Abstract
Numerical methods are widespread in forming applications since a deeper understanding and a finer calibration of the process can be reached without most of the assumptions used in analytical approaches. In this calibration procedure the characterization of the material behaviour is an important preliminary step that cannot be avoided. Experimental tests can be numerically modelled and material constants can be found by inverse methods making numerical results as close as possible to experimental ones. In this work material parameters of a superplastic aluminium alloy have been found by experimental forming tests and an inverse analysis. Constant pressure free inflation tests were firstly performed to find the optimal range for temperature and strain rate values. Material constants were then calculated, on the basis of these tests, minimizing errors between experimental and numerical data through a gradient based optimization iterative procedure. Constant strain rate experimental tests were finally used to refine material parameters and to gain a better agreement between experiments and numerical simulations.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chandra N (2002) Constitutive behavior of superplastic materials. Int J Non Lin Mech 37:461–484
Bonet J, Gil A, Wood RD, Said R, Curtis RV (2006) Simulating superplastic forming. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng 195(48–49):6580–6603
ISO 20032:2007 - Method for evaluation of tensile properties of metallic superplastic materials
Sorgente D, Tricarico L (2007) Analysis of different specimen geometries for tensile tests in superplastic conditions for an aluminium alloy. Mater Sci Forum 551–552:123–128
Carrino L, Giuliano G, Polini W (2003) A method to characterise superplastic materials in comparison with alternative methods. J Mater Process Technol 138(1–3):417–422
Giuliano G (2009) Thickness and strain rate at the sheet dome apex in superplastic bulge forming tests. Int J Mater Form 2(1):375–378
Franchitti S, Giuliano G, Palumbo G, Sorgente D, Tricarico L (2008) On the optimisation of superplastic free forming test of an AZ31 magnesium alloy sheet, Int J Mater Form Suppl 1:1067–1070
Kappes J, Wagner S, Schatz M (2010) Superplastic sheet metal forming with focus on the warm bulge test and its in-process monitoring. Int J Mater Form 3(1):1135–1138
Enikeev FU, Kruglov AA (1995) An analysis of the superplastic forming of a thin circular diaphragm. Int J Mech Sci 37(5):473–483
Sorgente D, Scintilla LD, Palumbo G, Tricarico L (2010) Blow forming of AZ31 magnesium alloy at elevated temperatures. Int J Mater Form 3:13–19
El-Morsy AW, Manabe KI (2002) FE simulation of rectangular box forming using material characteristics from the multi-dome test. J Mater Process Technol 125–126:772–777
Liu GR, Han X (2003) Computational inverse techniques in nondestructive evaluation. CRC Press
Gavrus A, Massoni E, Chenot JL (1996) An inverse analysis using a finite element model for identification of rheological parameters. J Mater Process Technol 60(1–4):447–454
Yang HS (1997) A new light optical metallographic technique for revealing grain structures of common 2000, 5000, and 7000 series aluminum alloys. Mater Charact 38(3):165–175
Abaqus User Subroutines Reference Manual, Version 6.10, section 1.1.45 User subroutine to redefine field variables at a material point. Dassault Systèmes, 2010
Giuliano G, Franchitti S (2007) On the evaluation of superplastic characteristics using the finite element method. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 47:471–476
Giuliano G (2012) Superplastic Constitutive Modelling of AA-5083. TECHNISCHE MECHANIK 32(2–5):221–226
Giuliano G (2012) AZ31 Magnesium Alloy Parameters Identification through Inverse Analysis at 713 K. Key Engineering Materials 504–506:643–646
Chen Y, Kibble K, Hall R, Huang X (2001) Numerical analysis of superplastic blow forming of Ti-6Al-4V alloys. Mater Des 22:679–685
Ridley N, Bate PS, Zhang B (2005) Material modelling data for superplastic forming optimisation. Mater Sci Eng, A 410–411:100–104
Sorgente D, Palumbo G, Tricarico L (2007) Material superplastic parameters evaluation by a jump pressure blow forming test. Key Engineering Materials 344:119–126
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank the Italian Institutions Region APULIA and MIUR (Ministry of Education, University and Research) for financing the present research activity (TRASFORMA and SMATI projects).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sorgente, D., Tricarico, L. Characterization of a superplastic aluminium alloy ALNOVI-U through free inflation tests and inverse analysis. Int J Mater Form 7, 179–187 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-012-1118-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-012-1118-3