Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of Parks' anal retractor on anal sphincter pressures

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

PURPOSE: The effects of the Parks' anal retractor on anal sphincter function were studied in a prospective, randomized trial. A closed hemorrhoidectomy was performed intraanally in 20 patients using the Parks' anal retractor; in 20 other patients, the procedure was done perineally without the use of a retractor. METHODS: Anal manometry was performed before and at 6 and 12 weeks after hemorrhoidectomy. RESULTS: Mean squeeze pressure decreased by 4 percent whether or not a retractor was used. Mean resting pressure decreased by 23 percent after use of Parks' anal retractor (P=0.01) compared with 8 percent when it was not used (P >0,05). CONCLUSIONS: The internal anal sphincter is easily damaged with the use of the Parks' anal retractor. When possible, its use should be avoided to obtain better manometric and functional results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kuijpers JH. Colorectal physiology: fecal incontinence. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 1994:65–7.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Browning GG, Parks AG. Postanal repair for neurogenic fecal incontinence: correlation of clinical results and anal canal pressures. Br J Surg 1983;70:101–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kuijpers HC, Scheuer M. Disorders of impaired fecal control: a clinical and manometric study. Dis Colon Rectum 1990;33:207–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. van Tets WF, Kuijpers HC. Continence disorders after anal fistulotomy. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:1194–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. van Tets WF, Kuijpers JH. Seton treatment of perianal fistula with high anal or rectal opening. Br J Surg 1995;82:895–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Marks CG, Ritchie JK. Anal fistulas at St. Marks Hospital. Br J Surg 1977;64:84–91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lilius HG. Fistula in ano: an investigation of human foetal anal ducts and intramuscular glands and a clinical study of 150 patients. Acta Chir Scand Suppl 1968;383:7–88.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bennett RC, Coligher JC. Results of internal sphincterotomy for anal fissure and stenosis. BMJ 1962;2:1500–1.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Walker WA, Rothenberger DA, Goldberg SM. Morbidity of internal sphincterotomy for anal fissure and stenosis. Dis Colon Rectum 1985;28:832–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Khubchandani IT, Reed JF. Sequelae of internal sphincterotomy for chronic fissure in ano. Br J Surg 1989;76:431–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Belliveau P, Thomson JP, Parks AG. Fistula-in-ano: a manometric study. Dis Colon Rectum 1983;26:152–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Goligher JC, Graham NG, Clark G, de Dombal FT, Giles G. The value of stretching the sphincters in relief of post hemorrhoidectomy pain. Br J Surg 1969;56:859–61.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hancock BD. Lord's procedure for hemorrhoids: a prospective anal pressure study. Br J Surg 1981;68:729–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Read MG, Read NW, Haynes WG, Donnelly TC, Johnson AG. A prospective study of the effect of hemorrhoidectomy on sphincter function and fecal incontinence. Br J Surg 1982;69:396–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Goligher JC. Surgery of the anus, rectum and colon. 4th ed. London: Bailiere & Tindall, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Shemesh EI, Kodner IJ, Fry RD, Neufeld DM. Endorectal sliding flap repair of complicated anterior anoperineal fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum 1988;31:22–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rothenberger DA, Vermeulen FD, Christenson CE,et al. Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal reservoir and ileoanal anastomosis. Am J Surg 1983;145:82–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Snooks SJ, Henry MM, Swash M. Fecal incontinence after anal dilatation. Br J Surg 1984;71:617–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Keighley MR. Abdominal mucosectomy reduces the incidence of soiling and sphincter damage after restorative proctocolectomy and J-pouch. Dis Colon Rectum 1987;30:386–90.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tuckson W, Lavery I, Fazio V, Oakley J, Church J, Milson J. Manometric and functional comparison of the ileal pouch anal anastomosis with and without anal manipulation. Am J Surg 1991;161:90–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Braun J, Treutner KH, Harder M, Lerch MM, Tons Chr, Schumpelick V. Anal sphincter function after intersphincteric resection and stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 1991;34:8–16.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hancock BD. Internal sphincter and the nature of hemorrhoids. Gut 1977;18:651–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Arabi Y, Alexander-Williams J, Keighley M. Anal pressures in haemorrhoids and anal fissure. Am J Surg 1977;134:608.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

No reprints are available.

About this article

Cite this article

van Tets, W.F., Kuijpers, J.H.C., Tran, K. et al. Influence of Parks' anal retractor on anal sphincter pressures. Dis Colon Rectum 40, 1042–1045 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02050926

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02050926

Key words

Navigation