Skip to main content
Log in

Thepenis rectus as a marker in human palaeontology?

  • Published:
Human Evolution

Abstract

Thepenis rectus, i.e. the human penis which maintains an almost horizontal position in its flaccid state, has so far only been observed amongst the Bushmen in southern Africa. There, however, it is already displayed in prehistoric rock art in stark and obviously intended contrast with differently positioned penes of other population groups. A similar juxtaposition can be found in European upper Palaeolithic cave art where certain humanlike figures, with indications of much body hair and with an upturned nose, exhibit what seems to be apenis rectus rather than an ordinary penis in erection. It is argued that these hairy people are most likely Neanderthals portrayed by early modern man (Homo sapiens) with whom they coexisted and who was struck by these anatomical differences. This theory is derived from the expert description and depiction of a recently killed remnant Neanderthal from central Vietnam who indeed shows the same combination of hairiness, an upturned nose and a thin penis with a compact small scrotum which is the mark of thepenis rectus. By comparing this body with representations of “bull-men” by perfectlysapiens Sumerians, it is realized that they, too, are most likely remnant Neanderthals with the same kind of penis. The same situation is again found in classical Greece where the hairy, knobby-nosed Satyr contrasts with the straight-nosed glabroussapiens Greek who mistook the former'spenis rectus for a penis in erection and therefore endowed him with sexual prowess and licentiousness. The conclusion is reached that the Satyrs, like the Mesopotamian “bull-men», must have been a remnant Neanderthal population, that these findings are consistant with not only the examination of a remnant Neanderthal from Southeast Asia, but also with the prehistoric evidence from both Europe and Africa, and that therefore thepenis rectus can be seen as a marker in Human Palaeontology, i.e. that ofHomo neanderthalensis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amiet P., 1973. “La glyptique de la fin de l'Élam”.Arts Asiatiques, XXVII: 3–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • ApSimon A.M., 1980. “The last Neanderthal in France?”Nature, 287:271272, September 25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azrié A., 1979.L'épopée de Gilgamesh, Paris: Berg International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey G., 1992. “The Palaeolithic of Klithi in its wider context”.The Annual of the British School of Archaeology at Athens, 87: 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker J.R., 1974.Race. London: Oxford U.P.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brace C.L., 1991. “Comment” on P. Graves, “New Models and Metaphors for the Neanderthal Debate”.Current Anthropology, 32:524–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capitan L., H. Breuil & D. Peyrony, 1906. “Figures anthropomorphes ou humaines de la caverne des Combaralles”.Congrès International d'Anthropologie.

  • Dambricourt Malassé A., A. Débenath & J. Pelegrin, 1992. “On New Models for the Neanderthal Debate”.Current Anthropology 33:49–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Rachewiltz B., 1964.Black Eros. London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dover K.J., 1978.Greek Homosexuality. London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drury J. & M.R. Drennan, 1926. “The Pudental Parts of the South African Bush Race”.Med. J. South Africa, November.

  • Fritsch G., 1872.Die Eingeborenen Süd-Africa's ethnographisch und anatomisch: Breslau: Hirt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giacobini G., 1989. “Neanderthals”,in G. Giacobini ed.,Hominidae 297–304. Milano: Jaca Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giedion S., 1962.The Eternal Present: The Beginnings of Art, London: Oxford U.P.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graves P., 1991. “New Models and Metaphors for the Neanderthal Debate”.Current Anthropology, 32:513–541 (incl. “Comments” and “Reply”).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grün R. & C.B. Stringer, 1991. “Electron Spin Resonance Dating and the Evolution of Modern Humans”.Archaeometry, 33:2:153–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guirand F. ed., 1968.New Larousse Encyclopedia of Mythology, rev. from the orig. French ed. London: Hamlyn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn T., 1879. “Felszeichnungen der Buschmänner”,Zeitschr.f.Ethnol, 11:307–308 (Verh. Berl. Ges. Anthrop. Ethnol. Urgesch.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Heuvelmans B., 1969. “Note préliminaire sur un spécimen conservé dans la glace d'une forme encore inconnue d'hominide vivant Homo Pongoides (Sp.seu subsp.nov.)”,Bull.Inst.r.Sci.nat.Belg,45: 4:1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heuvelmans B., 1980.Les bêtes humaines d'Afrique. Paris: Plon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heuvelmans B. & B. Porchnev, 1974.L'Homme de Néanderthal est toujours vivant. Paris: Plon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howells W.W., 1970. “Mount Carmel Man: Morphological Relationshipsn,Proceedings VIIIth Congress of Anthropological and Ehthnological Sciences, Tokyo and Kyoto 1968 1:269–272. Tokyo: Science Council of Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson T., Rabinowitz H. & Sieff P., 1959.Rock-Paintings of the South-West Cape. Cape Town: Nasionale Boekhandel BPK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenntner G., 1986. “Wechselbeziehungen zwischen Raum, Mensch und Kultur. Studien bei der Jäger- und Sammlerpopulation der Buschleute im südlichen Afrika”,Fridericiana (Zeitschrift der Universität Karlsruhe) 39:3–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leroi-Gourhan A., 1965.Préhistoire de l'art occidental. Paris: Ed. Mazenod.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lissarague F., 1990. “The Sexual Life of the Satyrs”,in D.M. Halperin, J.J. Winkler and F.I. Zeitlin eds.Before Sexuality, 53–81. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton U.P.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallowan M.E.L., 1961. “The Birth of Written History”, being Chap. III (65–96) of S. Piggott ed.,The Dawn of Civilization. London: Thames and Hudson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manuduit J.A., 1954.Quarante Mille ans d'Art Moderne. Paris: Plon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel W., 1968. “Fruhe Großplastik und die Hochkultur am Erythräischen Meer: ‘Westmakkanische’ Rundplastik.Berliner Jahrbuch für Vor-und Frühgeschichte, 8: 54–67, pls. XVI–XXVI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Napier J., 1972.Bigfoot. The Yeti and Sasquatch in Myth and Reality. London: Jonathan Cape.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obermaier H. & H. Kühn, 1930.Bushman Art: Rock Paintings of South-West Africa. London: Oxford U.P.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olami Y., 1984.Prehistoric Carmel. Jerusalem: Israel Exploration Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pager H., 1975.Stone Age Myth and Magic, as documented in the rock paintings of South Africa. Graz, Austria: Akademische Druck-u. Verlagsanstalt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pöch R., 1927. “Die Stellung der Buschmannasse unter den übrigen Menschenrassen”,Korr.-Bl.deutsch.Ges.Anthr. Ethn.Urgesch, 42:7–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pöch R., 1927. quoted by E von Eickstedt,Rassenkunde und Rassengeschichte der Menschheit, I:Die Forschung am Menschen. Second edition. Stuttgart: Ferdinand Enke Verl., 1942:1189, Anm. 548.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray Y., 1986. The Neanderthal: a new look at an old face”.J. hum. Evol, 15:151–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds T.E.G., 1991. “Revolution or resolution? The archaeology of modern human origins”.World Archaeology, 23:154–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson I.T., 1967. “The Wudewása or Hairy Primitives of Ancient Europe”.Genus, XXIII:109–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seiner F., 1912. “Beobachtungen und Messungen an Buschleuten”.Zeitschr.f. Ethn., XLI:275–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shackley M., 1980.Neanderthal Man. London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shackley M., 1984. “The case for Neanderthal survival: fact, fiction or faction?”.Antiquity, LVI:31–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shackley M., 1983.Wildmen. Yeti, Sasquatch and the Neanderthal Enigma, London: Thames and Hudson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith F.H. & F. Spencer eds., 1984.The Origin of Modern Humans: A World Survey of the Fossil Evidence. New York: Alan R. Liss.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stow B.W. & D.F. Bleek, 1930.Rock Paintings in South Africa from Parts of the Eastern Province and Orange Free State. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stringer C.B., 1984. “Fate of the Neanderthal”.Natural History, 12:9–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stringer C.B., 1990. “The Emergence of Modern Humans”.Scientific American, Dec.:68–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stringer C.B., R. Grun, H.P. Schwarcz & P. Goldeberg, 1989. “ESR dates for the hominid burial site of Es Skhul in Israel”.Nature, 338:756–758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strommenger E., 1989. “Das Rohstoffland Iran: Handwerkserzeugnisse und bildende Kunst”.Führungsblatt 1128, Museum für Vor- und Frühgeschichte, Staatliche Museen Preußischer Kulturbesitz. Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Summers R. ed., 1959.Prehistoric Rock Art of the Federation of Rhodesia and Nyasaland. Salisbury: National Publications Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobias P.V. ed., 1978.The Bushmen. San Hunters and Herders of Southern Africa. Cape Town and Pretoria: Human and Rousseau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trinkaus E., 1983.The Shanidar Neandertals. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trinkaus E., 1986a. “Les Néandertaliens”.La Recherche, 17:180: 1040–1047.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trinkaus E., 1986b. “The Neanderthals and Modern Human Origins”.Ann. Rev. Anthrop., 15:193–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trinkaus E., 1990.The Emergence of Modern Humans: Biocultural Adaptations in the Later Pleistocene. Cambridge: C.U.P.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trinkaus E. & W.W. Howells, 1979. “The Neanderthals”.Scientific American, 241:6:94–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ucko P. & A. Rosenfeld, 1972. “Anthropomorphic Representations in Palaeolithic Art”,Actas del Simposium Internacional del Arte Rupestre, Santander 1970. Santander, Madrid: UISPP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ucko P. ed., 1977.Form in indigenous Art. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandermeersch B., 1990. “Réflexions d'un anthropologue à propos de la transition Moustérien/Paléolithique supérieur’,Paléolithique moyen récent et Paléolithique supérieur ancien en Europe. Actes du Colloque international de Nemours, 9–11 Mai 1988, C. Farizy ed.:21–24.

  • Virchow R., 1886. “Buschmänner”.Zeitschr. f. Ethnol., 18:221–239. (Verhandl. Berl. Ges. Anhrop. Ethnol. Urgesch.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Von der Brock A.J.P., 1929. “Über den descensus testiculorum”,Morphol. Jb. (Maurer-Festschrift) 1: 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Eickstedt E., 1942.Rassenkunde und Rassengeschichte der Menschheit, I:Die Forschung am Menschen. Second edition, Stuttgart: Ferdinand Enke Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Loofs-Wissowa, H. Thepenis rectus as a marker in human palaeontology?. Hum. Evol. 9, 343–356 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02435520

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02435520

Key words

Navigation