Abstract
While clonogenic assays are extensively used in radiobiology, there is no widely accepted procedure for choosing the composition of the cell culture media. Cell line suppliers recommend a specific culture medium for each cell line, however a researcher will frequently customize this aspect of the protocol by supplementing the recommended support medium with additives. For example, many researchers add antibiotics, in order to avoid contamination of cells and the consequent loss of data, with little discussion of the influence of the antibiotics on the clonogenic survival of the cells. It is assumed that the effect of any variables in the growth medium on cell survival is taken into consideration by comparing the survival fraction relative to that of controls grown under the same conditions. In the search for better cancer treatment, the effect of various stressors on clonogenic cell survival is under investigation. This study seeks to identify and test potential stressors commonly introduced into the cell culture medium, which may confound the response to radiation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Elkind MM, Whitmore GF (1967) The radiobiology of cultured mammalian cells. Gordon and Breach, Paris
Hall EJ, Garcia AJ (2006) Radiobiology for the radiologist, Chap 3: Cell survival curves. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia
Barber PR, Vojnovic B, Kelly J, Mayes CR, Boulton P, Woodcock M, Joiner MC (2001) Automated counting of mammalian cell colonies. Phys Med Biol 46:63–76
Bewes JM, Suchowerska N, McKenzie DR (2008) Automated cell colony counting and analysis using the circular Hough image transform algorithm (CHiTA). Phys Med Biol 53:5991–6008
Claridge Mackonis E, Suchowerska N, Zhang M, Ebert M, McKenzie DR, Jackson M (2007) Cellular response to modulated radiation fields. Phys Med Biol 52:5469–5482
Herok R, Konopacka M, Polanska J, Swierniak A, Rogolinski J, Jaksik R, Hancock R, Rzesowska-Wolny J (2010) Bystander effects induced by medium from irradiated cells: Similar transcriptome responses in irradiated and bystander K562 cells. Int J Radiat Oncol 77:244–252
Lincoln K, Gabridge M (1998) Cell culture contamination: sources, consequences, prevention and elimination. Methods Cell Biol 57:49–65
McGarrity G (1976) Spread and control of mycoplasma infection of cell cultures. In Vitro 12:643–647
Zhou H, Suzuki M, Geard CR, Hei TK (2002) Effects of irradiated medium with or without cells on bystander cell responses. Mutat Res 499:135–141
Mothersill C, Seymour CB (1997) Medium from irradiated human epithelial cells but not human fibroblasts reduces the clonogenic survival of non-irradiated cells. Int J Radiat Biol 71:421–427
Suchowerska N, Ebert MA, Zhang M, Jackson M (2005) In vitro response of tumour cells to non-uniform irradiation. Phys Med Biol 50:3041–3051
Franken NAP, Rodermond HM, Stap J, Haveman J, van Bree C (2006) Clonigenic assay of cells in vitro. Nat Protoc 1:2315–2319
Claridge Mackonis E, Suchowerska N, Naseri P, McKenzie DR (2011) Optimisation of exposure conditions for in vitro (in press)
International Atomic Energy Agency (2000) Absorbed dose determination in external beam radiotherapy. Technical report series no 398 IAEA Vienna, pp 210–214
Hall EJ, Garcia AJ (2006) Radiobiology for the radiologist, Chap 28: Hyperthermia. 2006. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia
Stostedt S, Bezak E (2010) Non-targeted effects of ionising radiation and radiotherapy. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 33(3):219–231
Acknowledgment
We acknowledge the support of the NSW Cancer Council.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Potter, M.D.E., Suchowerska, N., Rizvi, S. et al. Hidden stressors in the clonogenic assay used in radiobiology experiments. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 34, 345–350 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-011-0082-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-011-0082-4