Skip to main content
Log in

Class struggle in campaign finance? Political action committee contributions in the 1984 elections

  • Published:
Sociological Forum

Abstract

Pluralist and class-based theories offer alternative hypotheses about the political behavior of organized interests in the United States. Using network methods and data on political action committees' (PAC) contributions to congressional candidates in the 1984 elections, we identify interest groups with politically similar behavior in an attempt to assess these perspectives concerning elites in the United States. The analysis includes corporate, labor, membership association, and nonconnected PACs. Counter to pluralist expectations, we find just two large groups—one primarily business oriented and the other primarily labor/public-interest oriented. Our findings thus support a class-based interpretation of the nature of organized interests. These findings are framed in terms of the meaning of unity and fragmentation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alba, Richard D. 1973 “A graph theoretic definition of a sociometric clique.” Journal of Mathematical Sociology 3:113–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baden, Naomi 1986 “Developing an agenda: Expanding the role of women in unions.” Labor Studies Journal 10:229–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balbus, Isaac D. 1971 “The concept of interest in pluralist and marxian analysis.” Politics and Society 1:151–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boies, John L. 1989 “Money, business, and the state: Material interests, Fortune 500 corporations, and the size of political action committees.” American Sociological Review 54:821–833.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burris, Val 1987 “The political partisanship of American business: A study of corporate political action committees.” American Sociological Review 52:732–744.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clawson, Dan and Alan Neustadtl 1988 “Business elites and political realignment.” National Science Foundation Grant SES-8721982.

  • 1989 “Interlocks, PACs, and corporate conservatism.” American Journal of Sociology 4:749–773.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clawson, Dan, Allen Kaufman, andAlan Neustadtl 1985 “Corporate PACs for a new pax Americana.” Insurgent Sociologist 13:6–777.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clawson, Dan, Alan Neustadtl, andJames Bearden 1986 “The logic of business unity: Corporate contributions to the 1980 Congressional elections.” American Sociological Review 51:797–811.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clawson, Dan, Alan Neustadtl, and Denise Scott ForthcomingThe Golden Rule.

  • Collins, Robert M. 1981 The Business Response to Keynes, 1929–1964. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commoner, Barry 1973 “Workplace burden.” Environment 15(July-August):15–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, Alan 1979 Thunder on the Right: The “New Right” and the Politics of Resentment. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1961 Who Governs? New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, Robert formation organizations.” Social Problems 33:130–145.

  • 1962 Dilemmas of a Pluralist Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Mike 1986 Prisoners of the American Dream. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Defense 1984 Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, U.S. Government. Fiscal Year 1984. 100 Companies Receiving the Largest Dollar Volume of Prime Contract Awards.

  • 1970 The Higher Circles: The Governing Class in America. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1974 The Bohemian Grove and Other Retreats. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1978 The Powers That Be. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edsall, Thomas Byrne 1984 The New Politics of Inequality. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenreich, Barbara andJohn Ehrenreich 1979 “The professional managerial class.” In Pat Walker (ed.), Between Labor and Capital: 5–45. Boston: South End Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eismeier, Theodore J. andPhillip H. Pollock III 1988 Business, Money, and the Rise of Corporate PACs in American Elections. New York: Quorum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Election Commission 1984 FEC 1983-84 RFA Senate/House Campaigns. [MRDF] Washington, DC.

  • Friedan, Betty 1963 The Feminine Mystique. New York: Dell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gais, Thomas L., Mark A. Peterson, andJack L. Walker 1984 “Interest groups, iron triangles, and representative institutions in American national government.” British Journal of Political Science 14:161–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Himmelstein, Jerome L. 1990 To the Right. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, J. Craig and Teri Schumate 1985 “Cowboy capitalists and the rise of the ‘New Right’: An analysis of contributions to conservative policy

  • Kaufman, Allen M., Alfred A. Marcus, andLarry Zacharias 1987 “How business manages politics.” In Alfred A. Marcus, Allen M. Kaufman, and David R. Beam (eds.), Business Strategy and Public Policy: Perspectives from Business and Academia: 293–312. New York: Quorum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotz, David 1978 Bank Control of Large Corporations in the United States. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladd, Carl Everett 1984 “Is Election '84 really a class struggle?” Public Opinion 7:41–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, Steven B. 1980 “The rise of American boarding schools and the development of a national upper class.” Social Problems 28:63–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom, C. E. 1977 Politics and Markets. New York: Basic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manley, John F. 1983 “Neo-pluralism: A class analysis of pluralism I and pluralism II.” American Political Science Review 77:368–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masters, Marick F. andJohn Thomas Delaney 1987 “Union political activities: A review of the empirical literature.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 40:336–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masters, Marick F. andAsghar Zardkoohi 1988 “Congressional support for unions' positions across diverse legislation.” Journal of Labor Research 9:149–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • McConnell, Grant 1966 Private Power and American Democracy. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, C. W. 1956 The Power Elite. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintz, Beth andMichael Schwartz 1985 The Structure of Power of American Business. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1982 The American Corporate Network 1904–1974. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mizruchi, Mark S. 1989a “Determinants of political behavior among large American corporations.” Columbia University, manuscript.

  • 1989b “Similarity of political behavior among large American corporations.” American Journal of Sociology 95:401–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1990 “Cohesion, structural equivalence, and similarity of behavior: An approach to the study of corporate political power.” Sociological Theory 8:16–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1986 “Economic sources of corporate political consensus: An examination of interindustry relations.” American Sociological Review 51:482–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1988 “Economic concentration and corporate political behavior: A cross-industry comparison.” Social Science Research 17:287–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neustadtl, Alan 1990 “Interest group PACsmanship: An analysis of campaign contributions, issue visibility, and legislative impact.” Social Forces 69.

  • Neustadtl, Alan andDan Clawson 1988 “Corporate political groupings: Does ideology unify business political behavior.” American Sociological Review 53:172–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peschek, Joseph G. 1987 Policy-Planning Organizations: Elite Agendas and America's Rightward Turn. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, Kevin 1982 Post-Conservative America: People, Politics, and Ideology in a Time of Crisis. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polsby, N. W. 1980 Community Power and Political Theory. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, Everett M. andD. Lawrence Kincaid 1981 Communication Networks. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, Peter H. 1980 “The ups and downs of social class in America.” Contemporary Sociology 9:40–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlozman, Kay Lehman andJohn T. Tierney 1986 Organized Interests and American Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, Michael, ed. 1987 The Structure of Power in America: The Corporate Elite as a Ruling Class. New York: Holmes and Meier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoup, Laurence H. andWilliam Minter 1977 Imperial Braintrust: The Council on Foreign Relations and U.S. Foreign Policy. New York: Monthly Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sklar, Holly, ed. 1980 Trilateralism: The Trilateral Commission and Elite Planning for World Management. Boston: South End.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, David W. 1987 “The application and misapplication of factor analysis in marketing research.” In Joseph Hair, Rolph Anderson, and Ronald Tatham (eds.), Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings: 278–291.New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Su, Tie-ting, Dan Clawson, and Alan Neustadtl 1989 “Corporate PACs and conservative realignment: A comparison of 1980 and 1984.” University of Massachusetts, manuscript.

  • Truman, David 1951 The Governmental Process: Political Interests and Public Opinion. New York: Alfred A Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Useem, Michael 1984 The Inner Circle. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanneman, Reeve andLynn Weber Cannon 1987 The American Perception of Class. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1981 “The public interest movement and the American reform tradition.” Political Science Quarterly 95:607–627.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1989 Fluctuating Fortunes: The Power of Business in America. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, Jack 1983 “The origin and maintenance of interest groups in America.” American Political Science Review 77:390–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitaker, Robert W., ed. 1982 The New Right Papers. New York: St. Martin's Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitt, J. Allen 1982 Urban Elites and Mass Transportation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilhite, Al 1988 “Union PAC contributions and legislative voting.” Journal of Labor Research 9:79–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilhite, Allen andJohn Theilmann 1986 “Unions, corporations, and political campaign contributions: The 1982 House elections.” Journal of Labor Research 7:175–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Graham K. 1986 “American business and politics.” In Allan J. Cigler and Burdett A. Loomis (eds.), Interest Group Politics, 2nd ed.: 221–235. Washington, DC: CQ Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Neustadtl, A., Scott, D. & Clawson, D. Class struggle in campaign finance? Political action committee contributions in the 1984 elections. Sociol Forum 6, 219–238 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01114391

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01114391

Key words

Navigation