Skip to main content
Log in

Characterization of a superplastic aluminium alloy ALNOVI-U through free inflation tests and inverse analysis

  • Original Research
  • Published:
International Journal of Material Forming Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Numerical methods are widespread in forming applications since a deeper understanding and a finer calibration of the process can be reached without most of the assumptions used in analytical approaches. In this calibration procedure the characterization of the material behaviour is an important preliminary step that cannot be avoided. Experimental tests can be numerically modelled and material constants can be found by inverse methods making numerical results as close as possible to experimental ones. In this work material parameters of a superplastic aluminium alloy have been found by experimental forming tests and an inverse analysis. Constant pressure free inflation tests were firstly performed to find the optimal range for temperature and strain rate values. Material constants were then calculated, on the basis of these tests, minimizing errors between experimental and numerical data through a gradient based optimization iterative procedure. Constant strain rate experimental tests were finally used to refine material parameters and to gain a better agreement between experiments and numerical simulations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chandra N (2002) Constitutive behavior of superplastic materials. Int J Non Lin Mech 37:461–484

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Bonet J, Gil A, Wood RD, Said R, Curtis RV (2006) Simulating superplastic forming. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng 195(48–49):6580–6603

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. ISO 20032:2007 - Method for evaluation of tensile properties of metallic superplastic materials

  4. Sorgente D, Tricarico L (2007) Analysis of different specimen geometries for tensile tests in superplastic conditions for an aluminium alloy. Mater Sci Forum 551–552:123–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Carrino L, Giuliano G, Polini W (2003) A method to characterise superplastic materials in comparison with alternative methods. J Mater Process Technol 138(1–3):417–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Giuliano G (2009) Thickness and strain rate at the sheet dome apex in superplastic bulge forming tests. Int J Mater Form 2(1):375–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Franchitti S, Giuliano G, Palumbo G, Sorgente D, Tricarico L (2008) On the optimisation of superplastic free forming test of an AZ31 magnesium alloy sheet, Int J Mater Form Suppl 1:1067–1070

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kappes J, Wagner S, Schatz M (2010) Superplastic sheet metal forming with focus on the warm bulge test and its in-process monitoring. Int J Mater Form 3(1):1135–1138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Enikeev FU, Kruglov AA (1995) An analysis of the superplastic forming of a thin circular diaphragm. Int J Mech Sci 37(5):473–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sorgente D, Scintilla LD, Palumbo G, Tricarico L (2010) Blow forming of AZ31 magnesium alloy at elevated temperatures. Int J Mater Form 3:13–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. El-Morsy AW, Manabe KI (2002) FE simulation of rectangular box forming using material characteristics from the multi-dome test. J Mater Process Technol 125–126:772–777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu GR, Han X (2003) Computational inverse techniques in nondestructive evaluation. CRC Press

  13. Gavrus A, Massoni E, Chenot JL (1996) An inverse analysis using a finite element model for identification of rheological parameters. J Mater Process Technol 60(1–4):447–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yang HS (1997) A new light optical metallographic technique for revealing grain structures of common 2000, 5000, and 7000 series aluminum alloys. Mater Charact 38(3):165–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Abaqus User Subroutines Reference Manual, Version 6.10, section 1.1.45 User subroutine to redefine field variables at a material point. Dassault Systèmes, 2010

  16. Giuliano G, Franchitti S (2007) On the evaluation of superplastic characteristics using the finite element method. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 47:471–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Giuliano G (2012) Superplastic Constitutive Modelling of AA-5083. TECHNISCHE MECHANIK 32(2–5):221–226

    Google Scholar 

  18. Giuliano G (2012) AZ31 Magnesium Alloy Parameters Identification through Inverse Analysis at 713 K. Key Engineering Materials 504–506:643–646

    Google Scholar 

  19. Chen Y, Kibble K, Hall R, Huang X (2001) Numerical analysis of superplastic blow forming of Ti-6Al-4V alloys. Mater Des 22:679–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ridley N, Bate PS, Zhang B (2005) Material modelling data for superplastic forming optimisation. Mater Sci Eng, A 410–411:100–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sorgente D, Palumbo G, Tricarico L (2007) Material superplastic parameters evaluation by a jump pressure blow forming test. Key Engineering Materials 344:119–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the Italian Institutions Region APULIA and MIUR (Ministry of Education, University and Research) for financing the present research activity (TRASFORMA and SMATI projects).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Sorgente.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sorgente, D., Tricarico, L. Characterization of a superplastic aluminium alloy ALNOVI-U through free inflation tests and inverse analysis. Int J Mater Form 7, 179–187 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-012-1118-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-012-1118-3

Keywords

Navigation