Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Diagnostiek naar voedselallergie in de tweede lijn

Consensusstandpunt sectie kinderallergologie

  • Published:
Tijdschrift voor Kindergeneeskunde

Samenvatting

Voedselallergie is een veelvoorkomend probleem, waaraan gedacht kan worden op basis van anamnese en aanvullend onderzoek. Om voedselallergie aan te tonen dan wel te verwerpen, is een voedselprovocatie geïndiceerd. In dit consensusstandpunt van de sectie kinderallergologie worden de indicaties, de uitvoering en de voor- en nadelen van open en dubbelblinde placebogecontroleerde voedselprovocaties besproken.

Summary

Food allergy is a common problem in pediatric practice. This diagnosis can be thought off by history and sensitisation. However, the definite diagnosis of food allergy is based on a food provocation test. In this consensus of opinion from the section pediatric allergology the indications, implementation and the advances and disadvantages of open and double blind placebo controlled food provocation tests are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figuur 1

Literatuur

  1. Kneepkens CM, Meijer Y, Elburg RM van. Voedselallergie. In: Brand PLP, Kneepkens CMF, Laag J van der, Rikkers-Mutsaerts ERVM, red.Werkboek kinderallergologie. Amsterdam: VU University Press, 2006.

  2. Gezondheidsraad. Voedselallergie. 2007.

  3. Young E, Stoneham MD, Petruckevitch A, et al. A population study of food intolerance. Lancet. 1994;343:1127–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Venter C, Pereira B, Grundy J, et al. Incidence of parentally reported and clinically diagnosed food hypersensitivity in the first year of life. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006;117:1118–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Brand PL, Dubois AE. Diagnostiek van voedselallergie bij kinderen. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2006;150:2188–90.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Flinterman AE, Knulst AC, Meijer Y, et al. Acute allergic reactions in children with AEDS after prolonged cow’s milk elimination diets. Allergy. 2006;61:370–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Johansson SG, Hourihane JO, Bousquet J, et al. A revised nomenclature for allergy. An EAACI position statement from the EAACI nomenclature task force. Allergy. 2001;56:813–24.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sampson HA. Update on food allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004;113:805–19.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wensing M, Penninks AH, Hefle SL, et al. The distribution of individual threshold doses eliciting allergic reactions in a population with peanut allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2002;110:915–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Flinterman AE, Pasmans SG, Hoekstra MO, et al. Determination of no-observed-adverse-effect levels and eliciting doses in a representative group of peanut-sensitized children. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006;117:448–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bindslev-Jensen C, Ballmer-Weber BK, Bengtsson U, et al. Standardization of food challenges in patients with immediate reactions to foods – position paper from the European Academy of Allergology and Clinical Immunology. Allergy. 2004;59:690–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Pasmans SG. Voedselallergie en eczeem bij kinderen. Tijdschr Kindergeneeskd. 2008;76:72–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Breuer K, Heratizadeh A,Wulf A, et al. Late eczematous reactions to food in children with atopic dermatitis. Clin Exp Allergy. 2004;34:817–24.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gans RO, Everdingen JJ van, Bruijnzeel-Koomen CA, et al. Richtlijn Constitutioneel eczeem. Utrecht: CBO, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Niggemann B, Rolinck-Werninghaus C, Mehl A, et al. Controlled oral food challenges in children – when indicated, when superfluous? Allergy. 2005; 60:865–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Roberts S. Challenging times for food allergy tests. Arch Dis Child. 2005;90:564–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sampson HA. Foodallergy. Part 2: diagnosis and management. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1999;103: 981–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sampson HA, Ho DG. Relationship between food specific IgE concentrations and the risk of positive and the risk of positive challenges in children and adolescents. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1997;100: 444–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Gugten AC van der, Otter M den, Meijer Y, et al. Usefulness of specific IgE levels in predicting cow’s milk allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008; 121:531–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Vlieg-Boerstra BJ, Meijer Y.Voedselprovocaties. In: Brand PLP, Kneepkens CMF, Laag J van der, Rikkers- Mutsaerts ERVM, red.Werkboek kinderallergologie. Amsterdam: VU University Press, 2006.

  21. Venter C, Pereira B, Voigt K, et al. Comparison of open and double blind placebo controlled food challenges in diagnosis of food hypersensitivity amongst children. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2007;20:565–79.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Vlieg-Boerstra B, Heide S van der, Bijleveld CM, et al. Placebo reactions in double-blind, placebocontrolled food challenges in children. Allergy. 2007;62:905–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hospers IC, Brand PL, Vries-Vrolijk K de. Dubbelblinde placebogecontroleerde koemelkprovocaties bij kinderen met een vermeende koemelkallergie, in een algemeen ziekenhuis: diagnose verworpen bij twee derde van de kinderen. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2006;150:1292–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Vlieg-Boerstra BJ, Duiverman EJ, Heide S van der, et al. Should children with a history of anaphylaxis to foods undergo challenge testing? Clin Exp Allergy. 2008;38:1935–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Vlieg-Boerstra BJ, Bijleveld CM, Heide S van der, et al. Development and validation of challenge materials for double blind, placebo-controlled food challenges in children. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004;113:341–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Schade RP, Meijer Y, Pasmans SG, et al. Dubbelblinde placebogecontroleerde koemelkprovocatie voor de diagnostiek van koemelkallergie bij zuigelingen en kinderen. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2002;146:1739–42.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Flinterman AE, Hoekstra MO, Meijer Y, et al. Clinical reactivity to hazelnut in children: association with sensitization to birch pollen or nuts. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006;118:1186–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Brand PL, Dubois AE. Dubbelblinde voedselprovocaties in de praktijk. Praktische Pediatrie. 2007; 1:13–7.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Vlieg-Boerstra BJ, Herpertz I, Pasker L, et al. Validation of novel recipes for double-blind, placebo- controlled food challenges in children and adults. Submitted.

  30. Vlieg-Boerstra B, Meijer Y. Dubbelblinde voedselprovocaties. Tijdschr Kindergeneeskd. 2008;76: 66–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Sampson HA. Anaphylaxis and emergency treatment. Pediatrics. 2003;111:1601–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Eigenmann PA, Caubet JC, Zamora SA. Continuing food-avoidance diets after negative food challenges. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2006;17:601–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Clark AT, Ewan PW. Interpretation of tests for nut allergy in one thousand patients in relation to allergy or tolerance. Clin Exp Allergy. 2003;33:1041–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Bock SA, Munoz-Furlong A, Sampson HA. Fatalities due to anaphylactic reactions to foods. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2001;107:191–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Fleischer DM. The natural history of peanut and tree nut allergy. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2007;7:175–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Host A, Jacobse HP, Halken S, Holmenlund D. The natural history of cow’s milk protein allergy/intolerance. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1995;49(Suppl 1):S13–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Wilhelmina Kinderziekenhuis, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands

    Y. Meijer

  2. Isala klinieken, Zwolle, The Netherlands

    P.L.P. Brand

  3. Medisch Centrum Alkmaar, Alkmaar, The Netherlands

    Y.C.M. Duijvestijn

  4. Academisch Medisch Centrum, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    B.J. Vlieg-Boerstra

Authors
  1. Y. Meijer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. P.L.P. Brand
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Y.C.M. Duijvestijn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. B.J. Vlieg-Boerstra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

kinderarts-allergoloog

kinderlongarts

kinderarts

diëtist/postdoctoraal onderzoeker

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Meijer, Y., Brand, P., Duijvestijn, Y. et al. Diagnostiek naar voedselallergie in de tweede lijn. TIJDSCHR. KINDERGENEESKUNDE 78, 237–243 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12456-010-0057-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12456-010-0057-5

Search

Navigation