Abstract
While most scientific journals have well defined ethics requirements for authors, very few journals explicitly specify the ethics standards that govern the actions of editors, editorial board members, and reviewers. We believe it is time to create a standardized policy for all medical and scientific journals that guides the ethical conduct of all stakeholders in the peer review process.
References
James MJ, Cook-Johnson RJ, Cleland LG (2007) Selective COX-2 inhibitors, eicosanoid synthesis and clinical outcomes: a case study of system failure. Lipids 42:779–785
National Institutes of Health Ethics Program, Principles of Ethical Conduct for Government Officers and Employees http://ethics.od.nih.gov/principl.htm (Accessed: 5 October, 2007)
Cooper RJ, Gupta M, Wilkes MS, Hoffman JR (2005) Conflict of interest disclosure policies and practices of peer-reviewed biomedical journals. J Gen Intern Med 21:1248–1252
Ethics of Peer Review: a guide for manuscript reviewers http://ori.hhs.gov/education/products/yale/prethics.pdf (Accessed: 5 October, 2007)
Publication Ethics http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/Publicationethics/#ethical_policy_template (Accessed: 5 October, 2007)
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/intro.cws_home/ethical_guidelines#Duties%20of%20Editors (Accessed: 5 October, 2007)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Bosetti, F., Toscano, C.D. Is It Time to Standardize Ethics Guiding the Peer Review Process?. Lipids 43, 107–108 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11745-007-3134-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11745-007-3134-5