Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The inadequacy of individual educational program (IEP) goals for high school students with word-level reading difficulties

  • Published:
Annals of Dyslexia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This investigation analyzed goals from the Individual Educational Programs (IEPs) of 54 high school students with diagnosed reading disabilities in basic skills (decoding and/or word identification). Results showed that for 73% of the students, the IEPs written when they were in high school failed to specify any objectives regarding their acute difficulties with basic skills. IEPs from earlier points in the students’ educations were also reviewed, as available. For 23 of the students, IEPs were present in the students’ files for three time points: elementary school (ES), middle school (MS), and high school (HS). Another 20 students from the sample of 54 had IEPs available for two time points (HS and either MS or ES). Comparisons with the IEPs from younger years showed a pattern of decline from ES to MS to HS in the percentage of IEPs that commented on or set goals pertaining to weaknesses in decoding. These findings suggest that basic skills deficits that persist into the upper grade levels are not being sufficiently targeted for remediation, and help explain why older students frequently fail to resolve their reading problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, M. (1990). Outside-in models of reading: What skilled readers look like they do. In M. Adams (Ed.), Beginning to read: Thinking about print (pp. 95–106). Cambridge: MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, M. J., & Henry, M. K. (1997). Myths and realities about words and literacy. School Psychology Review, 26, 425–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateman, B. D. (1995). Writing individualized educational programs (IEPs) for success. Available at http//www.Idonline.org/ld_indepth/iep/success_ieps.html

  • Bear, D. R., Invernizzi, M., Templeton, S., & Johnston, F. (2004). Words their way: Word study for phonics, vocabulary and spelling instruction. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berninger, V. W. (1997). Introduction to intervention for students with learning and behavior problems: Myths and realities. School Psychology Review, 26, 326–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, A., & Ehri, L. (2004). Graphosyllabic analysis helps adolescent struggling readers read and spell words. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37, 331–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blalock, J. W. (1981). Persistent problems and concerns of young adults with learning disabilities. In W. M. Cruickshank and A. A. Silver (Eds.), Bridges to tomorrow: The best of ACLD (pp. 35–55). Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady, S. (1999). Professional development for teachers: Raising the bar. Perspectives, 25, 1, 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady, S., & Moats, L. (1997). Informed instruction for reading success: Foundations for teacher preparation. Position paper of the Orton Dyslexia Society. Baltimore, MD: Orton Dyslexia Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruck, M, (1990). Word recognition skills of adults with childhood diagnoses of dyslexia. Developmental Psychology, 26, 439–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruck, M. (1992). Persistence of dyslexics’ phonological awareness deficits. Developmental Psychology, 28, 874–886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catone, W. V. (2000). Teacher opinions about the nature and treatment of reading deficits in adolescents. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Rhode Island, Kingston. In Dissertation abstracts (Pub. No. AAT 9988100).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chard, D. L. (1999). Reading certification for special education teachers: Making the difference. Perspectives, 25, 10–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheyney, W., & Cohen, E. J. (1999). Focus on phonics: Assessment and instruction. New York: The Wright Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Come Romine, B. G., McKenna, M. C., & Robinson, R. D. (1996). Reading coursework requirements for middle and high school content area teachers: A U.S. survey. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 40, 194–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, A. E., Perry, K. E., Stanovich, K. E., & Stanovich, P. J. (2004). Disciplinary knowledge of K-3 teachers and their knowledge calibration in the domain of early literacy. Annals of Dyslexia, 54, 139–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deschler, D., Schumaker, J., Lenz, K., & Ellis, E. (1984). Academic and cognitive interventions for learning disabled adolescents: Part II. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 17, 170–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drecktrah, M. E., & Chiang, B. (1997). Instructional strategies used by general educators and teachers of students with learning disabilities: A survey. Remedial and Special Education, 18, 174–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehri, L. (2000). Learning to read and learning to spell: Two sides of a coin. Topics in Language Disorders, 20(3), 19–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, M. H., Patton, J. R., Palloway, E., & Foley, R. (1992). Educational services for students with behavior disorders: A review of individualized educational programs. Teacher Education and Special Education, 15, 41–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foorman, B. R. (1995). Research on the “great debate:” Code-oriented versus whole language approaches to reading instruction. School Psychology Review, 24, 376–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foorman, B. R., Francis, D. J., Shaywitz, S. E., Shaywitz, B. A., & Fletcher, J. M. (1997). The case for early reading intervention. In B. Blachmen (Ed.), Foundations of reading acquisition and dyslexia: Implications for early intervention (pp. 243–264). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, A. E., & Scarborough, H. S. (1993, September). Should reading disabled adults be distinguished from other adults seeking literacy instruction? A review of theory and research. Technical Report TR93-7. Philadelphia: National Center on Adult Literacy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, D. J., Shaywitz, S. E., Stuebing, K. K., Shaywitz, B. A., & Fletcher, J. M. (1994). The measurement of change: Assessing behavior over time and within a developmental context. In G. R. Lyon (Ed.), Frames of reference for the assessment of learning disabilities: New views on measurement issues (pp. 29–58). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganske, K. (2000). Word journeys: Assessment-guided phonics, spelling, and vocabulary instruction. New York: Guilford Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, D., Ehri, L. C., & Perin, D. (1997). Are word-reading processes the same or different in adult literacy students and third-graders matched for reading level? Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 262–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J. F. (1996). LANGUAGE! Effects of an individualized structured language curriculum for middle and high school students. Annals of Dyslexia, 46, 97–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gross-Glenn, K., Jallad, B., Novoa, L., Helgren-Lempesis, V., & Lubes, H. A. (1990). Nonsense passage reading as a diagnostic aid in the study of adult familial dyslexia. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2, 161–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guyer, B. P., Banks, S. R., & Guyer, K. E. (1993). Spelling improvement for college students who are dyslexic. Annals of Dyslexia, 43, 186–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guyer, B. P., & Sabatino, D. (1989). The effectiveness of a multisensory alphabetic phonetic approach with college students who are learning disabled. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 430–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harry, B. (1992). An ethnographic study of cross-cultural communication with Puerto Rican American families in the special education system. American Educational Research Journal, 29, 471–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haynes, M., and Jenkins, J. (1986). Reading instruction in special education resource rooms. American Education Research Journal, 23, 161–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henry, M. (2003). Unlocking literacy: Effective decoding and spelling instruction. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hock, M. L. (2000). Standards, assessments, and individualized education programs. In R. A. Villa & J. S. Thousand (Eds.), Restructuring for caring and effective education: Piecing the puzzle together (pp. 208–241). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell, D. (1987). Statistical methods for psychology (2nd ed.). Boston: Duxbury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keppel, G. (1991). Design and analysis: A researcher’s handbook (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leach, J. M., Scarborough, H. S., & Rescorla, L. (2003). Late-emerging reading disabilities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 211–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewkowicz, N. (1987). On the question of teaching decoding skills to older students. Journal of Reading, 31, 50–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyon, G. R., Vaassen, M., & Toomey, F. (1989). Teachers’ perceptions of their undergraduate and graduate preparation. Teacher Education and Special Education, 12, 164–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mather, N., Bos, C., & Babur, N. (2001). Perceptions and knowledge of preservice and inservice teachers about early literacy instruction. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 472–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marascuilo, L., & McSweeney, M. (1977). Nonparametric and distribution-free methods for the social sciences (pp. 354–392). Monterey, CA: Brookes Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, R. G. (1991). The form and substance of secondary resource models: Content area versus skill instruction. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24, 467–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moats, L. C. (1995). The missing foundation in teacher education. American Educator, 19, 43–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moats, L. C. (1998). Reading, spelling and writing disabilities in the middle grades. In B. Wong (Ed.), Learning about learning disabilities (2nd ed.) (pp. 367–389). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moats, L. C. (1999). Teaching reading is rocket science: What expert teachers of reading should know and be able to do. Washington, DC: American Federation of Teachers, Item No. 372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moats, L. C., & Lyon, G. R. (1996). Wanted: Teachers with knowledge of language. Topics in Language Disorders, 16, 73–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, E. L., & Rhodes, G. (1983). Teachers’ attitudes toward IEPs: A two year follow-up. Exceptional Children, 50, 64–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the national reading panel: Teaching children to read (Pub. No. 00-4769).

  • North, M. E. (1999). What constitutes adequate preparation for teachers of reading? Perspectives, 25, 4–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakland, T., Black, J. L., Stanford, G., Nussbaum, N. L., & Balise, R. R. (1998). An evaluation of the dyslexia training program: A multisensory method for promoting reading in students with reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 140–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Conner, J. R., & Wilson, B. A. (1995). Effectiveness of the Wilson Reading System used in public school training. In C. McIntyre & J. Pickering (Eds.), Clinical studies of multisensory structured language education (pp. 247–254). Salem, OR: International Multisensory Structured Language Education Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, A., C. & Brady, S. (1988). Relation of phonological awareness to reading disability in children and adults. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 319–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, K., Foorman, B., Perfetti, C., Pesetsky, D., & Seidenberg, M. (2001). How psychological science informs the teaching of reading. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 2, 31–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Read, C., & Ruyter, L. (1985). Reading and spelling skills in adults of low literacy. Remedial and Special Education, 6, 43–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, E., & DiBenedetto, B. (1985). Decoding skills test. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sands, D. J., Adams, L., & Stout, D. M. (1995). A statewide exploration of the nature and use of curriculum in special education. Exceptional Children, 62, 68–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarborough, H., & Brady, S. (2002). Toward a common terminology for talking about speech and reading: A glossary of the “Phon” words and some related terms. Journal of Literacy Research, 34, 299–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumaker, J. B., & Deschler, D. D. (1988). Implementing regular education initiative in secondary schools: A different ball game. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 36–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shankweiler, D., Lundquist, E., Dreyer, L. G., & Dickenson, C. C. (1996). Reading and spelling difficulties in high school students. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 8, 267–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, L. S. (1999). Issues in the definition and diagnosis of learning disabilities: A perspective on Guckenberger vs. Boston University. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 304–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. W. (1990a). Comparison of individual educational programs (IEPs) of students with behavioral disorders and learning disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 24, 85–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. W. (1990b). Individualized education plans (IEPs) in special education—from intent to acquiescence. Exceptional Children, 57, 6–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, C. E., Burns, S., & Griffin, P. (Eds.). (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spear-Swerling, L. (2001, June). Fourth-graders’ performance on two different measures of reading comprehension. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Society for the Scientific Studies of Reading, Boulder, CO.

  • Spear-Swerling, L., & Brucker, P. O. (2003). Teachers’ acquisition of knowledge about English word structure. Annals of Dyslexia, 53, 72–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spear-Swerling, L., & Brucker, P. O. (2004). Preparing novice teachers to develop basic reading and spelling skills in children. Annals of Dyslexia, 54, 332–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torgesen, J. K., Rashotte, C., Alexander, A., Alexander, J., & MacPhee, K. (2003). Progress toward understanding the instructional conditions necessary for remediating reading difficulties in older children In B. Foorman (Ed.), Preventing and remediating reading difficulties: Bringing science to scale (pp. 275–298). Timonium, MD: York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., Rashotte, C. A., Alexander, A. W., & Conway, T. (1997). Preventive and remedial interventions for children with severe reading disabilities. Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 8, 51–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treiman, R. (1997). Spelling in normal children and dyslexics. In Blachman, B. (Ed.), Foundations of reading acquisition and dyslexia: Implications for early intervention (pp. 191–218). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turnbull, K. K. & Hughes, D. L. (1987). A pragmatic analysis of speech and language IEP conferences. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in the Schools, 18, 275–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Education. (2003). The nation’s report card: Reading highlights 2002. NCES 2003-524. Washington, DC: Institute for Education Sciences. National Center for Education Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughn, S. (1988). Parent participation in the initial placement/IEP conference ten years after mandated involvement. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21(2), 82–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venezky, R. L., Bristow, P. S., & Sabatini, J. P. (1994). Measuring change in adult literacy programs: Enduring issues and a few answers. Educational Assessment, 2, 101–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venezky, R. L., Bristow, P. S., & Sabatini, J. P. (1997). When less is more: Methods for placing students in adult literacy classes. Adult Basic Education, 7, 3–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venezky, R. L., Sabatini, J., Brooks, C., & Carino, C. (1997). Policy and practice in adult learning: A case study perspective. (Technical Report TR960-06.) Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, National Center on Adult Literacy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (1974). Wechsler intelligence scale for children-revised. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (1981). Wechsler adult intelligence scale-revised. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (1991). Wechsler intelligence scale for children-third edition. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, B. (1988). Wilson reading system. Millbury, MA: Wilson Language Training.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock, R. W. (1987). Woodcock reading mastery tests-revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock, R. W., & Johnson, M. B. (1977). Woodcock-Johnson psychoeducational test battery. Boston: Teaching Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, P. D., & Wright, P. W. D. (1997). Your child’s IEP: Practical and legal guidance for parents. Available at http://www.Idonline.org/ld_indepth/iep_guidance.html

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to William V. Catone Ph.D. or Susan A. Brady Ph.D..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Catone, W.V., Brady, S.A. The inadequacy of individual educational program (IEP) goals for high school students with word-level reading difficulties. Ann. of Dyslexia 55, 53–78 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-005-0004-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-005-0004-9

Key Words

Navigation