Abstract
The increasing demand for bioenergy and the combination of agricultural production with conservation has made short-rotation agroforestry systems (SRAFS) a sustainable land-management option. Aboveground woody biomass is a decisive factor in economic and ecological assessment of those systems. To study the yields of organic and conventional SRAFS, the tree species black alder, black locust, poplar clone Max 3, poplar clone Androscoggin, willow clone Inger, and a mixture of different native species were established in an alley-cropping configuration in 2009 and coppiced in 2012. Biomass was determined by harvesting the inner rows of the tree strips and, to investigate row differences within a strip, by an allometric model which estimates tree biomass from stem diameter. Significant variation was observed between species. For inner rows and at the conventional system, highest harvested average annual yield was observed for poplar Androscoggin (10.5 todt ha−1 year−1), followed by black locust (9.7 todt ha−1 year−1), poplar Max 3 (8.6 todt ha−1 year−1), black alder (7.6 todt ha−1 year−1), the native mix (4.9 todt ha−1 year−1), and willow (3.9 todt ha−1 year−1). At the organic system, highest yields were observed for poplar Max 3 (Androscoggin not planted) (10.9 todt ha−1 year−1), followed by black locust (8.1 todt ha−1 year−1), black alder (7.4 todt ha−1 year−1), willow (6.4 todt ha−1 year−1), and the native mix (4.7 todt ha−1 year−1). Farming system differences were only significant for willow and poplar Max 3; however, the higher yields of the organic system seemed to be a result of varying small-scale site properties rather than a management effect. Border rows showed 18–111 % more yield than inner rows because of greater tree diameters or heights and higher number of stems. This edge effect was emphasized in the conventional systems, possibly indicating that trees benefit from fertilizers applied at adjacent crop fields.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Gustavsson L, Börjesson P, Johansson B, Svenningsson P (1995) Reducing CO2 emissions by substituting biomass for fossil fuels. Energy 20:1097–1113
Cook J, Beyea J (2000) Bioenergy in the United States: progress and possibilities. Based on the final report for NREL Subcontract No. ACD-5-15212-01 with the National Audubon Society. Biomass Bioenerg 18:441–455
Karp A, Shield I (2008) Bioenergy from plants and the sustainable yield challenge. New Phytol 179:15–32
Updegraff K, Baughman MJ, Taff SJ (2004) Environmental benefits of cropland conversion to hybrid poplar: economic and policy considerations. Biomass Bioenerg 27:411–428
Börjesson P (1999) Environmental effects of energy crop cultivation in Sweden-I: identification and quantification. Biomass Bioenerg 16:137–154
Smith J, Pearce BD, Wolfe MS (2012) A European perspective for developing modern multifunctional agroforestry systems for sustainable intensification. Renew Agric Food Syst 27:323–332
Jose S (2009) Agroforestry for ecosystem services and environmental benefits: an overview. Agroforest Syst 76:1–10
Christen B, Dalgaard T (2013) Buffers for biomass production in temperate European agriculture: a review and synthesis on function, ecosystem services and implementation. Biomass Bioenerg 55:53–67
Graves AR, Burgess PJ, Palma JHN, Herzog F, Moreno G, Bertomeu M, Dupraz C, Liagre F, Keesman K, van der Werf W, Koeffeman de Nooy A, van den Briel JP (2007) Development and application of bio-economic modelling to compare silvoarable, arable, and forestry systems in three European countries. Ecol Eng 29:434–49
Kauter D, Lewandowski I, Claupein W (2003) Quantity and quality of harvestable biomass from Populus short rotation coppice for solid fuel use-a review of the physiological basis and management influences. Biomass Bioenerg 24:411–427
Hofmann-Schielle C, Jug A, Makeschin F, Rehfuess K (1999) Short-rotation plantations of balsam poplars, aspen and willows on former arable land in the Federal Republic of Germany. I. Site–growth relationships. Forest Ecol Manag 121:41–55
Gruenewald H, Brandt BK, Schneider BU, Bens O, Kendzia G, Hüttl RF (2007) Agroforestry systems for the production of woody biomass for energy transformation purposes. Ecol Eng 29:319–328
Burger FJ (2010). Bewirtschaftung und Ökobilanzierung von Kurzumtriebsplantagen. dissertation. München (DE)
Böhm C, Quinkenstein A, Freese D (2011) Yield prediction of young black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia L.) plantations for woody biomass production using allometric relations. Ann For Res 54:215–227
Winterling A, Borchert H, Wiesinger K (2013) Schnellwachsende Gehölze zur Energiegewinnung im ökologischen Landbau - Etablierung und Wuchsleistung verschiedener Baumarten. In: Neuhoff D, Stumm C, Ziegler S, Rahmann G, Hamm U, Köpke U (eds) Ideal und Wirklichkeit - Perspektiven Ökologischer Landbewirtschaftung, vol 12, Beiträge zur. Wissenschaftstagung Ökologischer Landbau. Berlin, Germany, pp 72–75
Schweier J, Becker G (2013) Economics of poplar short rotation coppice plantations on marginal land in Germany. Biomass Bioenerg 59:494–502
Lamerre J, Schwarz K, Langhof M, von Wühlisch G, Greef J (2015) Productivity of poplar short rotation coppice in an alley-cropping agroforestry system. Agroforest Syst 89:933–942
Jørgensen U, Dalgaard T, Kristensen ES (2005) Biomass energy in organic farming—the potential role of short rotation coppice. Biomass Bioenerg 28:237–48
Seufert V, Ramankutty N, Foley JA (2012) Comparing the yields of organic and conventional agriculture. Nature 485:229–232
Bongarten BC, Huber DA, Apsley DK (1992) Environmental and genetic influences on short-rotation biomass production of black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia L.) in the Georgia Piedmont. For Ecol Manag 55:315–331
Welham C, van Rees K, Seely B, Kimmins H (2007) Projected long-term productivity in Saskatchewan hybrid poplar plantations: weed competition and fertilizer effects. Can J For Res 37:356–370
Heilman PE, Fu-Guang X (1993) Influence of nitrogen on growth and productivity of short-rotation Populus trichocarpa × Populus deltoides hybrids. Can J For Res 23:1863–1869
Labrecque M, Teodorescu TI, Daigle S (1998) Early performance and nutrition of two willow species in short-rotation intensive culture fertilized with wastewater sludge and impact on the soil characteristics. Can J For Res 28:1621–1635
Ceulemans R, Deraedt W (1999) Production physiology and growth potential of poplars under short-rotation forestry culture. For Ecol Manag 121:9–23
Claessens H, Oosterbaan A, Savill P, Rondeux J (2010) A review of the characteristics of black alder (Alnus glutinosa (L.) Gaertn.) and their implications for silvicultural practices. Forestry 83:163–175
Küstermann B, Kainz M, Hülsbergen K (2008) Modeling carbon cycles and estimation of greenhouse gas emissions from organic and conventional farming systems. Renew Agr Food Syst 23:38–52
Bradshaw HD, Ceulemans R, Davis J, Stettler R (2000) Emerging model systems in plant biology: poplar (Populus) as a model forest tree. J Plant Growth Regul 19:306–313
Kuzovkina YA, Quigley MF (2005) Willows beyond wetlands: uses of Salix L. species for environmental projects. Water Air Soil Pollut 162:183–204
Dickmann DI (2006) Silviculture and biology of short-rotation woody crops in temperate regions: then and now. Biomass Bioenerg 30:696–705
Bullard MJ, Mustill SJ, McMillan SD, Nixon PM, Carver P, Britt CP (2002) Yield improvements through modification of planting density and harvest frequency in short rotation coppice Salix spp.—1. Yield response in two morphologically diverse varieties. Biomass Bioenerg 22:15–25
Johansson T (1999) Dry matter amounts and increment in 21- to 91-year-old common alder and grey alder and some practical implications. Can J For Res 29:1679–1690
Küstermann B, Christen O, Hülsbergen K (2010) Modelling nitrogen cycles of farming systems as basis of site- and farm-specific nitrogen management. Agr Ecosyst Environ 135:70–80
Scheinost A, Sinowski W, Schwertmann U, Auerswald K (1993). Flächenhafte und punktuelle Erfassung von Bodenparametern. Abschlussbericht Aufbauphase 1990–1992, FAM - Bericht 3
Schröder P, Huber B, Olazábal U, Kämmerer A, Munch JC (2002) Land use and sustainability: FAM Research Network on Agroecosystems. Geoderma 105:155–166
Huber J, May K, Hülsbergen K (2015). Tree biomass allometry in short-rotation agroforestry. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Walker NJ, Saveliev AA, Smith GM (2009) Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. Springer, London
Akaike H (1973) Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: Csaki F (ed) Petrov BN. Second international symposium on information theory, Budapest, pp 267–281
Schwarz G (1978) Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann Stat 2:461–464
Core Team R (2015) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria
Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D, Core Team R (2014) nlme: Linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3:1–118
Hothorn T, Bretz F, Westfall P (2008) Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biometrical J 50:346–363
Coyle DR, Coleman MD, Durant JA, Newman LA (2006) Survival and growth of 31 Populus clones in South Carolina. Biomass Bioenerg 30:750–758
Al Afas N, Marron N, van Dongen S, Laureysens I, Ceulemans R (2008) Dynamics of biomass production in a poplar coppice culture over three rotations (11 years). For Ecol Manage 255:1883–1891
Brown SL, Schroeder PE (1999) Spatial patterns of aboveground production and mortality of woody biomass for eastern U.S. forests. Ecol Appl 9:968–980
Fortier J, Gagnon D, Truax B, Lambert F (2010) Biomass and volume yield after 6 years in multiclonal hybrid poplar riparian buffer strips. Biomass Bioenerg 34:1028–1040
Laureysens I, Deraedt W, Ceulemans R (2005) Population dynamics in a 6-year-old coppice culture of poplar: II. Size variability and one-sided competition of shoots and stools. For Ecol Manag 218:115–128
Amichev BY, Johnston M, Rees V, Ken CJ (2010) Hybrid poplar growth in bioenergy production systems: biomass prediction with a simple process-based model (3PG). Biomass Bioenerg 34:687–702
Laureysens I, Deraedt W, Indeherberge T, Ceulemans R (2003) Population dynamics in a 6-year old coppice culture of poplar. I. Clonal differences in stool mortality, shoot dynamics and shoot diameter distribution in relation to biomass production. Biomass Bioenerg 24:81–95
Bergkvist P, Ledin S (1998) Stem biomass yields at different planting designs and spacings in willow coppice systems. Biomass Bioenerg 14:149–156
Labrecque M, Teodorescu TI (2005) Field performance and biomass production of 12 willow and poplar clones in short-rotation coppice in southern Quebec (Canada). Biomass Bioenerg 29:1–9
Guidi Nissim W, Pitre FE, Teodorescu TI, Labrecque M (2013) Long-term biomass productivity of willow bioenergy plantations maintained in southern Quebec, Canada. Biomass Bioenerg 56:361–369
Dillen SY, Njakou Djomo S, Al Afas N, Vanbeveren S, Ceulemans R (2013) Biomass yield and energy balance of a short-rotation poplar coppice with multiple clones on degraded land during 16 years. Biomass Bioenerg 56:157–165
Zabek LM, Prescott CE (2006) Biomass equations and carbon content of aboveground leafless biomass of hybrid poplar in Coastal British Columbia. For Ecol Manag 223:291–302
Vande Walle I, van Camp N, Van de Casteele L, Verheyen K, Lemeur R (2007) Short-rotation forestry of birch, maple, poplar and willow in Flanders (Belgium) I-Biomass production after 4 years of tree growth. Biomass Bioenerg 31:267–275
Stolarski MJ, Szczukowski S, Tworkowski J, Klasa A (2011) Willow biomass production under conditions of low-input agriculture on marginal soils. For Ecol Manag 262:1558–1566
Toillon J, Rollin B, Dallé E, Feinard-Duranceau M, Bastien J, Brignolas F, Marron N (2013) Variability and plasticity of productivity, water-use efficiency, and nitrogen exportation rate in Salix short rotation coppice. Biomass Bioenerg 56:392–404
Sevel L, Nord-Larsen T, Raulund-Rasmussen K (2012) Biomass production of four willow clones grown as short rotation coppice on two soil types in Denmark. Biomass Bioenerg 46:664–672
Labrecque M, Teodorescu TI (2003) High biomass yield achieved by Salix clones in SRIC following two 3-year coppice rotations on abandoned farmland in southern Quebec, Canada. Biomass Bioenerg 25:135–146
Klašnja B, Orlović S, Galić Z (2013) Comparison of different wood species as raw materials for bioenergy. South-east Eur for 4:81–88
Kiaei M (2013) Effect of cultivation methods on wood static bending properties in Alnus glutinosa. Drvna ind 64:265–271
Rédei K, Veperdi I (2009) The role of black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia L.) in establishment of short-rotation energy plantations in Hungary. Int J Hortic Sci 15:41–44
Johansson T (2000) Biomass equations for determining fractions of common and grey alders growing on abandoned farmland and some practical implications. Biomass Bioenerg 18:147–159
Zavitkovski J (1981) Small plots with unplanted plot border can distort data in biomass production studies. Can J For Res 11:9–12
Acknowledgments
We gratefully acknowledge Dr. Weber for his constructive comments on the manuscript. We thank the staff of the Research Station Scheyern for their support with the fieldwork. We would like to specially thank Christina Bauer, Thomas Langenegger, and Daniel Plank. Gratitude is also owed to Markus Karmann and Lucie Chmelíková for their help with the fieldwork. The project was coordinated by the Institute for Applied Material Flow Management Trier.
Funding
This work is part of the research project ELKE (Development of an extensive land-use strategy for the production of renewable resources as compensation measures of the impact regulation in Germany), funded by the German Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture and the Agency for Renewable Resources.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Huber, J.A., May, K., Siegl, T. et al. Yield Potential of Tree Species in Organic and Conventional Short-Rotation Agroforestry Systems in Southern Germany. Bioenerg. Res. 9, 955–968 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-016-9750-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-016-9750-2