Abstract
Purpose
The aim of this study was to examine the usage parameters of diagnostic computed tomography (CT) in children because of concerns of possible overuse in Japanese hospitals, including the “technical” CT exposure settings and the “clinical” grounds for CT requests.
Materials and methods
We examined the methodology at the radiology department to reduce radiation exposure to children and performed a retrospective study on pediatric CT requests during a 1-year period at Nagasaki University Hospital. The parameters of diagnostic CT usage for minor head trauma and acute appendicitis were studied in detail.
Results
CT radiation dose settings are adjusted for children based on guidelines issued by the Japan Radiological Society, with few limitations. CT requests were made for 62% of minor head trauma cases and 76% of cases clinically suspected to be acute appendicitis. These figures are considerably higher than those reported by studies in the United Kingdom, Canada, or the United States. No specific guidelines are advocated regarding CT usage for minor head trauma. The diagnosis of acute appendicitis in children is almost routinely referred for “confirmation” by CT.
Conclusion
CT radiation risks to children at Japanese hospitals need to be considered more seriously. Physicians should be encouraged to follow diagnostic algorithms that help avoid unnecessary CT usage in children.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
DP Frush LF Donnelly NS Rosen (2003) ArticleTitleComputed tomography and radiation risks: what pediatric health care providers should know Pediatrics 112 951–7 Occurrence Handle14523191 Occurrence Handle10.1542/peds.112.4.951
A Paterson DP Frush LF Donnely (2001) ArticleTitleHelical CT of the body: are settings adjusted for pediatric patients? AJR Am J Roentgenol 176 297–301 Occurrence Handle11159060 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3isVWktw%3D%3D
DJ Brenner (2002) ArticleTitleEstimating cancer risks from pediatric CT: going from the qualitative to the quantitative Pediatr Radiol 32 228–31 Occurrence Handle11956700 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00247-002-0671-1
DJ Brenner CD Ellison EJ Hall WE Berdon (2001) ArticleTitleEstimated risks of radiation induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT AJR Am J Roentgenol 176 289–96 Occurrence Handle11159059 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3isVWktg%3D%3D
LF Donnelly K-H Emery AS Brody T Laor VM Gylys-Morin CG Anton et al. (2001) ArticleTitleMinimizing the radiation dose for pediatric body applications of single-detector helical CT: strategies at a large children's hospital AJR Am J Roentgenol 176 303–6 Occurrence Handle11159061 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3isVWktA%3D%3D
Y Funama K Awai M Shimamura K Kakei N Nagasue Y Yamashita (2005) ArticleTitleReduction of radiation dose at HRCT of the temporal bone in children Radiat Med 23 578–83 Occurrence Handle16555569
Online information available at the homepage of the Japan Radiological society (JRS) (http://www.radiology.or.jp/docs_htm/pediatricCT2005.pdf) and also other guidelines by the Japan Association of Radiological Technologists (JART) available at http://www.jart.jp/guideline/ (both in Japanese)
H Takagi (2002) ArticleTitleX-ray exposure dose control for X-ray CT system (in Japanese) Jpn J Med Phys (Igaku Butsuri) 22 81–7
A Berrington de González S Darby (2004) ArticleTitleRisk of cancer from diagnostic X-rays: estimates for the UK and 14 other countries Lancet 363 345–51 Occurrence Handle15070562 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15433-0
International Commission on Radiological Protection. Managing patient dose in computed tomography. ICRP Publication 87. Ann ICRP 2001;30(4)
S Shiralkar A Rennie M Snow RB Galland MH Lewis K Gower-Thomas (2003) ArticleTitleDoctors knowledge of radiation exposure: questionnaire study BMJ 327 371–2 Occurrence Handle12919987 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3szotlalsg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1136/bmj.327.7411.371
DJ Roebuck (1999) ArticleTitleRisk and benefit in pediatric radiology Pediatr Radiol 29 637–40 Occurrence Handle10415195 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1Mzks1altQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1007/s002470050666
EL Nickoloff PO Alderson (2001) ArticleTitleRadiation exposure to patients from CT: reality, public perception, and policy AJR Am J Roentgenol 177 285–7 Occurrence Handle11461846 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MvhtF2gtw%3D%3D
SJ Golding PC Shrimpton (2002) ArticleTitleRadiation doses in CT: are we meeting the challenge? Br J Radiol 75 1–4 Occurrence Handle11806950 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38%2FotVKitQ%3D%3D
KS White (1996) ArticleTitleHelical/spiral CT scanning: a pediatric radiology perspective Pediatric Radiol 26 5–14 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymC283pvVE%3D Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF01403695
JC Décarie C Mercier (1999) ArticleTitleThe role of ultrasonography in imaging of pediatric head trauma Child Nerv Syst 15 740–2 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s003810050463
J Dunning JP Daly R Malhotra P Stratford-Smith JP Lomas F Lecky et al. (2004) ArticleTitleThe implications of NICE guidelines on the management of children presenting with head injury Arch Dis Child 89 763–7 Occurrence Handle15269079 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD2czmsVensQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1136/adc.2003.042523
IG Stiell GA Wells K Vandemheen C Clement H Lesiuk A Laupacis et al. (2001) ArticleTitleThe Canadian CT head rule for patients with minor head injury Lancet 357 1391–6 Occurrence Handle11356436 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3mtlGntw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04561-X
InstitutionalAuthorNameAmerican Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Quality Improvement and American Academy of Family Physicians Commission on Clinical Qualities and Research (1999) ArticleTitleThe management of minor closed head injury in children Pediatrics 104 1407–15 Occurrence Handle10.1542/peds.104.6.1407
SA Schutzman P Barnes AC Duhaime D Greenes C Homer D Jaffe et al. (2001) ArticleTitleEvaluation and management of children younger than two years old with apparently minor head trauma: proposed guidelines Pediatrics 107 983–93 Occurrence Handle11331675 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3ptVCmsg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1542/peds.107.5.983
D Pickuth SH Heywang-Köbrunner RP Spielmann (2000) ArticleTitleSuspected acute appendicitis: is ultrasonography or computed tomography the preferred imaging technique? Eur J Surg 166 315–9 Occurrence Handle10817330 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3czptFaqtA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1080/110241500750009177
T Miki S Ogata M Uto T Nakazono M Urata R Ishibe et al. (2005) ArticleTitleEnhanced multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis and its severity Radiat Med 23 242–55 Occurrence Handle16012400
MJ Weyant SR Eachempati MA Maluccio N Spigland LJ Hydo PS Barie (2001) ArticleTitleThe use of computed tomography for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in children does not influence the overall rate of negative appendectomy or perforation Surg Infect 2 19–23 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3s%2FosVGqtQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1089/109629601750185325
EL Teo KP Tan SL Lam CL Ong CS Wong (2000) ArticleTitleUltrasonography and computed tomography in a clinical algorithm for the evaluation of suspected acute appendicitis in children Singapore Med J 41 387–92 Occurrence Handle11256346 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3ksFSksw%3D%3D
AE Martin D Vollman B Adler DA Caniano (2004) ArticleTitleCT scans may not reduce the negative appendectomy rate in children J Pediatr Surg 39 886–90 Occurrence Handle15185219 Occurrence Handle10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2004.02.034
DA Partrick JE Janik JS Janik DD Bensard FM Karrer (2003) ArticleTitleIncreased CT scan utilization does not improve the diagnostic accuracy of appendicitis in children J Pediatr Surg 38 659–62 Occurrence Handle12720164 Occurrence Handle10.1016/jpsu.2003.5017
JD Reich B Brogdon WE Ray J Eckert H Gorell (2000) ArticleTitleUse of CT scan in the diagnosis of pediatric acute appendicitis Pediatr Emerg Care 16 241–3 Occurrence Handle10966341 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2FnsFSjsg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1097/00006565-200008000-00006
MB Ujiki KM Murayama AJ Cribbins P Angelos L Dawes JB Prystowsky et al. (2002) ArticleTitleCT scan in the management of acute appendicitis J Surg Res 105 119–22 Occurrence Handle12121697 Occurrence Handle10.1006/jsre.2002.6407
BM Pena EF Cook KD Mandl (2003) ArticleTitleSelective imaging strategies for the diagnosis of appendicitis in children Pediatrics 113 24–8 Occurrence Handle10.1542/peds.113.1.24
BM Pena GA Taylor SJ Fishman KD Mandl (2002) ArticleTitleEffect of an imaging protocol on clinical outcomes among pediatric patients with appendicitis Pediatrics 110 1088–93 Occurrence Handle12456904 Occurrence Handle10.1542/peds.110.6.1088
AM Kosloske CL Love JE Rohrer JF Goldthorn SR Lacey (2003) ArticleTitleThe diagnosis of appendicitis in children: outcomes of a strategy based on pediatric surgical evaluation Pediatrics 113 29–34 Occurrence Handle10.1542/peds.113.1.29
AE Stephen DL Segev DP Ryan ME Mullins SH Kim JJ Schnitzer et al. (2003) ArticleTitleThe diagnosis of acute appendicitis in a pediatric population: to CT or not to CT J Pediatr Surg 38 367–71 Occurrence Handle12632351 Occurrence Handle10.1053/jpsu.2003.50110
K Nishizawa M Matsumoto K Iwai A Tonari T Yoshida M Takayama (2002) ArticleTitleDose evaluation and effective dose estimation from multi detector CT (in Japanese) Jpn J Med Phys (Igaku Butsuri) 22 152–8
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Ghotbi, N., Ohtsuru, A., Ogawa, Y. et al. Pediatric CT scan usage in Japan: results of a hospital survey. Radiat Med 24, 560–567 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-006-0072-8
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-006-0072-8