and growthin vitro andex vitro. Am J Potato Res 77:103–110.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman WK, DJ Donnelley, and SE Coleman. 2001. Potato microtubers as research tools: a review. Am J Potato Res 78:47–55.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Denny FE. 1945. Synergistic effects of three chemicals in the treatment of dormant potato tubers to hasten germination. Contr Boyce Thompson Inst Pl Res 14:1–14.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dobránszki J, and M Mandi. 1993. Induction ofin vitro tuberization by short day period and dark treatment of potato shoots grown on hormone-free medium. Acta Biol Hung 44:411–420.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dobránszki J, KM Tábóri, and A Ferenczy. 1999. Light and genotype effects on in vitro tuberization of potato plantlets. Potato Res 42:483–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estrada R, P Tovar, and JH Dodds. 1986. Induction ofin vitro tubers in a broad range of potato genotypes. Plant Cell Tis Organ Cult 7:3–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gopal J, JL Minocha, and JS Sidhu. 1997. Comparative performance of potato crops raised from microtubers induced in the dark versus microtubers induced in light. Potato Res 40:407–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson SD. 1999. Multiple signalling pathways control tuber induction in potato. Plant Physiol 119:1–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jones ED. 1988. A current assessment ofin vitro culture, and other rapid multiplication methods in North America and Europe. Am Potato J 65:209–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joung H, JH Jeon, SW Park, and HS Kim. 1993. The impact of mass-produced potato microtubers on Korean potato agriculture. Am Potato J 70:819–820 (abstr).

    Google Scholar 

  • Khuri S, and J Moorby. 1996. Nodal segments or microtubers as expiants forin vitro microtuber production of potato. Plant Cell Tis Organ Cult 45:215–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim SY, JK Kim, KH Choi, YH Joung, and H Joung. 1999. Effects of Rindite on breaking dormancy of potato microtubers. Am J Potato Res 76:5–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Koda Y, Y Kikuta, H Tazaki, Y Tsuhino, S Sakamura, and T Yoshihara. 1991. Potato tuber-inducing activities of jasmonic acid and related compounds. Phytochem 30:1435–1438.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kreft S, M Ravinkar, P Mesko, J Pungercar, A Umek, I Kregar, and B Strukelj. 1997. Jasmonic acid inducible aspartic proteinase inhibitors from potato. Phytochem 44:1001–1006.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lê CL. 1999. In vitro microtuberization: an evaluation of culture conditions for the production of virus-free potatoes. Potato Res 42:489–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leclerc Y, DJ Donnelly, WK Coleman, and RR King. 1995. Microtuber dormancy in three potato cultivars. Am Potato J 72:215–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lillo C. 1989. A simple two-phase system for efficient in vitro tuberization in potato. Norwegian J Agric Sci 3:23–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lommen WJM. 1995. Basic studies on the production and performance of potato minitubers. PhD thesis, Agriculture University of Wageningen, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery DC. 2001. Design and Analysis of Experiments. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murashige T, and F Skoog. 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15:473–497.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nasiruddin KM, and J Blake. 1997. Effect of Rindite on storage behavior, dormancy break and sprout growth of potato microtubers (cv. Desiree). Am Potato J 74:325–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelacho AM, and AM Mingo-Castel. 1991. Jasmonic acid induces tuberization of potato stolons culturedin vitro. Plant Physiol 97:1253–1255.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pruski K, J Nowak, and T Lewis. 1993. Jasmonates and photoperiod effect on microtuber production in two potato cultivars. In Vitro Cell Develop Biol Plant 29:69 (abstr).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pruski, K., T. Astatkie, and J. Nowak. 2002. Jasmonate effects on in vitro tuberization and tuber bulking in two potato cultivars (Solanum tuberosum L.) under different media and photoperiod conditions. In Vitro Cell Develop Biol Plant 38:203–209.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ranalli P. 1997. Innovative propagation methods in seed tuber multiplication programmes. Potato Res 40:439–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranalli P, F Bassi, G Ruaro, P del Re, M di Candilo, and G Mandolino. 1994. Microtuber and minituber production and field performance compared with normal tubers. Potato Res 37:383–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravnikar M, B Vilhar, and N Gogala. 1992. Stimulatory effects of jasmonic acid on potato node and protoplast culture. J Plant Growth Reg 11:29–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc. 1999. SAS Online Doc®, Version 8. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Struik PC, and WJM. Lommen. 1990. Production, storage and use of micro-and minitubers. Proceedings of the 11th Triennial Conference of the European Association for Potato Research (EAPR), Edinburgh, UK. pp. 122–133.

  • Struik PC, and SG Wiersema. 1999. Seed Potato Technology. Wageningen Pers, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tábóri KM, J Dobránszki, and A Ferenczy. 1999. Some sprouting characteristics of microtubers. Potato Res 42:611–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Berg JH, and EE Ewing. 1991. Jasmonates and their role in plant growth and development with special reference to the control of potato tuberization: a review. Am Potato J 68:781–794.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu WC, PJ Joyce, DC Cameron and BH McCown. 2000. Sucrose utilization during potato microtuber growth in bioreactors. Plant Cell Rep 19:407–413.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Pruski.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pruski, K., Astatkie, T., Duplessis, P. et al. Use of jasmonate for conditioning of potato plantlets and microtubers in greenhouse production of minitubers. Am. J. Pot Res 80, 183–193 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02855690

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02855690

Additional Key Words

Navigation