Skip to main content

Interest Community Influence: A Neopluralist Perspective

  • Chapter
The Organization Ecology of Interest Communities

Part of the book series: Interest Groups, Advocacy and Democracy Series ((IGAD))

Abstract

In the United States each year organizations spend about $200 million on federal campaign contributions and more than $3 billion on lobbying the federal government (Center for Responsive Politics 2014a, 2014b). Thousands of businesses and other organizations maintain full-time offices in the nation’s capital for the sole purpose of communicating with government. The pattern is repeated at the state and even the local levels. Politicians and the news media decry the power of “special interests,” and political scientists themselves find that organized interests are embedded in all aspects of the policymaking process. And yet, evidence of interest group power often escapes the grasp of systematic research. Although lobbyists make convenient scapegoats, the degree to which organized interests wield influence in politics is far from clear. Scholarly findings are mixed and any power that organized interests may wield is highly contingent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bachrach, Peter, and Morton Baratz. 1962. “The Two Faces of Power.” American Political Science Review 56: 947–952.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, Frank R., Jeffrey M. Berry, Marie Hojnacki, David C. Kimball, and Beth L. Leech. 2009a. Lobbying and Policy Change: Who Wins, Who Loses, and Why. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, Frank R., Suzanna L. De Boef, and Amber E. Boydstun. 2008. The Decline of the Death Penalty and the Discovery of Innocence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, Frank R., Virginia Gray, and David Lowery. 2009b. “Congressional Influence on State Lobbying Activity.” Political Research Quarterly 2: 552–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, Frank R., and Bryan D. Jones. 1993. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, Frank R., and Bryan D. Jones. 2005. The Politics of Attention: How Government Prioritizes Problems. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, Frank R., Heather A. Larsen-Price, Beth L. Leech, and Paul Rutledge. 2011. “Congressional and Presidential Effects on the Demand for Lobbying.” Political Research Quarterly 64: 3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, Frank R., and Beth L. Leech. 1998. Basic Interests: The Importance of Groups in Politics and in Political Science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, Frank R., and Beth L. Leech. 2001. “Issue Niches and Policy Bandwagons: Patterns of Interest Group Involvement in National Politics.” Journal of Politics 63: 1191–1213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, Jeffrey M. 1999. The New Liberalism: The Rising Power of Citizen Groups. Washington: Brookings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyers, Jan, Laura Chaqués Bonafont, Andreas Dür, Rainer Eising, Danica Fink-Hafner, David Lowery, Christine Mahoney, William Maloney, and Daniel Naurin. 2014. “The INTEREURO Project: Logic and Structure.” Interest Groups & Advocacy 3: 126–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burstein, Paul. 2014. American Public Opinion, Advocacy, and Policy in Congress What the Public Wants and What It Gets. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burstein, Paul, and April Linton. 2002. “The Impact of Political Parties, Interest Groups, and Social Movement Organizations on Public Policy: Some Recent Evidence and Theoretical Concerns.” Social Forces 81 (2): 381–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Center for Responsive Politics. 2014a. Political Action Committees. http://www.opensecrets.org/pacs/

  • Center for Responsive Politics. 2014b. Lobbying Database. http://www.opensecrets.org/lobby/

  • Dahl, Robert A. 1966. “Further Refections on ‘The Elitist Theory of Democracy’.” American Political Science Review 60: 296–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denzau, Arthur T., and Michael C. Munger. 1986. “Legislators and Interest Groups: How Unorganized Interests Get Represented.” American Political Science Review 80 (1): 89–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Domhoff, G. William. 1967. Who Rules America?. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drutman, Lee. 2015. The Business of America is Lobbying: How Corporations Became Politicized and Politics became More Corporate. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dür, Andreas, Patrick Bernhagen, and David Marshall. 2015. “Interest Group Success in the European Union: When (and Why) Does Business Lose?” Comparative Political Studies 48 (80): 951–983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fellowes, Matthew, Virginia Gray, and David Lowery. 2006. “What’s on the Table? The Content of State Policy Agendas.” Party Politics 12 (1): 35–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godwin, R. K., E. J. Lopez, and B. J. Seldon, 2008. “Allocating Lobbying Resources between Collective and Private Rents.” Political Research Quarterly 61 (2): 345–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golden, Marissa Martino. 1998. “Interest Groups in the Rule-Making Process: Who Participates? Whose Voices Get Heard?” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 8 (2): 245–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, Kenneth M. 1999. Interest Groups, Lobbying, and Participation in America. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, Virginia, and David Lowery. 1991. “Corporatism without Labor? Industrial Policymaking in the American States.” Journal of Public Policy 11 (3): 315–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, Virginia, and David Lowery. 1995. “Interest Representation and Democratic Gridlock.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 20 (4): 531–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, Virginia, and David Lowery. 1996. The Population Ecology of Interest Representation: Lobbying Communities in the American States. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, Virginia, David Lowery, and Jennifer K. Benz. 2013. Organized Interests and Health Policy in the American States. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, Virginia, David Lowery, Matthew Fellowes, and Jennifer Anderson. 2005. “Understanding the Demand-Side of Lobbying: Interest System Energy in the American States.” American Politics Research 33 (1): 404–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, Virginia, David Lowery, and Eric Godwin. 2007. “The Political Management of Managed Care: Explaining Variations in State HMO Regulations.” Journal of Health Politics, Policy, and Law 32 (3): 457–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, Virginia, David Lowery, James Monogan, and Erik K. Godwin. 2010. “Incrementing Toward Nowhere: Universal Health Care Coverage in the States.” Publius 40: 82–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Richard L., and Alan V. Deardorff. 2006. Lobbying as Legislative Subsidy. American Political Science Review 100 (1): 69–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinz, John P., Edward O. Laumann, Robert L. Nelson, and Robert H. Salisbury. 1993. The Hollow Core: Private Interests in National Policymaking. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hojnacki, Marie. 1997. “Interest Groups’ Decisions to Join Alliances or Work Alone.” American Journal of Political Science 41: 61–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hojnacki, Marie, and David C. Kimball. 1998. “Organized Interests and the Decision of Whom to Lobby in Congress.” American Political Science Review 92: 775–790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hojnacki, Marie, and David C. Kimball. 1999. “The Who and How of Organizations’ Lobbying Strategies in Committee.” Journal of Politics 61 (4): 999–1024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hojnacki, Marie, David C. Kimball, Frank R. Baumgartner, Jeffrey M. Berry, and Beth L. Leech. 2012. “Studying Organizational Advocacy and Influence: Reexamining Interest Group Research.” Annual Review of Political Science 15: 379–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hojnacki, Marie, Kathleen M. Marchetti, Frank R. Baumgartner, Jeffrey M. Berry, David C. Kimball, and Beth L. Leech. 2015. “Assessing Business Advantage in Washington Lobbying.” Interest Groups & Advocacy. Advance online publication, doi: 10.1057/iga.2015.3

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, Floyd. 1953. Community Power Structure. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimball, David, Frank R. Baumgartner, Jeffrey M. Berry, Marie Hojnacki, and Beth L. Leech. 2012. “Who Cares About the Lobbying Agenda?” Interest Groups and Advocacy 1: 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kollman, Ken. 1998. Outside Lobbying: Public Opinion and Interest Group Strategies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leech, Beth L. 2010. “Lobbying Influence.” In J. M. Berry and S. Maisel, eds, The Oxford Handbook of Political Organizations, pp. 533–551. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leech, Beth L., Frank R. Baumgartner, Timothy La Pira, and Nicholas Semanko. 2005. “Drawing Lobbyists to Washington: Government Activity and the Demand for Advocacy.” Political Research Quarterly 58: 19–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowery, David. 2013. “Lobbying Influence: Meaning, Measurement, and Missing.” Interest Groups and Advocacy 2 (1): 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowery, David, and Virginia Gray. 1995. “The Population Ecology of Gucci Gulch, or the Natural Regulation of Interest Group Numbers in the American States.” American Journal of Political Science 39 (1): 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowery, David, and Virginia Gray. 2004a. “A Neopluralist Perspective on Research on Organized Interests.” Political Research Quarterly 57 (1): 163–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowery, David, and Virginia Gray. 2004b. “Bias in the Heavenly Chorus: Interests in Society and Before Government,” Journal of Theoretical Politics 16 (1): 5–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowery, David, Virginia Gray, and Frank Baumgartner. 2011. “Policy Attention in State and Nation: Is Anyone Listening to the Laboratories of Democracy?” Publius 41 (2): 286–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowery, David, Virginia Gray, and Matthew Fellowes. 2005. “Organized Interests and Political Extortion: A Test of the Fetcher Bill Hypothesis.” Social Science Quarterly 86 (2): 368–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowery, David, Virginia Gray, Matthew Fellowes, and Jennifer Anderson. 2004. “Living in the Moment: Lags, Leads, and the Link between Legislative Agendas and Interest Advocacy.” Social Science Quarterly 85 (2): 463–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McChesney, Fred S. 1997. Money for Nothing: Politicians, Rent Extraction, and Political Extortion. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFarland, Andrew S. 2004. Neopluralism. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, C. Wright. 1956. The Power Elite. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mucciaroni, Gary. 1995. Reversals of Fortune: Public Policy and Private Interests. Washington: Brookings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, Mancur, Jr. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlozman, Kay L., Sidney Verba, and Henry Brady. 2012. The Unheavenly Chorus: Unequal Political Voice and the Broken Promise of American Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Richard A. 1995. “Interest Group Influence in the U.S. Congress.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 20: 89–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Truman, David B. 1951. The Governmental Process: Political Interests and Public Opinion. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, Jack L., Jr. 1991. Mobilizing Interest Groups in America. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, Jack L., Jr. 1966. “A Critique of the Elitist Theory of Democracy.” American Political Science Review 60: 285–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Beth L. Leech

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Leech, B.L. (2015). Interest Community Influence: A Neopluralist Perspective. In: Lowery, D., Halpin, D., Gray, V. (eds) The Organization Ecology of Interest Communities. Interest Groups, Advocacy and Democracy Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137514318_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics