Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Robinia pseudoacacia L.: A Lesser Known Tree Species for Biomass Production

  • Published:
BioEnergy Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Experiments with fast-growing tree species for biomass production in Germany have been mainly focused on the growth performance of Populus and Salix spp. Among the lesser-known species for energy plantations is Robinia pseudoacacia L. Special features of this species are its drought tolerance and its ability to fix nitrogen. Given the large share of marginal arable land in NE-Germany and the predicted climate change, R. pseudoacacia is expected to grow in importance. In order to evaluate the growth performance of this species under extreme conditions, four experiments were established in the post-mining landscape of the Lusatian lignite-mining district (NE-Germany). Biomass production was estimated for 3- to 14-year-old shoots on 4- to 14-year-old roots. Results for the annual production of oven-dried biomass of R. pseudoacacia ranged between 3 and 10 t ha−1, which was substantially greater than the biomass of poplar and willow clones established on the same site. Economic analysis results show that the rotation period, the duration of the plantation, and the harvesting costs are important parameters for the economic return and cash flow in short-rotation coppice cultivation. The results show that the cultivation of R. pseudoacacia is an economically competitive land-use strategy for the post-mining landscapes considered in our study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bullard MJ, Mustill SJ, Carver P, Nixon PMI, Britt CP (2002) Yield improvements through modification of planting density and harvest frequency in short rotation coppice Salix spp.—1. Yield response in two morphologically diverse varieties. Biomass Bioenerg 22:15–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bungart R (1999) Erzeugung von Biomasse zur energetischen Nutzung durch den Anbau schnellwachsender Baumarten auf Kippsubstraten des Lausitzer Braunkohlereviers. Cottbuser Schriften zu Bodenschutz und Rekultivierung 7

  3. Bungart R, Hüttl RF (2004) Growth dynamics and biomass accumulation of 8-year-old hybrid poplar clones in a short-rotation plantation on a clayey–sandy mining substrate with respect to plant nutrition and water budget. Eur J Forest Res 123:105–115

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Burger F, Sommer W (2003) Von der Pappel bis zum Hackschnitzel. LWF aktuell 39:4–6

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dickmann D, Steinbeck K, Skinner T (1985) Leaf Area and biomass in mixed and pure plantations of sycamore and black locust in the Georgia Piedmont. Forest Sci 31(2):509–517

    Google Scholar 

  6. Drebenstedt C (1998) Planungsgrundlagen der Wiedernutzbarmachung. In: Pflug W (ed) Braunkohletagebau und Rekultivierung. Springer, Berlin, pp 487–512

    Google Scholar 

  7. European Commission (2005) Biomass action plan. Communication from the Commission of the European Communities, COM(2005)-628-final. Brussels, Belgium

  8. Fomundam FF (2007) The influence of rotation period on growth performance and biomass production of willow, poplar and black locust. Master thesis at Brandenburg University of Technology, Cottbus

    Google Scholar 

  9. Foster C (1992) Wood fuel production from short rotation coppice. Vegetation management in forestry, amenity and conservation areas. Asp Appl Biol 29:233–239

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gerstengarbe F, Badeck F, Hattermann F, Krysanova V, Lahmer W, Lasch P et al. (2003) Studie zur klimatischen Entwicklung im Land Brandenburg bis 2055 und deren Auswirkungen auf den Wasserhaushalt, die Forst- und Landwirtschaft sowie die Ableitung erster Perspektiven. PIK report no. 83, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research

  11. Geyer WA (1989) Biomass yield potential of short-rotation hardwoods in the Great Plains. Biomass 20:167–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Grünewald H, Brandt BKV, Schneider BU, Bens O, Kendzia G, Hüttl RF (2007) Agroforestry systems for the production of woody biomass for energy transformation purposes. Ecol Eng 29:319–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Grundmann P, Eberts J (2009) Oekonomische Bewertung von Kurzumtriebsholz: Verfahrensvergleich mit landwirtschaftlichen Kulturen im regionalen Kontext. In: Reeg T, Bemmann W, Konold D, Murach D, Spiecker H (eds) Anbau und Nutzung von Baeumen auf landwirtschaftlichen Flächen. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hanff H, Neubert G, Brudel H (2005) Datensammlung für die Betriebsplanung und die betriebswirtschaftliche Bewertung landwirtschaftlicher Produktionsverfahren im Land Brandenburg, Schriftenreihe des Landesamtes für Verbraucherschutz. Landwirtschaft und Flurneuordnung (LVLF), Potsdam

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hanover JW, Mebrahtu T (1991) Robinia pseudoacacia: Temperate Legume Tree with Worldwide Potential. NFT Highlights, NFTA 91-03

  16. Heath MC, Bullard MJ, Kilpatrick JP, Speller CS (1995) A comparison of the production and economics of biomass crops for use in agriculture and set-aside land. Asp Appl Biol 40:505–558

    Google Scholar 

  17. Heinsdorf D (1992) Untersuchungen zur Duengebeduerftigkeit von Forstkulturen auf Kipprohboeden der Niederlausitz. Dissertation, Technical University Dresden

  18. Hofmann-Schielle C, Jug A, Makeschin F, Rehfuess KE (1999) Short-rotation plantations of balsam poplars, aspen and willows on former arable land in the Federal Republic of Germany. I. Site-growth relationships. For Ecol Manage 121:41–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Keresztesi B (1988) The black locust. Forestry Monograph—Series of the Agricultural Science

  20. KTBL (2006) Energiepflanzen. Daten für die Planung des Energiepflanzenanbaus. Kuratorium fuer Technik und Bauwesen in der Landwirtschaft. Darmstadt, Germany

  21. Landgraf D, Böcker L, Oldenburg C (2007) Landwirte als Energieholz-Produzenten. AFZ-DerWald 14:751–753

    Google Scholar 

  22. Liesebach H, Yang MS, Schneck V (2004) Genetic diversity and differentiation in a black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia L.) progeny test. For Genet 11:151–161

    Google Scholar 

  23. Müller (1990) Die Robinie als Biomasseproduzent in Kurzumtriebsplantagen. Oestereichische Forstzeitung 101(5):22–24

    Google Scholar 

  24. Murach D, Murn Y, Hartmann H (2008) Ertragsermittlung und Potenziale von Agrarholz. Forst Holz 6:18–23

    Google Scholar 

  25. Peters K, Bilke G, Strohbach B (2007) Ertragsleistung sechsjähriger Robinien (Robinia pseudoacacia) auf vier ehemaligen Ackerstandorten unterschiedlicher Bodengüte in Brandenburg. Archiv für Forstwesen und Landschaftsökologie 1(2007):26–28

    Google Scholar 

  26. Rédei K (1998) Black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia L.) growing in Hungary. Publications of the Hungarian Forest Research Institute, Budapest, Ungarn

    Google Scholar 

  27. Rosenqvist H, Dawson M (2005) Economics of willow growing in Northern Ireland. Biomass Bioenerg 28:7–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Scholz V, Ellerbrock R (2002) The growth productivity, and environmental impact of the cultivation of energy crops on sandy soil in Germany. Biomass Bioenerg 23:81–92

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Weih M (2004) Intensive short rotation forestry in boreal climates: present and future perspectives. Can J For Res 34:1369–1378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Werner A, Vetter A, Reinhold G (2006) Leitlinie zur effizienten und umweltverträglichen Erzeugung von Energieholz. Thüringer Landesanstalt für Landwirtschaft, Jena

    Google Scholar 

  31. Wieneke F, Döhrer K (1993) Mäh-Hacker für Gehölze. Offenlegungsschrift DE 4209947 A1, Dt. Patentamt

Download references

Acknowledgements

Funds for this study were provided by Vattenfall Europe Mining AG, the Federal Ministry of Education and Research, and the European Union.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institut, Federal Research Institute for Rural Areas, Forestry and Fishery, Institute of Forest Genetics, Sieker Landtraße 2, 22927, Großhansdorf, Germany

    Holger Grünewald & Georg von Wühlisch

  2. Brandenburg University of Technology, Chair of Soil Protection and Recultivation, Konrad-Wachsmann-Allee 6, 03046, Cottbus, Germany

    Christian Böhm & Ansgar Quinkenstein

  3. Leibniz-Institute for Agricultural Engineering Potsdam-Bornim, Department of Technology Assessment and Substance Cycles, Max-Eyth-Allee 100, 14469, Potsdam, Germany

    Philipp Grundmann & Jörg Eberts

Authors
  1. Holger Grünewald
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Christian Böhm
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ansgar Quinkenstein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Philipp Grundmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jörg Eberts
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Georg von Wühlisch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Holger Grünewald.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Grünewald, H., Böhm, C., Quinkenstein, A. et al. Robinia pseudoacacia L.: A Lesser Known Tree Species for Biomass Production. Bioenerg. Res. 2, 123–133 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-009-9038-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-009-9038-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation