Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

General self-efficacy and control in relation to anxiety and cognitive performance

  • Article
  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present investigation employed a general measure of self-efficacy, a measure of perceived control, and items relating to expectation and evaluation (pre and post). The purpose was to determine whether general self-efficacy or perceived control best predicted the criterion variables of state anxiety and performance on a stressful cognitive task (solving anagrams) under conditions of high versus low control. These relationships were tested under the experimental conditions of high and low objective control (i.e., the actual control afforded by the situation). Results showed that general self-efficacy, relative to perceived control was a better predictor of state anxiety in the high and low control conditions but neither predicted actual performance. Participants’ expectations of task difficulty, their own performance, and their performance relative to the performance of others taken before the task were compared with their evaluations of difficulty and performance after completing the task. Participants indicated that the task was easier than anticipated, but rated their own performance more poorly after completion of the task.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ajzen, I. & Madden, T.J. (1986). Prediction of goal-directed behaviour: Attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioural control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 453–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Averill, J.R. (1973). Personal control over aversive stimuli and its relationship to stress. Psychological Bulletin, 80, 286–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1983). Self-efficacy determinants of fears and calamities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 464–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1988). Self-efficacy conception of anxiety. Anxiety Research, 1, 77–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blankstein, K.R. (1984). Psychophysiology and perceived locus of control: Critical review, theoretical speculation and research directions. In H.M. Lefcourt (Ed.), Research with the locus of control construct. Vol. 3. pp. 73–95. Orlando: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blankstein, K.R., Toner, B.B. & Flett, G.L. (1989). Test anxiety and the contents of consciousness: Thought-listing and endorsement measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 23, 269–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourne, L. E., Jr., Edstrand, B. R. & Dominowski, R. I., (1971). The psychology of thinking. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carver, C. S. & Scheier, M. F. (1986). Self and the control of behavior. In L. M. Hartman & K. R. Blankstein (Eds.), Advances in the study of communication and affect: Vol ll. Perception of self in emotional disorder and psychotherapy (pp. 5–35). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chwalisz, K., Altmaier, E.M. & Russell, D.W. (1992). Causal attributions, self-efficacy cognitions, and coping with stress. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 11, 377–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway, V. J. & Terry, D. J. (1992). Appraised controllability as a moderator of the effectiveness of different coping strategies: A test of the goodness of fit hypothesis. Australian Journal of Psychology, 44, 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cozzarelli, C. (1993). Personality and self-efficacy as predictors of coping with abortion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1224–1236.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Endler, N.S., Speer, R.L., Johnson, J.M. & Flett, G.L. (2000). Controllability, Coping, efficacy, and distress. European Journal of Personality, 14, 245–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Endler, N.S., Edwards, J.M. & Vitelli, R. (1991). Endler Multidimensional Anxiety Scales (EMAS): Manual. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folkman, S. (1984). Personal control and the stress and coping process: a theoretical analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 839–852.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Geer, J. & Maisel., E. (1972). Evaluating the effects of the prediction-control confound. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 23, 314–319.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gerin, W., Litt, M., Deich, J. & Pickering, T.G. (1995). Self-efficacy as a moderator of perceived control effects on cardiovascular reactivity: Is enhanced control always beneficial? Psychosomatic Medicine, 57, 390–397.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Glass, D.C., Singer, J.E., Leonard, H.S., Krantz, D., Cohen, S. & Cummings, H. (1973). Perceived control of aversive stimulation and the reductions of stress responses. Journal of Personality, 41, 517–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jimmieson, N. L. & Terry, D. J. (1997). Responses to an in-basket activity: The role of work stress, behavioral control, and informational control. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 2, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Litt, M.D. (1988). Self-efficacy and perceived control: Cognitive mediators of pain tolerance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 149–160.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maddux, J.E. (1991). Self-efficacy. In C.R. Snyder. & D.R. Forsyth. Handbook of Social and Clinical Psychology (pp. 57–78). New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallinckrodt, B. (1992). Childhood emotional bonds with parents, development of adult social competencies and availability of social support. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 39, 453–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manstead, A. S. R. & van Eekelen, S. A. M. (1998). Distinguishing between perceived behavioral control and self-efficacy in the domain of academic intentions and behaviors. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 1375–1392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meier, S., McCarthy, P. R. & Schmeck, R. R. (1984). Validity of self-efficacy as a predictor of writing performance. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 8, 107–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendelsohn, G. A., Griswold, B. B. & Anderson, M. L. (1966). Individual differences in anagram-solving ability. Psychological Reports, 2, 429–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikulincer, M. (1989) Cognitive interference and learned helplessness: The effects of off-task cognitions on performance following unsolvable problems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 129–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mineka, S. & Henderson, R.W. (1985). Controllability and predictability in acquired motivation. Annual Review of Psychology, 36, 495–529.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, C.H., Owen, D.W., Miller, A. & Watts, M.L. (1986). Variations in stress responses as a function of cognitive and personality variables. Psychological Reports, 59, 575–583.

    Google Scholar 

  • Notani, A. S. (1998). Moderators of perceived behavioral control’s predictiveness in the theory of planned behavior: A meta-analysis. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 7, 247–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O'Leary, A. (1985). Self-efficacy and health. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 23, 437–451.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R. & DeGroot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rich, A. R. & Woolever, D. K. (1988). Expectancy and self-focused attention: Experimental support for the self-regulation model of test anxiety. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 7, 246–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotter, J. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80, 609.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherer, M., Maddux, J., Mercandante, B., Prentice-Dunn, S., Jacobs, B. & Rogers, R. (1982). The selfefficacy scale: Construction and validation. Psychological Reports, 51, 663–611.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R.E. (1989). Effects of coping skills training on generalized self-efficacy and locus of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 228–233.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. J., Arnkoff, D. B. & Wright, T. L. (1990). Test anxiety and academic competence: A comparison of alternative models. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 37, 313–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, K. D. & Murphy, M.R. (1997). A comparison of general self-efficacy with self-esteem. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 123, 79–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terry, D.J. & O'Leary, J.E. (1995). The theory of planned behavior: The effects of perceived behavioral control and self-efficacy. British Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 199–220.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, S.C. (1991). Intervening to enhance perceptions of control. In Snyder, C.R., & Forsyth, D.R. Handbook of Social and Clinical Psychology (pp. 89–101). New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tresselt, M. E. & Mayzner, M. S. (1966). Normative solution times for a sample of 134 solution words and 378 associated anagrams. Psychonomic Monograph Supplements, 1, 293–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodruff, S. L. & Cashman, J. F. (1993). Task, domain, and general efficacy: A re-examination of the Self-Efficacy Scale. Psychological Reports, 72, 423–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wortman, C.B., Panciera, L., Shusterman, L. & Hibscher, J. (1976). Attributions of causality and reactions to uncontrollable outcomes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 12, 301–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. York University, Toronto

    Norman S. Endler, Rachel L. Speer, Judith M. Johnson & Gordon L. Flett

  2. Department of Psychology, York University, USA

    Norman S. Endler, Judith M. Johnson & Gordon L. Flett

  3. Compusearch Micromarketing Data & Systems, Toronto

    Rachel L. Speer

Authors
  1. Norman S. Endler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rachel L. Speer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Judith M. Johnson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Gordon L. Flett
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

The study reported in this article was supported, in part, by Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council Grant No. 410-94-1473 to Norman S. Endler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Endler, N.S., Speer, R.L., Johnson, J.M. et al. General self-efficacy and control in relation to anxiety and cognitive performance. Curr Psychol 20, 36–52 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-001-1002-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-001-1002-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation