Skip to main content
Log in

Reliability and validity in qualitative research within education in Africa

  • Articles
  • Published:
International Review of Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article discusses the problems of validity and reliability in qualitative research within education and relates this discussion to Africa. A main concern is the posing of the right research questions. The article attempts to bring into focus the voice of Africans, showing that the African researcher knows his/her environment better than any expatriate and will be more likely to ask the right questions provided that s/he is allowed to ask them and is not forced to work with questions of concern to Western donors, and provided that s/he trusts her/his own experiences and uses those to form concepts instead of merely transferring concepts formed in the West and based on experiences in the northern hemisphere. It argues for the need of secondary research to reanalyze from an Afro-centric viewpoint many of the accounts written by Western travellers and anthropologists. It further argues for the use of an autobiographical approach to secure data of high ecological validity. Validity is looked at as a more important concept than reliability and a mixing of qualitative and quantitative methods argued for.

Zusammenfassung

Dieser Artikel befaßt sich mit Problemen der Gültigkeit und zuverlässigkeit der Qualitativen Forschung innerhalb der Bildung in Bezug auf Afrika. Ein Hauptanliegen ist die richtige Fragestellung hinsichtlich der Forschung. Der Artikel versucht die Stimme der Afrikaner in den Vordergrund zu stellen und zeigt damit, daß afrikanische ForscherInnen ihr Umfeld besser als irgendein Außenstehender kennen und somit mit größerer Wahrscheinlichkeit die richtigen Fragen stellen. Dies setzt voraus, daß sie die richtigen Fragen stellen dürfen und nicht gezwungen sind, für westliche Geldgeber richtig erscheinende Fragen zu stellen. Eine weitere Voraussetzung ist, daß sie ihren eigenen Erfahrungen trauen können und sie für die Ausarbeitung von Konzepten nutzen, anstatt im Westen erstellte und auf Erfahrung in der nördlichen Hemisphäre basierende Konzepte weiterzugeben. Der Artikel befürwortet die Notwendigkeit einer zweiten Untersuchung, um vom afrikanischen Standpunkt aus die zahlreichen Berichte neu zu analysieren, die von westlichen Reisenden und Anthropologen geschrieben wurden. Weiterhin wird für die Sicherstellung von Daten hochwertiger ökologischer Gültigkeit die Anwendung eines autobiographischen Ansatzes empfohlen. Gültigkeit wird gegenüber der Zuverlässigkeit als wichtigeres Konzept angesehen und sowohl qualitative als auch quantitative Methoden gemeinsam befürwortet.

Résumé

Cet article aborde les problèmes soulevés par la validité et la fiabilité de la recherche qualitative en éducation et remplace la question dans le contexte du continent africain. Un point important concerne la juste formulation des questions qui feront l'objet de recherches. L'auteur tente de faire entendre l'opinion africaine en exposant que le personnel de recherche africain connaît mieux son environnement que toute personne expatriée et qu'il sera plus susceptible de poser les questions appropriées, à la condition qu'on lui permette de les poser et qu'il ne soit pas obligé de travailler sur des questions qui importent aux commanditaires occidentaux, à la condition aussi qu'il se fie à ses propres expériences et les mette á profit pour former des concepts, au lieu de se borner à transférer ceux établis par l'Occident, et qui se fondent sur des expériences vécues dans l'hémisphère nord. Il démontre donc la nécessité d'une recherche secondaire pour procéder à une nouvelle analyse d'un point de vue africain de nombre de récits écrits par des voyageurs ou anthropologues occidentaux. Il plaide également pour le choix d'une approache autobiographique pour protèger des données d'une importante validité écologique. La validité est posée comme concept plus important que celui de la fiabilité, et il est conseillé d'appliquer conjointement des méthodes qualitatives et quantitatives.

Resumen

Este artículo se ocupa de los problemas de la validez y fiabilidad del estudio cualitativo dentro de la educación y relaciona esta discusión con Africa. Uno de los temas principales es el planteamiento de los interrogantes de investigación correctos. El artículo pone su énfasis central en la voz de los africanos, mostrando que el/la investigador/a africano/a conoce mejor su entorno que cualquier otro extranjero o expatriado, y que es más probable que formule las preguntas correctas, siempre que esté autorizado/a a hacerlo y que no se vea obligado/a a trabajar con asuntos que conciernen a los donantes occidentales, y siempre que él o ella confíe en sus propias costumbres y experiencias para formar los conceptos, en lugar de transferir meramente conceptos formados en el mundo occidental y basados en experiencias del hemisferio norte. Aboga por la necesidad de la investigación secundaria a efectos de analizar desde un punto de vista afrocéntrico muchos de los informes escritos por viajeros y antropólogos occidentales. Además, sostiene la aplicación de un enfoque autobiográfico para asegurar datos de alto valor ecológico. El trabajo considera que la validez es un concepto más importante que la fiabilidad, y aboga por la mezcla de métodos cualitativos y cuantitativos.

Резюме

Эта статья обсужцает проблемы связанные с обоснованностью и надёжностъю качественных исследовательских работ в педагогической области и она относит свои обсуждения в Африку. Она старается задавать правильные вопроцы. Статья старается сосредоточиться на высказываниях африкандев, таким образом демонстрируя, что исследователь -африканец лучШе понимает его/её общецтво чем какой-либо иностранец и что, вероятно, он/она будет задавать правильные вопносы вопросы если только ему/ей разрешат задавать их вместо того, чтобы заставляли его/её задавать вопросы, которыми интересуются западные жертвователи и если только он/она доверяет своему собственному опыту, пользуясь им для создания общих представлений, вместо того чтобы только переносить западные идеи, которые обоснованы на опыте в северном полушарию. Статья понуждает вторичные исследования, которые бы представили на повторное раццмотрение, с афроцентрической точки зрения, многие сообщения написанные западными путешецтвенниками и антропологами. Вдобавок, она тоже понуждает использование автобиографического подхода, чтобы получить данные обладающие высокой экологической обоснованностью. Обоснованность счнтается более важным общнм представлением чем надёжность и понуждается смесь качественных и количественных методов.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abu-Loghod, Lila. 1991. Writing against Culture. In: Fox, ed.,Recapturing Anthropology. School of American Research Press.

  • Becker, Howard. 1970a. Problems in the Publication of Field Studies. In:Sociological Work. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, Howard. 1970b. Whose Side Are We On? In:Sociological Work. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besha, M.R. 1973. Education for Self-Reliance and Rural Development (mimeo). Dar es Salaam: Institute of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brannen, Julia, ed. 1992.Mixing Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Research. Aldershot: Avebury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brock-Utne, Birgit. 1980.Ungdomsskoler i utvikling (Innovation in Secondary Schools). Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brock-Utne, Birgit, ed. 1994. Indigenous Forms of Learning in Africa. Education in Africa. Vol. 2.Rapport no. 7 Oslo: Institute for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callewaert, Staf. 1994. Are African Pupils Different? Paul Riesman's Contribution to Ethno-Pedagogics. In: Karsten Schnack, ed., Export of Curriculum and Educational Ideas. Didaktiske studier.Studies in Educational Theory and Curriculum. Vol. 14 (99–129). Copenhagen: Royal Danish School of Educational Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D.T. and Fiske, D.W. 1959. Convergent and Discriminant Validation by the Multitrait-Multimethod Matrix.Psychological Bulletin 56: 81–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L.J. and Meehl, P.E. 1955. Construct Validity in Psychological Tests.Psychological Bulletin 52: 281–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossley, M. and Vulliamy, Graham. 1984. Case-Study Research Methods and Comparative Education.Comparative Education 20: 193–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, Norman K and Lincoln, Yvona S. eds. 1994.Handbook of Qualitiative Research. Beverly Hills, Ca.: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldt, Leonard and Robert Brennan. 1989. Reliability. In: Robert Linn, ed.,Educational Measurement (105–146) 3 ed. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnegan, R. 1970.Oral Literature in Africa. Oxford: Claredon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guba, Egon G. and Yvonna Lincoln. 1994. Competing Paradigms in Qualitative Research. In: Norman K. Denzin and Yvonna S. Lincoln, eds.,Handbook of Qualitative Research (105–117). Beverly Hills, Ca.: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammerley, Martyn. 1992. Deconstructing the Qualitative-Quantitative Divide. In: Julia Brannen, ed.,Mixing Mehthods: Qualitative and Quantitative Research (39–57). Aldershot: Avebury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishengoma, J.M.R. 1988. Riddles as an Agent of Socialization and Social Learning among the Haya Children.Term Paper for Ed. 605: Social Psychology. University of Dar es Salaam: Faculty of Education.

  • Kirk, J. and Miller, M.L. 1986.Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research. Beverly Hills, Ca.: Sage Publications

    Google Scholar 

  • Kincheloe, Joe L. and Peter L. McLaren. 1994. Rethinking Critical Theory and Qualitative Research. In: Norman K. Denzin and Yvonna S. Lincoln, ed.,Handbook of Qualitative Research (138–158). Beverly Hills, Ca.: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleven, Thor Arnfinn. 1995. Reliabilitet som pedagogisk problem (Reliability as an Educational Problem)Mimeo. Doctoral lecture 17. February 1995. Oslo: Institute for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvale, Steinar. 1989. To Validate is to Question. In: Steinar Kvale, ed.,Issues of Validity in Qualitative Research (73–92). Lund: Studentlitteratur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvale, Steinar. 1989. ed.,Issues of Validity in Qualitative Research. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lather, Patti. 1991.Getting Smart: Feminist Research and Pedagogy within the Post-Modern. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lather, Patti. 1993. Fertile Obsession: Validity after Poststructuralism.Sociological Quarterly 34(4): 673–693.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lather, Patti. 1995. The Validity of Angels: Interpretive and Textural Strategies in Researching the Lives of Women With HIV/AIDS.Qualitative Inquiry 1(1): 41–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lema, A.A. 1972.Education for Self Reliance. A Brief Survey of Self Reliance Activities in Some Tanzanian Schools and College. Dar es Salaam: Institute of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manase, T.J. 1978. Ideological State Apparatus Reproduces Existing Productive Relations; The Case of Mdanda Educational Institutions. In: Abel Ishumi and Geoffrey Mmari, eds.,The Educational Process. University of Dar es Salaam: Department of Education.

  • Mblinyi, Majorie. 1976. The Study of Education and the “Community”. In: Kenneth King, ed.,Education and Community in Africa. University of Edinburgh: Centre of African Studies.

  • Miller, Janet. 1982. The Sound Silence Breaking: Feminist Pedagogy and Theory.Journal of Curriculum Theory 4(1): 5–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muganyizi, L. 1976. Implementation and Usefullness of Self-Reliance in Schools: Findings of Research Carried Out in Bukoba District.Papers in Education and Development 2: 97–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, Tove. 1992. Quality between tradition and modernity. Patterns of communication and cognition in teacher education in Zimbabwe.Doctoral Thesis. Oslo: Institute for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ocitti, J.P. 1990. Indigenous Education for Today. The Necessity of the Useless.Adult Educaiton and Development (35): 347–357. German Adult Education Association.

  • Pinar, William. 1995.Regimes of Reason and Male Narrative Voice (mimeo).

  • Psacharopoulos, G and Loxley, W. 1985.Diversified Secondary Education and Development: Evidence from Columbia and Tanzania. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rand, Gunvor. 1971.Elementœr testteori. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget. 3 edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanfield II, John. 1994. Ethnic Modeling in Qualitative Research. In: Norman K Denzin and Yvonna S. Lincoln, eds.,Handbook of Qualitative Research. Beverly Hills, Ca.: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, David. 1984. Secondary Research, Information, Sources and Methods.Applied Social Research Methods Series Vol. 4. Beverly Hills/London/New Delhi: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stordahl, Vigdis. 1994.Same i den moderne verden. Endring og kontinuitet i et samisk lokalsamfunn (Sami in the modern world. Change and continuity in a Sami community). Karasjok (mimeo).

  • Theal, G.M. 1910.History and Ethnography of Africa, South of the Zambezi before 1975. London: George Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tschudi, Finn. Do Qualitative and Quantiative Methods Require Different Approaches to Validity? In: Steinar Kvale, ed.,Issues of Validity in Qualitative Research (109–135). Lund: Studentlitteratur.

  • Vulliamy, Graham, Keith M. Lewin and David Stephen. 1990.Doing Educational Research in Developing Countries: Qualitative Strategies. London: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vulliamy, Graham. 1990. The Potential of Qualitative Educational Research Strategies in Developing Countries. In: Graham Vualliamy, K.M. Lewis and D. Stephens, ed.,Doing Educational Research in Developing Countries: Qualitative Strategies (7–25). London: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Østerud, Svein. 1995. Relevansen av begrepene “validitet” og “reliabilitet” i kvalitativ forskning (The relevance of the concepts “validity” and “reliability” within qualitative research).Mimeo. Doctoral lecture 9. of June 1995. Oslo: Institute for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brock-Utne, B. Reliability and validity in qualitative research within education in Africa. Int Rev Educ 42, 605–621 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00601405

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00601405

Keywords

Navigation